Criminal Law Case Titles
If you are looking for criminal law cases to help you write law essays, law dissertations and law coursework, then take a look at the case titles below for you to research.
0-9 | a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | i | j | k | l | m | n | o | p | q | r | s | t | u | v | w | x | y |
- A (a child) v Ministry of Defence
- A (children) (conjoined twins: surgical separation), Re
- A v B
- A v Bottrill
- A v DPP
- A v Essex County Council
- A v X
- AB (care proceedings: disclosure of medical evidence to police), Re
- AB v South West Water Services Ltd
- Abbott v Bayley
- Abu v MGN Ltd
- Acrecrest Ltd v W S Hattrell & Partners
- Ad Valorem Factors Ltd v Ricketts sub nom Ricketts v Ad Valorem Factors Ltd
- Adam Phones Ltd v Goldschmidt
- Adams v Schering Chemicals Ltd
- Adams's Application for Judicial Review, Re
- Adlington v Comr of Police for the Metropolis
- Advocate (Lord) v Wemyss
- A-G for Tuvalu v Philatelic Distribution Corpn Ltd
- A-G of Gambia v N'Jie
- A-G v Associated Newspapers Group plc
- A-G v Birmingham Post and Mail Ltd
- A-G v British Broadcasting Corpn
- A-G v Carlton Bank
- A-G v English
- A-G v Guardian Newspapers Ltd
- A-G v Guardian Newspapers Ltd sub nom A-G v Guardian Newspapers Ltd (No 3)
- A-G v Independent Television News Ltd
- A-G v MGN Ltd
- A-G v News Group Newspapers Ltd
- A-G v Newspaper Publishing plc
- A-G v Newspaper Publishing plc
- A-G v Newspaper Publishing plc
- A-G v Observer Ltd, Re an application by Derbyshire County Council
- A-G v Punch Ltd
- A-G v Punch Ltd
- A-G v Times Newspapers Ltd
- Agnew v Jobson
- A-G's Reference (No 1 of 1975)
- A-G's Reference (No 1 of 1995)
- A-G's Reference (No 1 of 1997)
- A-G's Reference (No 1 of 2001)
- A-G's Reference (No 1 of 2002)
- A-G's Reference (No 2 of 1992)
- A-G's Reference (No 2 of 1999)
- A-G's Reference (No 2 of 1999)
- A-G's Reference (No 2 of 1999)
- A-G's Reference (No 2 of 2003)
- A-G's Reference (No 3 of 1975)
- A-G's Reference (No 3 of 1992)
- A-G's Reference (No 3 of 1994)
- A-G's Reference (No 3 of 1994)
- A-G's Reference (No 3 of 1998)
- A-G's Reference (No 3 of 1998)
- A-G's Reference (No 3 of 1999)
- A-G's Reference (No 3 of 2004)
- A-G's Reference (No 3 of 2004)
- A-G's Reference (No 4 of 1980)
- A-G's Reference (No 4 of 2000)
- A-G's Reference (No 6 of 1980)
- A-G's Reference (No 76 of 2004)
- A-G's Reference (No 79 of 2006); R v Whitta
- Ahsan v University Hospital Leicester NHS Trust
- Ailesbury (Marquis) and Iveagh (Lord), Re
- Airbus Industrie GIE v Patel
- Akenzua (administrators of the estate of Laws (decd)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Aldridge, Re, Aldridge v Aldridge
- Alexander Forbes Europe Ltd v SBJ Ltd
- Allen v The Oliver Group plc
- Allied Domecq Leisure Ltd v Cooper
- Allied Maples Group Ltd v Simmons & Simmons (a firm)
- AMF International Ltd v Magnet Bowling Ltd
- Anderson v Heatherwood and Wexham Park Hospitals NHS Trust
- Anderson v Milton Keynes General NHS Trust
- Andrews v Barnett Waddingham (a firm)
- Anns v Merton London Borough Council
- Anon
- Anon
- Anon
- Anson v Anson
- Arauco Co Ltd, Re
- Archibald Kinross v Sterling Precast Ltd
- Armagas Ltd v Mundogas SA, The Ocean Frost
- Armstrong v Ministry of Defence
- Arndt v Smith
- Arnott v Sprake
- Arthur v HM Advocate
- Ashley v Chief Constable of Sussex Police
- Asiansky Television plc v Bayer Rosin (a firm)
- Asiansky Television plc v Bayer-Rosin
- Asiansky Television plc v Bayer-Rosin (a firm)
- Asiansky Television v Bayer Rosin (a firm)
- Askey v Wood
- Astbury v Astbury
- Atkins v DPP, Goodland v DPP
- Atkins v Dunn & Baker (firm)
- Atkinson v Warne
- Attorney-General v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd
- Auckland Unemployed Workers' Rights Centre Inc v A-G
- Australian Coastal Shipping Commission v Green
- Aylwen v Taylor Joynson Garrett (a firm)
- Azanian Peoples' Organisation (AZAPO) v President of the Republic of South Africa
- B & J (children) (care proceedings: responsibility for child's injury), Re
- B (a child) (care proceedings: additional expert evidence), Re
- B (a minor) v DPP
- B (a minor) v DPP
- B (a minor) v DPP
- B (a minor) v DPP
- B v United Kingdom (Application 9840/82)
- Baines v Tweddle
- Baker v Snell
- Bakhtiar v Keoshgerian
- Balfour Beatty Construction Ltd v Kelston Sparkes Contractors Ltd
- Balfron Trustees Ltd v Peterson
- Ball v Druces v Attlee (a firm)
- Ballard v Bond
- Bamford (Inspector of Taxes) v ATA Advertising Ltd
- Banditt v R
- Banditt v R
- Banks v Ablex Ltd
- Barber v DPP
- Barclays Bank plc v Kennedy
- Barings plc (in liq) v Coopers & Lybrand, Barings Futures (Singapore) Pte Lyd (in liq) v Mattar
- Barings plc, Re, Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Baker (No 5)
- Barker v Corus UK Ltd; Murray v British Shipbuilders (Hydrodynamics) Ltd; Patterson v Smiths Dock Ltd
- Barker v R
