Contract Law Case Titles
If you are looking for contrac law cases to help you write law essays, law dissertations and law coursework, then take a look at the case titles below for you to research.
0-9 | a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | i | j | k | l | m | n | o | p | q | r | s | t | u | v | w | x | y | z
- --v Adams
- --v Walford
- 1st Choice Recruitment v Hancock
- 3DM (3DMA) pte Ltd v 3DM 3DM Worldwide plc
- A and M, Re sub nom LA and BFM, Re, ex p Official Receiver v Debtors
- Abbey National plc v Stringer
- Abbott (a bankrupt), Re, ex p Trustee of the Property of the Bankrupt v Abbott
- Abraham v Bullock
- Abu v MGN Ltd
- Ace Insurance SA-NV v Zurich Insurance Co
- Ackerman v Protim Services Ltd
- Acraman, Re
- Ad Valorem Factors Ltd v Ricketts sub nom Ricketts v Ad Valorem Factors Ltd
- Adams v Claxton
- Adams v Lindsell
- Adams v Richardson and Starling Ltd
- Adams v Wheatley
- Adamson v Hammond sub nom Adamson v Adamson and Hammond
- Advanced Industrial Technology Corpn Ltd v Bond Street Jewellers Ltd
- Advent Capital plc v GN Ellinas Imports-Exports Ltd
- A-G v Duplessis
- A-G v Hall
- A-G v Lady Downing
- A-G v Parsons
- A-G v Strutt
- A-G v Wilkins
- Agar v Biden
- Agricultural Mortgage Corpn v IRC
- Agriculturists' Cattle Insurance Co, Re, Stewart's Case
- Ahmed v Addy
- AIC Ltd v ITS Testing Services (UK) Ltd
- Ailsa Craig Fishing Co Ltd v Malvern Fishing Co Ltd and Securicor (Scotland) Ltd
- Akinsanya v United Bank for Africa Ltd
- Alan (W J) & Co Ltd v El Nasr Export and Import Co
- Albright & Wilson UK Ltd v Biachem Ltd
- Albright & Wilson UK Ltd v Biachem Ltd
- Albright & Wilson UK Ltd v Biachem Ltd
- Aldborough (Earl) v Trye
- Alderslade v Hendon Laundry Ltd
- Aldwell v Bundey
- Alexander v Railway Executive
- Alexander v Rolls Royce Motor Cars Ltd
- Alghussein Establishment v Eton College
- Alicia Hosiery Ltd v Brown, Shipley & Co Ltd
- Allen v Cameron
- Allen v Quebec Warehouse Co
- Allhusen v Brooking
- Allison v Brighton and Hove City Council
- Al-Naimi (trading as Buildmaster Construction Services) v Islamic Press Services Inc
- Alpenstow Ltd v Regalian Properties plc
- Alwyn Treherne v The Amateur Boxing Association of England Ltd
- Amec Engineering v Norwich Union
- Amiri Flight Authority v BAE Systems plc
- Amiri Flight Authority v BAE Systems plc
- Anandh v Barnet Primary Health Care Trust
- Andr & Cie SA v Ets Michel Blanc & Fils
- Andrews v Garrett
- Andromeda Marine SA v O W Bunker & Trading A/S
- Anglo-Northern Trading Co Ltd v Emlyn Jones and Williams
- Anglo-Russian Merchant Traders Ltd and John Batt & Co (London) Ltd, Re
- Angus & Co v Dalton and Comrs of Her Majesty's Work and Public Buildings
- Annandale, The
- Anns v Merton London Borough Council
- Anon
- Anon (undated)
- Ant Jurgens Margarinefabrieken v Louis Dreyfus & Co
- Appleby v Johnson sub nom Johnson v Appleby
- Arden v Watkins
- Aris v Orchard
- Ark Therapeutics plc v True North Capital Ltd
- Ark Therapeutics plc v True North Capital Ltd
- Armstrong v Armstrong
- Armstrong's Trusts, Re
- Arnell v Bean
- Aroso v Coutts & Co
- Arrow Transfer Co Ltd v Royal Bank of Canada, Bank of Montreal and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
- Ashton v Blackshaw
- Ashurst v Royal Bank of Australia (Official Manager)
- Ashworth v Bristol and North Somerset Rly Co
- ASM Shipping Ltd of India v TTMI Ltd of England
- Assi v Leeds Metropolitan University
- Associated Dairies Ltd v Securicor (Mobile) Ltd
- Associated Portland Cement Manufacturers (1900) Ltd v Houlder Bros & Co Ltd
- Associated Portland Cement Manufacturers (1900) Ltd v William Cory & Son Ltd
- AT Bright & Sons (a firm) v PHR (Rayne) (a firm)
- Atari Corpn (UK) Ltd v Electronics Boutique Stores (UK) Ltd
- Atkinson v Bell
- Atkinson v Smith
- Atlee v Backhouse
- Austerberry v Oldham Corpn
- Austin Baldwin & Co v W Turner & Co Ltd
- Avimex SA v Dewulf & Cie
- Aziz v Embassy of Republic of Yemen
- B (minors) (termination of contract: paramount consideration), Re
- Bacardi-Martini Beverages Ltd v Thomas Hardy Packaging Ltd
- Badische Anilin und Soda Fabrik v Hickson
- Baglan Hall Colliery Co, Re
- Baillie v Kell
- Baines v Woodfall
- Baines v Woodfall
- Baker v IRC
- Baker v Liscoe
- Balfour Beatty Construction Ltd v Kelston Sparkes Contractors Ltd
- Ball v Bridges
- Ballerd v Sitwell
- Balmoral Group Ltd v Borealis (UK) Ltd
- Bamford v Cordiant Communications Group plc
- Banck v Bromley & Son
- Banerji v Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Trust
- Bangladesh Chemical Industries Corpn v Henry Stephens Shipping Co Ltd and Tex-Dilan Shipping Co Ltd, The SLS Everest
- Bank Line Ltd v Arthur Capel & Co
- Bank of Boston Connecticut v European Grain and Shipping Ltd, The Dominique
- Bank of India v Rai Bahadur Singh
- Bankers Insurance Co Ltd v South
- Banque Belge pour L'Etranger v Hambrouck
- Banque Financire de la Cit SA (formerly Banque Keyser Ullmann SA) v Westgate Insurance Co Ltd (formerly Hodge General and Mercantile Co Ltd)
- Barclays Bank Ltd v Taylor
- Barder v Caluori
- Barnes & Elliott Ltd v Taylor Woodrow Holdings Ltd
- Barnet London Borough Council v Barnet Football Club Holdings Ltd
- Barnet Primary Care Trust v Rabindra-Anandh
- Baron v Husband sub nom Barron v Husband
- Barrett v Irvine
- Barrett v Ring
- Barrett v Ring
- Barrett v Universal Island Records
- Barrow and Geddes, Re, ex p Moult
- Barrow v Coles
- Barry Urquart Associates (a firm) v East Surrey Health Authority
- Bartlett v Greene
- Barton v Official Receiver
- Bashir v Adam
- Bassett v Nosworthy
- Basten v Butter
- Bateman v Watts (t/a Watts Brothers Central Garage)
- Baune v Zduc Ltd
- Bayspoole v Collins
- BBC v Hearn
- BBC v Johns (Inspector of Taxes)
- Beadel v Pitt
- Beale v Mouls sub nom Beale v Moule
- Beard v Beard
- Beardall v Vinamul Ltd
- Beardall v Vinamul Ltd
- Beaulande v Directeur des Services Fiscaux de Nantes: C-208/91
- Beaumont, Re, Martin v Midland Bank Trust Co Ltd
- Beazley v Horizon Offshore Contractors Inc
- Beck v Scholz
- Becker v Lavender Ltd
- Beebee & Co v Turner's Successors
- Beesly v Hallwood Estates Ltd
- Belcher v Bellamy
- Belfour v Mace (Inspector of Taxes)
- Bell Electric Ltd v Aweco Appliance Systems GmbH & Co KG
- Bell v The Spirit Group Ltd
- Beller (Marcel) Ltd v Hayden
- Benecke v Chadwicke
- Benecke v Chadwicke
- Bennett, Walden & Co v Wood
- Bennetts of Sheffield Ltd v Customs and Excise Comrs
- Benwell v Inns
- Bergheim v Great Eastern Rly Co
- Berkeley Administration Inc v McClelland
- Bernstein v Pamson Motors (Golders Green) Ltd
- Beta Computers (Europe) Ltd v Adobe Systems (Europe) Ltd
- Bevan v Bevan
- Bevan v London Portland Cement Co Ltd
- Beves & Co Ltd v Farkas
- BG Linton Construction Ltd v Canadian National Rly Co
- Bhatia v Wincanton Logistics
- BHP Billiton Petroleum Ltd v Dalmine SpA
- BHP Petroleum Ltd v British Steel plc
- BHP Petroleum Ltd v British Steel plc and Dalmine SpA
- Bielecki v Suffolk Coastal County Council
- Bigg v Boyd Gibbins Ltd
- Bigg v Strong
- Bigg v Strong
- Biggar v Havering London Borough Council
- Bigos v Bousted
- Biotal Ltd v Dodson & Harrell Ltd
- Birch v University of Liverpool
- Bircham & Co, Nominees (2) Ltd v Worrell Holdings Ltd
- Birkenhead, Lancashire and Cheshire Junction Rly Co v Pilcher
- Birmingham Mosque Trust Ltd v Alavi
- Bishop and Baxter Ltd v Anglo-Eastern Trading and Industrial Co Ltd
- Bishop v Plumley
- Blackburn Bobbin Co Ltd v TW Allen & Sons Ltd
- Blackburn Borough Transport Ltd v Bailey
- Blackburn v Maconde (UK) Ltd
- Blanchet v Foster
- Blane Steamships Ltd v Minister of Transport
- Bliss v South East Thames Regional Health Authority
- Blois v Betts
- Bluck v Siddaway
- BNP Paribas v Deloitte and Touche LLP
- BOC Group plc v Centeon LLC
- Bodmer's Patent, Re
- Boehm v Sterling
- Bolton's Lease, Re sub nom Boulton v IRC
- Booth v Wellby
- Borneo Insurance Sdn Bhd v Milan
- Bosanquet v Anderson
- Bottin (International) Investments Ltd v Venson Group plc
- Bottin (International) Investments Ltd v Venson Group plc
- Boucas v Cooke
- Bourne v Dodson
- Bouzourou v Ottoman Bank
- Boys v Ayerst
- Boyson v Coles
- Boyson v Gibson
- BP Exploration Co (Libya) Ltd v Hunt
- BP Exploration Co (Libya) Ltd v Hunt (No 2)
- BP International Ltd v Energy Infrastructure Group Ltd
- Brabant & Co v King
- Bracken v Billinghurst
- Bracken v Billinghurst
- Brall, Re, ex p Norton
- Brama Brown & Root and Marshall Aerospace Ltd v Aramark Ltd
- Bramhill v Edwards
- Branca v Cobarro
- Brandlyn v Ord
- Brandts (William) Sons & Co v Dunlop Rubber Co Ltd
- Bray v Mayne
- Bremer Handelsgesellschaft mbH v C Mackprang Junior
- Bremer Handelsgesellschaft mbH v Continental Grain Co New York
- Brennan v Bolt Burdon (a firm)
- Brennan v Bolt Burdon (a firm)
- Brennan v LRT Pension Fund Trustee Co Ltd
- Brice & Sons v Christiani and Nielsen
- Briggs v Law Society; Awoloye Kio v Law Society
- Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Stahl und Stahlwarenhandel GmbH
- Brislen v Primary Fluid Power Ltd
- Bristol and West of England Bank v Midland Rly Co
- British Car Auctions Ltd v Wright
- British Crane Hire Corpn Ltd v Ipswich Plant Hire Ltd
- British Electrical and Associated Industries (Cardiff) Ltd v Patley Pressings Ltd
- British Farmers' Pure Linseed Cake Co, Re
- British Movietonews Ltd v London and District Cinemas Ltd
- British Rail Pension Trustee Co Ltd v Cardshops Ltd
- British Road Services Ltd v Arthur V Crutchley & Co Ltd (Factory Guards Ltd, Third Parties)
- Brockbank v Dilworth
- Bromley London Borough Council v Smith
- Bromley v Smith
- Brotherton v Aseguradora Colseguros SA
- Brown v Harper
- Brown v Jones
- Browne v Butter
