- Home
- Order your essay!
- Price quote
- Guarantees
- Meet the team
- About our service
- About law teacher
- FAQs
- Scam warning
- Step by step
- Law journal
Law Case File: Contract Law
Welcome to the largest contract law database on the Internet!
You’re here because you’re studying contract law, so you probably need help with a contract law essay.
Why not use our custom law essay service? We give you the exact answer to your contract law essay question.
Send us your essay or problem question by clicking here, and we’ll send you a fresh, original answer written by an expert law researcher.
Would you like a 2:1 standard answer to your contract law essay?
- We will write you a 2:1 standard law essay to your exact question
- All our work is fully original and backed by a £5,000 no plagiarism guarantee
- The Time and Manchester University have reported on the great quality of our work (links)
Your answer will be 2:1 or 1st class standard (you choose) and written by a top law expert. Many of our writers have also completed the LPC or BVC and currently work in private practice. Many deal with contacts and commercial law on a daily basis, because it is all they do. They have access to some of the best law libraries and research facilities in the world. Better still they are just a click of a button away here and are waiting for your order.
Our 2:1 law essays improve your marks by an average of 11%
Our tests show a student with one of our essays get on average 11% higher marks than one without. Our help will drive your success through the roof, so order today by clicking here. See our home page or FAQs for more details or call our friendly customer service team and discuss your requirements on 01623 499 057.
Useful Law Resources:
Contract Law Study Area | Free Contract Law Essays
0-9 | a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | i | j | k | l | m | n | o | p | q | r | s | t | u | v | w | x | y | z
- A and M, Re sub nom LA and BFM, Re, ex p Official Receiver v Debtors
- Abbey National plc v Stringer
- Abbott (a bankrupt), Re, ex p Trustee of the Property of the Bankrupt v Abbott
- Abraham v Bullock
- Abu v MGN Ltd
- Ace Insurance SA-NV v Zurich Insurance Co
- Ackerman v Protim Services Ltd
- Acraman, Re
- Ad Valorem Factors Ltd v Ricketts sub nom Ricketts v Ad Valorem Factors Ltd
- Adams v Claxton
- Adams v Lindsell
- Adams v Richardson and Starling Ltd
- Adams v Wheatley
- Adams v Wheatley
- Adamson v Hammond sub nom Adamson v Adamson and Hammond
- Advanced Industrial Technology Corpn Ltd v Bond Street Jewellers Ltd
- Advent Capital plc v GN Ellinas Imports-Exports Ltd
- A-G v Duplessis
- A-G v Hall
- A-G v Lady Downing
- A-G v Parsons
- A-G v Strutt
- A-G v Wilkins
- Agar v Biden
- Agricultural Mortgage Corpn v IRC
- Agriculturists' Cattle Insurance Co, Re, Stewart's Case
- Ahmed v Addy
- AIC Ltd v ITS Testing Services (UK) Ltd
- Ailsa Craig Fishing Co Ltd v Malvern Fishing Co Ltd and Securicor (Scotland) Ltd
- Akinsanya v United Bank for Africa Ltd
- Alan (W J) & Co Ltd v El Nasr Export and Import Co
- Albright & Wilson UK Ltd v Biachem Ltd
- Albright & Wilson UK Ltd v Biachem Ltd
- Albright & Wilson UK Ltd v Biachem Ltd
- Aldborough (Earl) v Trye
- Alderslade v Hendon Laundry Ltd
- Aldwell v Bundey
- Alexander v Railway Executive
- Alexander v Rolls Royce Motor Cars Ltd
- Alghussein Establishment v Eton College
- Alicia Hosiery Ltd v Brown, Shipley & Co Ltd
- Allen v Cameron
- Allen v Quebec Warehouse Co
- Allhusen v Brooking
- Allison v Brighton and Hove City Council
- Al-Naimi (trading as Buildmaster Construction Services) v Islamic Press Services Inc
- Alpenstow Ltd v Regalian Properties plc
- Alwyn Treherne v The Amateur Boxing Association of England Ltd
- Amec Engineering v Norwich Union
- Amiri Flight Authority v BAE Systems plc
- Amiri Flight Authority v BAE Systems plc
- Anandh v Barnet Primary Health Care Trust
- Andr & Cie SA v Ets Michel Blanc & Fils
- Andrews v Garrett
- Andromeda Marine SA v O W Bunker & Trading A/S
- Anglo-Northern Trading Co Ltd v Emlyn Jones and Williams
- Anglo-Russian Merchant Traders Ltd and John Batt & Co (London) Ltd, Re
- Angus & Co v Dalton and Comrs of Her Majesty's Work and Public Buildings
- Annandale, The
- Anns v Merton London Borough Council
- Anon
- Anon (undated)
- Ant Jurgens Margarinefabrieken v Louis Dreyfus & Co
- Appleby v Johnson sub nom Johnson v Appleby
- Arden v Watkins
- Aris v Orchard
- Ark Therapeutics plc v True North Capital Ltd
- Ark Therapeutics plc v True North Capital Ltd
- Armstrong v Armstrong
- Armstrong's Trusts, Re
- Arnell v Bean
- Aroso v Coutts & Co
- Arrow Transfer Co Ltd v Royal Bank of Canada, Bank of Montreal and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
- Ashton v Blackshaw
- Ashurst v Royal Bank of Australia (Official Manager)
- Ashworth v Bristol and North Somerset Rly Co
- ASM Shipping Ltd of India v TTMI Ltd of England
- Assi v Leeds Metropolitan University
- Associated Dairies Ltd v Securicor (Mobile) Ltd
- Associated Portland Cement Manufacturers (1900) Ltd v Houlder Bros & Co Ltd
- Associated Portland Cement Manufacturers (1900) Ltd v William Cory & Son Ltd
- AT Bright & Sons (a firm) v PHR (Rayne) (a firm)
- Atari Corpn (UK) Ltd v Electronics Boutique Stores (UK) Ltd
- Atkinson v Bell
- Atkinson v Smith
- Atlee v Backhouse
- Austerberry v Oldham Corpn
- Austin Baldwin & Co v W Turner & Co Ltd
- Avimex SA v Dewulf & Cie
- Aziz v Embassy of Republic of Yemen
- B (minors) (termination of contract: paramount consideration), Re
- Bacardi-Martini Beverages Ltd v Thomas Hardy Packaging Ltd
- Badische Anilin und Soda Fabrik v Hickson
- Baglan Hall Colliery Co, Re
- Baillie v Kell
- Baines v Woodfall
- Baines v Woodfall
- Baker v IRC
- Baker v Liscoe
- Balfour Beatty Construction Ltd v Kelston Sparkes Contractors Ltd
- Ball v Bridges
- Ballerd v Sitwell
- Balmoral Group Ltd v Borealis (UK) Ltd
- Bamford v Cordiant Communications Group plc
- Banck v Bromley & Son
- Banerji v Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Trust
- Bangladesh Chemical Industries Corpn v Henry Stephens Shipping Co Ltd and Tex-Dilan Shipping Co Ltd, The SLS Everest
- Bank Line Ltd v Arthur Capel & Co
- Bank of Boston Connecticut v European Grain and Shipping Ltd, The Dominique
- Bank of India v Rai Bahadur Singh
- Bankers Insurance Co Ltd v South
- Banque Belge pour L'Etranger v Hambrouck
- Banque Financire de la Cit SA (formerly Banque Keyser Ullmann SA) v Westgate Insurance Co Ltd (formerly Hodge General and Mercantile Co Ltd)
- Barclays Bank Ltd v Taylor
- Barder v Caluori
- Barnes & Elliott Ltd v Taylor Woodrow Holdings Ltd
- Barnet London Borough Council v Barnet Football Club Holdings Ltd
- Barnet Primary Care Trust v Rabindra-Anandh
- Baron v Husband sub nom Barron v Husband
- Barrett v Irvine
- Barrett v Ring
- Barrett v Ring
- Barrett v Universal Island Records
- Barrow and Geddes, Re, ex p Moult
- Barrow v Coles
- Barry Urquart Associates (a firm) v East Surrey Health Authority
- Bartlett v Greene
- Barton v Official Receiver
- Bashir v Adam
- Bassett v Nosworthy
- Basten v Butter
- Bateman v Watts (t/a Watts Brothers Central Garage)
- Baune v Zduc Ltd
- Bayspoole v Collins
- BBC v Hearn
- BBC v Johns (Inspector of Taxes)
- Beadel v Pitt
- Beale v Mouls sub nom Beale v Moule
- Beard v Beard
- Beardall v Vinamul Ltd
- Beardall v Vinamul Ltd
- Beaulande v Directeur des Services Fiscaux de Nantes: C-208/91
- Beaumont, Re, Martin v Midland Bank Trust Co Ltd
- Beazley v Horizon Offshore Contractors Inc
- Beck v Scholz
- Becker v Lavender Ltd
- Beebee & Co v Turner's Successors
- Beesly v Hallwood Estates Ltd
- Belcher v Bellamy
- Belfour v Mace (Inspector of Taxes)
- Bell Electric Ltd v Aweco Appliance Systems GmbH & Co KG
- Bell v The Spirit Group Ltd
- Beller (Marcel) Ltd v Hayden
- Benecke v Chadwicke
- Benecke v Chadwicke
- Bennett, Walden & Co v Wood
- Bennetts of Sheffield Ltd v Customs and Excise Comrs
- Benwell v Inns
- Bergheim v Great Eastern Rly Co
- Berkeley Administration Inc v McClelland
- Bernstein v Pamson Motors (Golders Green) Ltd
- Beta Computers (Europe) Ltd v Adobe Systems (Europe) Ltd
- Bevan v Bevan
- Bevan v London Portland Cement Co Ltd
- Beves & Co Ltd v Farkas
- BG Linton Construction Ltd v Canadian National Rly Co
- Bhatia v Wincanton Logistics
- BHP Billiton Petroleum Ltd v Dalmine SpA
- BHP Petroleum Ltd v British Steel plc
- BHP Petroleum Ltd v British Steel plc and Dalmine SpA
- Bielecki v Suffolk Coastal County Council
- Bigg v Boyd Gibbins Ltd
- Bigg v Strong
- Bigg v Strong
- Biggar v Havering London Borough Council
- Bigos v Bousted
- Biotal Ltd v Dodson & Harrell Ltd
- Birch v University of Liverpool
- Bircham & Co, Nominees (2) Ltd v Worrell Holdings Ltd
- Birkenhead, Lancashire and Cheshire Junction Rly Co v Pilcher
- Birmingham Mosque Trust Ltd v Alavi
- Bishop and Baxter Ltd v Anglo-Eastern Trading and Industrial Co Ltd
- Bishop v Plumley
- Blackburn Bobbin Co Ltd v TW Allen & Sons Ltd
- Blackburn Borough Transport Ltd v Bailey
- Blackburn v Maconde (UK) Ltd
- Blanchet v Foster
- Blane Steamships Ltd v Minister of Transport
- Bliss v South East Thames Regional Health Authority
- Blois v Betts
- Bluck v Siddaway
- BNP Paribas v Deloitte and Touche LLP
- BOC Group plc v Centeon LLC
- Bodmer's Patent, Re
- Boehm v Sterling
- Bolton's Lease, Re sub nom Boulton v IRC
- Booth v Wellby
- Borneo Insurance Sdn Bhd v Milan
- Bosanquet v Anderson
- Bottin (International) Investments Ltd v Venson Group plc
- Bottin (International) Investments Ltd v Venson Group plc
- Boucas v Cooke
- Bourne v Dodson
- Bouzourou v Ottoman Bank
- Boys v Ayerst
- Boyson v Coles
- Boyson v Gibson
- BP Exploration Co (Libya) Ltd v Hunt
- BP Exploration Co (Libya) Ltd v Hunt (No 2)
- BP International Ltd v Energy Infrastructure Group Ltd
- Brabant & Co v King