- Barker v R
- Barker v Saint Gobain Pipelines plc
- Barnfather v Islington Education Authority
- Barrett v Enfield London Borough Council
- Basma v Weekes sub nom Abdul Karim Basma v Weekes
- Bassie v Merseyside Fire and Civil Defence Authority
- Bate v Mishcon de Reya
- Bates' Patent, Re
- Batty v Danaher (practising as Jack Danaher & Co)
- Baxall Securities Ltd v Sheard Walshaw Partnership (a firm)
- Baxendale v Bennett
- Bayer AG v European Commission: T-41/96
- Beary v Pall Mall Investments (a firm)
- Beauchamp (Earl) v Winn
- Beckham v Drake
- Beckham v Drake
- Beckham v Drake
- Bedell v Russell
- Bedingfeld and Herring's Contract, Re sub nom Re Beddingfield, Norris and Herring's Contract and Vendor and Purchaser Act 1874
- Bell v Bell
- Bell v The Spirit Group Ltd
- Bella Casa Ltd v Vinestone Ltd
- Bellamy v Central Sheffield University NHS Trust
- Beoco Ltd v Alfa Laval Co Ltd
- Bernard v A-G of Jamaica
- Bews v Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust
- Bhoomidas v Port of Singapore Authority
- BHP Billiton Petroleum Ltd v Dalmine SpA
- BHP Billiton Petroleum Ltd v Dalmine SpA
- BICC Ltd v Cumbrian Industrials Ltd sub nom Parkman Consulting Engineers (an unlimited company) v Cumbrian Industrials Ltd
- Bilbie v Lumley
- Bingham v Dinardo Partnership
- Bird v Holbrook
- Bird v Holbrook
- Birkbeck Freehold Land Society, ex p
- Birmingham City Tramways Co Ltd v Law
- Birmingham City Tramways Co Ltd v Law
- Blackburn Rovers Football & Athletic Club v Avon Insurance plc
- Blackburn v Mackey
- Blackmore v Tidderley
- Blake v Barnard
- Blake v Galloway
- Bland v Morris
- Blayney v Knight
- Bloor v Liverpool Derricking and Carrying Co Ltd
- Bluett v Suffolk County Council
- Blunt v Beaumont
- Blyth v HM Advocate
- Blyth v HM Advocate
- Boateng v Hughmans (a firm)
- Bolton Pharmaceutical Co 100 Ltd v Swinghope Ltd
- Boodoosingh v Ramnarace
- Boome v Bromley R D C
- Boon v Eddison
- Booth v Crown Prosecution Service
- Booth v Hanley
- Booth v Smith
- Borwick v Urquhart (Procurator Fiscal, Kirkwall)
- Boughey v R
- Boulter v Clark
- Boulter v Clark
- Bovis Lend Lease Ltd v RD Fire Protection Ltd, Huthco Ltd v Bovis Lend Lease Ltd
- Bowden Wire Ltd's Trade Marks, Re, Bowden Wire Co Ltd v Bowden Brake Co Ltd
- Bowe v Townend
- Bowlt v Clark
- Bown v LAS Direct Ltd
- Boyce v Wyatt Engineering
- Bradford v Robinson Rentals Ltd
- Bradlaugh v Erskine
- Bradley v Wallaces Ltd
- Bravery v Bravery
- BRB (Residuary) Ltd v Cully
- Breeze v Ahmed
- Brew Bros Ltd v Snax (Ross) Ltd
- Brewer v Broadwood
- Bridgman v Skinner
- Briggs and Spicer, Re
- Brisbane v Dacres
- Bristol & West Building Society v Rollo Steven & Bond
- Bristol and West Building Society v May May & Merrimans (a firm)
- Brocks Mount Ltd v Beasant
- Brooke and Fremlin's Contract, Re
- Brooklyn House Ltd v Commission for Social Care Inspection
- Broom v Morgan
- Brown (Reference under para 6 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003), Re
- Brown v Bennett
- Brown v Corus (UK) Ltd
- Brown v KMR Services Ltd
- Brown v Lewisham and North Southwark Health Authority
- Brown v R
- Brown v Robinson
- Bunting Electric Manufacturing Co Ltd, Re; Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Golby
- Burns v Nowell
- Burton v Voelker
- Bush v Parker
- Butcher v Cornwall County Council
- Butler v Austen
- C v Cairns
- C v D
- C v Middlesbrough Council
- C v Middlesbrough Council
- Calden (Administrator of the Estate of Amanda Calden (decd)) v Dr Nunn and Partners
- Caltex Oil (Australia) Pty Ltd v Dredge Willemstad
- Cambridge Water Co Ltd v Eastern Counties Leather plc
- Cameron v Maguire (Procurator Fiscal, Oban)
- Cameron v Maguire (Procurator Fiscal, Oban)
- Campbell (application under para 3 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003), Re
- Canadian Pacific Rly Co v Kelvin Shipping Co Ltd, The Metagama
- Cardigan v Curzon-Howe
- Carford Catering Ltd v Fowler
- Carlisle and Cumberland Banking Co v Bragg
- Carter v McLaren
- Carty v Croydon London Borough Council
- Casey v Cartwright
- Casey v Morane Ltd
- Catherall v Michelin Tyres plc
- CB and JB (minors) (care proceedings: case conduct), Re
- Celanese International Corpn v BP Chemicals Ltd
- Central Asbestos Co Ltd v Dodd
- Centuryan Security Services v Kelly
- Cercato-Gouveia v Kyprianou
- CGB Publishing v Killey
- CGU International Insurance plc v Szabo
- Chambers v Miller
- Champion v Maughan
- Chantrey Vellacott (a firm) v Convergence Group plc
- Chappel v Hart
- Charles v State
- Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Ricketts
- Chester v Afshar
- Chester v Afshar
- Chief Constable of Avon and Somerset Constabulary v Shimmen
- Chief Constable of Bedfordshire Police v Liversidge
- Chief Constable of Cumbria v McGlennon
- Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police v Khan sub nom Khan v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police