- Browning v Brachers
- Browning v Brachers (a firm)
- BTR plc v IRC
- Buckle v Mitchell
- Buckler v Angil sub nom Buck v Angel
- Buckman v Levi
- Bulley v Bulley
- Bullock v Ardern
- Bullock v Sadlier
- Bulteel and Colmore v Parker and Bulteel's Trustee
- Bulwer v Astley
- Bunge Corpn v Tradax SA
- Bunker-Smith v Freeza Meats Ltd
- Bunn v BBC
- Bunn v Guy
- Burghart v Angerstein sub nom Burkhardt v Angerstein
- Burghart v Hall
- Burkinshaw v Nicolls
- Burn v Miller
- Burrow v Scammell
- Butler Machine Tool Co Ltd v Ex-Cell-O Corpn (England) Ltd
- Butterfield v Heath
- Buxton v Baughan
- Cable and Wireless plc v Valentine
- Caddick v Terry
- Cadogan v Escada AG
- Cailiff v Danvers
- Caine v Palace Steam Shipping Co
- Cala Homes (South) Ltd v Alfred McAlpine Homes East Ltd
- Callaghan v Callaghan
- Calvan Consolidated Oil and Gas Co Ltd v Manning
- Cameron v Gibson sub nom Cameron v MacIntyre's Executor
- Campbell v Frisbee
- Campbell v London and Brighton Rly Co
- Canelhas Comercio Importacao e Exportacao Ltd v Wooldridge (as representative of Lloyd's Property Consortium Syndicate 9091)
- Canelhas Comercio Importacao e Exportacao Ltd v Wooldridge (as representative of Lloyd's Property Consortium Syndicate 9091)
- Cantiare San Rocco SA v Clyde Shipbuilding Co
- Cantiere Navale Triestina v Handelsvertretung der Russ Soz Fd Soviet Republik Naphtha Export
- Capes v Hutton
- Capital Bank Cashflow Finance Ltd v Southall
- Capital Bank plc v Stickland
- Capital Quality Homes Ltd v Colwyn Construction Ltd
- Carapanayoti & Co Ltd v ET Green Ltd
- Cardigan (Earl) v Armitage
- Cardwell v Martin
- Carlton Holdings Ltd, Re, Worster v Priam Investments Ltd
- Carlyle Finance Ltd v Pallas Industrial Finance (Burgess (t/a John Burgess Car Sales), third party) (Wise (t/a HRG Car Sales), fourth party
- Carmichael v Bank of Montreal
- Carras v London and Scottish Assurance Corpn Ltd
- Carsen (W) & Co Ltd v Eastern Canada Stevedoring Co
- Carstairs v Rolleston
- Carter v Carter
- Carter v Hind
- Carter v Hyde
- Carter v Hyde
- Carteret (Lord) v Paschal
- Casson v University of Aston in Birmingham
- Castrique v Behrens
- Cave v Cave
- Cave v Mackenzie
- Cawston's Conveyance and School Sites Act 1841, Re, Hassard-Short v Cawston
- CEL Group Ltd v Nedlloyd Lines UK Ltd
- Centrovincial Estates plc v Merchant Investors Assurance Co Ltd
- Chaffer v Southern Birmingham Community Health NHS Trust
- Chaffer v Southern Birmingham Community Health NHS Trust
- Chaggar v Chaggar
- Chakki v United Yeast Co Ltd
- Challenger One Ltd v Asociacion Nacional de Arrastreros Congeladores
- Challenger v Watkins
- Chambers v Howell
- Champion Investments Ltd v Ahmed
- Chanter v Dickinson
- Chapel v Hickes
- Chapel Wood Estates Ltd v City Greenwich Lewisham Rail Link plc
- Chapelton v Barry UDC
- Chaplin v Leslie Frewin (Publishers) Ltd
- Chapman v Great Western Rly Co
- Charles v NTL Group Ltd
- Chartered Bank of India Australia and China v Henderson
- Charters, Re, ex p Trustee
- Chattock & Co v Bellamy & Co
- Cheesman v Exall
- Cheshire v Bailey
- Chiandetti, Re, ex p Trustee
- Chillingworth v Esche
- China Steamship Co, Re, ex p Mackenzie
- Chinnock v Marchioness of Ely
- Chowne v Baylis
- Christie, Owen and Davies Ltd v Stockton
- Churchill d Thomas v Day
- Churchman v Harvey
- Chwee Kin Keong v Digilandmall.com Pte Ltd
- Chwee Kin Keong v Digilandmall.com Pte Ltd
- CIBC Mellon Trust Co v Stolzenberg
- CIBC Mellon Trust Company v Stolzenberg
- Claridge v Hoare
- Clark v Clark
- Clark v Clark
- Clark v Cutland
- Clark v Hope
- Clarke, Re, Coombe v Carter
- Clay v Crofts
- Clay v Crofts
- Clay v Yates
- Clayton v Earl of Wilton
- Clements v London and North Western Rly Co
- Clerk v Crow sub nom Clerke v Comer sub nom Colmer v Clark
- Clifton v Palumbo
- Clinicare Ltd (formerly known as Strasbourgeoise UK Private Health Insurance Services Ltd) v Orchard Homes and Developments Ltd
- Clinton v Seymour
- Clive v Beaumont
- Clive v Beaumont
- Coaten v PBS Corpn
- Coates, Re, ex p Scott
- Cobban v Downe
- Cockerill, Re, Mackaness v Percival
- Codent Ltd v Lyson Ltd
- Coggs v Bernard
- Cohen v Nessdale Ltd
- Cole v Cottingham
- Cole v Eley
- Cole, Re, Trustee in Bankruptcy v Public Trustee
- Coleman v Riches
- Colin Buchanan & Partners Ltd v Marcus de Berg
- Collet v De Gols and Ward
- Collins v Archer
- Collins v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry
- Collins, Re
- Collinson v Pattrick
- Collis v Emett
- Colombo Apothecaries' Co Ltd v Peiris
- Coloniale Import-Export v Loumidis Sons
- Colston v Gardner sub nom Coulston v Gardiner
- Colyear v Countess of Mulgrave
- Colyer v Finch
- Comet Shipping Agencies (Nigeria) Ltd v Panalpina World Transport (Nigeria) Ltd
- Commission for the New Towns v Cooper (Great Britain) Ltd
- Community Living Concepts Ltd v Aitken
- Compania de Navegacion Pohing SA v Sea Tanker Shipping (Pte) Ltd, The Buena Trader
- Company, a (No 008699 of 1985), Re
- Comptoir Commercial Anversois and Power Son & Co, Re
- Comptoir d'Achat et de Vente du Boerenbond Belge S/A v Luis de Ridder Ltda, The Julia
- Computer & Systems Engineering plc v John Lelliott (Ilford) Ltd
- Condor v Barron Knights Ltd
- Confetti Records (a firm) v Warner Music UK Ltd (trading as East West Records)
- Congimex Companhia Geral de Comercio Importadora e Exportadora SARL v Tradax Export SA
- Congimex Companhia Geral de Comercio Importadora e Exportadora SARL v Tradax Export SA
- Congimex SARL (Lisbon) v Continental Grain Export Corporation (New York)
- Conlon v Simms
- Conrad Ritblatt & Co v Jil Sander AG
- Consolidated Tea and Lands Co v Oliver's Wharf
- Constantine (Joseph) Steamship Line Ltd v Imperial Smelting Corpn Ltd, The Kingswood
- Contract Corpn, Re, Baker's Case
- Contract Corpn, Re, Gooch's Case
- Cood v Cood
- Cook v Financial Insurance Co Ltd
- Cooke v Oxley
- Cooper v Pepys
- Cooper v Southgate
- Co-operative Group (CWS) Ltd v International Computers Ltd
- Cope v Albinson
- Cope v Albinson
- Copis v Middleton
- Coppard v Customs and Excise Comrs
- Corbett v South Eastern and Chatham Railways Managing Committee
- Cordey v Cardiff Pure Ice Co
- Cordwell v Mackrill
- Cormick v Trapaud
- Corn v Matthews
- Cornwall v Hawkins
- Cotterell v Homer
- Cotton (Executors) v Catlyn
- Cottrell (on behalf of Lloyd's Syndicate 1173) v General Cologne Re UK Ltd
- Coultwas v Swan
- Coultwas v Swan
- Council of Engineering Institutions v Maddison
- Countess of Warwick Steamship Co v Le Nickel SA
- Coup Co v Maddick
- Court Line Ltd v Dant and Russel Inc
- Court Line Ltd v R, The Lavington Court
- Cousins v Paddon
- Covington Marine Corp v Xiamen Shipbuilding Industry Co Ltd
- Cowie v Remfrey
- Cowley v Watts
- Cowley v Watts
- Cowx v Foster sub nom Cox v Forster
- Cox v Paxton
- Cox v Philips Industries Ltd
- Coxe v Harden
- Crabtree v Bramble
- Craignish, Re, Craignish v Hewitt
- Credit Agricole Indosuez v Unicof Ltd
- Cricklewood Property and Investment Trust Ltd v Leighton's Investment Trust Ltd
- Criminal Clothing Ltd v Aytan's Manufacturing (UK) Ltd
- Crook's Settlement, Re, Re Glasier's Settlement, Crook v Preston
- Crosbie v Munroe
- Crossley v Maycock
- Crosthwaite v Gardner
- Crouch v King's Healthcare NHS Trust; Murry v Blackburn Hyndburn & Ribble Valley Health Care NHS Trust sub nom Crouch v King's Healthcare NHS Trust; Murry v Blackburn Hyndburn
- Croudace Construction Ltd v Cawoods Concrete Products Ltd
- Crowther v Shannon Motor Co (a firm)
- CRS Computers Ltd v MacKenzie
- Crystal Decisions (UK) Ltd v Vedatech Corpn
- Cubbidge v Boatwright
- Cuming v Brown
- Cumming and West, Re, ex p Neilson and Craig v Trustee sub nom Re Cumming, ex p Neilson and Craig v Adamson (Trustee)
- Cumming v Prescott
- Cundy v Lindsay sub nom Lindsay & Co v Cundy
- Cunningham v Collett and Farmer
- Curling v Matthey
- Curran v Newpark Cinemas Ltd
- Currie v Misa
- Currie v Nind
- Curtis Moffat Ltd v Wheeler
- Curtis v Chemical Cleaning and Dyeing Co Ltd
- Customs and Excise Commissioners v RK Collections Ltd
- Customs and Excise Comrs v Tilling Management Services Ltd
- Cuthbert v Haley
- Cutler v North London Rly Co
- Cypher Holdings Ltd v Bertram
- Cypress Disposal Ltd v Inland Kenworth Sales (Nanaimo) Ltd
- Dadourian Group International Inc v Azuri Ltd
- Daewoo Heavy Industries Ltd v Klipriver Shipping Ltd, The Kapitan Petko Voivoda
- Daewoo Heavy Industries Ltd v Klipriver Shipping Ltd, The Kapitan Petko Voivoda
- Daking v Whimper
- Dale Steamship Co Ltd v Northern Steamship Co Ltd
- Dalkia Utilities Services plc v Celtech International Ltd
- Dalton v Hayter
- Daly v General Steam Navigation Co Ltd, The Dragon
- Danepoint Ltd v Allied Underwriting Insurance Ltd
- Daniel v Bowles
- Daniels v Davison
- Daniels v Thompson
- Danks v Farley
- Danlardy v Southwark Race Equalities Council
- Dansey v Richardson
- Daraydan Holdings Ltd v Solland International Ltd
- Dare v Bognor UDC
- Darlington Futures Ltd v Delco Australia Pty Ltd
- Daubeny v Cockburn
- Davenport v Bishopp
- Davenport v Bishopp
- David and Adlard, Re, ex p Whinney sub nom Re David and Johnson, ex p Whinney
- Davies (A) & Co (Shopfitters) Ltd v William Old Ltd
- Davies v Collins
- Davies v Davies
- Davies v Huguenin
- Davies v R Bolton & Co
- Daviller v Herring
- Davis (S) & Co Ltd, Re
- Davis Contractors Ltd v Fareham UDC
- Davis v Reynolds
- Davison v Robertson
- Dawson v Kearton
- Day Morris Associates v Voyce
- Day v Stuart
- Dayman v Anfield Services Ltd
- De Francesco v Barnum
- De Francesco v Barnum sub nom Francesco v Barnum
- De Hoghton v Money sub nom Hoghton v Money
- De Leeuw, Re, Jakens v Central Advance and Discount Corpn Ltd
- De Manneville v Crompton