- Bracken v Billinghurst
- Bracken v Billinghurst
- Brall, Re, ex p Norton
- Brama Brown & Root and Marshall Aerospace Ltd v Aramark Ltd
- Bramhill v Edwards
- Branca v Cobarro
- Brandlyn v Ord
- Brandts (William) Sons & Co v Dunlop Rubber Co Ltd
- Bray v Mayne
- Bremer Handelsgesellschaft mbH v C Mackprang Junior
- Bremer Handelsgesellschaft mbH v Continental Grain Co New York
- Brennan v Bolt Burdon (a firm)
- Brennan v Bolt Burdon (a firm)
- Brennan v LRT Pension Fund Trustee Co Ltd
- Brice & Sons v Christiani and Nielsen
- Briggs v Law Society; Awoloye Kio v Law Society
- Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Stahl und Stahlwarenhandel GmbH
- Brislen v Primary Fluid Power Ltd
- Bristol and West of England Bank v Midland Rly Co
- British Car Auctions Ltd v Wright
- British Crane Hire Corpn Ltd v Ipswich Plant Hire Ltd
- British Electrical and Associated Industries (Cardiff) Ltd v Patley Pressings Ltd
- British Farmers' Pure Linseed Cake Co, Re
- British Movietonews Ltd v London and District Cinemas Ltd
- British Rail Pension Trustee Co Ltd v Cardshops Ltd
- British Road Services Ltd v Arthur V Crutchley & Co Ltd (Factory Guards Ltd, Third Parties)
- Brockbank v Dilworth
- Bromley London Borough Council v Smith
- Bromley v Smith
- Brotherton v Aseguradora Colseguros SA
- Brown v Harper
- Brown v Jones
- Browne v Butter
- Browning v Brachers
- Browning v Brachers (a firm)
- BTR plc v IRC
- Buckle v Mitchell
- Buckler v Angil sub nom Buck v Angel
- Buckman v Levi
- Bulley v Bulley
- Bullock v Ardern
- Bullock v Sadlier
- Bulteel and Colmore v Parker and Bulteel's Trustee
- Bulwer v Astley
- Bunge Corpn v Tradax SA
- Bunker-Smith v Freeza Meats Ltd
- Bunn v BBC
- Bunn v Guy
- Burghart v Angerstein sub nom Burkhardt v Angerstein
- Burghart v Hall
- Burkinshaw v Nicolls
- Burn v Miller
- Burrow v Scammell
- Butler Machine Tool Co Ltd v Ex-Cell-O Corpn (England) Ltd
- Butterfield v Heath
- Buxton v Baughan
- Cable and Wireless plc v Valentine
- Caddick v Terry
- Cadogan v Escada AG
- Cailiff v Danvers
- Caine v Palace Steam Shipping Co
- Cala Homes (South) Ltd v Alfred McAlpine Homes East Ltd
- Callaghan v Callaghan
- Calvan Consolidated Oil and Gas Co Ltd v Manning
- Cameron v Gibson sub nom Cameron v MacIntyre's Executor
- Campbell v Frisbee
- Campbell v London and Brighton Rly Co
- Canelhas Comercio Importacao e Exportacao Ltd v Wooldridge (as representative of Lloyd's Property Consortium Syndicate 9091)
- Canelhas Comercio Importacao e Exportacao Ltd v Wooldridge (as representative of Lloyd's Property Consortium Syndicate 9091)
- Cantiare San Rocco SA v Clyde Shipbuilding Co
- Cantiere Navale Triestina v Handelsvertretung der Russ Soz Fd Soviet Republik Naphtha Export
- Capes v Hutton
- Capital Bank Cashflow Finance Ltd v Southall
- Capital Bank plc v Stickland
- Capital Quality Homes Ltd v Colwyn Construction Ltd
- Carapanayoti & Co Ltd v ET Green Ltd
- Cardigan (Earl) v Armitage
- Cardwell v Martin
- Carlton Holdings Ltd, Re, Worster v Priam Investments Ltd
- Carlyle Finance Ltd v Pallas Industrial Finance (Burgess (t/a John Burgess Car Sales), third party) (Wise (t/a HRG Car Sales), fourth party
- Carmichael v Bank of Montreal
- Carras v London and Scottish Assurance Corpn Ltd
- Carsen (W) & Co Ltd v Eastern Canada Stevedoring Co
- Carstairs v Rolleston
- Carter v Carter
- Carter v Hind
- Carter v Hyde
- Carter v Hyde
- Carteret (Lord) v Paschal
- Casson v University of Aston in Birmingham
- Castrique v Behrens
- Cave v Cave
- Cave v Mackenzie
- Cawston's Conveyance and School Sites Act 1841, Re, Hassard-Short v Cawston
- CEL Group Ltd v Nedlloyd Lines UK Ltd
- Centrovincial Estates plc v Merchant Investors Assurance Co Ltd
- Chaffer v Southern Birmingham Community Health NHS Trust
- Chaffer v Southern Birmingham Community Health NHS Trust
- Chaggar v Chaggar
- Chakki v United Yeast Co Ltd
- Challenger One Ltd v Asociacion Nacional de Arrastreros Congeladores
- Challenger v Watkins
- Chambers v Howell
- Champion Investments Ltd v Ahmed
- Chanter v Dickinson
- Chapel v Hickes
- Chapel Wood Estates Ltd v City Greenwich Lewisham Rail Link plc
- Chapelton v Barry UDC
- Chaplin v Leslie Frewin (Publishers) Ltd
- Chapman v Great Western Rly Co
- Charles v NTL Group Ltd
- Chartered Bank of India Australia and China v Henderson
- Charters, Re, ex p Trustee
- Chattock & Co v Bellamy & Co
- Cheesman v Exall
- Cheshire v Bailey
- Chiandetti, Re, ex p Trustee
- Chillingworth v Esche
- China Steamship Co, Re, ex p Mackenzie
- Chinnock v Marchioness of Ely
- Chowne v Baylis
- Christie, Owen and Davies Ltd v Stockton
- Churchill d Thomas v Day
- Churchman v Harvey
- Chwee Kin Keong v Digilandmall.com Pte Ltd
- Chwee Kin Keong v Digilandmall.com Pte Ltd
- CIBC Mellon Trust Co v Stolzenberg
- CIBC Mellon Trust Company v Stolzenberg
- Claridge v Hoare
- Clark v Clark
- Clark v Clark
- Clark v Cutland
- Clark v Hope
- Clarke, Re, Coombe v Carter
- Clay v Crofts
- Clay v Crofts
- Clay v Yates
- Clayton v Earl of Wilton
- Clements v London and North Western Rly Co
- Clerk v Crow sub nom Clerke v Comer sub nom Colmer v Clark
- Clifton v Palumbo
- Clinicare Ltd (formerly known as Strasbourgeoise UK Private Health Insurance Services Ltd) v Orchard Homes and Developments Ltd
- Clinton v Seymour
- Clive v Beaumont
- Clive v Beaumont
- Coaten v PBS Corpn
- Coates, Re, ex p Scott
- Cobban v Downe
- Cockerill, Re, Mackaness v Percival
- Codent Ltd v Lyson Ltd
- Coggs v Bernard
- Cohen v Nessdale Ltd
- Cole v Cottingham
- Cole v Eley
- Cole, Re, Trustee in Bankruptcy v Public Trustee
- Coleman v Riches
- Colin Buchanan & Partners Ltd v Marcus de Berg
- Collet v De Gols and Ward
- Collins v Archer
- Collins v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry
- Collins, Re
- Collinson v Pattrick
- Collis v Emett
- Colombo Apothecaries' Co Ltd v Peiris
- Coloniale Import-Export v Loumidis Sons
- Colston v Gardner sub nom Coulston v Gardiner
- Colyear v Countess of Mulgrave
- Colyer v Finch
- Comet Shipping Agencies (Nigeria) Ltd v Panalpina World Transport (Nigeria) Ltd
- Commission for the New Towns v Cooper (Great Britain) Ltd
- Community Living Concepts Ltd v Aitken
- Compania de Navegacion Pohing SA v Sea Tanker Shipping (Pte) Ltd, The Buena Trader
- Company, a (No 008699 of 1985), Re
- Comptoir Commercial Anversois and Power Son & Co, Re
- Comptoir d'Achat et de Vente du Boerenbond Belge S/A v Luis de Ridder Ltda, The Julia
- Computer & Systems Engineering plc v John Lelliott (Ilford) Ltd
- Condor v Barron Knights Ltd
- Confetti Records (a firm) v Warner Music UK Ltd (trading as East West Records)
- Congimex Companhia Geral de Comercio Importadora e Exportadora SARL v Tradax Export SA
- Congimex Companhia Geral de Comercio Importadora e Exportadora SARL v Tradax Export SA
- Congimex SARL (Lisbon) v Continental Grain Export Corporation (New York)
- Conlon v Simms
- Conrad Ritblatt & Co v Jil Sander AG
- Consolidated Tea and Lands Co v Oliver's Wharf
- Constantine (Joseph) Steamship Line Ltd v Imperial Smelting Corpn Ltd, The Kingswood
- Contract Corpn, Re, Baker's Case
- Contract Corpn, Re, Gooch's Case
- Cood v Cood
- Cook v Financial Insurance Co Ltd
- Cooke v Oxley
- Cooper v Pepys
- Cooper v Southgate
- Co-operative Group (CWS) Ltd v International Computers Ltd
- Cope v Albinson
- Cope v Albinson
- Copis v Middleton
- Coppard v Customs and Excise Comrs
- Corbett v South Eastern and Chatham Railways Managing Committee
- Cordey v Cardiff Pure Ice Co
- Cordwell v Mackrill
- Cormick v Trapaud
- Corn v Matthews
- Cornwall v Hawkins
- Cotterell v Homer
- Cotton (Executors) v Catlyn
- Cottrell (on behalf of Lloyd's Syndicate 1173) v General Cologne Re UK Ltd
- Coultwas v Swan
- Coultwas v Swan
- Council of Engineering Institutions v Maddison
- Countess of Warwick Steamship Co v Le Nickel SA
- Coup Co v Maddick
- Court Line Ltd v Dant and Russel Inc
- Court Line Ltd v R, The Lavington Court
- Cousins v Paddon
- Covington Marine Corp v Xiamen Shipbuilding Industry Co Ltd
- Cowie v Remfrey
- Cowley v Watts
- Cowley v Watts
- Cowx v Foster sub nom Cox v Forster
- Cox v Paxton
- Cox v Philips Industries Ltd
- Coxe v Harden
- Crabtree v Bramble
- Craignish, Re, Craignish v Hewitt
- Credit Agricole Indosuez v Unicof Ltd
- Cricklewood Property and Investment Trust Ltd v Leighton's Investment Trust Ltd
- Criminal Clothing Ltd v Aytan's Manufacturing (UK) Ltd
- Crook's Settlement, Re, Re Glasier's Settlement, Crook v Preston
- Crosbie v Munroe
- Crossley v Maycock
- Crosthwaite v Gardner
- Crouch v King's Healthcare NHS Trust; Murry v Blackburn Hyndburn & Ribble Valley Health Care NHS Trust sub nom Crouch v King's Healthcare NHS Trust; Murry v Blackburn Hyndburn
- Croudace Construction Ltd v Cawoods Concrete Products Ltd
- Crowther v Shannon Motor Co (a firm)
- CRS Computers Ltd v MacKenzie
- Crystal Decisions (UK) Ltd v Vedatech Corpn
- Cubbidge v Boatwright
- Cuming v Brown
- Cumming and West, Re, ex p Neilson and Craig v Trustee sub nom Re Cumming, ex p Neilson and Craig v Adamson (Trustee)
- Cumming v Prescott
- Cundy v Lindsay sub nom Lindsay & Co v Cundy
- Cunningham v Collett and Farmer
- Curling v Matthey
- Curran v Newpark Cinemas Ltd
- Currie v Misa
- Currie v Nind
- Curtis Moffat Ltd v Wheeler
- Curtis v Chemical Cleaning and Dyeing Co Ltd
- Customs and Excise Commissioners v RK Collections Ltd
- Customs and Excise Comrs v Tilling Management Services Ltd
- Cuthbert v Haley
- Cutler v North London Rly Co
- Cypher Holdings Ltd v Bertram
- Cypress Disposal Ltd v Inland Kenworth Sales (Nanaimo) Ltd
- Dadourian Group International Inc v Azuri Ltd
- Daewoo Heavy Industries Ltd v Klipriver Shipping Ltd, The Kapitan Petko Voivoda
- Daewoo Heavy Industries Ltd v Klipriver Shipping Ltd, The Kapitan Petko Voivoda
- Daking v Whimper
- Dale Steamship Co Ltd v Northern Steamship Co Ltd