- Chilvers v Rayner
- Chipchase v Chipchase (otherwise Leetch, otherwise Matthews)
- Christopherson v Bare
- Christopherson v Bare
- Chua Tian Bok v Public Prosecutor
- Cinci v HM Advocate
- City of Lincoln, The
- Clare v Buckle Mellows (a firm)
- Clark v Chief Constable of Essex Police
- Clarke, Re, ex p Debtor v S Aston & Son Ltd
- Clay v A J Crump & Sons Ltd
- Climpson v Coles
- Clinton Cards (Essex) Ltd v Royal and Sun Alliance Co Ltd
- Clough v First Choice Holidays and Flights Ltd
- CMC Group Plc v Zhang
- Cobb v Great Western Rly Co
- Cockcroft v Smith
- Codd v Cabe sub nom Cod v Cabe
- Coflexip SA v Stolt Offshore MS Ltd
- Cohen's Executors and LCC, Re
- Cole v Turner
- Collinge's Settled Estates, Re
- Collins Stewart Ltd v Financial Times Ltd
- Collins v Hertfordshire County Council
- Collins v Wilcock
- Compania Maritima San Basilio SA v Oceanus Mutual Underwriting Association (Bermuda) Ltd, The Eurysthenes
- Compania Naviera Maropan SA v Bowaters Lloyd Pulp and Paper Mills Ltd
- Concord International (Mauritius) Ltd v Concorde Tourist Guide Agency Ltd
- Connolly v Dale
- Conradi v Direction de la concurrence et des prix des Hauts-de-Seine and Minist�re public: 198/86
- Constable's Settled Estates, Re
- Conti v St Mary's Hospital NHS Trust
- Continental Oxygen Co, Re, Elias v Continental Oxygen Co
- Conway v Spencer
- Cook v Beal
- Cook v UK Insulation Ltd
- Cooper v Belsey
- Cooper v DPP
- Cooper v Phibbs
- Coppard v Customs and Excise Comrs
- Corporation of London v Eurostar (UK) Ltd
- Corporation of London v Eurostar (UK) Ltd
- Corr (administratrix of Corr deceased) v IBC Vehicles Ltd
- Cotterill v Starkey
- Cotton's Trustees and London School Board, Re
- Coulson v DPP
- County Ltd v Girozentrale Securities
- Coupe v Guyett
- Coward v Baddeley
- Cox v Sun Alliance Life Ltd
- Crapp v East Stonehouse Local Board
- Craven Settled Estates, Re
- Craven v Riches
- Credit Lyonnais Bank Nederland NV (now known as Generale Bank Nederland NV) v Export Credits Guarantee Department
- Credit Suisse (Monaco) SA v Attar
- Cross, Re, Harston v Tenison
- Crossley v Rawlinson
- Crown Dilmun v Sutton
- Cuckmere Brick Co Ltd v Mutual Finance Ltd
- Cummings v Granger
- Curtis v Betts
- Customs and Excise Comrs v Air Canada
- D & F Estates Ltd v Church Comrs for England
- D v DPP
- D v Irvine (Authority Reporter, Edinburgh)
- D v Irvine (Authority Reporter, Edinburgh)
- DA v North East London Strategic Health Authority
- Daglish v Ministry of Defence
- Dale v Wood
- Danby v Coutts & Co
- Daniel v Metropolitan Rly Co
- Daniels, Re
- Daniels, Re
- Danns v Department of Health
- Davey v Lee
- Davies and Kent's Contract, Re
- Davies v Eli Lilly & Co
- Davies v Swan Motor Co (Swansea) Ltd
- Davis v Schrogin
- Davis, ex p
- De La Bere v Pearson Ltd
- De Romana v Roberts
- Dean v Taylor
- Deane, Re, Bridger v Deane
- Debtor (No 1 of 1941), Re
- Debtor, a (No 7095/2001), Re
- Deep Vein Thrombosis and Air Travel Group Litigation, Re
- Deepak Fertilizers & Petrochemicals Corp Ltd v Davy McKee (UK) London Ltd
- Dempsey v HM Advocate
- Dench v Flynn & Partners
- Denham v Scott
- Denham v Scott
- Denny v Supplies and Transport Co Ltd
- Derby (Earl) and Fergusson's Contract, Re
- Deriche v Ealing Hospital NHS Trust
- Des Reaux and Setchfield's Contract, Re
- Desmond v Safeway Stores plc
- Deutsch v R
- Devon County Council v Clarke sub nom Clark v Devon County Council
- Dhedhi v United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust (formerly Pilgrim Health NHS Trust)
- Dibagula v Republic
- Dickenson v Watson
- Dickin and Kelsall's Contract, Re
- Dilke, Re, Re Dilke's Settlement Trusts, Verey v Dilke
- Dillon v Dillon
- Director General of Fair Trading v Buckland
- Director General of Fair Trading v Buckland
- Director General of Fair Trading v Pioneer Concrete (UK) Ltd sub nom Supply of Ready Mixed Concrete (No 2), Re, Director General of Fair Trading v Pioneer Concrete (UK) Ltd
- Dixon v Clement Jones Solicitors (a firm)
- DN v Greenwich London Borough Council
- DN v Greenwich London Borough Council
- DN v Greenwich London Borough Council
- Docwra, Re, Docwra v Faith
- Doe (a pseudonym) v Bennett
- Dominion Natural Gas Co Ltd v Collins and Perkins
- Donachie v The Chief Constable of the Greater Manchester Police
- Donachie v The Chief Constable of the Greater Manchester Police
- Donaldson v Williams
- Dornan v JW Ellis & Co Ltd
- Doughty v Turner Manufacturing Co Ltd
- Downs v Chappell
- Doyle (John) Construction Ltd v Laing Management (Scotland) Ltd
- Doyle (John) Construction Ltd v Laing Management (Scotland) Ltd
- DPP v Ara
- DPP v Everest
- DPP v Glendinning
- DPP v K & B
- DPP v K & B
- DPP v K (a minor)
- DPP v Merriman
- DPP v Morgan
- DPP v Newbury; DPP v Jones
- DPP v Ping Lin
- DPP v Santra-Bermudez
- DPP v Santra-Bermudez
- DPP v Santra-Bermudez
- DPP v Smith (Michael Ross)