- De Vile v Arnold
- De Witte v Addison
- Debtor, a (No 2389 of 1989), Re sub nom Re a Debtor (No 2389 of 1989), ex p Travel and General Insurance Co plc v Debtor
- Debtor, a (No 32 of 1993), Re
- Debtor, a (No 544/SD/98), Re
- Debtor, A, Re, ex p Official Receiver, Trustee of the Property of Debtor v Morrison
- Debtors (Nos 4449 and 4450 of 1998), Re
- Deepak Fertilisers and Petrochemicals Corpn v Davy McKee (London) Ltd
- Deerhurst, Re, ex p Seaton
- Deg-Deutsche Investitions und Entwicklungsgesellschaft GmbH v Koshy
- Dennis (a bankrupt), Re
- Dennis Commercial Properties Ltd and Westmount Life Insurance Co, Re
- Denny Mott and Dickson Ltd v James B Fraser & Co Ltd
- Densham (a bankrupt), Re, ex p trustee of bankrupt v Densham
- Dent (a bankrupt), Re, Trustee of the property of bankrupt v Dent
- Denton v Stewart
- Derby & Co Ltd v Weldon (Nos 3 and 4) sub nom Derby & Co Ltd v Weldon (No 2)
- Deutsche Morgan Grenfell Group plc v IRC and A-G
- Devereux v Barclay
- DHL Air Ltd v Wells
- Diamond Developments Ltd v Crown Assets Disposal Corpn
- Diamond v Graham
- Dibbs v Goren
- Dickinson (Inspector of Taxes) v Abel
- Dickinson (Inspector of Taxes) v Abel
- Dickinson v Dodds
- Dickinson v Valpy
- Dickson v Swansea Vale Rly Co
- Dies v British and International Mining and Finance Corpn Ltd
- Dietz v Lennig Chemicals Ltd
- Dillingham v Harrison
- Direct Birmingham, Oxford, Reading and Brighton Rly Co, Re, Onions's Case
- Direct Birmingham, Oxford, Reading and Brighton Rly Co, Re, Onions's Case
- Dixon (Peter) & Sons Ltd v Henderson Craig & Co
- Doak v Bedford
- Doble, Re, ex p Doble
- Doe d Baverstock v Rolfe
- Doe d Bingham v Cartwright
- Doe d Marchant v Errington
- Doe d Otley v Manning
- Doe d Parry v James
- Doe d Preece v Howells
- Doe v Martyr
- Doe v Skegg
- Doheny v New India Assurance Co Ltd
- Doherty v Allman (or Allen)
- Dominion Building Corpn Ltd v R
- Dominion of Canada General Insurance Co v Ardekany
- Dormer v Fortescue
- Dornoch Ltd v Mauritius Union Assurance Co Ltd
- Dornoch Ltd v Mauritius Union Assurance Co Ltd
- Dover Harbour Board v Owners of the Star Maria
- Dover v Mills
- Dowse, Re, Dowse v Glass
- Doyle v White City Stadium Ltd
- Drant v Brown
- Drayton v Dale
- Drosier v Brereton
- D'Silva v Lister House Development Ltd
- DSV Silo-und Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH v Sennar (Owners), The Sennar
- Dublin and Wicklow Rly Co v Black
- Duffin v Deloitte & Touche Wealth Management Ltd
- Dumford Trading AG v OAO Atlantrybflot
- Duncan Fox & Co v Schrempft and Bonke
- Dunlop v Higgins
- Dunlop v Higgins
- Dunn v Dunn
- Dunnachie v Kingston-Upon-Hull City Council
- Dunsany (Lord) v Shaw
- Duplessis v A-G
- Duru v Granada Retail Catering Ltd
- E Ivor Hughes Education Foundation v Leach
- Eagle Star Insurance Co Ltd v Games Video Co (GVC) SA
- Ease Faith Ltd v Leonis Marine Management Ltd
- East Barnet Valley UDC v Stallard
- Eastern Counties Junction and Southend Rly Co, Re, Mainwaring's Case
- Eastern Counties Junction and Southend Rly Co, Re, Mainwaring's Case
- Eastleigh Borough Council v Walsh
- Ebbw Vale Steel Iron and Coal Co v Macleod & Co
- Eccles v Bryant and Pollock
- Econet Wireless Ltd v Vee Networks Ltd
- Edgar v Blick
- Edgewater Developments Co (a firm) v Bailey
- Edmonds v Lawson
- Edwards v Dick
- Edwards v Newland & Co (E Burchett Ltd, third party)
- Edwards v Smiths Dock Ltd
- Edwards, Re, Macadam v Wright
- Egg Stores (Stamford Hill) Ltd v Leibovici
- EIC Services Ltd v Phipps
- Elliott Steam Tug Co Ltd v Charles Duncan & Sons Ltd
- Elliott v Crutchley
- Ellis v Horace Marshall & Son
- Embankment Place Hotels (Blackfriars) Ltd v Blackfriars Hotels Ltd
- Embiricos v Sydney Reid & Co
- Emilien Marie, The
- Emmerson v Ind Coope & Co
- Emmott v Riddel
- Empresa Exportadora de Azucar v Industria Azucarera Nacional SA, The Playa Larga and The Marble Islands
- English and Foreign Credit Co Ltd (Proprietors) v Arduin
- Enron (Thrace) Exploration and Product BV v Clapp
- Enron (Thrace) Exploration and Production BV v Clapp
- Enron (Thrace) Exploration and Production BV v Clapp
- Ensworth v Griffiths
- Entores Ltd v Miles Far East Corpn
- EQ Projects Ltd v Alavi (t/a Merc London)
- EQ Projects v Alavi
- ERC Frankona Reinsurance v American National Insurance Co
- Ernest v Vivian
- Etam Ltd v Forte
- Etty v Bridges
- Eugena Ltd v Gelande Corpn Ltd
- Euler Hermes UK plc v Apple Computer BV
- Euler Hermes UK plc v Apple Computers BV
- European Bank of Reconstruction & Development v Tahsin Tekoglu
- European Commission v Belgium: C-415/02
- European Commission v France: C-334/02
- Evans (J) & Son (Portsmouth) Ltd v Andrea Merzario Ltd
- Evans v Judkins
- Evans v Kymer
- Evans v Ware
- Everards v Society of Lloyd's
- Everenden v Vanacker
- Everest, Re, ex p Mowbray
- EWOS Ltd v Mainland
- Exchange Banking Co Ltd, Re, Ramwell's Case
- Excomm Ltd v Guan Guan Shipping (Pte) Ltd, The Golden Bear
- Express Newspapers v Telegraph Group Ltd
- Express Newspapers v Telegraph Group Ltd
- Express Newspapers v Telegraph Group Ltd
- Eyre, Re, ex p Eyre
- F & I Services Ltd v Customs and Excise Comrs; R v Customs and Excise Comrs, ex p F & I Services Ltd
- F (minors) (care proceedings: contact), Re
- Facta v Prew-Smith
- Factortame Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions
- Fagan v Harrison
- Fagan v Harrison
- Fairbrother v Gabb & Co
- Fairclough v Pavia
- Fairline Shipping Corpn v Adamson
- Falcke v Scottish Imperial Insurance Co
- Falconer v ASLEF and NUR
- Fallick v Barber
- Famatina Development Corpn Ltd v Bury
- Farina v Home
- Farley v Skinner
- Farley v Skinner
- Farnsworth v Garrard
- Farnworth Finance Facilities Ltd v Attryde
- Farquharson v Barstow
- Farr v Ward
- Feakins v Burstow
- Fellows v Wood
- Ferguson v Davies
- Fewings v Tisdal sub nom Flewings v Tisdal
- Fibrosa Spolka Akcyjna v Fairbairn Lawson Combe Barbour Ltd
- Figlia Maggiore, The
- Filby v Mortgage Express (No 2) Ltd
- Filobake Ltd v Rondo Ltd
- Financings Ltd v Stimson
- Finelvet AG v Vinava Shipping Co Ltd, The Chrysalis
- Finucane v Small
- First Gulf Bank v Wachovia Bank National Association
- First Touch Communications v EBST Ltd
- Fitch Lovell Ltd v IRC
- Flashback Ventures Ltd, Re
- Fleet Mobile Tyre Services Ltd v Stone
- Fleet Mobile Tyre Services Ltd v Stone
- Flightline Ltd v Edwards
- Flower v London and North Western Rly Co
- Flower v Sadler
- Flynn v Scougall
- Forbes v Git
- Ford v Stuart
- Formby v Barker
- Forster v Baker
- Forster v Baker
- Fortescue v Barnett
- Foster and Lister, Re
- Foster v Wheeler
- Four Seasons Healthcare Ltd (formerly Cotswold Spa Retirement Hotels Ltd) v Maughan
- Fowler v James
- Fowler v Lock
- Fowler v Lock
- Fox v Hanbury
- Frampton v Framtpon
- Francis v Cowcliffe Ltd
- Frank Wyatt & Son Ltd, Re
- Frankau (Ronald) Productions Ltd v Bell
- Fraser and Fraser v Morrison and Morrison
- Frazer v Bunn
- Freeman v Cooke
- Freeman v Cooke
- French Marine v Compagnie Napolitaine d'Eclairage et de Chauffage par le Gaz
- Frewen v Hamilton
- Frisby v BBC
- Frogley v Earl of Lovelace
- Fuji Finance Inc v Aetna Life Assurance Co Ltd
- Fuller v Cheveley sub nom Cheveley v Fuller
- Fuller v Cheveley sub nom Cheveley v Fuller
- Fuller v Happy Shopper Markets Ltd
- Fullerton v Martin
- Gabriel: C-96/00
- Gadd v Thompson
- Galaxy Energy International Ltd v Eurobunker SPA
- Gale v Williamson
- Gallagher v Gallagher
- Galton v Emuss
- Gamerco SA v ICM/Fair Warning (Agency) Ltd
- Gaon (Albert D) & Co v Socit Interprofessionelle des Oleagineux Fluides Alimentaires
- Gardner v Iredale
- Garratt v Saxby
- Garside v Trent and Mersey Navigation Proprietors
- Gaston v Courtney
- Gbangbola v Smith & Sherriff Ltd
- Gebr van Weelde Scheepvaartkantor BV v Compania Naviera Sea Orient SA, The Antclizo
- Gemma Ltd v Gimson
- General Palmer, The
- George Wimpey UK Ltd (formerly Wimpey Homes Holdings Ltd) v V I Components Ltd
- George Wimpey UK Ltd v VIC Construction Ltd
- George Wimpey UK Ltd v VIC Construction Ltd
- Gerraty v McGavin
- Gething v Kilner
- Ghafoor v Cliff
- Gibaud v Great Eastern Rly Co
- Gibbins v North Eastern Metropolitan Asylum District
- Gibbons v Standon
- Gibson v Hunter
- Gibson v Manchester City Council
- Gibson v Minet
- Gilbart v Dale
- Gilbert v Guignon
- Gilchrist, Watt and Sanderson Pty Ltd v York Products Pty Ltd sub nom York Products Pty Ltd v Gilchrist Watt and Sanderson Pty Ltd
- Gilham v Locke
- Gilkes v Leonino
- Gilkes v Leonino
- Gill (Stewart) Ltd v Horatio Myer & Co Ltd
- Gillespie v Fitzpatrick
- Gillett v Mawman
- GKN Westland Helicopters Ltd v Korean Air; Press Tech Controls Ltd v Korean Air
- Glahe International Expo AG v ACS Computer Pte Ltd
- Glencore International AG v Alpina Insurance Co Ltd
- Glencore International AG v Alpina Insurance Co Ltd
- Global Coal Ltd v ICAP Energy Ltd
- Globe Master Management Ltd v Boulus-Gad Ltd
- Gloyne v Richardson
- Glyn v Hertel
- GMAC Commercial Credit Development Ltd v Sandhu
- GMB v Amicus; Amicus v Beloit Walmsley Ltd
- Godwin v Francis
- Goff v Gauthier
- Golden, Re, ex p Norton
- Goldicutt v Townsend
- Goldsack v Shore
- Goldsbrough Mort & Co Ltd v Quinn
- Goodered v Armour
- Goodright d Humphreys v Moses
- Gordon & Co v Bank of England (Governor & Co)
- Gordon v East India Co
- Gordon v Woodford
- Goshawk Dedicated Ltd v ROP Inc
- Governments Stock and Other Securities Investment Co Ltd v Christopher
- Grafton v Armitage
- Graham v Drummond
- Graham v Entec Europe Ltd (t/a Exploration Associates)
- Graham v Johnson
- Grainger v Raybould
- Grant v Da Costa
- Granville Baird Capital Partners Ltd v Blackden
- Granville Oil and Chemicals Ltd v Davies Turner and Co Ltd