- Dalkia Utilities Services plc v Celtech International Ltd
- Dalton v Hayter
- Daly v General Steam Navigation Co Ltd, The Dragon
- Danepoint Ltd v Allied Underwriting Insurance Ltd
- Daniel v Bowles
- Daniels v Davison
- Daniels v Thompson
- Danks v Farley
- Danlardy v Southwark Race Equalities Council
- Dansey v Richardson
- Daraydan Holdings Ltd v Solland International Ltd
- Dare v Bognor UDC
- Darlington Futures Ltd v Delco Australia Pty Ltd
- Daubeny v Cockburn
- Davenport v Bishopp
- Davenport v Bishopp
- David and Adlard, Re, ex p Whinney sub nom Re David and Johnson, ex p Whinney
- Davies (A) & Co (Shopfitters) Ltd v William Old Ltd
- Davies v Collins
- Davies v Davies
- Davies v Huguenin
- Davies v R Bolton & Co
- Daviller v Herring
- Davis (S) & Co Ltd, Re
- Davis Contractors Ltd v Fareham UDC
- Davis v Reynolds
- Davison v Robertson
- Dawson v Kearton
- Day Morris Associates v Voyce
- Day v Stuart
- Dayman v Anfield Services Ltd
- De Francesco v Barnum
- De Francesco v Barnum sub nom Francesco v Barnum
- De Hoghton v Money sub nom Hoghton v Money
- De Leeuw, Re, Jakens v Central Advance and Discount Corpn Ltd
- De Manneville v Crompton
- De Vile v Arnold
- De Witte v Addison
- Debtor, a (No 2389 of 1989), Re sub nom Re a Debtor (No 2389 of 1989), ex p Travel and General Insurance Co plc v Debtor
- Debtor, a (No 32 of 1993), Re
- Debtor, a (No 544/SD/98), Re
- Debtor, A, Re, ex p Official Receiver, Trustee of the Property of Debtor v Morrison
- Debtors (Nos 4449 and 4450 of 1998), Re
- Deepak Fertilisers and Petrochemicals Corpn v Davy McKee (London) Ltd
- Deerhurst, Re, ex p Seaton
- Deg-Deutsche Investitions und Entwicklungsgesellschaft GmbH v Koshy
- Dennis (a bankrupt), Re
- Dennis Commercial Properties Ltd and Westmount Life Insurance Co, Re
- Denny Mott and Dickson Ltd v James B Fraser & Co Ltd
- Densham (a bankrupt), Re, ex p trustee of bankrupt v Densham
- Dent (a bankrupt), Re, Trustee of the property of bankrupt v Dent
- Denton v Stewart
- Derby & Co Ltd v Weldon (Nos 3 and 4) sub nom Derby & Co Ltd v Weldon (No 2)
- Deutsche Morgan Grenfell Group plc v IRC and A-G
- Devereux v Barclay
- DHL Air Ltd v Wells
- Diamond Developments Ltd v Crown Assets Disposal Corpn
- Diamond v Graham
- Dibbs v Goren
- Dickinson (Inspector of Taxes) v Abel
- Dickinson (Inspector of Taxes) v Abel
- Dickinson v Dodds
- Dickinson v Valpy
- Dickson v Swansea Vale Rly Co
- Dies v British and International Mining and Finance Corpn Ltd
- Dietz v Lennig Chemicals Ltd
- Dillingham v Harrison
- Direct Birmingham, Oxford, Reading and Brighton Rly Co, Re, Onions's Case
- Direct Birmingham, Oxford, Reading and Brighton Rly Co, Re, Onions's Case
- Dixon (Peter) & Sons Ltd v Henderson Craig & Co
- Doak v Bedford
- Doble, Re, ex p Doble
- Doe d Baverstock v Rolfe
- Doe d Bingham v Cartwright
- Doe d Marchant v Errington
- Doe d Otley v Manning
- Doe d Parry v James
- Doe d Preece v Howells
- Doe v Martyr
- Doe v Skegg
- Doheny v New India Assurance Co Ltd
- Doherty v Allman (or Allen)
- Dominion Building Corpn Ltd v R
- Dominion of Canada General Insurance Co v Ardekany
- Dormer v Fortescue
- Dornoch Ltd v Mauritius Union Assurance Co Ltd
- Dornoch Ltd v Mauritius Union Assurance Co Ltd
- Dover Harbour Board v Owners of the Star Maria
- Dover v Mills
- Dowse, Re, Dowse v Glass
- Doyle v White City Stadium Ltd
- Drant v Brown
- Drayton v Dale
- Drosier v Brereton
- D'Silva v Lister House Development Ltd
- DSV Silo-und Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH v Sennar (Owners), The Sennar
- Dublin and Wicklow Rly Co v Black
- Duffin v Deloitte & Touche Wealth Management Ltd
- Dumford Trading AG v OAO Atlantrybflot
- Duncan Fox & Co v Schrempft and Bonke
- Dunlop v Higgins
- Dunlop v Higgins
- Dunn v Dunn
- Dunnachie v Kingston-Upon-Hull City Council
- Dunsany (Lord) v Shaw
- Duplessis v A-G
- Duru v Granada Retail Catering Ltd
- E Ivor Hughes Education Foundation v Leach
- Eagle Star Insurance Co Ltd v Games Video Co (GVC) SA
- Ease Faith Ltd v Leonis Marine Management Ltd
- East Barnet Valley UDC v Stallard
- Eastern Counties Junction and Southend Rly Co, Re, Mainwaring's Case
- Eastern Counties Junction and Southend Rly Co, Re, Mainwaring's Case
- Eastleigh Borough Council v Walsh
- Ebbw Vale Steel Iron and Coal Co v Macleod & Co
- Eccles v Bryant and Pollock
- Econet Wireless Ltd v Vee Networks Ltd
- Edgar v Blick
- Edgewater Developments Co (a firm) v Bailey
- Edmonds v Lawson
- Edwards v Dick
- Edwards v Newland & Co (E Burchett Ltd, third party)
- Edwards v Smiths Dock Ltd
- Edwards, Re, Macadam v Wright
- Egg Stores (Stamford Hill) Ltd v Leibovici
- EIC Services Ltd v Phipps
- Elliott Steam Tug Co Ltd v Charles Duncan & Sons Ltd
- Elliott v Crutchley
- Ellis v Horace Marshall & Son
- Embankment Place Hotels (Blackfriars) Ltd v Blackfriars Hotels Ltd
- Embiricos v Sydney Reid & Co
- Emilien Marie, The
- Emmerson v Ind Coope & Co
- Emmott v Riddel
- Empresa Exportadora de Azucar v Industria Azucarera Nacional SA, The Playa Larga and The Marble Islands
- English and Foreign Credit Co Ltd (Proprietors) v Arduin
- Enron (Thrace) Exploration and Product BV v Clapp
- Enron (Thrace) Exploration and Production BV v Clapp
- Enron (Thrace) Exploration and Production BV v Clapp
- Ensworth v Griffiths
- Entores Ltd v Miles Far East Corpn
- EQ Projects Ltd v Alavi (t/a Merc London)
- EQ Projects v Alavi
- ERC Frankona Reinsurance v American National Insurance Co
- Ernest v Vivian
- Etam Ltd v Forte
- Etty v Bridges
- Eugena Ltd v Gelande Corpn Ltd
- Euler Hermes UK plc v Apple Computer BV
- Euler Hermes UK plc v Apple Computers BV
- European Bank of Reconstruction & Development v Tahsin Tekoglu
- European Commission v Belgium: C-415/02
- European Commission v France: C-334/02
- Evans (J) & Son (Portsmouth) Ltd v Andrea Merzario Ltd
- Evans v Judkins
- Evans v Kymer
- Evans v Ware
- Everards v Society of Lloyd's
- Everenden v Vanacker
- Everest, Re, ex p Mowbray
- EWOS Ltd v Mainland
- Exchange Banking Co Ltd, Re, Ramwell's Case
- Excomm Ltd v Guan Guan Shipping (Pte) Ltd, The Golden Bear
- Express Newspapers v Telegraph Group Ltd
- Express Newspapers v Telegraph Group Ltd
- Express Newspapers v Telegraph Group Ltd
- Eyre, Re, ex p Eyre
- F & I Services Ltd v Customs and Excise Comrs; R v Customs and Excise Comrs, ex p F & I Services Ltd
- F (minors) (care proceedings: contact), Re
- Facta v Prew-Smith
- Factortame Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions
- Fagan v Harrison
- Fagan v Harrison
- Fairbrother v Gabb & Co
- Fairclough v Pavia
- Fairline Shipping Corpn v Adamson
- Falcke v Scottish Imperial Insurance Co
- Falconer v ASLEF and NUR
- Fallick v Barber
- Famatina Development Corpn Ltd v Bury
- Farina v Home
- Farley v Skinner
- Farley v Skinner
- Farnsworth v Garrard
- Farnworth Finance Facilities Ltd v Attryde
- Farquharson v Barstow
- Farr v Ward
- Feakins v Burstow
- Fellows v Wood
- Ferguson v Davies
- Fewings v Tisdal sub nom Flewings v Tisdal
- Fibrosa Spolka Akcyjna v Fairbairn Lawson Combe Barbour Ltd
- Figlia Maggiore, The
- Filby v Mortgage Express (No 2) Ltd
- Filobake Ltd v Rondo Ltd
- Financings Ltd v Stimson
- Finelvet AG v Vinava Shipping Co Ltd, The Chrysalis
- Finucane v Small
- First Gulf Bank v Wachovia Bank National Association
- First Touch Communications v EBST Ltd
- Fitch Lovell Ltd v IRC
- Flashback Ventures Ltd, Re
- Fleet Mobile Tyre Services Ltd v Stone
- Fleet Mobile Tyre Services Ltd v Stone
- Flightline Ltd v Edwards
- Flower v London and North Western Rly Co
- Flower v Sadler
- Flynn v Scougall
- Forbes v Git
- Ford v Stuart
- Formby v Barker
- Forster v Baker
- Forster v Baker
- Fortescue v Barnett
- Foster and Lister, Re
- Foster v Wheeler
- Four Seasons Healthcare Ltd (formerly Cotswold Spa Retirement Hotels Ltd) v Maughan
- Fowler v James
- Fowler v Lock
- Fowler v Lock
- Fox v Hanbury
- Frampton v Framtpon
- Francis v Cowcliffe Ltd
- Frank Wyatt & Son Ltd, Re
- Frankau (Ronald) Productions Ltd v Bell
- Fraser and Fraser v Morrison and Morrison
- Frazer v Bunn
- Freeman v Cooke
- Freeman v Cooke
- French Marine v Compagnie Napolitaine d'Eclairage et de Chauffage par le Gaz
- Frewen v Hamilton
- Frisby v BBC
- Frogley v Earl of Lovelace
- Fuji Finance Inc v Aetna Life Assurance Co Ltd
- Fuller v Cheveley sub nom Cheveley v Fuller
- Fuller v Cheveley sub nom Cheveley v Fuller
- Fuller v Happy Shopper Markets Ltd
- Fullerton v Martin
- Gabriel: C-96/00
- Gadd v Thompson
- Galaxy Energy International Ltd v Eurobunker SPA
- Gale v Williamson
- Gallagher v Gallagher
- Galton v Emuss
- Gamerco SA v ICM/Fair Warning (Agency) Ltd
- Gaon (Albert D) & Co v Socit Interprofessionelle des Oleagineux Fluides Alimentaires
- Gardner v Iredale
- Garratt v Saxby
- Garside v Trent and Mersey Navigation Proprietors
- Gaston v Courtney
- Gbangbola v Smith & Sherriff Ltd
- Gebr van Weelde Scheepvaartkantor BV v Compania Naviera Sea Orient SA, The Antclizo
- Gemma Ltd v Gimson
- General Palmer, The
- George Wimpey UK Ltd (formerly Wimpey Homes Holdings Ltd) v V I Components Ltd
- George Wimpey UK Ltd v VIC Construction Ltd
- George Wimpey UK Ltd v VIC Construction Ltd
- Gerraty v McGavin
- Gething v Kilner
- Ghafoor v Cliff
- Gibaud v Great Eastern Rly Co
- Gibbins v North Eastern Metropolitan Asylum District
- Gibbons v Standon
- Gibson v Hunter
- Gibson v Manchester City Council
- Gibson v Minet
- Gilbart v Dale
- Gilbert v Guignon
- Gilchrist, Watt and Sanderson Pty Ltd v York Products Pty Ltd sub nom York Products Pty Ltd v Gilchrist Watt and Sanderson Pty Ltd
- Gilham v Locke
- Gilkes v Leonino
- Gilkes v Leonino
- Gill (Stewart) Ltd v Horatio Myer & Co Ltd
- Gillespie v Fitzpatrick
- Gillett v Mawman
- GKN Westland Helicopters Ltd v Korean Air; Press Tech Controls Ltd v Korean Air
- Glahe International Expo AG v ACS Computer Pte Ltd