- DPP v W
- DPP v W
- Drake v Beckham
- Drake v Beckham
- Dudarec v Andrews
- Duke v Robson
- Duncombe v Wingfield
- Dunnachie v Kingston-Upon-Hull City Council
- Dunnachie v Kingston-upon-Hull City Council and other appeals
- Dziennik v CTO Gesellschaft Fur Containertransport MBH
- E v S Garages Ltd
- Eames v Hacon
- East Anglian Rlys Co v Eastern Counties Rly Co
- East India Co v Tritton
- East Yorkshire Gravel Co Ltd's Application, Re
- EB v Order of the Oblates of Mary Immaculate in the Province of British Columbia (A-G of Canada intervening)
- Ebbs v James Whitson & Co Ltd
- Eckersley v Binnie
- Edgcombe v Rodd
- Edinburgh United Breweries Ltd v Molleson
- Edwards and Rudkin to Green, Re
- Edwards v Governors of Hanson School
- Effort Shipping Co Ltd v Linden Management SA, The Giannis NK
- Eggarevba v State
- Eiles v Southwark London Borough Council
- El Awadi v Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA Ltd
- Elcom, Re, Layborn v Grover Wright
- Eleady-Cole v The Brothers of Charity Services Merseyside
- Electronic Data Systems Ltd v National Air Traffic Services Ltd
- Elliott v C (a minor)
- Elworthy v Bird
- Ely Brewery Co v Pontypridd U D C
- Emeh v Kensington and Chelsea and Westminster Area Health Authority
- Enertrag (UK) Ltd v Sea and Land Power and Energy Ltd
- Engelhart v Farrant & Co
- Ernst & Young (a firm) v Butte Mining plc
- Essa v Laing Ltd
- Essendon Engineering Co Ltd v Maile
- Essendon Engineering Co Ltd v Maile
- Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Hall Russell & Co Ltd and Shetland Islands Council, The Esso Bernicia
- Etherington and Lancashire and Yorkshire Accident Insurance Co, Re
- European Commission v Volkswagen AG: C-74/04
- Evans v Benyon
- Evans v Clifton Inns Ltd
- Evans v Volex Group plc
- Everard (F T) and Sons Ltd v BP Marine Ltd
- Express Ltd (t/a Express Dairies Distribution) v Environment Agency
- Eyre v Norsworthy
- Fagan v Metropolitan Police Comr
- Fagan v Metropolitan Police Comr
- Fagan v Metropolitan Police Comr
- Fairbrother v Gabb & Co
- Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd (t/a GH Dovener & Son)
- Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd and other appeals
- Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd; Fox v Spousal (Midlands) Ltd; Matthews v Associated Portland Cement Manufacturers (1978) Ltd
- FAL Oil Co Ltd v Petronas Trading Corpn SDN BHD sub nom FAL Oil Co Ltd v Petronas Trading Corpn, The Devon
- Farah v Metropolitan Police Comr
- Farah v Metropolitan Police Comr
- Farquhar v Newbury RDC
- Farrell v Merton Sutton & Wandsworth Health Authority
- Farrell v Secretary of State for Defence
- Farrer v Lacy, Hartland & Co
- Farrier-Waimak Ltd v Bank of New Zealand sub nom Bank of New Zealand v Farrier-Waimak Ltd
- Farrukh v Irwin Mitchell (a firm)
- Faulkner v Talbot
- Feakins v Burstow
- Featherstone v Staples
- Federal Commerce and Navigation Ltd v Suisse-Atlantique Soci�t� D'Armement SA, The Cruzeiro do Sul
- Federazione Nazionale del Commercio Oleano (Federolio) v EC Commission: T-122/96
- Fennelly v Connex South Eastern Ltd
- Ferguson-Davie v Ferguson-Davie
- Fernback v Clarke
- Ferrer v Beale sub nom Fetter v Beale sub nom Fitter v Veal
- Finecard International Ltd (t/a The Ninja Corpn) v Urquhart Dyke & Lord (a firm)
- Flack v Hudson
- Flannagan v Shaw
- Fleming v Securities Commission
- Fletcher v Brent London Borough Council
- Fletcher v Collis
- Flintshire County Council v Reynolds
- Floyd v John Fairhurst & Co
- Forde v Skinner
- Formula One Autocentres Ltd v Birmingham City Council
- Forticrete Ltd v Lafarge Roofing Ltd
- Foster v Biosil
- Foster v Biosil
- Foster v Prince
- Fotedar v St George's Healthcare NHS Trust (No 2)
- Fountain Forestry Ltd v Edwards
- Fowler v Lanning
- Frances v Ley sub nom Day v Beddingfield
- Francisco v Diedrick
- Fraser v Berkeley
- French v Chief Constable of Sussex Police
- French v Thames Valley Strategic Health Authority
- Frewen v Hays
- Frewin v Consignia plc
- Furbert v R
- G (DM) (an infant), Re,
- Gammon (Hong Kong) Ltd v A-G of Hong Kong
- Gammon (Hong Kong) Ltd v A-G of Hong Kong
- Garcia v East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust
- Garcia v St Mary's National Health Service Trust
- Gardner v RP Winder (Wholesale Meats) Ltd
- Garnett, Re, Gandy v Macaulay
- Garrett v Halton Borough Council; Myatt v National Coal Board
- Garth v Earnshaw
- Gavalas v Police
- Gavalas v Police
- Gavalas v Police
- Gaylard v Morris
- Geffroy (criminal proceedings against): C-366/98
- General Engineering Services Ltd v Kingston and St Andrew Corpn
- Gertor, The
- Gibbon v Christchurch, High Harrogate (All of), Sheepshanks Intervening
- Gibbons v Pepper sub nom Gibbon v Pepper
- Gibbons v Pepper sub nom Gibbon v Pepper
- Giblett v P & NE Murray Ltd
- Gilhespie v Burdis
- Giorgianni v R
- Girbash v Main Line Auto Engineering Ltd