- Gravely v Barnard
- Gray (decd), Re; Allardyce v Roebuck
- Gray and Gillitt v Tiley (Inspector of Taxes)
- Great Australian Gold Mining Co, ex p Appleyard
- Great Future International Ltd v Sealand Housing Corp
- Great Future International Ltd v Sealand Housing Corpn
- Great Peace Shipping Ltd v Tsavliris Salvage (International) Ltd), The Great Peace
- Great Peace Shipping Ltd v Tsavliris Salvage (International) Ltd, The Great Peace
- Greatwood Property Management Ltd v Cheerent Ltd
- Greaves v Ashlin
- Green v Beach
- Green v Paterson
- Greene v Church Comrs for England
- Greenslade v Dare
- Greenslade v Dare
- Greenwood, Re, Priestley v Griffith
- Gregson v Ruck
- Grell-Taurel Ltd v The Caribbean Home Insurance Co Ltd
- Grey (Edward) & Co v Tolme and Runge
- Greythorn Ltd, Re
- Grierson, Oldham and Adams Ltd, Re
- Griffiths v St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council
- Griffiths v Young
- Grimoldby v Wells
- Groves & Sons v Webb and Kenward
- Gryf-Lowczowski v Hinchingbrooke Healthcare NHS Trust
- Guinness plc v IRC
- Gulbenkian's Settlement Trusts (No 2), Re, Stevens v Maun
- Gully v Bishop of Exeter sub nom Exeter (Bishop) v Gully
- Gunmakers Co v Fell
- Gurney v Behrend
- Gutter v Tait
- H T A Architects Ltd v Countryside Properties plc
- Habib Bank Ltd v Tufail
- Hadham RDC v Crallan
- Halbauer v Brighton Corpn
- Hale v Allnutt
- Hale v Saloon Omnibus Co
- Hales v Darell
- Halpern v Halpern
- Haly v Lane
- Hamilton v Allied Domecq plc
- Hamilton v Allied Domecq plc
- Hamilton v Vaughan-Sherrin Electrical Engineering Co
- Hammonds v Barrett
- Hanbury v Lovett
- Hance v Harding
- Handelsbanken ASA v Dandridge
- Hangkam Kwingtong Woo v Liu Lan Fong (alias Liu Ah Lan)
- Hanily v Minister of Local Government and Planning
- Hanley v Greening & Sykes (Builders Ltd)
- Hans Fuchs Versandschlachterei KG v European Commission: T-134/01
- Harbutt's Plasticine Ltd v Wayne Tank and Pump Co Ltd
- Harding v Harding
- Hare v Murphy Bros Ltd
- Hares v Stringer
- Harman v Richards
- Harmer v Cornelius
- Harmer v Steele
- Harmony Shipping Co SA v Davis, The Good Helmsman; Harmony Shipping Co SA v Saudi Europe Line Ltd
- Harper Verischerungs AG v Indemnity Maine Assurance Co Ltd; River Thames Insurance Co Ltd v Indemnity Marine Assurance Co Ltd
- Harris v Great Western Rly Co
- Harris v Nickerson
- Harris v Tubb
- Harris v Wyre Forest District Council
- Harrison v Battye
- Hart v A R Marshall & Sons (Bulwell) Ltd
- Hart v Minors
- Hart v Newman
- Hartog v Colin and Shields
- Harvey v Perry
- Harvey, The
- Hatch v Searles, Stanway's Case, Conway's Case
- Hawker v Wood
- Hawkins v Duch
- Hawley v Luminar Leisure plc
- Hayne v Burchell
- Hayworth v Barnes
- Hayworth v Barnes
- Head v Diggon
- Heap v Tonge
- Heath v Crealock
- Heath v Freeland
- Heathmill Ltd v British Telecommunications plc
- Hebden v Forsey & Son
- Hector v Lyons
- Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd
- Heffron v Imperial Parking Co
- Heger Rudi GmbH v Finanzamt Graz-Stadt: C-166/05
- Heilgers & Co v Cambrian Steam Navigation Co Ltd
- Henderson & Co v Williams
- Henderson (John M) & Co Ltd v Montague L Meyer Ltd
- Henderson v North Eastern Rly Co sub nom Anderson v North Eastern Rly Co
- Hennings v Rothschild
- Henry v BBC
- Henslow v Fawcett
- Heritage Insurance Services Ltd v Rotch Property Group Ltd
- Herne Bay Steam Boat Co v Hutton
- Heron International Ltd v Lord Grade and Associated Communications Corpn plc
- Hesketh Estates Ltd v Craddock (Inspector of Taxes)
- Hewison v Negus
- Hewitt (G & G B) v SA Namur-Assurances du Credit
- Heyman v Darwins Ltd
- Heyworth v Knight
- Hickman v Blake Lapthorn
- HIH Casualty and General Insurance Co Ltd v JLT Risk Solutions Ltd (formerly Lloyd Thompson Ltd)
- Hill v Bishop of Exeter
- Hill v General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corpn plc
- Hillingdon Estates Co v Stonefield Estates Ltd
- Hindes v Supersine Ltd
- Hingeston v Kelly
- Hiort v London and North Western Rly Co
- Hirji Mulji v Cheong Yue Steamship Co Ltd
- Hirsch v Zinc Corpn Ltd
- Hitchcock v Coker
- Hodgeson v Bussey
- Hoenig v Isaacs
- Hogan v Cambridgeshire County Council
- Hogg v Cramphorn Ltd
- Holdcroft v South Derbyshire District Council
- Holden v Hayn and Bacon
- Holder v Soulby
- Holdsworth v Dimsdale
- Holland v Eyre
- Holland, Re, Gregg v Holland
- Hollier v Rambler Motors (AMC) Ltd
- Hollins v J Davy Ltd
- Holmes v Blogg
- Holmes v Morris
- Holmes v Penney
- Holroyd v Marshall
- Holwell Securities Ltd v Hughes
- Homer v Ashford and Ainsworth
- Hong Guan & Co Ltd v R Jumabhoy & Sons Ltd
- Hong Kong and China Gas Co Ltd v Glen
- Hong Kong Fir Shipping Co Ltd v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd
- Hood v Aston
- Hooper and Ashby v Willis
- Hooper v Gumm
- Horlock, The
- Horne v Norwich Union Insurance Ltd
- Horsfall v Garnett
- Horsfall v Garnett
- Horton v Westminster Improvement Comrs
- Hotel Services Ltd v Hilton International Hotels (UK) Ltd
- Hotson v Howitt
- Hougie v Hewitt
- Houlditch v Wallace
- Houldsworth v Evans
- Howard v Fingall
- Howkins v Jackson
- Hudspeth v Yarnold
- Hudspeth v Yarnold
- Hughes v Lenny
- Hulton (E) & Co Ltd v Chadwick and Taylor Ltd
- Hultquist v Universal Pattern and Precision Engineering Co Ltd
- Hunt v Elmes
- Hunt v Fripp
- Hunt v Hunt
- Hunt v Luck
- Hunter Engineering Co Inc v Syncrude Canada Ltd
- Hurditch v Sheffield Health Authority
- Hurnandrai Fulchand v Pragdas Budhsen
- Hurst Stores and Interiors Ltd v ML Europe Property Ltd
- Hurst Stores and Interiors Ltd v ML Europe Property Ltd
- Hurst v Goddard
- Hussey v Jacob
- Hutchinson, Re, ex p Dickson
- Hutchison v Bowker
- Hutton v Brown
- Hutton v Parker
- Huyton SA v Distribuidora Internacional De Products Agricolas SA De CV
- Hyde v Wrench
- Hydra plc v Anastasi
- Hyman v Nye
- Icon Capital UK Ltd v Michael Gerson (Leasing) Ltd
- Imperial Land Co of Marseilles, Re, Harris' Case
- Imperial Land Co of Marseilles, Re, Townsend's Case
- Ind Coope & Co v Emmerson
- Indigo International Holdings Ltd v Owners and/or Demise Charterers of the vessel 'Brave Challenger'; Ronastone Ltd v Indigo International Holdings Ltd
- Infiniteland Ltd v Artisan Contracting Ltd
- Ingham v Emes
- Innholders' Co v Wainwright
- INS Realisations Ltd, Re, Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Jonkler
- INS Realisations Ltd, Re, Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Jonkler
- Intense Investments Ltd v Development Ventures Ltd
- Intercase UK Ltd v Time Computers Ltd
- Interlink Express Parcels Ltd v Night Trunkers Ltd
- International Correspondence Schools Ltd v Ayres
- InterserveFM Ltd v Omnisure Property Management Ltd
- Irani v Irani
- Irby v Irby (No 3)
- IRC v Brebner
- IRC v Fry
- IRC v Ufitec Group Ltd
- IRC v Willoughby
- Irvine v Hervey
- Irvine, Re
- Isherwood v Whitmore
- Islington London Borough Council v Uckac
- iSoft Group plc v Misys Holdings Ltd
- iSoft Group plc v Misys Holdings Ltd
- Ithell v Beane
- I-Way Ltd v World Online Telecom Ltd
- Jackson v Forster
- Jackson v North Wales Rly Co
- Jackson v Tollett
- Jacobs v East Sussex County Council
- Jager v Tolme and Runge and The London Produce Clearing House Ltd
- James v Bydder
- Jameson v Stein
- Jameson v Stein
- Jarvis v Swans Tours Ltd
- Jassi v Gallagher
- Jefferson v Paskell
- Jefferys v Smith
- Jelley v Iliffe
- Jennings and Chapman Ltd v Woodman Matthews & Co
- Jerrard v Saunders
- JH & S (Timber) Ltd v Quirk (or Quirke)
- JIS (1974) Ltd v MCE International Nominees Ltd
- John Lewis plc v Pearson-Burton
- John Mowlem Construction plc v Neil F Jones & Co (a firm)
- John v Price Waterhouse (t/a PricewaterhouseCoopers); Price Waterhouse (t/a PricewaterhouseCoopers) v Frere Cholmely (a firm)
- Johnson Gibbons (London) Ltd v Jilani
- Johnson v Barnes
- Johnson v Black, The Two Ellens
- Johnson v Collings
- Johnson v King
- Joinery Plus Ltd (in administration) v Laing Ltd
- Jolland v Stainbridge
- Jolliffe v Blumberg
- Jones v Consolidated Investment Assurance Co
- Jones v Croucher
- Jones v Jones
- Jones v Marsh
- Jones v Page
- Jones v Powles
- Jones v Vaughan
- Jones v Williams
- Jones, Re, ex p Jones
- Jordan Grand Prix Ltd v Vodafone Group plc
- Joseph Holt plc, Re; Winpar Holdings Ltd v Joseph Holt Group plc
- Joyce v Morrissey
- JP Morgan Chase Bank v Springwell Navigation Corpn
- JP Morgan Chase Bank v Springwell Navigation Corpn
- Kahn v University of Warwick
- Kamilla Hans-Peter Eckhoff KG v AC Oerssleff's EFTF A/B, The Kamilla
- Kapferer v Schlank & Schick GmbH: C-234/04
- Karak Rubber Co Ltd v Burden (No 2)
- Keasley, Re, ex p Pennell sub nom Kearsley, Re, ex p Pennell
- Keenan v Handley
- Keever (bankrupt), Re, ex p Trustee of Property of Bankrupt v Midland Bank Ltd
- Kekewich v Manning
- Kelson v Kelson
- Kelvin Homes Ltd v Ritchie Brothers (Public Works Contractors) Ltd
- Kempson v Boyle
- Kennedy v Green
- Kenyon Son and Craven Ltd v Baxter Hoare & Co Ltd
- Kenyon Son and Craven Ltd v Baxter Hoare & Co Ltd
- Keppel v Wheeler
- Kerr v Morris
- Kershaw v Alfred John Smith & Co Ltd
- Kewley v Stokes
- Keys v Harwood
- Keyse v Powell
- KH Enterprise v Pioneer Container, The Pioneer Container
- Khaled v Athanas Bros (Aden) Ltd
- Killick v Rendall
- Kimber v William Willett Ltd
- King v Milsom
- King v Sansom (otherwise King)
- King's Leasehold Estates, Re, ex p East London Rly Co
- Kingston-upon-Hull (Governor etc) v Petch
- Kingston-upon-Hull (Governor etc) v Petch
- Kingston-upon-Hull Dock Co v La Marche sub nom Hull Dock Co v La Marche
- Kirby v Trotter
- Kirk, ex p
- Kitson v Hardwick
- Klckner Holdings GmbH v Klckner Beteiligungs GmbH