- Glencore International AG v Alpina Insurance Co Ltd
- Glencore International AG v Alpina Insurance Co Ltd
- Global Coal Ltd v ICAP Energy Ltd
- Globe Master Management Ltd v Boulus-Gad Ltd
- Gloyne v Richardson
- Glyn v Hertel
- GMAC Commercial Credit Development Ltd v Sandhu
- GMB v Amicus; Amicus v Beloit Walmsley Ltd
- Godwin v Francis
- Goff v Gauthier
- Golden, Re, ex p Norton
- Goldicutt v Townsend
- Goldsack v Shore
- Goldsbrough Mort & Co Ltd v Quinn
- Goodered v Armour
- Goodright d Humphreys v Moses
- Gordon & Co v Bank of England (Governor & Co)
- Gordon v East India Co
- Gordon v Woodford
- Goshawk Dedicated Ltd v ROP Inc
- Governments Stock and Other Securities Investment Co Ltd v Christopher
- Grafton v Armitage
- Graham v Drummond
- Graham v Entec Europe Ltd (t/a Exploration Associates)
- Graham v Johnson
- Grainger v Raybould
- Grant v Da Costa
- Granville Baird Capital Partners Ltd v Blackden
- Granville Oil and Chemicals Ltd v Davies Turner and Co Ltd
- Gravely v Barnard
- Gray (decd), Re; Allardyce v Roebuck
- Gray and Gillitt v Tiley (Inspector of Taxes)
- Great Australian Gold Mining Co, ex p Appleyard
- Great Future International Ltd v Sealand Housing Corp
- Great Future International Ltd v Sealand Housing Corpn
- Great Peace Shipping Ltd v Tsavliris Salvage (International) Ltd), The Great Peace
- Great Peace Shipping Ltd v Tsavliris Salvage (International) Ltd, The Great Peace
- Greatwood Property Management Ltd v Cheerent Ltd
- Greaves v Ashlin
- Green v Beach
- Green v Paterson
- Greene v Church Comrs for England
- Greenslade v Dare
- Greenslade v Dare
- Greenwood, Re, Priestley v Griffith
- Gregson v Ruck
- Grell-Taurel Ltd v The Caribbean Home Insurance Co Ltd
- Grey (Edward) & Co v Tolme and Runge
- Greythorn Ltd, Re
- Grierson, Oldham and Adams Ltd, Re
- Griffiths v St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council
- Griffiths v Young
- Grimoldby v Wells
- Groves & Sons v Webb and Kenward
- Gryf-Lowczowski v Hinchingbrooke Healthcare NHS Trust
- Guinness plc v IRC
- Gulbenkian's Settlement Trusts (No 2), Re, Stevens v Maun
- Gully v Bishop of Exeter sub nom Exeter (Bishop) v Gully
- Gunmakers Co v Fell
- Gurney v Behrend
- Gutter v Tait
- H T A Architects Ltd v Countryside Properties plc
- Habib Bank Ltd v Tufail
- Hadham RDC v Crallan
- Halbauer v Brighton Corpn
- Hale v Allnutt
- Hale v Saloon Omnibus Co
- Hales v Darell
- Halpern v Halpern
- Haly v Lane
- Hamilton v Allied Domecq plc
- Hamilton v Allied Domecq plc
- Hamilton v Vaughan-Sherrin Electrical Engineering Co
- Hammonds v Barrett
- Hanbury v Lovett
- Hance v Harding
- Handelsbanken ASA v Dandridge
- Hangkam Kwingtong Woo v Liu Lan Fong (alias Liu Ah Lan)
- Hanily v Minister of Local Government and Planning
- Hanley v Greening & Sykes (Builders Ltd)
- Hans Fuchs Versandschlachterei KG v European Commission: T-134/01
- Harbutt's Plasticine Ltd v Wayne Tank and Pump Co Ltd
- Harding v Harding
- Hare v Murphy Bros Ltd
- Hares v Stringer
- Harman v Richards
- Harmer v Cornelius
- Harmer v Steele
- Harmony Shipping Co SA v Davis, The Good Helmsman; Harmony Shipping Co SA v Saudi Europe Line Ltd
- Harper Verischerungs AG v Indemnity Maine Assurance Co Ltd; River Thames Insurance Co Ltd v Indemnity Marine Assurance Co Ltd
- Harris v Great Western Rly Co
- Harris v Nickerson
- Harris v Tubb
- Harris v Wyre Forest District Council
- Harrison v Battye
- Hart v A R Marshall & Sons (Bulwell) Ltd
- Hart v Minors
- Hart v Newman
- Hartog v Colin and Shields
- Harvey v Perry
- Harvey, The
- Hatch v Searles, Stanway's Case, Conway's Case
- Hawker v Wood
- Hawkins v Duch
- Hawley v Luminar Leisure plc
- Hayne v Burchell
- Hayworth v Barnes
- Hayworth v Barnes
- Head v Diggon
- Heap v Tonge
- Heath v Crealock
- Heath v Freeland
- Heathmill Ltd v British Telecommunications plc
- Hebden v Forsey & Son
- Hector v Lyons
- Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd
- Heffron v Imperial Parking Co
- Heger Rudi GmbH v Finanzamt Graz-Stadt: C-166/05
- Heilgers & Co v Cambrian Steam Navigation Co Ltd
- Henderson & Co v Williams
- Henderson (John M) & Co Ltd v Montague L Meyer Ltd
- Henderson v North Eastern Rly Co sub nom Anderson v North Eastern Rly Co
- Hennings v Rothschild
- Henry v BBC
- Henslow v Fawcett
- Heritage Insurance Services Ltd v Rotch Property Group Ltd
- Herne Bay Steam Boat Co v Hutton
- Heron International Ltd v Lord Grade and Associated Communications Corpn plc
- Hesketh Estates Ltd v Craddock (Inspector of Taxes)
- Hewison v Negus
- Hewitt (G & G B) v SA Namur-Assurances du Credit
- Heyman v Darwins Ltd
- Heyworth v Knight
- Hickman v Blake Lapthorn
- HIH Casualty and General Insurance Co Ltd v JLT Risk Solutions Ltd (formerly Lloyd Thompson Ltd)
- Hill v Bishop of Exeter
- Hill v General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corpn plc
- Hillingdon Estates Co v Stonefield Estates Ltd
- Hindes v Supersine Ltd
- Hingeston v Kelly
- Hiort v London and North Western Rly Co
- Hirji Mulji v Cheong Yue Steamship Co Ltd
- Hirsch v Zinc Corpn Ltd
- Hitchcock v Coker
- Hodgeson v Bussey
- Hoenig v Isaacs
- Hogan v Cambridgeshire County Council
- Hogg v Cramphorn Ltd
- Holdcroft v South Derbyshire District Council
- Holden v Hayn and Bacon
- Holder v Soulby
- Holdsworth v Dimsdale
- Holland v Eyre
- Holland, Re, Gregg v Holland
- Hollier v Rambler Motors (AMC) Ltd
- Hollins v J Davy Ltd
- Holmes v Blogg
- Holmes v Morris
- Holmes v Penney
- Holroyd v Marshall
- Holwell Securities Ltd v Hughes
- Homer v Ashford and Ainsworth
- Hong Guan & Co Ltd v R Jumabhoy & Sons Ltd
- Hong Kong and China Gas Co Ltd v Glen
- Hong Kong Fir Shipping Co Ltd v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd
- Hood v Aston
- Hooper and Ashby v Willis
- Hooper v Gumm
- Horlock, The
- Horne v Norwich Union Insurance Ltd
- Horsfall v Garnett
- Horsfall v Garnett
- Horton v Westminster Improvement Comrs
- Hotel Services Ltd v Hilton International Hotels (UK) Ltd
- Hotson v Howitt
- Hougie v Hewitt
- Houlditch v Wallace
- Houldsworth v Evans
- Howard v Fingall
- Howkins v Jackson
- Hudspeth v Yarnold
- Hudspeth v Yarnold
- Hughes v Lenny
- Hulton (E) & Co Ltd v Chadwick and Taylor Ltd
- Hultquist v Universal Pattern and Precision Engineering Co Ltd
- Hunt v Elmes
- Hunt v Fripp
- Hunt v Hunt
- Hunt v Luck
- Hunter Engineering Co Inc v Syncrude Canada Ltd
- Hurditch v Sheffield Health Authority
- Hurnandrai Fulchand v Pragdas Budhsen
- Hurst Stores and Interiors Ltd v ML Europe Property Ltd
- Hurst Stores and Interiors Ltd v ML Europe Property Ltd
- Hurst v Goddard
- Hussey v Jacob
- Hutchinson, Re, ex p Dickson
- Hutchison v Bowker
- Hutton v Brown
- Hutton v Parker
- Huyton SA v Distribuidora Internacional De Products Agricolas SA De CV
- Hyde v Wrench
- Hydra plc v Anastasi
- Hyman v Nye
- Icon Capital UK Ltd v Michael Gerson (Leasing) Ltd
- Imperial Land Co of Marseilles, Re, Harris' Case
- Imperial Land Co of Marseilles, Re, Townsend's Case
- Ind Coope & Co v Emmerson
- Indigo International Holdings Ltd v Owners and/or Demise Charterers of the vessel 'Brave Challenger'; Ronastone Ltd v Indigo International Holdings Ltd
- Infiniteland Ltd v Artisan Contracting Ltd
- Ingham v Emes
- Innholders' Co v Wainwright
- INS Realisations Ltd, Re, Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Jonkler
- INS Realisations Ltd, Re, Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Jonkler
- Intense Investments Ltd v Development Ventures Ltd
- Intercase UK Ltd v Time Computers Ltd
- Interlink Express Parcels Ltd v Night Trunkers Ltd
- International Correspondence Schools Ltd v Ayres
- InterserveFM Ltd v Omnisure Property Management Ltd
- Irani v Irani
- Irby v Irby (No 3)
- IRC v Brebner
- IRC v Fry
- IRC v Ufitec Group Ltd
- IRC v Willoughby
- Irvine v Hervey
- Irvine, Re
- Isherwood v Whitmore
- Islington London Borough Council v Uckac
- iSoft Group plc v Misys Holdings Ltd
- iSoft Group plc v Misys Holdings Ltd
- Ithell v Beane
- I-Way Ltd v World Online Telecom Ltd
- Jackson v Forster
- Jackson v North Wales Rly Co
- Jackson v Tollett
- Jacobs v East Sussex County Council
- Jager v Tolme and Runge and The London Produce Clearing House Ltd
- James v Bydder
- Jameson v Stein
- Jameson v Stein
- Jarvis v Swans Tours Ltd
- Jassi v Gallagher
- Jefferson v Paskell
- Jefferys v Smith
- Jelley v Iliffe
- Jennings and Chapman Ltd v Woodman Matthews & Co
- Jerrard v Saunders
- JH & S (Timber) Ltd v Quirk (or Quirke)
- JIS (1974) Ltd v MCE International Nominees Ltd
- John Lewis plc v Pearson-Burton
- John Mowlem Construction plc v Neil F Jones & Co (a firm)
- John v Price Waterhouse (t/a PricewaterhouseCoopers); Price Waterhouse (t/a PricewaterhouseCoopers) v Frere Cholmely (a firm)
- Johnson Gibbons (London) Ltd v Jilani
- Johnson v Barnes
- Johnson v Black, The Two Ellens
- Johnson v Collings
- Johnson v King
- Joinery Plus Ltd (in administration) v Laing Ltd
- Jolland v Stainbridge
- Jolliffe v Blumberg
- Jones v Consolidated Investment Assurance Co
- Jones v Croucher
- Jones v Jones
- Jones v Marsh
- Jones v Page
- Jones v Powles
- Jones v Vaughan
- Jones v Williams
- Jones, Re, ex p Jones
- Jordan Grand Prix Ltd v Vodafone Group plc
- Joseph Holt plc, Re; Winpar Holdings Ltd v Joseph Holt Group plc
- Joyce v Morrissey
- JP Morgan Chase Bank v Springwell Navigation Corpn
- JP Morgan Chase Bank v Springwell Navigation Corpn
- Kahn v University of Warwick
- Kamilla Hans-Peter Eckhoff KG v AC Oerssleff's EFTF A/B, The Kamilla
- Kapferer v Schlank & Schick GmbH: C-234/04
- Karak Rubber Co Ltd v Burden (No 2)
- Keasley, Re, ex p Pennell sub nom Kearsley, Re, ex p Pennell
- Keenan v Handley
- Keever (bankrupt), Re, ex p Trustee of Property of Bankrupt v Midland Bank Ltd
- Kekewich v Manning
- Kelson v Kelson
- Kelvin Homes Ltd v Ritchie Brothers (Public Works Contractors) Ltd