- Glamorganshire Iron and Coal Co v Irvine
- Glanville v Glanville
- Glencore Grain Ltd v Goldbeam Shipping Inc; Goldbeam Shipping Inc v Navios International Inc; The Mass Glory
- Glentree Estates Ltd v Gee
- Glicksman v Redbridge Healthcare NHS Trust
- Glover v London and South Western Rly Co
- Godden v Kent and Medway Strategic Health Authority
- Golden Strait Corpn v Nippon Yusen Kubishika Kaisha, The Golden Victory
- Goldman v Thai Airways International Ltd
- Gordon v HM Advocate
- Gordon v Selico Co Ltd
- Gorham v British Telecommunications plc
- Gorrie v The Marist Brothers
- Gowans (reference under para 6 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003), Re
- Grainger v HM Advocate
- Grand Trunk Rly Co v McAlpine
- Grand Trunk Rly Co v McAlpine
- Gray v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board
- Gray v Southampton and South West Hampshire Health Authority
- Gray v Southampton and South West Hampshire Health Authority
- Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Executive v Sands
- Green v Bannister
- Green v Chief Constable of Lothian and Borders Police (Green, third party)
- Green v Hills
- Green v Vickers Defence Systems Ltd
- Green v Yorkshire Traction Co Ltd
- Greenwich London Borough Council v Browne
- Gregg v Scott
- Gregg v Scott
- Greis Case
- Grell-Taurel Ltd v The Caribbean Home Insurance Co Ltd
- Grey v Grant
- Greymalkin Ltd v Copleys (a firm)
- Griffith-Boscawen v Scott
- Griffiths v Dunnett
- Griggs v Transco plc
- Groom v Selby
- Groupama Insurance Co Ltd v Channel Islands Securities Ltd
- Grove, Re, Public Trustee v Dixon
- Guest v Warren
- Gurney, Re, Mason v Mercer
- Gusty, The and The Daniel M
- Guy v Livesey
- Haggard v Mason
- Halbot v Lens
- Hale v Jennings Bros
- Halkett v Earl of Dudley
- Hall Dare's Contract, Re
- Hall v Fearnley
- Hallam, petitioner
- Halsted v Clark
- Hamer v London, City and Midland Bank Ltd
- Hamilton v Papakura District Council
- Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council v Monk
- Hancock v Somes
- Harding v Scott-Moncrieff
- Harding v The Pub Estate Co Ltd
- Hardman v Child
- Harkness and Allsopp's Contract, Re
- Harley Street Capital Ltd v Tchigirinsky
- Harracksingh v A-G of Trinidad and Tobago
- Harris v Mobbs
- Harris v Perry & Co
- Harrison v Hodgson
- Harrison v Michelin Tyre Co Ltd
- Harrison v West of Scotland Kart Club
- Harrow London Borough Council v Shah
- Harrow London Borough Council v Shah
- Hatton v Treeby
- Hawker's Settled Estates, Re
- Hawkins v R
- Hawley v Luminar Leisure Ltd
- Hawley v Luminar Leisure plc
- Haystead v Chief Constable of Derbyshire
- Haystead v Chief Constable of Derbyshire
- He Kaw Teh v R
- He Kaw Teh v R
- Head's Trustees and Macdonald, Re
- Heasmans v Clarity Cleaning Co Ltd
- Hedley v Barlow
- Hemmings v Stoke Poges Golf Club
- Hendry v Turner
- Hereford and Worcester County Council v Clayton
- Hevican v Ruane
- Hewitt v DPP
- Heyward v Plymouth Hospital NHS Trust
- Hibbert v R
- Hibbert v R
- HIH Casualty and General Insurance Ltd v Chase Manhattan Bank
- Hillman (reference under para 6 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003), Re
- Hills v Potter
- Hills v Potter
- Hillsdown Holdings plc v Pensions Ombudsman
- Hinckley and Country Building Society v Henny
- Hipwood v Gloucester Health Authority
- HM Advocate v Caledonian Newspapers Ltd
- HM Advocate v Shearer
- HM Prison Service v Beart
- Hobin v Douglas
- Hobson v Bartram & Sons Ltd
- Hollis v Vabu Pty Ltd (trading as Crisis Couriers)
- Holmes (W & R) and Cosmopolitan Press Ltd's Contract, Re
- Holmes v Mather
- Holsgrove v South West London Strategic Health Authority
- Holt v Holroyd Meek Ltd
- Holtby v Brigham & Cowan (Hull) Ltd
- Holy v Law Society
- Holyday v Oxenbridge
- Hone v Going Places Leisure Travel Ltd
- Hook v Hook and Brown
- Hopper v Reeve
- Horton v Evans
- Horton v Taplin Contracts Ltd
- Hotson v East Berkshire Area Health Authority
- Hounslow London Borough Council v Pilling
- Howard v Bergin, O'Connor & Co
- Howe v David Brown Tractors (Retail) Ltd (Rustons Engineering Co Ltd, third party)
- Howell v Jackson
- Hudson v Crane
- Huggins v Butcher sub nom Higgins' Case sub nom Higgins v Butcher
- Hughes v Lord Advocate
- Hughes v National Union of Mineworkers
- Hulme v DPP
- Hurditch v Sheffield Health Authority
- Hurst v Bryk
- Hurst v Bryk
- Hurst v Picture Theatres Ltd
- Hussaney v Chester City FC
- Hutchinson (administratrix of the estate of Hutchinson (decd)) v Epsom and St Hellier NHS Trust
- Hutton v Mansell
- Hyam v DPP
- Hyett v Great Western Rly Co
- Hyundai Merchant Marine Co Ltd v Furness Withy (Australia) Pty, The Doric Pride
- Ikumene Singapore Pte Ltd v Leong Chee Leng
- Ilott v Wilkes
- Ilott v Wilkes
- Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v Union of India
- Innes v Wylie