- Kleinwort Benson Ltd v City of Glasgow Council
- Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Malaysia Mining Corpn Bhd
- Kleinwort Sons & Co v Ungarische Baumwolle Industrie Akt
- Knox v Gye
- Kollerich & Cie SA v State Trading Corpn of India
- Konigsberg (a bankrupt), Re, ex p Trustee v Konigsberg
- KPMG LLP v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd
- KR v Royal & Sun Alliance plc
- Krupp Handel GmbH v Intermare Transport GmbH, The Elbe Ore
- Kruse v Questier & Co Ltd
- Kulukundis v Norwich Union Fire Insurance Society
- Kundrath v Harry Kwatia & Gooding (a firm)
- Kursell v Timber Operators and Contractors
- Kyle Bay Ltd (t/a Astons Nightclub) v Underwriters subscribing under policy 019057/08/01
- Kyle Bay Ltd (t/a Astons Nightclub) v Underwriters subscribing under policy 019057/08/01
- Lafarge (Aggregates) Ltd v Newham London Borough Council
- Lake (K & S) City Freighters Pty Ltd v Gordon & Gotch Ltd
- Lake v Bayliss
- Lake v Goldsborough Ltd
- Lakeman v Mountstephen
- Lalji v Post Office Ltd
- Lamare v London and St Katherine Docks Co
- Lamarra v Capital Bank plc (Shields Automotive Ltd, Third Party)
- Lambert, ex p
- Lampson & Co v London and India Dock Joint Co
- Lancaster v Walsh
- Lara v General Apothecaries' Co
- Lara v General Apothecaries' Co
- Larrinaga & Co Ltd v Socit Franco-Amricaine des Phosphates de Mdulla, Paris
- Latimer Management Consultants Ltd v Ellingham Investments Ltd
- Lattimore v Mott
- Laurence, Re, ex p Laurence
- Law Debenture Trust Corp (Channel Islands) Ltd v Lexington Insurance Co
- Law Society v Sephton & Co
- Law Society v Sephton & Co (a firm)
- Law v Jones
- Lawrie v Bankes
- Laws v Society of Lloyd's
- LCC v Churchwardens of St Botolph, Bishopsgate
- Le Feuvre v Sullivan
- Le Mesurier v Glen International Ltd
- Leader v Moody
- Leah v Two Worlds Publishing Co Ltd
- Lease Management Services Ltd v Purnell Secretarial Services Ltd (Canon (South West) Ltd, third party)
- Leask v Scott Bros
- Lebeaupin v R Crispin & Co
- Leck v Maestaer
- Lee v Zagury
- Leeds and Thirsk Rly Co v Fearnley
- Leeds Banking Co, Re, Howard's Case
- Leeds Banking Co, Re, Mallorie's Case
- Leggat v Reed
- Leicester Circuits Ltd v Coates Brothers plc
- Leigh v Smith
- Leightons Investment Trust Ltd v Cricklewood Property and Investment Trust Ltd
- Leiston Gas Co v Leiston-cum-Sizewell UDC
- Lempriere v Pasley
- Lendon, Re, ex p Lane
- Leney v Taplin
- Leng (Sir W C) & Co Ltd v Andrews
- Leonardo Private Equity Fund Ltd v Loscalzo
- Leslie (R) Ltd v Reliable Advertising and Addressing Agency Ltd
- Leslie v Fitzpatrick
- L'Estrange v F Graucob Ltd
- Lethbridge v A-G
- Levenshulme UDC v Manchester Corpn
- Levison v Patent Steam Carpet Cleaning Co Ltd
- Levob Verzekeringen BV v Staatssecretaris van Financien: C-41/04
- Levy v Creighton
- Lewis v Nicholson
- Lewis v Nicholson
- Lewis v Pedrick
- Libra Bank plc v Financiera De La Republica SA
- Lickbarrow v Mason
- Lickbarrow v Mason
- Lidl UK GmbH v Hertford Foods Ltd
- Lilley v Barnsley
- Lilley v Doubleday
- Lilley v Hewitt
- Lim Kim Som v Sheriffa Taibah bte Abdul Rahman
- Lincoln National Life Insurance Co v Employers Reinsurance Corp
- Lincoln National Life Insurance Co v Sun Life Assurance Co of Canada
- Lincoln National Life Insurance Co v Sun Life Assurance Co of Canada
- Lindner Ceilings Floors and Partitions plc v How Engineering Services Ltd
- Lindsay v Cundy
- Lindsay v Cundy
- Lindsley v Woodfull
- Lipkin Gorman (a firm) v Karpnale Ltd
- Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale Ltd
- Lister v Hodgson
- Littman v Aspen Oil (Broking) Ltd
- Liverpool Grain Storage and Transit Co Ltd v Charlton and Bagshaw
- Livingstone v Evans
- Lloyd Royal Belge SA v Stathatos
- Lloyd v Cheetham
- Lloyd-Wolper v Moore (National Insurance Guarantee Corpn plc, Pt 20 claimant, Moore, Pt 20 defendant)
- Lockett v Norman-Wright
- Lockhart v Barnard
- L'Office National du Th et du Sucre v Philippine Sugar Trading (London) Ltd
- Lombard Finance Ltd v Brookplain Trading Ltd
- Lomi v Tucker
- London Joint Stock Bank v Macmillan and Arthur
- Longley (James) & Co Ltd (in receivership) v Forest Giles Ltd (in receivership)
- Lopes v Bird & Bird (a firm)
- Loughton Contracts plc v Dun & Bradstreet Ltd
- Lovell and Christmas v Beauchamp
- Lovelock v King
- Lowe v Waller
- Lowenthal, Re, ex p Lowenthal
- Lowndes v Anderson
- LPMG Ltd v Stapleford Commercials Ltd
- Lucas v Dorrien
- Lucas v James
- Lucas v James
- Lucas v Novofilieski
- Luders v Anstey
- LUK Leamington Ltd v Whitnash plc
- Lynton International Ltd v Noble
- Macadam (bankrupt), Re, ex p Guillaume v Trustee
- Macadam (No 2), Re, ex p Guillaume v Trustee
- Macartney-Filgate v Bishop & Sons Depositories Ltd
- Macdonald v Longbottom
- Macdonald, Re, ex p McCullum sub nom Macdonald, Re, ex p Trustee
- Macintosh v Haydon
- Mackenzie v Cox
- Mackintosh v Pogose sub nom Macintosh v Pogose
- Macklin v Dowsett
- Macklin v Dowsett
- Macrae v Goodman
- Macrae v Swindells (trading as West View Garage Co)
- Magee v Pennine Insurance Co Ltd
- Magnum Photo Supplies Ltd v Viko New Zealand Ltd
- Magnum Photo Supplies Ltd v Viko New Zealand Ltd
- Maguire and M'Clelland's Contract, Re
- Mahmoud v Lambeth London Borough Council
- Mairs (Inspector of Taxes) v Haughey
- Malekout v Allied Dunbar Assurance plc
- Malkins Nominees Ltd v Societe Financiere Mirelis SA
- Malpas v Ackland
- Malpass, Re, Lloyds Bank plc v Malpass
- Man Nutzfahrzeuge Aktiengesellschaft v Freightliner Ltd
- MAN Nuzfahrzeuge AG v Freightliner Ltd
- Management Corporation Strata Title No 473 v De Beers Jewellery Pte Ltd
- Manchester Diocesan Council for Education v Commercial and General Investments Ltd
- Manheath Ltd v HJ Banks & Co Ltd
- Mansell v Mansell
- Manson v Baillie
- Marcel v Metropolitan Police Comr
- Marchands Associates LLP v Thompson Partnership LLP
- Marchmont Investments Ltd v BFO SA
- Maredelanto Cia Naviera SA v Bergbau-Handel GmbH, The Mihalis Angelos
- Margareson v Saxton
- Margulead Ltd v Exide Technologies
- Maritime National Fish Ltd v Ocean Trawlers Ltd
- Markel International Insurance Co Ltd v La Republica Compania Argentina de Seguros Generales SA
- Marks v Board
- Marlborough (Duke) v A-G
- Marler v Tommas
- Marlow v Orgill
- Marlwood Commercial Inc v Kozeny; Omega Group Holdings Ltd v Kozeny
- Marlwood Commercial Inc v Kozeny; Omega Group Holdings Ltd v Kozeny
- Mars Pension Trustees Ltd v County Properties and Developments Ltd
- Marsh and Earl Granville, Re
- Marsh, ex p
- Marshall Specialist Vehicles Ltd v Osborne
- Marshall v Harland and Wolff Ltd
- Marshall v Marshall
- Martin v Had-Fab Ltd
- Martin v LCC
- Martin v Leaney
- Martin v N Negin Ltd
- Martin's Case
- Mason v Lickbarrow
- Master v Miller
- Matalan Discount Club (Cash & Carry) Ltd v Tokenspire Properties (North Western) Ltd
- Matlock Old Bath Hydropathic Co, Re, Manchester Finance Corpn Case
- Matthey v Curling
- Maving v Todd
- May v Hiskey
- Mayer v British Broadcasting Corpn
- Mayne v Silvermere Cleaners Ltd
- Mayner v Payne
- McAlpine (Sir Robert) Ltd v Alfred McAlpine plc
- McArdle, Re
- McBlain v Cross
- McCann v Switzerland Insurance Australia Ltd
- McC's Estate, Re sub nom CA v CC
- McCulloch Co of Canada v Lloyd G Howe Industrial Real Estate Ltd
- McCulloch v Bank of Novia Scotia Channel Islands Ltd; Clemmetsen v Bank of Novia Scotia Channel Islands Ltd
- McEvoy v Belfast Banking Co Ltd
- McFeetridge v Stewarts and Lloyds Ltd
- McGinley v Burke
- McGreevy v Russell
- McHugh v Kerr
- MCI Worldcom International Inc v Primus Telecommunications Inc
- MCI Worldcom International Inc v Primus Telecommunications Inc
- McManus v Bark
- McMaster University v Wilchar Construction Ltd
- McMeekin v Long
- McPherson v Temiskaming Lumber Co Ltd
- Mead v Lord Orrery
- Meakin v Morris
- Mecca Ltd v Shepherd
- Medcalfe and Ives v Medcalfe and Johnson sub nom Metcalf v Ives
- Meikle v Maufe
- Melville v IRC
- Melville v Mirror of Life Co
- Mendelssohn v Normand Ltd
- Menetone v Athawes
- Mercator Trustees Ltd v Upstream Downstream Simulation Services Inc
- Meriel v Wymondsold
- Merryweather v Jones
- Mertens v Home Freeholds Co
- Metcalfe (or Metcalf) v Clough
- Metcalfe, ex p
- Metropolitan Water Board v Dick Kerr & Co
- Metzler v Gounod
- Meynell v Surtees
- Meynell v Surtees
- Meynell v Surtees
- Meynell v Surtees
- MGN Ltd v Cainer
- Midco Holdings v Piper
- Middleton v Brown
- Middleton v Wiggin
- Midland Industries Ltd v Gonvarri Industrial SA
- Midland Linen Services Ltd, Re, Chaudhry v Yap
- Midland Mainline Ltd v Eagle Star Insurance Co Ltd
- Midland Mainline Ltd v National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers
- Milbank v Milbank
- Millar (Andrew) & Co Ltd v Taylor & Co Ltd
- Miller, Gibb & Co Ltd, Re
- Mills v Barber
- Minister of State for the Army v Dalziel
- Ministry of Defence v Country and Metropolitan Homes (Rissington) Ltd
- Minor, ex p
- Mirehouse v Barrymore
- Mirehouse v Barrymore
- Misa v Currie
- Mitchell (George) (Chesterhall) Ltd v Finney Lock Seeds Ltd
- Mitchell v Lancashire and Yorkshire Rly Co
- Mitford v Mitford
- M'Iver v Richardson
- Monaghan v Close Thornton Solicitors (a firm)
- Monkton v Shepherdson
- Montefiore v Menday Motor Components Co
- Moore v Woolsey
- Moorsom v Kymer
- Morelle Ltd v Wakeling
- Morgan Est (Scotland) Ltd v Hanson Concrete Products Ltd
- Morgan Est (Scotland) Ltd v Hanson Concrete Products Ltd
- Morgan v Manser
- Morin v Bonhams & Brooks Ltd
- Morley v United Friendly Insurance plc
- Morris v CW Martin & Sons Ltd
- Morris, Re, Mayhew v Halton
- Morrison Fleet & Co Ltd v Fletcher (otherwise Futcher)
- Morrow & Benjamin v Whittington
- Mosley v Hide