- Kempson v Boyle
- Kennedy v Green
- Kenyon Son and Craven Ltd v Baxter Hoare & Co Ltd
- Kenyon Son and Craven Ltd v Baxter Hoare & Co Ltd
- Keppel v Wheeler
- Kerr v Morris
- Kershaw v Alfred John Smith & Co Ltd
- Kewley v Stokes
- Keys v Harwood
- Keyse v Powell
- KH Enterprise v Pioneer Container, The Pioneer Container
- Khaled v Athanas Bros (Aden) Ltd
- Killick v Rendall
- Kimber v William Willett Ltd
- King v Milsom
- King v Sansom (otherwise King)
- King's Leasehold Estates, Re, ex p East London Rly Co
- Kingston-upon-Hull (Governor etc) v Petch
- Kingston-upon-Hull (Governor etc) v Petch
- Kingston-upon-Hull Dock Co v La Marche sub nom Hull Dock Co v La Marche
- Kirby v Trotter
- Kirk, ex p
- Kitson v Hardwick
- Klckner Holdings GmbH v Klckner Beteiligungs GmbH
- Kleinwort Benson Ltd v City of Glasgow Council
- Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Malaysia Mining Corpn Bhd
- Kleinwort Sons & Co v Ungarische Baumwolle Industrie Akt
- Knox v Gye
- Kollerich & Cie SA v State Trading Corpn of India
- Konigsberg (a bankrupt), Re, ex p Trustee v Konigsberg
- KPMG LLP v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd
- KR v Royal & Sun Alliance plc
- Krupp Handel GmbH v Intermare Transport GmbH, The Elbe Ore
- Kruse v Questier & Co Ltd
- Kulukundis v Norwich Union Fire Insurance Society
- Kundrath v Harry Kwatia & Gooding (a firm)
- Kursell v Timber Operators and Contractors
- Kyle Bay Ltd (t/a Astons Nightclub) v Underwriters subscribing under policy 019057/08/01
- Kyle Bay Ltd (t/a Astons Nightclub) v Underwriters subscribing under policy 019057/08/01
- Lafarge (Aggregates) Ltd v Newham London Borough Council
- Lake (K & S) City Freighters Pty Ltd v Gordon & Gotch Ltd
- Lake v Bayliss
- Lake v Goldsborough Ltd
- Lakeman v Mountstephen
- Lalji v Post Office Ltd
- Lamare v London and St Katherine Docks Co
- Lamarra v Capital Bank plc (Shields Automotive Ltd, Third Party)
- Lambert, ex p
- Lampson & Co v London and India Dock Joint Co
- Lancaster v Walsh
- Lara v General Apothecaries' Co
- Lara v General Apothecaries' Co
- Larrinaga & Co Ltd v Socit Franco-Amricaine des Phosphates de Mdulla, Paris
- Latimer Management Consultants Ltd v Ellingham Investments Ltd
- Lattimore v Mott
- Laurence, Re, ex p Laurence
- Law Debenture Trust Corp (Channel Islands) Ltd v Lexington Insurance Co
- Law Society v Sephton & Co
- Law Society v Sephton & Co (a firm)
- Law v Jones
- Lawrie v Bankes
- Laws v Society of Lloyd's
- LCC v Churchwardens of St Botolph, Bishopsgate
- Le Feuvre v Sullivan
- Le Mesurier v Glen International Ltd
- Leader v Moody
- Leah v Two Worlds Publishing Co Ltd
- Lease Management Services Ltd v Purnell Secretarial Services Ltd (Canon (South West) Ltd, third party)
- Leask v Scott Bros
- Lebeaupin v R Crispin & Co
- Leck v Maestaer
- Lee v Zagury
- Leeds and Thirsk Rly Co v Fearnley
- Leeds Banking Co, Re, Howard's Case
- Leeds Banking Co, Re, Mallorie's Case
- Leggat v Reed
- Leicester Circuits Ltd v Coates Brothers plc
- Leigh v Smith
- Leightons Investment Trust Ltd v Cricklewood Property and Investment Trust Ltd
- Leiston Gas Co v Leiston-cum-Sizewell UDC
- Lempriere v Pasley
- Lendon, Re, ex p Lane
- Leney v Taplin
- Leng (Sir W C) & Co Ltd v Andrews
- Leonardo Private Equity Fund Ltd v Loscalzo
- Leslie (R) Ltd v Reliable Advertising and Addressing Agency Ltd
- Leslie v Fitzpatrick
- L'Estrange v F Graucob Ltd
- Lethbridge v A-G
- Levenshulme UDC v Manchester Corpn
- Levison v Patent Steam Carpet Cleaning Co Ltd
- Levob Verzekeringen BV v Staatssecretaris van Financien: C-41/04
- Levy v Creighton
- Lewis v Nicholson
- Lewis v Nicholson
- Lewis v Pedrick
- Libra Bank plc v Financiera De La Republica SA
- Lickbarrow v Mason
- Lickbarrow v Mason
- Lidl UK GmbH v Hertford Foods Ltd
- Lilley v Barnsley
- Lilley v Doubleday
- Lilley v Hewitt
- Lim Kim Som v Sheriffa Taibah bte Abdul Rahman
- Lincoln National Life Insurance Co v Employers Reinsurance Corp
- Lincoln National Life Insurance Co v Sun Life Assurance Co of Canada
- Lincoln National Life Insurance Co v Sun Life Assurance Co of Canada
- Lindner Ceilings Floors and Partitions plc v How Engineering Services Ltd
- Lindsay v Cundy
- Lindsay v Cundy
- Lindsley v Woodfull
- Lipkin Gorman (a firm) v Karpnale Ltd
- Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale Ltd
- Lister v Hodgson
- Littman v Aspen Oil (Broking) Ltd
- Liverpool Grain Storage and Transit Co Ltd v Charlton and Bagshaw
- Livingstone v Evans
- Lloyd Royal Belge SA v Stathatos
- Lloyd v Cheetham
- Lloyd-Wolper v Moore (National Insurance Guarantee Corpn plc, Pt 20 claimant, Moore, Pt 20 defendant)
- Lockett v Norman-Wright
- Lockhart v Barnard
- L'Office National du Th et du Sucre v Philippine Sugar Trading (London) Ltd
- Lombard Finance Ltd v Brookplain Trading Ltd
- Lomi v Tucker
- London Joint Stock Bank v Macmillan and Arthur
- Longley (James) & Co Ltd (in receivership) v Forest Giles Ltd (in receivership)
- Lopes v Bird & Bird (a firm)
- Loughton Contracts plc v Dun & Bradstreet Ltd
- Lovell and Christmas v Beauchamp
- Lovelock v King
- Lowe v Waller
- Lowenthal, Re, ex p Lowenthal
- Lowndes v Anderson
- LPMG Ltd v Stapleford Commercials Ltd
- Lucas v Dorrien
- Lucas v James
- Lucas v James
- Lucas v Novofilieski
- Luders v Anstey
- LUK Leamington Ltd v Whitnash plc
- Lynton International Ltd v Noble
- Macadam (bankrupt), Re, ex p Guillaume v Trustee
- Macadam (No 2), Re, ex p Guillaume v Trustee
- Macartney-Filgate v Bishop & Sons Depositories Ltd
- Macdonald v Longbottom
- Macdonald, Re, ex p McCullum sub nom Macdonald, Re, ex p Trustee
- Macintosh v Haydon
- Mackenzie v Cox
- Mackintosh v Pogose sub nom Macintosh v Pogose
- Macklin v Dowsett
- Macklin v Dowsett
- Macrae v Goodman
- Macrae v Swindells (trading as West View Garage Co)
- Magee v Pennine Insurance Co Ltd
- Magnum Photo Supplies Ltd v Viko New Zealand Ltd
- Magnum Photo Supplies Ltd v Viko New Zealand Ltd
- Maguire and M'Clelland's Contract, Re
- Mahmoud v Lambeth London Borough Council
- Mairs (Inspector of Taxes) v Haughey
- Malekout v Allied Dunbar Assurance plc
- Malkins Nominees Ltd v Societe Financiere Mirelis SA
- Malpas v Ackland
- Malpass, Re, Lloyds Bank plc v Malpass
- Man Nutzfahrzeuge Aktiengesellschaft v Freightliner Ltd
- MAN Nuzfahrzeuge AG v Freightliner Ltd
- Management Corporation Strata Title No 473 v De Beers Jewellery Pte Ltd
- Manchester Diocesan Council for Education v Commercial and General Investments Ltd
- Manheath Ltd v HJ Banks & Co Ltd
- Mansell v Mansell
- Manson v Baillie
- Marcel v Metropolitan Police Comr
- Marchands Associates LLP v Thompson Partnership LLP
- Marchmont Investments Ltd v BFO SA
- Maredelanto Cia Naviera SA v Bergbau-Handel GmbH, The Mihalis Angelos
- Margareson v Saxton
- Margulead Ltd v Exide Technologies
- Maritime National Fish Ltd v Ocean Trawlers Ltd
- Markel International Insurance Co Ltd v La Republica Compania Argentina de Seguros Generales SA
- Marks v Board
- Marlborough (Duke) v A-G
- Marler v Tommas
- Marlow v Orgill
- Marlwood Commercial Inc v Kozeny; Omega Group Holdings Ltd v Kozeny
- Marlwood Commercial Inc v Kozeny; Omega Group Holdings Ltd v Kozeny
- Mars Pension Trustees Ltd v County Properties and Developments Ltd
- Marsh and Earl Granville, Re
- Marsh, ex p
- Marshall Specialist Vehicles Ltd v Osborne
- Marshall v Harland and Wolff Ltd
- Marshall v Marshall
- Martin v Had-Fab Ltd
- Martin v LCC
- Martin v Leaney
- Martin v N Negin Ltd
- Martin's Case
- Mason v Lickbarrow
- Master v Miller
- Matalan Discount Club (Cash & Carry) Ltd v Tokenspire Properties (North Western) Ltd
- Matlock Old Bath Hydropathic Co, Re, Manchester Finance Corpn Case
- Matthey v Curling
- Maving v Todd
- May v Hiskey
- Mayer v British Broadcasting Corpn
- Mayne v Silvermere Cleaners Ltd
- Mayner v Payne
- McAlpine (Sir Robert) Ltd v Alfred McAlpine plc
- McArdle, Re
- McBlain v Cross
- McCann v Switzerland Insurance Australia Ltd
- McC's Estate, Re sub nom CA v CC
- McCulloch Co of Canada v Lloyd G Howe Industrial Real Estate Ltd
- McCulloch v Bank of Novia Scotia Channel Islands Ltd; Clemmetsen v Bank of Novia Scotia Channel Islands Ltd
- McEvoy v Belfast Banking Co Ltd
- McFeetridge v Stewarts and Lloyds Ltd
- McGinley v Burke
- McGreevy v Russell
- McHugh v Kerr
- MCI Worldcom International Inc v Primus Telecommunications Inc
- MCI Worldcom International Inc v Primus Telecommunications Inc
- McManus v Bark
- McMaster University v Wilchar Construction Ltd
- McMeekin v Long
- McPherson v Temiskaming Lumber Co Ltd
- Mead v Lord Orrery
- Meakin v Morris
- Mecca Ltd v Shepherd
- Medcalfe and Ives v Medcalfe and Johnson sub nom Metcalf v Ives
- Meikle v Maufe
- Melville v IRC
- Melville v Mirror of Life Co
- Mendelssohn v Normand Ltd
- Menetone v Athawes
- Mercator Trustees Ltd v Upstream Downstream Simulation Services Inc
- Meriel v Wymondsold
- Merryweather v Jones
- Mertens v Home Freeholds Co
- Metcalfe (or Metcalf) v Clough
- Metcalfe, ex p
- Metropolitan Water Board v Dick Kerr & Co
- Metzler v Gounod
- Meynell v Surtees
- Meynell v Surtees
- Meynell v Surtees
- Meynell v Surtees
- MGN Ltd v Cainer
- Midco Holdings v Piper
- Middleton v Brown
- Middleton v Wiggin
- Midland Industries Ltd v Gonvarri Industrial SA
- Midland Linen Services Ltd, Re, Chaudhry v Yap
- Midland Mainline Ltd v Eagle Star Insurance Co Ltd
- Midland Mainline Ltd v National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers
- Milbank v Milbank
- Millar (Andrew) & Co Ltd v Taylor & Co Ltd
- Miller, Gibb & Co Ltd, Re
- Mills v Barber
- Minister of State for the Army v Dalziel
- Ministry of Defence v Country and Metropolitan Homes (Rissington) Ltd
- Minor, ex p
- Mirehouse v Barrymore
- Mirehouse v Barrymore
- Misa v Currie
- Mitchell (George) (Chesterhall) Ltd v Finney Lock Seeds Ltd