- International Transport Roth GmbH v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- IRC v Joicey (No 2)
- IRC v Thompson
- Irvine v Metropolitan Police Comr
- Issa v Hackney London Borough Council sub nom Hackney London Borough Council v Issa
- Ive v Steel
- J (a child: adoption), Re
- J (Children) (abduction: child's objections to return), Re
- J and M (children) (care proceedings: responsibility for child's injury), Re
- J and M (children) (care proceedings: responsibility for child's injury), Re
- J D Williams & Co Ltd v Michael Hyde & Associates Ltd
- Jaggard v Dickinson
- James v Cliffe
- James v Cliffe
- James v Fairley
- Jamieson v HM Advocate
- Janaway v Salford Area Health Authority
- JEB Fasteners Ltd v Marks, Bloom & Co (a firm)
- Jenkins and H E Randall & Co's Contract, Re
- Jenney (a minor) v North Lincolnshire County Council
- Jervis, Re
- Jetley v Hill
- JJ Coughlan Ltd v Ruparelia
- John Gerrard Barry v John Sutherland
- John Mowlem Construction plc v Neil F Jones & Co (a firm)
- John v MGN Ltd
- Johnson (t/a Johnson Butchers) v BJW Property Developments Ltd
- Johnson (t/a Johnson Butchers) v BJW Property Developments Ltd
- Johnson v Gore Wood & Co (a firm)
- Johnson v Northwood
- Johnson v State
- Jones (L E) (Insurance Brokers) Ltd v Portsmouth City Council
- Jones v Ministry of the Interior of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs intervening)
- Jones v Ministry of the Interior of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs intervening); Mitchell v Al-Dali
- Jones v Owen
- Jones v Sherwood
- Jones v Tower Boot Co Ltd
- Jones v Tower Boot Co Ltd
- Jones v Trollope Colls Cementation Overseas Ltd
- Jones, Re, Jones v Cusack-Smith
- JT (adult: refusal of medical treatment), Re
- Judson v British Transport Commission
- K v Gilmartin's Executrix
- K v Minister of Safety and Security
- Kaberry v Freethcartwright (formerly Freeth Cartwright Hunt Dickens) (a firm)
- Kamilla Hans-Peter Eckhoff KG v AC Oerssleff's EFTF A/B, The Kamilla
- Kandalla v British Airways Board
- Karia v ICS (Management) Services Ltd
- Kauesa v Minister of Home Affairs
- Kearn-Price v Kent County Council
- Keir v Leeman
- Keith v Chalmers
- Kelly v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police
- Kenny & Good Pty Ltd v MGICA (1992) Ltd
- Kent County Council v Batchelor
- Kerifford's Case
- Khaliq v HM Advocate
- Khanna v Sombra
- Kim v HM Advocate
- King v Brandywine Reinsurance Co (UK) Ltd (formerly known as Cigna RE Co (UK) Ltd)
- King v Dept of Transport, Local Government and the Regions
- King v Phippard
- King v RCO Support Services Ltd
- King v Zurich Insurance Co
- Kingsberry v Greater Manchester Strategic Health Authority
- Kirkland v Robinson
- Kirkland v Robinson
- Knight v Nicholls
- Knight v Nicholls
- Knight v Vale Royal Borough Council
- Knightley v Johns
- Knott v Knott
- Knott v Newham Healthcare NHS Trust
- Kooragang Investments Pty Ltd v Richardson and Wrench Ltd
- KR v Bryn Alyn Community (Holdings) Ltd (in liq)
- KR v Bryn Alyn Community (Holdings) Ltd (in liq)
- Kuwait Airways Corp v Iraqi Airways Co
- Kuwait Airways Corp v Iraqi Airways Co
- Kuwait Airways Corp v Iraqi Airways Co
- Kuwait Airways Corp v Iraqi Airways Co (No 3)
- Kuwait Airways Corp v Iraqi Airways Co (No 4)
- Kuwait Airways Corp v Iraqi Airways Corp
- Kuwait Airways Corp v Iraqi Airways Corp (No 7)
- Laboratorios RTB, SL v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Design): T-162/01
- Lake, Re, ex p Howe Trustees
- Lalji v Post Office Ltd
- Lambson Aviation v Embraer Empresa Brasiliera de Aeronautica SA
- Lamoon v Fry
- Lane v Holloway
- Latter v Braddell
- Latter v Braddell
- Laverton v Kiapasha (trading as Takeaway Supreme)
- Laybourn v R
- Le Lievre v Gould
- Leefe v NSM Music Ltd
- Leggett v Norfolk, Suffolk and Cambridgeshire Strategic Health Authority
- Leicestershire County Council v Gordon Hewitt Associates
- Leigh v Gladstone
- Leslie v Archer
- Leslie, Re, ex p Leslie
- Lesogoro v State
- Letang v Cooper
- Lever v Hide sub nom Glever v Hynde
- Levy v Edwards
- Lewis v Arnold
- Lewis v Lewis
- Lexmead (Basingstoke) Ltd v Lewis sub nom Lambert v Lewis
- Lillicrap v Nalder & Son (a firm)
- Lillywhite v University College London Hospitals' NHS Trust
- Lim Chin Aik v R
- Lincolnshire County Council v RJ (X intervening)
- Lindsay v Alliance & Leicester plc
- Lister v Hesley Hall Ltd
- Lister's Case sub nom R v Lister
- Livesey v Parker Merchanting Ltd
- Livingstone v Fife Council
- Lloyd v John Lewis Partnership
- Lloyds TSB General Insurance Holdings Ltd v Lloyds Bank Group Insurance Co Ltd, Abbey National plc v Lee
- Lloyds TSB General Insurance Holdings Ltd v Lloyds Bank Group Insurance Co Ltd, Abbey National plc v Lee
- Lloyd-Wolper v Moore (National Insurance Guarantee Corpn plc, Pt 20 claimant, Moore, Pt 20 defendant)
- Lobb (Alec) (Garages) Ltd v Total Oil GB Ltd
- Loftus-Brigham v Ealing London Borough Council