- Mostcash plc v Fluor Ltd
- Mostcash plc v Fluor Ltd
- Motis Exports Ltd v Dampskibsselskabet AF 1912 Aktieselskab and Aktieselskabet Dampskibsselskabet Svendborg
- Motours Ltd v Eurobell (West Kent) Ltd
- Motz v Moreau
- Mount (D F) Ltd v Jay and Jay (Provisions) Co Ltd
- Mountstephen v Lakeman
- Mountview Court Properties Ltd v Devlin
- Mowbray v Merryweather
- Mowlem (John) Construction plc v Secretary of State for Defence
- Mozley v Tinkler sub nom Morley v Tinkler
- Mugesera v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
- Mulchrone v Swiss Life (UK) Ltd
- Mulford v Manpower UK Ltd
- Mulliner v Midland Rly Co
- Mulrine v University of Ulster
- Mumford v Stohwasser
- Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Sea Insurance Co Ltd
- Murad v Al Saraj
- Murad v Al-Saraj
- Murray v Tower Insurance Ltd
- Murray v Two Strokes Ltd
- Musson v Howard Glasgow Associates Ltd
- Myers (G H) & Co v Brent Cross Service Co
- N v Agrawal
- Nabb Brothers Ltd v Lloyds Bank International (Guernsey) Ltd
- Nash v Tonbridge Estates (Sussex) Ltd
- Nash v Tonbridge Estates (Sussex) Ltd
- Nathan v Giles sub nom Giles v Nathan
- National Carriers Ltd v Panalpina (Northern) Ltd
- National Coal Board v National Union of Mineworkers
- National Savings Bank Association, Re, Hebb's Case
- National Westminster Bank plc v Feeney
- National Westminster Bank plc v Kotonou
- National Westminster Bank plc v Radobank Nederland
- Navigators Insurance Co Ltd v Atlantic Methanol Production Co LLC
- Naylor Benzon & Co Ltd v Aron Hirsch & Son
- Naylor Benzon & Co Ltd v Krainische Industrie Gesellschaft
- Naylor, Re, ex p Stephenson v Pike
- NBTY Europe Ltd (Fomerly Holland & Barrett Europe Ltd) v Nutricia International BV
- Ndyanabo v A-G
- Neale v Merrett
- Neave v Neave (No 2)
- Neesom (or Meeson) v Clarkson
- Neill v Duke of Devonshire
- Nelson v Stocker
- Neuchatel Asphalte Co Ltd v Barnett
- Nevill v Snelling
- Neville v Kelly
- New Hart Builders Ltd v Brindley
- New System Private Telephones (London) Ltd v Hughes & Co
- Newborn v Just
- Newcomb v De Roos
- Newry and Enniskillen Rly Co v Coombe
- Newsat Holdings Ltd v Zani
- Niagara Mechanical Services International Ltd (in administration), Re
- Nicolene Ltd v Simmonds
- Niger-Benue Transport Co Ltd v Narumal & Sons (Nigeria) Ltd
- Niru Battery Manufacturing Co v Milestone Trading Ltd
- Niru Battery Manufacturing Co v Milestone Trading Ltd
- Nissho Co Ltd v Livanos
- Nolte v Landesversicherungsanstalt Hannover: C-317/93
- Non-Marine Underwriters, Lloyd's of London v Scalera
- Nordman v Rayner and Sturges
- Norgren (C A) & Co v Technomarketing
- Norman v Simpson
- Norris v Southampton City Council
- Norris v Staps (or Stapes)
- North British and Mercantile Insurance Co v London, Liverpool and Globe Insurance Co
- North Star Shipping Ltd v Sphere Drake Insurance plc
- North Western Rly Co v M'Michael
- Northern Foods plc v Focal Foods Ltd
- Notcutt v Universal Equipment Co (London) Ltd
- Nugent v Gifford
- Ocean Coal Co Ltd v Powell Duffryn Steam Coal Co Ltd
- Ocean Tramp Tankers Corpn v V/O Sovfracht, The Eugenia
- O'Donovan v Rogers
- Office of Fair Trading v Lloyds TSB Bank plc
- Office of Fair Trading v Lloyds TSB Bank plc
- Official Assignee of Estate of Cheak Soo Tuan v Khoo Saw
- Offord v Davies
- Okolo v Mortgages 4 Ltd
- Oksuzoglu v Kay
- Olivebank, Akt v Dansk Svovlsyre Fabrik
- Oliver v Davis
- Olsen v Corry and Gravesend Aviation Ltd
- O'Mahoney v Joliffe and Motor Insurers' Bureau
- Online Rentals Ltd v Box Media Ltd
- Open University v Triesman
- Orchidway Properties Ltd v Fairlight Commercial Ltd
- O'Reilly v Thompson
- Oriental Steam Navigation Co, ex p Briggs
- Orion Insurance Co plc v Sphere Drake Insurance plc
- Orion Investments (Pvt) Ltd v Ujanaa Investments (Pvt) Ltd
- Osborne v Bradley
- Osenton v Osenton
- Osmond v Woolley
- Otter v Church, Adams, Tatham & Co
- OTV Birwelco Ltd v Technical and General Guarantee Co Ltd
- Owen v Homan
- Oxford and Worcester Extension and Chester Junction Rly Co, Re, ex p Barber sub nom Re Barber and Oxford and Worcester Extension and Chester Junction Rly Co
- Oxford and Worcester Extension and Chester Junction Rly Co, Re, ex p Barber sub nom Re Barber and Oxford and Worcester Extension and Chester Junction Rly Co
- Oxford v Provand
- P v National Union of School Masters Union of Women Teachers
- Pacific Motor Auctions Pty Ltd v Motor Credits (Hire Finance) Ltd
- Pacific National Investments Ltd v City of Victoria
- Pacific Phosphate Co Ltd v Empire Transport Co Ltd
- Palace Shipping Co Ltd v Caine
- Palgrave Brown (UK) Ltd v Stinnes Logistics AG
- Palmer v East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust
- Palmer v Scott
- Pambakian v Brentford Nylons Ltd
- Panamanian Oriental SS Corp v Wright
- Panamena Europea Navigacion (Compania Ltda) v Frederick Leyland & Co Ltd (J Russell & Co)
- Pankhania v Hackney London Borough Council
- Papadimitriou v Henderson
- Papamichael v National Westminster Bank plc and Paprounis (Pt 20 defendant)
- Paragon Finance plc (formerly the National Home Loans Corpn plc) v Pender
- Parameter v Burrell
- Parker v Carter
- Parkes v Great Western Rly Co
- Parkette Apartments Ltd v Masternak
- Parr v Eliason
- Parry, Re, ex p Salaman
- Parsons v New Zealand Shipping Co
- Parton v Cole
- Partridge v Crittenden
- Paschall v Thurston
- Paterson v Norris
- Patterson v Becher
- Pausker v Pandia
- Peacock v Burt
- Pearce & High Ltd v Baxter
- Pearce v Brooks
- Pearson v London and Croydon Rly Co
- Pease v Gloahec, The Marie Joseph
- Pedley v Avon Insurance plc
- Peekay Intermark Ltd v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd
- Peekay Intermark Ltd v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd
- Peel v Peel
- Peerless Laundry and Cleaners Ltd v Neal
- Peffer v Rigg
- Pelepah Valley (Johore) Rubber Estates Ltd v Sungei Besi Mines Ltd
- Penelope, The
- Penwith District Council v VP Developments Ltd
- Pepper v South Eastern Rly Co
- Peppitt's Estate, Re
- Percival v Frampton
- Percy v Board of National Mission of the Church of Scotland
- Percy v Clements
- Peregrine Systems Ltd v Steria Ltd
- Peregrine Systems Ltd v Steria Ltd
- Peregrine Systems Ltd v Steria Ltd
- Perkins v Shone
- Persse v Persse
- Persse v Persse
- Peter Lind & Co Ltd v Constable Hart & Co Ltd sub nom Constable Hart & Co Ltd v Peter Lind & Co Ltd
- Peter v Shipway
- Petromec Inc v Petroleo Brasiliero SA
- Petroships Pte Ltd of Singapore v Petec Trading and Investment Corp of Vietnam
- Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd
- Phelps v Hillingdon London BC
- Phillipps v Associated Newspapers Ltd
- Phillipps v Bateman
- Phillips Products Ltd v Hyland
- Phillips v Canadon Ltd
- Phillips v Phillips
- Phipps v New Claridge's Hotel Ltd
- Phones 4u Ltd v Phone4u.co.uk Internet Ltd
- Photo Production Ltd v Securicor Transport Ltd
- Phyllis Trading Ltd v 86 Lordship Road Ltd
- Pickfords Ltd v Celestica Ltd
- Pilcher v Rawlins
- Pilkington UK Ltd v CGU Insurance plc
- Pioneer Shipping Ltd v BTP Tioxide Ltd sub nom BTP Tioxide Ltd v Pioneer Shipping Ltd and Armada Marine SA, The Nema
- Pitt v PHH Asset Management Ltd
- Pitt v PHH Asset Management Ltd
- Planck (Con) Ltd v Kolynos Inc
- Plaskett's Estate, Re
- Playford v United Kingdom Telegraph Co
- Pole's Trust, Re, ex p Hulme
- Pomfret (Earl) v Lord Windsor
- Popat v Shonchhatra
- Pope, Re, ex p Dicksee
- Porter v Clinton
- Portland (Duke of) v Lady Topham
- Portsmouth v Alldays Franchising Ltd
- Pott v Todhunter
- Potter v Sanders
- Potts v Surr
- Powell v Pleydell
- Power v Walker
- Powers v Fowler
- Powers v Fowler
- Powers v Fowler
- Powers v Fowler
- Pratt v South Eastern Rly Co
- Precision Dippings Ltd v Precision Dippings Marketing Ltd
- Premier Briquette Co v Gray
- Prestige Properties Ltd v Scottish Provident Institution
- Preston v Wolverhampton Healthcare NHS Trust; Fletcher v Midland Bank plc
- Pretty Pictures Sarl v Quixote Films Ltd
- Price Bros (Somerford) Ltd v J Kelly Homes (Stoke-on-Trent) Ltd
- Price v Hong Kong Tea Co
- Price v Jenkins
- Price v Lea
- Prifti v Musini Sociedad Anonima De Seguros Y Reaseguros
- Prifti v Musini Sociedad Anonima De Seguros Y Reaseguros
- Prinicipal Investments Ltd v Trevett
- Pritchard v Mantaray Partners Ltd
- Prodger v Langham
- Produce Brokers Co v Weis & Co
- Prosser v Edmonds
- PT Garuda Indonesia Ltd v Grellman
- Public Works Comrs v Angus & Co, Dalton v Angus & Co
- Pulvertoft v Pulvertoft
- Pumfrey, Re, ex p Hillman
- Qasim v Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust
- QR Sciences Ltd v BTG International Ltd
- Quiggin v Duff
- R (a minor), Re sub nom Re A (a minor) (adoption contract)
- R (on the action of Lidl (UK) GmbH) v Swale BC (Aldi Stores Ltd intervening)
- R (on the application of DFS Furniture Co plc) v Customs and Excise Comrs
- R (on the application of Maughan) v Leicester City Council
- R (on the application of Steele) v Birmingham City Council
- R (on the application of Steele) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions sub nom R (on the application of Steele) v Birmingham City Council
- R v Adaway
- R v Arundel Inhabitants
- R v Barry
- R v Clarke
- R v Colucci
- R v Crown Court at Bodmin, ex p Young
- R v Great Wigston, Leicester, Inhabitants
- R v John
- R v K
- R v Kensington and Chelsea Royal London BC, ex p Lawrie Plantation Services Ltd
- R v Kensington and Chelsea Royal London Borough Council, ex p Lawrie Plantation Services Ltd
- R v Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council, ex p Maguire
- R v Lara
- R v Lord
- R v Mountsorrel Inhabitants
- R v Murray
- R v Paddington and St Marylebone Rent Tribunal, ex p Bell London and Provincial Properties Ltd