- Mitchell v Lancashire and Yorkshire Rly Co
- Mitford v Mitford
- M'Iver v Richardson
- Monaghan v Close Thornton Solicitors (a firm)
- Monkton v Shepherdson
- Montefiore v Menday Motor Components Co
- Moore v Woolsey
- Moorsom v Kymer
- Morelle Ltd v Wakeling
- Morgan Est (Scotland) Ltd v Hanson Concrete Products Ltd
- Morgan Est (Scotland) Ltd v Hanson Concrete Products Ltd
- Morgan v Manser
- Morin v Bonhams & Brooks Ltd
- Morley v United Friendly Insurance plc
- Morris v CW Martin & Sons Ltd
- Morris, Re, Mayhew v Halton
- Morrison Fleet & Co Ltd v Fletcher (otherwise Futcher)
- Morrow & Benjamin v Whittington
- Mosley v Hide
- Mostcash plc v Fluor Ltd
- Mostcash plc v Fluor Ltd
- Motis Exports Ltd v Dampskibsselskabet AF 1912 Aktieselskab and Aktieselskabet Dampskibsselskabet Svendborg
- Motours Ltd v Eurobell (West Kent) Ltd
- Motz v Moreau
- Mount (D F) Ltd v Jay and Jay (Provisions) Co Ltd
- Mountstephen v Lakeman
- Mountview Court Properties Ltd v Devlin
- Mowbray v Merryweather
- Mowlem (John) Construction plc v Secretary of State for Defence
- Mozley v Tinkler sub nom Morley v Tinkler
- Mugesera v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
- Mulchrone v Swiss Life (UK) Ltd
- Mulford v Manpower UK Ltd
- Mulliner v Midland Rly Co
- Mulrine v University of Ulster
- Mumford v Stohwasser
- Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Sea Insurance Co Ltd
- Murad v Al Saraj
- Murad v Al-Saraj
- Murray v Tower Insurance Ltd
- Murray v Two Strokes Ltd
- Musson v Howard Glasgow Associates Ltd
- Myers (G H) & Co v Brent Cross Service Co
- N v Agrawal
- Nabb Brothers Ltd v Lloyds Bank International (Guernsey) Ltd
- Nash v Tonbridge Estates (Sussex) Ltd
- Nash v Tonbridge Estates (Sussex) Ltd
- Nathan v Giles sub nom Giles v Nathan
- National Carriers Ltd v Panalpina (Northern) Ltd
- National Coal Board v National Union of Mineworkers
- National Savings Bank Association, Re, Hebb's Case
- National Westminster Bank plc v Feeney
- National Westminster Bank plc v Kotonou
- National Westminster Bank plc v Radobank Nederland
- Navigators Insurance Co Ltd v Atlantic Methanol Production Co LLC
- Naylor Benzon & Co Ltd v Aron Hirsch & Son
- Naylor Benzon & Co Ltd v Krainische Industrie Gesellschaft
- Naylor, Re, ex p Stephenson v Pike
- NBTY Europe Ltd (Fomerly Holland & Barrett Europe Ltd) v Nutricia International BV
- Ndyanabo v A-G
- Neale v Merrett
- Neave v Neave (No 2)
- Neesom (or Meeson) v Clarkson
- Neill v Duke of Devonshire
- Nelson v Stocker
- Neuchatel Asphalte Co Ltd v Barnett
- Nevill v Snelling
- Neville v Kelly
- New Hart Builders Ltd v Brindley
- New System Private Telephones (London) Ltd v Hughes & Co
- Newborn v Just
- Newcomb v De Roos
- Newry and Enniskillen Rly Co v Coombe
- Newsat Holdings Ltd v Zani
- Niagara Mechanical Services International Ltd (in administration), Re
- Nicolene Ltd v Simmonds
- Niger-Benue Transport Co Ltd v Narumal & Sons (Nigeria) Ltd
- Niru Battery Manufacturing Co v Milestone Trading Ltd
- Niru Battery Manufacturing Co v Milestone Trading Ltd
- Nissho Co Ltd v Livanos
- Nolte v Landesversicherungsanstalt Hannover: C-317/93
- Non-Marine Underwriters, Lloyd's of London v Scalera
- Nordman v Rayner and Sturges
- Norgren (C A) & Co v Technomarketing
- Norman v Simpson
- Norris v Southampton City Council
- Norris v Staps (or Stapes)
- North British and Mercantile Insurance Co v London, Liverpool and Globe Insurance Co
- North Star Shipping Ltd v Sphere Drake Insurance plc
- North Western Rly Co v M'Michael
- Northern Foods plc v Focal Foods Ltd
- Notcutt v Universal Equipment Co (London) Ltd
- Nugent v Gifford
- Ocean Coal Co Ltd v Powell Duffryn Steam Coal Co Ltd
- Ocean Tramp Tankers Corpn v V/O Sovfracht, The Eugenia
- O'Donovan v Rogers
- Office of Fair Trading v Lloyds TSB Bank plc
- Office of Fair Trading v Lloyds TSB Bank plc
- Official Assignee of Estate of Cheak Soo Tuan v Khoo Saw
- Offord v Davies
- Okolo v Mortgages 4 Ltd
- Oksuzoglu v Kay
- Olivebank, Akt v Dansk Svovlsyre Fabrik
- Oliver v Davis
- Olsen v Corry and Gravesend Aviation Ltd
- O'Mahoney v Joliffe and Motor Insurers' Bureau
- Online Rentals Ltd v Box Media Ltd
- Open University v Triesman
- Orchidway Properties Ltd v Fairlight Commercial Ltd
- O'Reilly v Thompson
- Oriental Steam Navigation Co, ex p Briggs
- Orion Insurance Co plc v Sphere Drake Insurance plc
- Orion Investments (Pvt) Ltd v Ujanaa Investments (Pvt) Ltd
- Osborne v Bradley
- Osenton v Osenton
- Osmond v Woolley
- Otter v Church, Adams, Tatham & Co
- OTV Birwelco Ltd v Technical and General Guarantee Co Ltd
- Owen v Homan
- Oxford and Worcester Extension and Chester Junction Rly Co, Re, ex p Barber sub nom Re Barber and Oxford and Worcester Extension and Chester Junction Rly Co
- Oxford and Worcester Extension and Chester Junction Rly Co, Re, ex p Barber sub nom Re Barber and Oxford and Worcester Extension and Chester Junction Rly Co
- Oxford v Provand
- P v National Union of School Masters Union of Women Teachers
- Pacific Motor Auctions Pty Ltd v Motor Credits (Hire Finance) Ltd
- Pacific National Investments Ltd v City of Victoria
- Pacific Phosphate Co Ltd v Empire Transport Co Ltd
- Palace Shipping Co Ltd v Caine
- Palgrave Brown (UK) Ltd v Stinnes Logistics AG
- Palmer v East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust
- Palmer v Scott
- Pambakian v Brentford Nylons Ltd
- Panamanian Oriental SS Corp v Wright
- Panamena Europea Navigacion (Compania Ltda) v Frederick Leyland & Co Ltd (J Russell & Co)
- Pankhania v Hackney London Borough Council
- Papadimitriou v Henderson
- Papamichael v National Westminster Bank plc and Paprounis (Pt 20 defendant)
- Paragon Finance plc (formerly the National Home Loans Corpn plc) v Pender
- Parameter v Burrell
- Parker v Carter
- Parkes v Great Western Rly Co
- Parkette Apartments Ltd v Masternak
- Parr v Eliason
- Parry, Re, ex p Salaman
- Parsons v New Zealand Shipping Co
- Parton v Cole
- Partridge v Crittenden
- Paschall v Thurston
- Paterson v Norris
- Patterson v Becher
- Pausker v Pandia
- Peacock v Burt
- Pearce & High Ltd v Baxter
- Pearce v Brooks
- Pearson v London and Croydon Rly Co
- Pease v Gloahec, The Marie Joseph
- Pedley v Avon Insurance plc
- Peekay Intermark Ltd v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd
- Peekay Intermark Ltd v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd
- Peel v Peel
- Peerless Laundry and Cleaners Ltd v Neal
- Peffer v Rigg
- Pelepah Valley (Johore) Rubber Estates Ltd v Sungei Besi Mines Ltd
- Penelope, The
- Penwith District Council v VP Developments Ltd
- Pepper v South Eastern Rly Co
- Peppitt's Estate, Re
- Percival v Frampton
- Percy v Board of National Mission of the Church of Scotland
- Percy v Clements
- Peregrine Systems Ltd v Steria Ltd
- Peregrine Systems Ltd v Steria Ltd
- Peregrine Systems Ltd v Steria Ltd
- Perkins v Shone
- Persse v Persse
- Persse v Persse
- Peter Lind & Co Ltd v Constable Hart & Co Ltd sub nom Constable Hart & Co Ltd v Peter Lind & Co Ltd
- Peter v Shipway
- Petromec Inc v Petroleo Brasiliero SA
- Petroships Pte Ltd of Singapore v Petec Trading and Investment Corp of Vietnam
- Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd
- Phelps v Hillingdon London BC
- Phillipps v Associated Newspapers Ltd
- Phillipps v Bateman
- Phillips Products Ltd v Hyland
- Phillips v Canadon Ltd
- Phillips v Phillips
- Phipps v New Claridge's Hotel Ltd
- Phones 4u Ltd v Phone4u.co.uk Internet Ltd
- Photo Production Ltd v Securicor Transport Ltd
- Phyllis Trading Ltd v 86 Lordship Road Ltd
- Pickfords Ltd v Celestica Ltd
- Pilcher v Rawlins
- Pilkington UK Ltd v CGU Insurance plc
- Pioneer Shipping Ltd v BTP Tioxide Ltd sub nom BTP Tioxide Ltd v Pioneer Shipping Ltd and Armada Marine SA, The Nema
- Pitt v PHH Asset Management Ltd
- Pitt v PHH Asset Management Ltd
- Planck (Con) Ltd v Kolynos Inc
- Plaskett's Estate, Re
- Playford v United Kingdom Telegraph Co
- Pole's Trust, Re, ex p Hulme
- Pomfret (Earl) v Lord Windsor
- Popat v Shonchhatra
- Pope, Re, ex p Dicksee
- Porter v Clinton
- Portland (Duke of) v Lady Topham
- Portsmouth v Alldays Franchising Ltd
- Pott v Todhunter
- Potter v Sanders
- Potts v Surr
- Powell v Pleydell
- Power v Walker
- Powers v Fowler
- Powers v Fowler
- Powers v Fowler
- Powers v Fowler
- Pratt v South Eastern Rly Co
- Precision Dippings Ltd v Precision Dippings Marketing Ltd
- Premier Briquette Co v Gray
- Prestige Properties Ltd v Scottish Provident Institution
- Preston v Wolverhampton Healthcare NHS Trust; Fletcher v Midland Bank plc
- Pretty Pictures Sarl v Quixote Films Ltd
- Price Bros (Somerford) Ltd v J Kelly Homes (Stoke-on-Trent) Ltd
- Price v Hong Kong Tea Co
- Price v Jenkins
- Price v Lea
- Prifti v Musini Sociedad Anonima De Seguros Y Reaseguros
- Prifti v Musini Sociedad Anonima De Seguros Y Reaseguros
- Prinicipal Investments Ltd v Trevett
- Pritchard v Mantaray Partners Ltd
- Prodger v Langham
- Produce Brokers Co v Weis & Co
- Prosser v Edmonds
- PT Garuda Indonesia Ltd v Grellman
- Public Works Comrs v Angus & Co, Dalton v Angus & Co
- Pulvertoft v Pulvertoft
- Pumfrey, Re, ex p Hillman
- Qasim v Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust
- QR Sciences Ltd v BTG International Ltd
- Quiggin v Duff
- R (a minor), Re sub nom Re A (a minor) (adoption contract)
- R (on the action of Lidl (UK) GmbH) v Swale BC (Aldi Stores Ltd intervening)
- R (on the application of DFS Furniture Co plc) v Customs and Excise Comrs
- R (on the application of Maughan) v Leicester City Council
- R (on the application of Steele) v Birmingham City Council
- R (on the application of Steele) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions sub nom R (on the application of Steele) v Birmingham City Council
- R v Adaway
- R v Arundel Inhabitants
- R v Barry
- R v Clarke
- R v Colucci
- R v Crown Court at Bodmin, ex p Young