- Logicrose Ltd v Southend United Football Club Ltd
- London and North Western Rly Co v Swainson
- London Drugs Ltd v Kuehne and Nagel International Ltd
- Longman v Bath Electric Tramways Ltd
- Lonrho plc v Fayed
- Lord Advocate's Reference (No 1 of 2001)
- Lord Advocate's Reference (No 1 of 2001)
- Lord Advocate's Reference (No 1 of 2001)
- Lord v Pacific Steam Navigation Co Ltd, The Oropesa
- Lowe v Havering NHS Trust
- Lowry v Bourdieu
- Lucas v R
- Luck (trading as G Luck Arboricultural & Horticultural) v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council
- Lyttle v HM Advocate
- M (a minor) v Oxford
- M (Care Proceedings: Disclosure: Human rights), Re
- M v Blackpool Victoria Hospital NHS Trust
- M v HM Advocate
- M v Singer
- Macey v Warwickshire Health Authority
- Maguire v Harland & Wolff plc
- Maguire v Regentford Ltd
- Mahmud v BCCI SA (in liq); Malik v BCCI SA (in liq)
- Mainstream Properties Ltd v Young
- Majrowski v Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust
- Majrowski v Guy's and St Thomas's NHS Trust
- Makanjuola v Metropolitan Police Comr
- Maltby v Murrells
- Man Nutzfahrzeuge Aktiengesellschaft v Freightliner Ltd
- Mann v Ward
- Mansfield v Weetabix Ltd
- Manual Work Services (Construction) Ltd, Re
- Margolle v Delta Maritime Co Ltd
- Markham Main Colliery Ltd, Re
- Marr v Lambeth London Borough Council
- Martin v Stanborough
- Mattei v Vautro
- Matthews v Neill
- Mattis v Pollock (trading as Flamingos Nightclub)
- Mattis v Pollock (trading as Flamingo's Nightclub)
- Mattocks v Mann
- Mawdsley v Cosmosair plc
- Mayo, Re, Mayo v Mayo sub nom Mayo's Will Trusts, Re
- MB (an adult: medical treatment), Re
- M'Bain v Crichton
- Mbutu v De La Rue Brown
- Mbutu v De la Rue Browne
- McCarey v Associated Newspapers Ltd (No 2)
- McCue v Cameron sub nom McCue v Currie (Procurator Fiscal, Kilmarnock)
- McCue v Cameron sub nom McCue v Currie (Procurator Fiscal, Kilmarnock)
- McDonald v HM Advocate
- McDonnell v Holwerda
- McDowall v Great Western Rly Co
- McElhinney v Ireland (Application 31253/96)
- McFarland, Re
- McFarlane v Tayside Health Board
- McFarlane v Thain
- McGhee v National Coal Board
- McGovern v British Steel Corpn
- McGovern v Owen (t/a Owen Lyons Estate Agents)
- McHugh v Kerr
- McKearney v HM Advocate
- McKearney v HM Advocate
- McKenzie v Chilliwack Corpn
- McKew v Holland and Hannen and Cubitts (Scotland) Ltd
- McKinnon v HM Advocate
- McKinnon v HM Advocate
- McLoughlin v Jones (a firm)
- McManus v Beckham
- McMylor v Firth Rixson plc
- McNairn v HM Advocate
- McSorley, Petitioner
- M'Curday v Driscoll
- Meadow v General Medical Council
- Mellor v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
- Melton, Re, Milk v Towers
- Melville v HM Advocate
- Melvin v HM Advocate
- Merelie v Newcastle Primary Care Trust
- Meridian Global Funds Management Asia Ltd v Securities Commission
- Merrett v Schuster
- Merson v Cartwright
- Metropolitan Police Comr v Caldwell sub nom R v Caldwell
- Metropolitan Police Comr v Caldwell sub nom R v Caldwell
- Metropolitan Rly Co v Jackson
- MFI Warehouses Ltd v Nattrass
- Middle Temple v Lloyds Bank plc
- Milkhu v North West Hospitals NHS Trust
- Miller v Minister of Pensions
- Milne v Express Newspapers plc
- Milner v Wilson
- Milner v Wilson
- Minister of Pensions v Chennell
- Minister of Safety and Security v Carmichele
- Ministry of Defence v Bloomfield-Evans
- Ministry of Defence v Cannock
- Mirvahedy v Henley
- Mirvahedy v Henley
- Mirvahedy v Henley
- Mitchell v Milford Haven Port Authority
- Mitera Marigo (M/V) (Owners) v M/V Fritz Thyssen (Owners), The Fritz Thyssen
- MMR and MR Vaccine Litigation (No 3), Re
- Moffat v Burges Salmon (a firm)
- Moffat v Burges Salmon (a firm)
- Mohamed v Alaga & Co (a firm) sub nom Mohamed v Alaga
- Mok Wei Tak v R
- Moncrieff v Jamieson
- Monks v Dykes
- Moores v Bude Stratton Town Council
- Moreton v Hardern
- Morgans v Launchbury
- Moriarty v Brooks
- Morrisey v R
- Morriss v Marsden
- Morrow v Belcher
- Mortin v Shoppee
- Morton, Re, Morton v Morton
- Moses v Midland Rly
- Mostyn v Mostyn
- Moy v Pettman Smith (a firm)
- Moy v Pettman Smith (a firm)
- Mpala v State
- MSC Mediterranean Shipping Co SA v Delumar BVBA
- Mulhouse (formerly Mulhausen) v Mulhouse (formerly Mulhausen)
- Mulvenna v Royal Bank of Scotland plc
- Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Harrop
- Munro v Daw
- Murray v Foyle Meats Ltd
- Mutch v Allen
- Mutual Aid Permanent Benefit Building Society, Re, ex p James
- Nation v King's Healthcare NHS Trust
- National Rivers Authority v Alfred McAlpine Homes (East) Ltd
- National Rivers Authority v Alfred McAlpine Homes (East) Ltd
- National Rivers Authority v Alfred McAlpine Homes (East) Ltd
- National Rivers Authority v Yorkshire Water Services Ltd
- National Utility Services Ltd v St James Court Hotel Ltd