- R v Powys County Council, ex p Smith
- R v Prior
- R v Rotherfield Greys Inhabitants
- R v Sevenoaks District Council, ex p Terry
- R v St James', Westminster
- R v St James', Westminster
- Rainbow Spring, The
- Raingold v Bromley
- Raja v Van Hoogstraten
- Ramsey v Hartley
- Rank Xerox Ltd v Lane (Inspector of Taxes)
- Ranson v Platt
- Rayner v Davies
- RC Pillar & Sons v Edwards
- Re Severn, ex p Tennyson sub nom Severn, Re, ex p Colvill
- Read v Edmed
- Redman v Rymer
- Redmond v Dainton
- Reed Executive plc v Reed Business Information Ltd
- Reed v O'Brien
- Reed, Re, ex p Cox
- Rees Hough Ltd v Redland Reinforced Plastics Ltd
- Rees v Newbery and Institute of Cancer Research
- Reeves v Huffman
- Reffell v King
- Reid v Batte
- Reilly v R
- Rendall v Combined Insurance Company of America
- Rennie v Mills
- Rennie v Morris
- Representative Body of the Church in Wales v Newton
- Republic of Kazakhstan v Istil Group Inc
- Republic of Kazakhstan v Istil Group Inc
- Reuss v Picksley
- Reynolds v Atherton
- Reynolds v Boston Deep Sea Fishing and Ice Co Ltd
- Reynolds v Ivemey
- Rhoden-Burke v Lambeth London Borough Council
- Rhyl UDC v Rhyl Amusements Ltd
- Richards (Michael) Properties Ltd v Corpn of Wardens of St Saviour's Parish, Southwark
- Richards v Delbridge
- Richards v Whitham
- Richardson v North Eastern Rly Co sub nom North Eastern Rly Co v Richardson and Sisson
- Richmond Ltd v DHL International (NZ) Ltd
- Rickards v Forestal Land, Timber and Railways Co Ltd; Robertson v Middows Ltd; Kann v W W Howard Brothers & Co Ltd
- Ridge Nominees Ltd v IRC
- Ridge Nominees Ltd v IRC
- Ridler, Re, Ridler v Ridler
- Ridley v Ridley
- Right d Jefferys v Bucknell
- Riley v Troll
- Rimalt v Cartwright
- Riniker v University College London
- Riyad Bank v Ahli United Bank (UK) plc
- Roberto v Bumb
- Roberts v Hughes
- Roberts v Williams
- Robertson v Amazon Tug and Lighterage Co
- Robertson v Marquis of Londonderry
- Robinson v Briggs
- Robson v Godfrey
- Rockcliffe v Pearce
- Rockcliffe v Pearce
- Rodger v Comptoir d'Escompte de Paris
- Roe d Hamerton v Mitton
- Rolls v Pearce
- Ronson International Ltd v Patrick
- Rosher v Williams
- Ross v Close
- Rothschild v Hennings
- Routledge v Grant
- Row v Dawson
- Royal Bank of Canada v Cooperative Centrale Raiffeisen-Boorenleenbank
- Royal Bank of Canada v Coperative Centrale Raiffeisen-Boorenleenbank BA
- Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Wilson
- Royal London Mutual Insurance Society Ltd v Barrett
- Rudkin v Dolman
- Ruiz Bernldez, Criminal proceedings against: C-129/94
- Rummens v Robins
- Rutter v Palmer
- Ryder v Wombwell
- Sabey (Clifford) (Contractors) Ltd v Long
- Sabo SA v United Arab Shipping Co
- Safe Gard Europe Ltd v Manttan
- Sainsbury's Supermarkets Ltd v Olympia Homes Ltd
- Salmon Harvester Properties Ltd v Metropolitan Police Authority
- SAM Business Systems Ltd v Hedley & Co
- Sanderson v Collins
- Santa F Land Co Ltd v Forestal Land, Timber and Rly Co Ltd
- Sargant (WJ) & Sons v Eric Paterson & Co
- Sarkis v Watfa
- Saunders v Graves
- Savid Developments Ltd v Gibbs
- Scammell v Dicker
- Scammell v Dicker
- Scammell v Dicker
- Scanlan's New Neon Ltd v Tooheys Ltd
- Scarborough v Cosgrove
- Scheibler, Re, ex p Holthausen
- Schenkers International Deutschland GmbH v Overland Shoes Ltd, Schenkers Ltd v Overland Shoes Ltd
- Schering Ltd v Stockholms Enskilda Bank Aktiebolag
- Schostall v Johnson
- Schuldenfrei v Hilton (Inspector of Taxes)
- Schuldenfrei v Hilton (Inspector of Taxes)
- Scot v Bell
- Scott Paper Co v Drayton Paper Works Ltd
- Scott v Allnutt
- Scott v Lifford
- Scott v Scott
- Scott v Spashett
- Scott, Re
- Scottish & Newcastle plc v GD Construction (St Albans) Ltd
- Scottish & Newcastle plc v GD Construction (St Albans) Ltd
- Scottish Navigation Co Ltd v W A Souter & Co
- Scottish Power Generation Ltd v British Energy Generation (UK) Ltd
- Scottish Special Housing Association v Wimpey Construction UK Ltd
- Sea Success Maritime Inc v African Maritime Carriers Ltd
- Seabrook v Mervyn
- Seale v Lowndes
- Seaman, Re, ex p Furness Finance Co Ltd
- Searle v Laverick
- Searle v Law
- Seath v Moore
- Sebba, Re, Lloyds Bank Ltd v Hutson
- Seddon v Binions (Zurich Insurance Co Ltd, third party); Stork v Same
- Selby v Bowie
- Select Commodities Ltd v Valdo SA, The Florida
- Seligman Bros v Brown Shipley & Co
- Seng Djit Hin v Nagurdas Purshotumdas & Co
- Sergeson v Sealey
- Settlement Corpn v Hochschild
- Sharp (G F) & Co Ltd v McMillan
- Sharp (or Chisholm) v Wardrope
- Sharp v Fourseasons Healthcare Ltd
- Shaw & Co v Symmons & Sons
- Shaw v Sequence (UK) Ltd
- Shea and Foubert v Halifax Insurance Co
- Shears v Goddard sub nom Sills, Re, Shears v Goddard
- Sheffield Canal Co v Sheffield and Rotherham Rly Co
- Shell International Petroleum Co Ltd v Gibbs, The Salem
- Shelley, Re, ex p Stewart
- Shepherd (FC) & Co Ltd v Jerrom
- Sherrington v Berwin Leighton Paisner (a firm)
- Shillito v Theed
- Shimizu Europe Ltd v Automajor Ltd
- Shimmell v Clarke
- Shipton Anderson & Co and Harrison Bros & Co, Re sub nom Shipton Anderson & Co v Harrison Bros & Co
- Shogun Finance Ltd v Hudson
- SHV Gas Supply and Trading SAS v Naftomar Shipping & Trading Co Ltd Inc
- Sibery v Connelly
- Sidaways v Todd
- Siddiqui v James & Charles Dodd
- Simo Securities Trust Ltd, Re
- Simpson v Yeend
- Sindall (William) plc v Cambridgeshire County Council
- Sirius International Insurance Corp (Publ) v FAI General Insurance Co Ltd
- Sisu Capital Fund Ltd v Tucker
- Six Continents Hotels Inc v Event Hotels GmbH
- Skanska Rasleigh Weatherfoil v Somerfield Stores Ltd
- Skinner v M'Douall
- Skinner v M'Douall
- Skipwith v Great Western Rly Co
- Skylight Maritime SA v Ascot Underwriting
- Slade v Metrodent Ltd
- Slater v Lewisham London Borough Council
- Slobodinsky, Re, ex p Moore
- Smartle v Williams sub nom Newport's Case
- Smeaton v St Andrews Magistrates
- Smith Coney and Barrett v Becker Gray & Co
- Smith v Artsana SPA
- Smith v DPP
- Smith v Eric S Bush
- Smith v Eric S Bush (a firm), Harris v Wyre Forest District Council
- Smith v Eric S Bush (a firm), Harris v Wyre Forest District Council
- Smith v Hughes
- Smith v Lucas
- Smith v Mansi
- Smith v Moore
- Smith v Pickering
- Smith v Smith
- Smith, Knight & Co, Re, Battie's Case
- Smith, Re, ex p Smith
- Smyth (Ross T) & Co Ltd (Liverpool) v WN Lindsay Ltd (Leith)
- Snowstar Shipping Co Ltd v Graig Shipping plc
- Sociedade Portuguesa de Navios Tanques Ltda v Hvalfangerselskapet Polaris A/S
- Society of Lloyd's v Bowman
- Society of Lloyd's v Laws
- Socit Franco Tunisienne d'Armement v Sidermar SpA, The Massalia
- Solicitors' and General Life Assurance Society v Lamb
- Sorby v Gordon
- South East Windscreens Ltd v Jamshidi
- South Eastern Rly v National Telephone Co Ltd
- South Essex Gas-Light and Coke Co, Re, Hulett's Case
- Spaight v Cowne
- Spalding v Ruding
- Spencer v Harding
- Sphere Drake Insurance Ltd v Euro International Underwriting Ltd
- Spicer v Hayward
- Spurling (J) Ltd v Bradshaw
- Squib v Wyn
- St John Tugboat Co Ltd v Irving Refinery Ltd
- St Mary Magdalen, Oxford (President, etc) v A-G
- St Marylebone Property Co Ltd v Payne
- St Paul Travelers Insurance Co Ltd v Okporuah
- Stackemann v Paton
- Stallard v Great Western Rly Co sub nom Stanner v Great Western Rly Co
- Stamp Duties Comr v Bone
- Standard Bank London Ltd v Canara Bank
- Standard Chartered Bank v Banque Marocaine D Commerce Exterieur
- Stanley v Dowdeswell
- Stannifer Developments Ltd v Glasgow Development Agency (No 2)
- Stansbie v Troman
- Stanton v Hall
- Stapilton v Stapilton
- Startup v Macdonald
- Stead v Bligh
- Stead v Nelson
- Stearn v Twitchell
- Steel v Brown and Parry
- Stegmann v O'Connor
- Stent Foundation Ltd v Tarmac Construction (Contracts) Ltd
- Stent Foundations Ltd v Carillion Construction (Contracts) Ltd (formerly Tarmac Construction (Contracts) Ltd)
- Stent Foundations Ltd v M J Gleeson Group plc
- Stephen v Costor
- Stephens v Olive
- Stephens v Trueman
- Stephenson, Re
- Stevenson & Sons v Maule & Son
- Stevenson v Nationwide Building Society
- Stewart v Perth and Kinross Council
- Stewart v Reavell's Garage
- Stewart, Re, ex p Pottinger
- Stikeman v Dawson
- Stiles v A-G
- Stirling v Maitland
- Stocken v Stocken
- Stoddart v Union Trust Ltd
- Stoneleigh Finance Ltd v Phillips
- Storer v Manchester City Council
- Storey v Fulham Steel Works Co
- Story v Lord Windsor
- Stourton v Burrell
- Stradling v Higgins
- Strand v Corlett
- Street v Coombes
- Stretch v United Kingdom (Application 44277/98)
- Strive Shipping Corp v Hellenic Mutual War Risks Association (Bermuda) Ltd, The Grecia Express
- Strode v Blackburne
- Strong v Foster
- Sturmey's Trustee v Sturmey
- Suffield v Brown
- Summers v Congreve Horner & Co (Independent Insurance Co Ltd, third party)
- Sun Life Assurance Co of Canada v Pearson (Inspector of Taxes)
- Sunlight Mercantile Pte v Ever Lucky Shipping Co Ltd
- Sutcliffe v Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council
- Sutton v Mishcon de Reya
- Sutton v Temple
- Swainland Builders Ltd v Freehold Properties Ltd
- Swann v Earl of Falmouth
- Sweetman v Nathan
- Swift v Kelly
- Swift v Macbean
- Sykes v Taylor-Rose
- Symance v Tattam
- Symes, Re, ex p Poole
- Symmons v Want
- T (a minor) v Surrey County Council sub nom Harrison v Surrey County Council
- T&N Ltd (in administration) v Royal & Sun Alliance plc (Curzon Insurance Ltd, Pt 20 defendant)
- Tamplin (F A) Steamship Co v Anglo-Mexican Petroleum Products Co
- Tan Chin Seng v Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd (No 2)
- Tanner v Scovell