- R v Great Wigston, Leicester, Inhabitants
- R v John
- R v K
- R v Kensington and Chelsea Royal London BC, ex p Lawrie Plantation Services Ltd
- R v Kensington and Chelsea Royal London Borough Council, ex p Lawrie Plantation Services Ltd
- R v Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council, ex p Maguire
- R v Lara
- R v Lord
- R v Mountsorrel Inhabitants
- R v Murray
- R v Paddington and St Marylebone Rent Tribunal, ex p Bell London and Provincial Properties Ltd
- R v Powys County Council, ex p Smith
- R v Prior
- R v Rotherfield Greys Inhabitants
- R v Sevenoaks District Council, ex p Terry
- R v St James', Westminster
- R v St James', Westminster
- Rainbow Spring, The
- Raingold v Bromley
- Raja v Van Hoogstraten
- Ramsey v Hartley
- Rank Xerox Ltd v Lane (Inspector of Taxes)
- Ranson v Platt
- Rayner v Davies
- RC Pillar & Sons v Edwards
- Re Severn, ex p Tennyson sub nom Severn, Re, ex p Colvill
- Read v Edmed
- Redman v Rymer
- Redmond v Dainton
- Reed Executive plc v Reed Business Information Ltd
- Reed v O'Brien
- Reed, Re, ex p Cox
- Rees Hough Ltd v Redland Reinforced Plastics Ltd
- Rees v Newbery and Institute of Cancer Research
- Reeves v Huffman
- Reffell v King
- Reid v Batte
- Reilly v R
- Rendall v Combined Insurance Company of America
- Rennie v Mills
- Rennie v Morris
- Representative Body of the Church in Wales v Newton
- Republic of Kazakhstan v Istil Group Inc
- Republic of Kazakhstan v Istil Group Inc
- Reuss v Picksley
- Reynolds v Atherton
- Reynolds v Boston Deep Sea Fishing and Ice Co Ltd
- Reynolds v Ivemey
- Rhoden-Burke v Lambeth London Borough Council
- Rhyl UDC v Rhyl Amusements Ltd
- Richards (Michael) Properties Ltd v Corpn of Wardens of St Saviour's Parish, Southwark
- Richards v Delbridge
- Richards v Whitham
- Richardson v North Eastern Rly Co sub nom North Eastern Rly Co v Richardson and Sisson
- Richmond Ltd v DHL International (NZ) Ltd
- Rickards v Forestal Land, Timber and Railways Co Ltd; Robertson v Middows Ltd; Kann v W W Howard Brothers & Co Ltd
- Ridge Nominees Ltd v IRC
- Ridge Nominees Ltd v IRC
- Ridler, Re, Ridler v Ridler
- Ridley v Ridley
- Right d Jefferys v Bucknell
- Riley v Troll
- Rimalt v Cartwright
- Riniker v University College London
- Riyad Bank v Ahli United Bank (UK) plc
- Roberto v Bumb
- Roberts v Hughes
- Roberts v Williams
- Robertson v Amazon Tug and Lighterage Co
- Robertson v Marquis of Londonderry
- Robinson v Briggs
- Robson v Godfrey
- Rockcliffe v Pearce
- Rockcliffe v Pearce
- Rodger v Comptoir d'Escompte de Paris
- Roe d Hamerton v Mitton
- Rolls v Pearce
- Ronson International Ltd v Patrick
- Rosher v Williams
- Ross v Close
- Rothschild v Hennings
- Routledge v Grant
- Row v Dawson
- Royal Bank of Canada v Cooperative Centrale Raiffeisen-Boorenleenbank
- Royal Bank of Canada v Coperative Centrale Raiffeisen-Boorenleenbank BA
- Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Wilson
- Royal London Mutual Insurance Society Ltd v Barrett
- Rudkin v Dolman
- Ruiz Bernldez, Criminal proceedings against: C-129/94
- Rummens v Robins
- Rutter v Palmer
- Ryder v Wombwell
- Sabey (Clifford) (Contractors) Ltd v Long
- Sabo SA v United Arab Shipping Co
- Safe Gard Europe Ltd v Manttan
- Sainsbury's Supermarkets Ltd v Olympia Homes Ltd
- Salmon Harvester Properties Ltd v Metropolitan Police Authority
- SAM Business Systems Ltd v Hedley & Co
- Sanderson v Collins
- Santa F Land Co Ltd v Forestal Land, Timber and Rly Co Ltd
- Sargant (WJ) & Sons v Eric Paterson & Co
- Sarkis v Watfa
- Saunders v Graves
- Savid Developments Ltd v Gibbs
- Scammell v Dicker
- Scammell v Dicker
- Scammell v Dicker
- Scanlan's New Neon Ltd v Tooheys Ltd
- Scarborough v Cosgrove
- Scheibler, Re, ex p Holthausen
- Schenkers International Deutschland GmbH v Overland Shoes Ltd, Schenkers Ltd v Overland Shoes Ltd
- Schering Ltd v Stockholms Enskilda Bank Aktiebolag
- Schostall v Johnson
- Schuldenfrei v Hilton (Inspector of Taxes)
- Schuldenfrei v Hilton (Inspector of Taxes)
- Scot v Bell
- Scott Paper Co v Drayton Paper Works Ltd
- Scott v Allnutt
- Scott v Lifford
- Scott v Scott
- Scott v Spashett
- Scott, Re
- Scottish & Newcastle plc v GD Construction (St Albans) Ltd
- Scottish & Newcastle plc v GD Construction (St Albans) Ltd
- Scottish Navigation Co Ltd v W A Souter & Co
- Scottish Power Generation Ltd v British Energy Generation (UK) Ltd
- Scottish Special Housing Association v Wimpey Construction UK Ltd
- Sea Success Maritime Inc v African Maritime Carriers Ltd
- Seabrook v Mervyn
- Seale v Lowndes
- Seaman, Re, ex p Furness Finance Co Ltd
- Searle v Laverick
- Searle v Law
- Seath v Moore
- Sebba, Re, Lloyds Bank Ltd v Hutson
- Seddon v Binions (Zurich Insurance Co Ltd, third party); Stork v Same
- Selby v Bowie
- Select Commodities Ltd v Valdo SA, The Florida
- Seligman Bros v Brown Shipley & Co
- Seng Djit Hin v Nagurdas Purshotumdas & Co
- Sergeson v Sealey
- Settlement Corpn v Hochschild
- Sharp (G F) & Co Ltd v McMillan
- Sharp (or Chisholm) v Wardrope
- Sharp v Fourseasons Healthcare Ltd
- Shaw & Co v Symmons & Sons
- Shaw v Sequence (UK) Ltd
- Shea and Foubert v Halifax Insurance Co
- Shears v Goddard sub nom Sills, Re, Shears v Goddard
- Sheffield Canal Co v Sheffield and Rotherham Rly Co
- Shell International Petroleum Co Ltd v Gibbs, The Salem
- Shelley, Re, ex p Stewart
- Shepherd (FC) & Co Ltd v Jerrom
- Sherrington v Berwin Leighton Paisner (a firm)
- Shillito v Theed
- Shimizu Europe Ltd v Automajor Ltd
- Shimmell v Clarke
- Shipton Anderson & Co and Harrison Bros & Co, Re sub nom Shipton Anderson & Co v Harrison Bros & Co
- Shogun Finance Ltd v Hudson
- SHV Gas Supply and Trading SAS v Naftomar Shipping & Trading Co Ltd Inc
- Sibery v Connelly
- Sidaways v Todd
- Siddiqui v James & Charles Dodd
- Simo Securities Trust Ltd, Re
- Simpson v Yeend
- Sindall (William) plc v Cambridgeshire County Council
- Sirius International Insurance Corp (Publ) v FAI General Insurance Co Ltd
- Sisu Capital Fund Ltd v Tucker
- Six Continents Hotels Inc v Event Hotels GmbH
- Skanska Rasleigh Weatherfoil v Somerfield Stores Ltd
- Skinner v M'Douall
- Skinner v M'Douall
- Skipwith v Great Western Rly Co
- Skylight Maritime SA v Ascot Underwriting
- Slade v Metrodent Ltd
- Slater v Lewisham London Borough Council
- Slobodinsky, Re, ex p Moore
- Smartle v Williams sub nom Newport's Case
- Smeaton v St Andrews Magistrates
- Smith Coney and Barrett v Becker Gray & Co
- Smith v Artsana SPA
- Smith v DPP
- Smith v Eric S Bush
- Smith v Eric S Bush (a firm), Harris v Wyre Forest District Council
- Smith v Eric S Bush (a firm), Harris v Wyre Forest District Council
- Smith v Hughes
- Smith v Lucas
- Smith v Mansi
- Smith v Moore
- Smith v Pickering
- Smith v Smith
- Smith, Knight & Co, Re, Battie's Case
- Smith, Re, ex p Smith
- Smyth (Ross T) & Co Ltd (Liverpool) v WN Lindsay Ltd (Leith)
- Snowstar Shipping Co Ltd v Graig Shipping plc
- Sociedade Portuguesa de Navios Tanques Ltda v Hvalfangerselskapet Polaris A/S
- Society of Lloyd's v Bowman
- Society of Lloyd's v Laws
- Socit Franco Tunisienne d'Armement v Sidermar SpA, The Massalia
- Solicitors' and General Life Assurance Society v Lamb
- Sorby v Gordon
- South East Windscreens Ltd v Jamshidi
- South Eastern Rly v National Telephone Co Ltd
- South Essex Gas-Light and Coke Co, Re, Hulett's Case
- Spaight v Cowne
- Spalding v Ruding
- Spencer v Harding
- Sphere Drake Insurance Ltd v Euro International Underwriting Ltd
- Spicer v Hayward
- Spurling (J) Ltd v Bradshaw
- Squib v Wyn
- St John Tugboat Co Ltd v Irving Refinery Ltd
- St Mary Magdalen, Oxford (President, etc) v A-G
- St Marylebone Property Co Ltd v Payne
- St Paul Travelers Insurance Co Ltd v Okporuah
- Stackemann v Paton
- Stallard v Great Western Rly Co sub nom Stanner v Great Western Rly Co
- Stamp Duties Comr v Bone
- Standard Bank London Ltd v Canara Bank
- Standard Chartered Bank v Banque Marocaine D Commerce Exterieur
- Stanley v Dowdeswell
- Stannifer Developments Ltd v Glasgow Development Agency (No 2)
- Stansbie v Troman
- Stanton v Hall
- Stapilton v Stapilton
- Startup v Macdonald
- Stead v Bligh
- Stead v Nelson
- Stearn v Twitchell
- Steel v Brown and Parry
- Stegmann v O'Connor
- Stent Foundation Ltd v Tarmac Construction (Contracts) Ltd
- Stent Foundations Ltd v Carillion Construction (Contracts) Ltd (formerly Tarmac Construction (Contracts) Ltd)
- Stent Foundations Ltd v M J Gleeson Group plc
- Stephen v Costor
- Stephens v Olive
- Stephens v Trueman
- Stephenson, Re
- Stevenson & Sons v Maule & Son
- Stevenson v Nationwide Building Society
- Stewart v Perth and Kinross Council
- Stewart v Reavell's Garage
- Stewart, Re, ex p Pottinger
- Stikeman v Dawson
- Stiles v A-G
- Stirling v Maitland
- Stocken v Stocken
- Stoddart v Union Trust Ltd
- Stoneleigh Finance Ltd v Phillips
- Storer v Manchester City Council
- Storey v Fulham Steel Works Co
- Story v Lord Windsor
- Stourton v Burrell
- Stradling v Higgins
- Strand v Corlett
- Street v Coombes
- Stretch v United Kingdom (Application 44277/98)
- Strive Shipping Corp v Hellenic Mutual War Risks Association (Bermuda) Ltd, The Grecia Express
- Strode v Blackburne
- Strong v Foster
- Sturmey's Trustee v Sturmey
- Suffield v Brown
- Summers v Congreve Horner & Co (Independent Insurance Co Ltd, third party)
- Sun Life Assurance Co of Canada v Pearson (Inspector of Taxes)
- Sunlight Mercantile Pte v Ever Lucky Shipping Co Ltd
- Sutcliffe v Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council
- Sutton v Mishcon de Reya
- Sutton v Temple
- Swainland Builders Ltd v Freehold Properties Ltd
- Swann v Earl of Falmouth
- Sweetman v Nathan
- Swift v Kelly
- Swift v Macbean
- Sykes v Taylor-Rose
- Symance v Tattam
- Symes, Re, ex p Poole
- Symmons v Want
- T (a minor) v Surrey County Council sub nom Harrison v Surrey County Council