- Tappoo Holdings Ltd v Stuchbery
- Tarner v Walker
- Tatem Ltd v Gamboa
- Tatlock v Harris
- Tayler v Waters
- Taylor & Co v Landauer & Co
- Taylor d Atkyns v Horde
- Taylor v Blakelock
- Taylor v Burgess
- Taylor v Caldwell
- Taylor v Laird
- Taylor v Laird
- TBA Industrial Products Ltd v Morland
- TBL Realisations plc (in administration) v Awada
- Teasdale v Braithwaite
- Tektrol Ltd (Formerly Atto Power Controls Ltd) v International Insurance Co of Hanover Ltd
- Tektrol Ltd v International Insurance Co of Hanover Ltd
- Tennants (Lancashire) Ltd v CS Wilson & Co Ltd
- Tera Construction Ltd v Lam
- Tesco Stores Ltd v Costain Construction Ltd and other applications
- Tesco Stores Ltd v Pook
- Tetley, Re, ex p Jeffrey
- TFW Printers Ltd v Interserve Project Services Ltd
- Thatcher v England
- Thomas v Day
- Thomas v Dering
- Thomas v GT Pryce (Farms) Ltd
- Thompson v T Lohan (Plant Hire) Ltd (JW Hurdiss Ltd, third party)
- Thompson v Webster
- Thomson v Christie Manson & Woods Ltd
- Thomson v Christie Manson & Woods Ltd
- Thomson v The Royal Bank of Scotland plc
- Thorn v Public Works Comrs
- Thornborow v Whitacre
- Thornbury v Bevill
- Thornett and Fehr and Yuills Ltd, Re
- Thornton v Kempster
- Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking Ltd
- Thorold v Martell Press Ltd
- Thundercrest Ltd, Re
- Thurstan Hoskin & Partners v Jewill Hill & Bennett
- Tilling v Balmain
- Time Group Ltd v Computer 2000 Distribution Ltd (IBM United Kingdom Ltd, Part 20 defendant)
- Timson v Ramsbottom
- Tinn v Hoffmann & Co
- Tiverton Estates Ltd v Wearwell Ltd
- Todd v Adam
- Todd, Re
- Todd, Re, ex p Wood
- Toepfer v Schwarze
- Tokyo Leisure Development Co Ltd v Witan Hall Ltd
- Tolley v Morris
- Tomkins v Savory
- Tomkins v Tomkins
- Tonicstar Ltd (operating as Lloyd's Syndicate 1861) v American Home Assurance Co; Commercial Union Corporate Member Ltd v American Home Assurance Co
- Tonkin v UK Insurance Ltd
- Tonkins v Ennis
- Toomey (of Syndicate 2021) v Banco Vitalicio de Espana SA de Seguros y Reaseguros
- Toomey (of Syndicate 2021) v Banco Vitalicio de Espana SA de Seguros y Reaseguros
- Topham v Duke of Portland
- Topham v Duke of Portland
- Toronto Carton Co v Manchester McGregor Ltd
- Tourville v Naish
- Tower Hamlets London Borough v Ayinde
- Townend v Toker
- Townshend (Lord) v Windham
- Tracomin SA v Anton C Nielsen A/S, Langelands Korn Kobenshavn A/S, Sydysk Korn OG Foderstof Kompagni, Short, Beaton and Roscoe
- Tradax Export SA v Andr & Cie SA
- Tradax International SA v Goldschmidt SA
- Trade and Transport Incorporated v Iino Kaiun Kaisha, The Angelia
- Transport and Crane Hire (Pvt) Ltd v Hubert Davies & Co (Pvt) Ltd
- Travers (Joseph) & Sons Ltd v Cooper
- Treherne v Amateur Boxing Association of England Ltd
- Trent and Humber Co, Re, ex p Cambrian Steam Packet Co
- Treuhand v George
- Trevanian v Mosse
- Trident Fashions plc, Re; Anderson v Kroll Ltd
- Trollope (George) & Sons v Martyn Bros
- Trollope and Colls Ltd and Holland and Hannen and Cubitts Ltd (t/a Nuclear Civil Constructors (a firm)) v Atomic Power Constructions Ltd
- Troughton v Troughton
- Trustees of Morden College v Mayrick
- Trustees of National Deposit Friendly Society v Beatties of London Ltd
- Trustees of Stokes Pension Fund v Western Power Distribution (South West) plc
- Trustees of WASPS Football Club v Lambert Smith Hampton Group Ltd sub nom Montlake (as Trustees of WASPS Football Club v Lambert Smith Hampton Group Ltd)
- Tsakiroglou & Co Ltd v Noblee Thorl GmbH
- Tuck v Baker
- Tunstall v Boothby
- Turner Smith Investments Ltd v Philex plc
- Turner v Diaper
- Turner v News Group Newspapers Ltd
- Turner v Thomas
- Tussaud v Tussaud
- Twentsche Overseas Trading Co Ltd v Uganda Sugar Factory Ltd
- Two Ellens, The
- Tyrer v Smart (Inspector of Taxes)
- Ubsdell v Paterson
- UCB Corporate Services Ltd v Thomason
- UCB Corporate Services Ltd v Thomason
- Unger v Preston Corpn
- Union Bank of Jamaica Ltd v Yap
- Union Bank of London v Lenanton
- Union Bank of Scotland v National Bank of Scotland
- United Fresh Meat Co Ltd v Charterhouse Cold Storage Ltd
- Universal Cargo Carriers Corpn v Citati
- Universal Corpn v Five Ways Properties Ltd
- Universal Provident Life Association, Re, ex p Daniell's Case (No 2)
- Universal Studios International BV v Flextech Rights Ltd
- University Court of the University of Edinburgh v Eagle Star Insurance Co Ltd
- University of Huddersfield Higher Education Corpn v Revenue and Customs Comrs: C-223/03
- University of Keele v Price Waterhouse (a firm)
- University of Liverpool v Humber and Birch
- Uttley v Uttley
- Vacwell Engineering Co Ltd v BDH Chemicals Ltd
- van Dijk v Wilkinson t/a HFF Construction
- Van Toll v South Eastern Rly Co
- Vane v Vane
- Vartoukian v Daejan Properties Ltd
- Vaughan v Jones
- Vaughan v Moffat
- Veba Oil Supply & Trading GmbH v Petrotrade Inc
- Vedatech Corpn v Crystal Decisions
- Vee Networks Ltd v Econet Wireless International Ltd
- Veithardt and Hall Ltd v Rylands Bros Ltd
- Venning, Re
- Vertue v Jewell
- Victoria Laundry (Windsor) Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd
- Vineall v Veness
- Vogan & Co v Oulton
- Voss, Re, ex p Manners
- W, Re, W v M
- Wait v Baker
- Wait v Baker
- Walford v Miles
- Walker Residential Ltd v Davis
- Walker Residential Ltd v Davis
- Walker v British Guarantee Association
- Walker v Burrows
- Wallwyn v Lee
- Walrond v Walrond
- Walter and Sullivan Ltd v J Murphy & Sons Ltd
- Walter v Everard
- Walton (Grain and Shipping) Ltd v British Italian Trading Co Ltd
- Walton Harvey Ltd v Walker and Homfrays Ltd
- Walton v Everington
- Wandsworth London Borough Council v Attwell
- Wandsworth London Borough Council v The Co-Operative Bank plc
- Warburton v Co-operative Wholesale Society Ltd
- Ward v Byrne
- Ward v Fairhead
- Ward v Fry
- Warden v Jones
- Warden v Warden
- Warren v Truprint Ltd
- Warwick Ltd v GPS (Great Britain) Ltd
- Watford Electronics Ltd v Sanderson CFL Ltd
- Watford Electronics Ltd v Sanderson CFL Ltd
- Watkins v Birch
- Watkins v Maule
- Watkins v Rymill
- Watkins v Steevens
- Watkins v Vince
- Watson v All Saints, Poplar, Vestry
- Watson v Davies
- Watson v Lucas
- Watson v Pearson
- Watson v Russell
- Watts v Ainsworth
- Watts v Hyde
- Watts v Morrow
- Webb v Lugar
- Webb, Re
- Webster v Ahadiwand
- Wedgwood Coal and Iron Co, Re, Anderson's Case
- Weissfisch v Julius
- Wellington City Council v Body Corporate 51702 (Wellington)
- West Bromwich Albion Football Club Ltd v El-Safty
- West Bromwich Albion Football Club Ltd v El-Safty
- West Peckham (Vicar and Churchwardens) v Geary, Dalison Intervening
- West Riding of Yorkshire Rivers Board v Linthwaite UDC (No 2) sub nom Yorkshire (W R) Rivers Board v Linthwaite Urban Council (No 2)
- West Sussex Constabulary's Widows, Children and Benevolent (1930) Fund Trusts, Re, Barnett v Ketteringham
- Westbury v Clapp
- Western Manufacturing (Reading) Ltd, Re
- Westerton, Re, Public Trustee v Gray
- Weston, Re, Davies v Tagart
- Wethered, Re, ex p Salaman
- Whitaker v Dunn
- Whitbread v Smith
- White and Carter Ltd v Carbis Bay Garage Ltd
- White v Humphrey
- White v John Warrick & Co Ltd
- White v Thornborough
- White, Re, ex p Caldecott
- Whitehall Court Ltd v Ettlinger
- Whitfield v Fausset
- Whittaker v Howe
- Wigan Coal and Iron Co Ltd v IRC
- Wigan v English and Scottish Law Life Assurance Association
- Wilby v Elgee
- Wilding v Russell
- Wilkinson v Schneider
- Wilkinson, Re, Neale v Newell
- Will v IRC
- Willan v Willan
- Willats v Busby
- Willey v Parratt
- Williams and Parry's Contract, Re
- Williams v Byrnes
- Williams v Carwardine
- Williams v Devon County Council
- Williams v Jones
- Williams v Lloyd
- Williams v Mercer
- Williams v Roffey Bros & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd
- Williams v Travel Promotions Ltd (t/a Voyages Jules Verne)
- Williams v Travel Promotions Ltd (t/a Voyages Jules Verne)
- Williams v Watsons Luxury Coaches Ltd
- Williams v Williams
- Williams v Williams
- Williams v Williams
- Williamson v Codrington
- Willis v Baggs and Salt
- Willoughby v Willoughby
- Wilmot v Coventry Corpn
- Wilson & Co v Tennants (Lancashire) Ltd
- Wilson (Paal) & Co A/S v Partenreederei Hannah Blumenthal, The Hannah Blumenthal
- Wilson v Balfour
- Wilson v Northampton and Banbury Junction Rly Co
- Wilson v Powis
- Wilson v Truelove
- Wimbledon Construction Co 2000 Ltd v Vago
- Windle (a bankrupt), Re, ex p Trustee of the Bankrupt v Windle
- Winn v Bull
- WISE Underwriting Agency Ltd v Grupo Nacional Provincial SA
- Witter (Thomas) Ltd v TBP Industries Ltd
- Wolmershausen v O'Connor
- Wontner v Shairp
- Wood v Fenwick
- Wood v Scarth
- Wood v Scarth
- Woodfield Steam Shipping Co Ltd v JL Thompson & Sons Ltd
- Woodford v Whiteley
- Woodruffe v Daniel
- Woodyatt v Gresley
- Woolmer v Delmer Price Ltd
- Worcester College Oxford v Oxford Canal Navigation
- Worldwide Corpn Ltd v GPT Ltd
- WPP Holdings Italy SRL v Benatti
- Wren (Jonathan) & Co Ltd v Microdec plc
- Wright v Bigg
- Wright v Bigg
- Wright v Melville
- Wright v Snowe
- Wright v Wright
- Wycombe Borough Electric Light and Power Co Ltd v Chipping Wycombe Corpn
- Wynn-Jones v Bickley
- X Ltd v Y Ltd
- Yates Building Co Ltd v RJ Pulleyn & Sons (York) Ltd
- Yeates v Groves
- Yeoman Credit Ltd v Apps
- York Corpn v Henry Leetham & Sons Ltd
- Yorkshire Water Services Ltd v Taylor Woodrow Construction Northern Ltd
- Yorkshire Water Services Ltd v Taylor Woodrow Construction Northern Ltd
- Young and Marten Ltd v McManus Childs Ltd
- Young v Hoffman Manufacturing Co Ltd
- Young v Peirce
- Zinc Corpn Ltd v Hirsch
- Zockoll Group Ltd v Mercury Communications Ltd