- T&N Ltd (in administration) v Royal & Sun Alliance plc (Curzon Insurance Ltd, Pt 20 defendant)
- Tamplin (F A) Steamship Co v Anglo-Mexican Petroleum Products Co
- Tan Chin Seng v Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd (No 2)
- Tanner v Scovell
- Tappoo Holdings Ltd v Stuchbery
- Tarner v Walker
- Tatem Ltd v Gamboa
- Tatlock v Harris
- Tayler v Waters
- Taylor & Co v Landauer & Co
- Taylor d Atkyns v Horde
- Taylor v Blakelock
- Taylor v Burgess
- Taylor v Caldwell
- Taylor v Laird
- Taylor v Laird
- TBA Industrial Products Ltd v Morland
- TBL Realisations plc (in administration) v Awada
- Teasdale v Braithwaite
- Tektrol Ltd (Formerly Atto Power Controls Ltd) v International Insurance Co of Hanover Ltd
- Tektrol Ltd v International Insurance Co of Hanover Ltd
- Tennants (Lancashire) Ltd v CS Wilson & Co Ltd
- Tera Construction Ltd v Lam
- Tesco Stores Ltd v Costain Construction Ltd and other applications
- Tesco Stores Ltd v Pook
- Tetley, Re, ex p Jeffrey
- TFW Printers Ltd v Interserve Project Services Ltd
- Thatcher v England
- Thomas v Day
- Thomas v Dering
- Thomas v GT Pryce (Farms) Ltd
- Thompson v T Lohan (Plant Hire) Ltd (JW Hurdiss Ltd, third party)
- Thompson v Webster
- Thomson v Christie Manson & Woods Ltd
- Thomson v Christie Manson & Woods Ltd
- Thomson v The Royal Bank of Scotland plc
- Thorn v Public Works Comrs
- Thornborow v Whitacre
- Thornbury v Bevill
- Thornett and Fehr and Yuills Ltd, Re
- Thornton v Kempster
- Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking Ltd
- Thorold v Martell Press Ltd
- Thundercrest Ltd, Re
- Thurstan Hoskin & Partners v Jewill Hill & Bennett
- Tilling v Balmain
- Time Group Ltd v Computer 2000 Distribution Ltd (IBM United Kingdom Ltd, Part 20 defendant)
- Timson v Ramsbottom
- Tinn v Hoffmann & Co
- Tiverton Estates Ltd v Wearwell Ltd
- Todd v Adam
- Todd, Re
- Todd, Re, ex p Wood
- Toepfer v Schwarze
- Tokyo Leisure Development Co Ltd v Witan Hall Ltd
- Tolley v Morris
- Tomkins v Savory
- Tomkins v Tomkins
- Tonicstar Ltd (operating as Lloyd's Syndicate 1861) v American Home Assurance Co; Commercial Union Corporate Member Ltd v American Home Assurance Co
- Tonkin v UK Insurance Ltd
- Tonkins v Ennis
- Toomey (of Syndicate 2021) v Banco Vitalicio de Espana SA de Seguros y Reaseguros
- Toomey (of Syndicate 2021) v Banco Vitalicio de Espana SA de Seguros y Reaseguros
- Topham v Duke of Portland
- Topham v Duke of Portland
- Toronto Carton Co v Manchester McGregor Ltd
- Tourville v Naish
- Tower Hamlets London Borough v Ayinde
- Townend v Toker
- Townshend (Lord) v Windham
- Tracomin SA v Anton C Nielsen A/S, Langelands Korn Kobenshavn A/S, Sydysk Korn OG Foderstof Kompagni, Short, Beaton and Roscoe
- Tradax Export SA v Andr & Cie SA
- Tradax International SA v Goldschmidt SA
- Trade and Transport Incorporated v Iino Kaiun Kaisha, The Angelia
- Transport and Crane Hire (Pvt) Ltd v Hubert Davies & Co (Pvt) Ltd
- Travers (Joseph) & Sons Ltd v Cooper
- Treherne v Amateur Boxing Association of England Ltd
- Trent and Humber Co, Re, ex p Cambrian Steam Packet Co
- Treuhand v George
- Trevanian v Mosse
- Trident Fashions plc, Re; Anderson v Kroll Ltd
- Trollope (George) & Sons v Martyn Bros
- Trollope and Colls Ltd and Holland and Hannen and Cubitts Ltd (t/a Nuclear Civil Constructors (a firm)) v Atomic Power Constructions Ltd
- Troughton v Troughton
- Trustees of Morden College v Mayrick
- Trustees of National Deposit Friendly Society v Beatties of London Ltd
- Trustees of Stokes Pension Fund v Western Power Distribution (South West) plc
- Trustees of WASPS Football Club v Lambert Smith Hampton Group Ltd sub nom Montlake (as Trustees of WASPS Football Club v Lambert Smith Hampton Group Ltd)
- Tsakiroglou & Co Ltd v Noblee Thorl GmbH
- Tuck v Baker
- Tunstall v Boothby
- Turner Smith Investments Ltd v Philex plc
- Turner v Diaper
- Turner v News Group Newspapers Ltd
- Turner v Thomas
- Tussaud v Tussaud
- Twentsche Overseas Trading Co Ltd v Uganda Sugar Factory Ltd
- Two Ellens, The
- Tyrer v Smart (Inspector of Taxes)
- Ubsdell v Paterson
- UCB Corporate Services Ltd v Thomason
- UCB Corporate Services Ltd v Thomason
- Unger v Preston Corpn
- Union Bank of Jamaica Ltd v Yap
- Union Bank of London v Lenanton
- Union Bank of Scotland v National Bank of Scotland
- United Fresh Meat Co Ltd v Charterhouse Cold Storage Ltd
- Universal Cargo Carriers Corpn v Citati
- Universal Corpn v Five Ways Properties Ltd
- Universal Provident Life Association, Re, ex p Daniell's Case (No 2)
- Universal Studios International BV v Flextech Rights Ltd
- University Court of the University of Edinburgh v Eagle Star Insurance Co Ltd
- University of Huddersfield Higher Education Corpn v Revenue and Customs Comrs: C-223/03
- University of Keele v Price Waterhouse (a firm)
- University of Liverpool v Humber and Birch
- Uttley v Uttley
- Vacwell Engineering Co Ltd v BDH Chemicals Ltd
- van Dijk v Wilkinson t/a HFF Construction
- Van Toll v South Eastern Rly Co
- Vane v Vane
- Vartoukian v Daejan Properties Ltd
- Vaughan v Jones
- Vaughan v Moffat
- Veba Oil Supply & Trading GmbH v Petrotrade Inc
- Vedatech Corpn v Crystal Decisions
- Vee Networks Ltd v Econet Wireless International Ltd
- Veithardt and Hall Ltd v Rylands Bros Ltd
- Venning, Re
- Vertue v Jewell
- Victoria Laundry (Windsor) Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd
- Vineall v Veness
- Vogan & Co v Oulton
- Voss, Re, ex p Manners
- W, Re, W v M
- Wait v Baker
- Wait v Baker
- Walford v Miles
- Walker Residential Ltd v Davis
- Walker Residential Ltd v Davis
- Walker v British Guarantee Association
- Walker v Burrows
- Wallwyn v Lee
- Walrond v Walrond
- Walter and Sullivan Ltd v J Murphy & Sons Ltd
- Walter v Everard
- Walton (Grain and Shipping) Ltd v British Italian Trading Co Ltd
- Walton Harvey Ltd v Walker and Homfrays Ltd
- Walton v Everington
- Wandsworth London Borough Council v Attwell
- Wandsworth London Borough Council v The Co-Operative Bank plc
- Warburton v Co-operative Wholesale Society Ltd
- Ward v Byrne
- Ward v Fairhead
- Ward v Fry
- Warden v Jones
- Warden v Warden
- Warren v Truprint Ltd
- Warwick Ltd v GPS (Great Britain) Ltd
- Watford Electronics Ltd v Sanderson CFL Ltd
- Watford Electronics Ltd v Sanderson CFL Ltd
- Watkins v Birch
- Watkins v Maule
- Watkins v Rymill
- Watkins v Steevens
- Watkins v Vince
- Watson v All Saints, Poplar, Vestry
- Watson v Davies
- Watson v Lucas
- Watson v Pearson
- Watson v Russell
- Watts v Ainsworth
- Watts v Hyde
- Watts v Morrow
- Webb v Lugar
- Webb, Re
- Webster v Ahadiwand
- Wedgwood Coal and Iron Co, Re, Anderson's Case
- Weissfisch v Julius
- Wellington City Council v Body Corporate 51702 (Wellington)
- West Bromwich Albion Football Club Ltd v El-Safty
- West Bromwich Albion Football Club Ltd v El-Safty
- West Peckham (Vicar and Churchwardens) v Geary, Dalison Intervening
- West Riding of Yorkshire Rivers Board v Linthwaite UDC (No 2) sub nom Yorkshire (W R) Rivers Board v Linthwaite Urban Council (No 2)
- West Sussex Constabulary's Widows, Children and Benevolent (1930) Fund Trusts, Re, Barnett v Ketteringham
- Westbury v Clapp
- Western Manufacturing (Reading) Ltd, Re
- Westerton, Re, Public Trustee v Gray
- Weston, Re, Davies v Tagart
- Wethered, Re, ex p Salaman
- Whitaker v Dunn
- Whitbread v Smith
- White and Carter Ltd v Carbis Bay Garage Ltd
- White v Humphrey
- White v John Warrick & Co Ltd
- White v Thornborough
- White, Re, ex p Caldecott
- Whitehall Court Ltd v Ettlinger
- Whitfield v Fausset
- Whittaker v Howe
- Wigan Coal and Iron Co Ltd v IRC
- Wigan v English and Scottish Law Life Assurance Association
- Wilby v Elgee
- Wilding v Russell
- Wilkinson v Schneider
- Wilkinson, Re, Neale v Newell
- Will v IRC
- Willan v Willan
- Willats v Busby
- Willey v Parratt
- Williams and Parry's Contract, Re
- Williams v Byrnes
- Williams v Carwardine
- Williams v Devon County Council
- Williams v Jones
- Williams v Lloyd
- Williams v Mercer
- Williams v Roffey Bros & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd
- Williams v Travel Promotions Ltd (t/a Voyages Jules Verne)
- Williams v Travel Promotions Ltd (t/a Voyages Jules Verne)
- Williams v Watsons Luxury Coaches Ltd
- Williams v Williams
- Williams v Williams
- Williams v Williams
- Williamson v Codrington
- Willis v Baggs and Salt
- Willoughby v Willoughby
- Wilmot v Coventry Corpn
- Wilson & Co v Tennants (Lancashire) Ltd
- Wilson (Paal) & Co A/S v Partenreederei Hannah Blumenthal, The Hannah Blumenthal
- Wilson v Balfour
- Wilson v Northampton and Banbury Junction Rly Co
- Wilson v Powis
- Wilson v Truelove
- Wimbledon Construction Co 2000 Ltd v Vago
- Windle (a bankrupt), Re, ex p Trustee of the Bankrupt v Windle
- Winn v Bull
- WISE Underwriting Agency Ltd v Grupo Nacional Provincial SA
- Witter (Thomas) Ltd v TBP Industries Ltd
- Wolmershausen v O'Connor
- Wontner v Shairp
- Wood v Fenwick
- Wood v Scarth
- Wood v Scarth
- Woodfield Steam Shipping Co Ltd v JL Thompson & Sons Ltd
- Woodford v Whiteley
- Woodruffe v Daniel
- Woodyatt v Gresley
- Woolmer v Delmer Price Ltd
- Worcester College Oxford v Oxford Canal Navigation
- Worldwide Corpn Ltd v GPT Ltd
- WPP Holdings Italy SRL v Benatti
- Wren (Jonathan) & Co Ltd v Microdec plc
- Wright v Bigg
- Wright v Bigg
- Wright v Melville
- Wright v Snowe
- Wright v Wright
- Wycombe Borough Electric Light and Power Co Ltd v Chipping Wycombe Corpn
- Wynn-Jones v Bickley
- Yates Building Co Ltd v RJ Pulleyn & Sons (York) Ltd
- Yeates v Groves
- Yeoman Credit Ltd v Apps
- York Corpn v Henry Leetham & Sons Ltd
- Yorkshire Water Services Ltd v Taylor Woodrow Construction Northern Ltd
- Yorkshire Water Services Ltd v Taylor Woodrow Construction Northern Ltd
- Young and Marten Ltd v McManus Childs Ltd
- Young v Hoffman Manufacturing Co Ltd
- Young v Peirce