- National Westminster Bank plc v Brice Droogleever (a firm)
- Nationwide Building Society v Balmer Radmore (a firm)
- Needler Financial Services v Taber
- Neill v North Antrim Magistrates' Court
- Nelder v DPP
- New Zealand Guardian Trust Co Ltd v Brooks
- Newbold v Ministry of Defence
- Newhart Developments Ltd v Co-operative Commercial Bank Ltd
- Ng Keng Yong v Public Prosecutor
- Nicholson v Booth and Naylor
- Nisbet v Chief Constable, Strathclyde
- Noakes v Noakes & Co Ltd
- Noden v Johnson sub nom Nodin v Johnson
- Noel v Poland
- Non-Marine Underwriters, Lloyd's of London v Scalera
- Non-Marine Underwriters, Lloyd's of London v Scalera
- Norberg v Wynrib
- Norberg v Wynrib
- Norjarl K/S A/S v Hyundai Heavy Industries Co Ltd
- Norman (Alec) Garages Ltd v Phillips
- Normans Bay Ltd (formerly Illingworth Morris Ltd) v Coudert Brothers (a firm)
- Norris v Brown & Root Ealing Technical Services Ltd
- Northern Garage Ltd, Re
- Noyes v Pollock
- Nwali v State
- Nyakbambo v Minister of Justice
- Nygaard v R
- Nygaard v R
- O v Governor of Holloway Prison
- O v Governor of Holloway Prison
- O v Ministry of Defence
- Ocloo v Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust
- Office of Fair Trading v X
- Official Solicitor v Allison
- Ogwo v Taylor
- Oksuzoglu v Kay
- Old Grovebury Manor Farm Ltd v W Seymour Plant Sales and Hire Ltd
- Oliver v Chief Constable of Northumbria Police
- O'Neill v DSG Retail Ltd
- O'Neill v Governors of St Thomas More RCVA Upper School; O'Neill v Bedfordshire County Council
- Onibudo v Law Society
- Ophthalmic Innovations International (United Kingdom) Ltd v Ophthalmic Innovations International Inc
- Organophosphate Litigation, Re, Snell v Robert Young & Co Ltd
- O'Riordan v DPP
- Orkem v EC Commission: 374/87
- Osborn v Veitch
- Osei-Bonsu v Wandsworth London Borough Council sub nom Wandsworth London Borough Council v Osei-Bonsu
- O'Shea v MGN Ltd
- Osland v R
- Ostrowski v Palmer
- Ostrowski v Palmer
- Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Miller Steamship Co Pty, The Wagon Mound (No 2)
- Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts Dock and Engineering Co Ltd, The Wagon Mound
- P v HM Advocate
- Pacific Direct Ltd v Riaz
- Page v Smith (No 2)
- Palfrey v ARC Offshore Ltd
- Palmer Bruyn & Parker Pty Ltd v Parsons
- Palmer v Guadagni
- Palmer v Locke
- Paragon Finance plc (formerly National Home Loans Corpn plc) v Freshfields (a firm)
- Parker v PFC Flooring Supplies Ltd
- Paterson v Blackburn Corpn
- Paterson Zochonis & Co Ltd v Merfarken Packaging Ltd
- Patrick v Johnson
- Patten and Edmonton Union Poor Guardians, Re
- Patterson v National Floor Coverings Ltd
- Paul Davidson Taylor (a firm) v White
- Pauling's Settlement Trusts, Re, Younghusband v Coutts & Co
- Pawley and London and Provincial Bank, Re
- Payless Travel Ltd v Baba Krupa Holidays Ltd
- Peace v HM Advocate
- Peck v Craighead sub nom Debtor, a (No 10 of 1992), Re, Peck v Craighead
- Peel's (Sir Robert) Settled Estates, Re
- Penn v Ward
- Pennington v Cayley
- Pensher Security Door Co Ltd v Sunderland City Council
- Perrott and King's Contract, Re
- Petchey v Broker
- Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Storkwain Ltd
- Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Storkwain Ltd
- Phelps v Hillingdon London BC
- Phelps v London Borough of Hillingdon, Anderton v Clwyd County Council, Jarvis v Hampshire County Council, Re G (a minor)
- Phillip v State
- Phillips v Eyre
- Phillips v Henlys Ltd
- Phillips v Howgate
- Phillips v Phillips
- Pickford v Imperial Chemical Industries plc
- Pigford v City of Sunderland
- Piggott v Kemp sub nom Pigott v Kemp
- Pigney v Pointers Transport Services Ltd
- Pinekerry Ltd v Kenneth Needs (Contractors) Ltd
- Plant Construction plc v Clive Adams Associates
- Plant Construction plc v Clive Adams Associates
- Plymouth and Torbay Health Authority v Glanfield
- Polemis and Furness Withy & Co, Re
- Pope's Contract, Re
- Poppleton and Jones' Contract, Re
- Porter (JP) Co v Bell
- Porter (JP) Co v Bell
- Portsea Island Mutual Co-operative Society Ltd v Leyland
- Power v Banks
- Preferred Mortgages Ltd v Bradford and Bingley Estate Agencies Ltd
- Preferred Mortgages Ltd v Countrywide Surveyors Ltd
- Price v John
- Pride Valley Foods Ltd v Hall & Partners
- Pride Valley Foods Ltd v Hall & Partners
- Pride Valley Foods Ltd v Hall & Partners
- Pride Valley Foods Ltd v Hall & Partners
- Priestley v Ellis
- Priestley v Harrogate Health Care NHS Trust
- Pritchard (Inspector of Taxes) v Arundale
- Prosser (A) & Son Ltd v Levy
- Provimi Ltd v Roche Products Ltd
- Provimi Ltd v Roche Products Ltd
- Puffett v Hayfield
- Pugh v Cantor Fitzgerald International
- Pugh v Comr of Police for the Metropolis
- Pursell v Horn sub nom Purcell v Horne
- Purset v Hutchings
- Queen Elizabeth's Grammar School Blackburn Ltd v Banks Wilson Solicitors (a firm)
- Quinn (or Quin) v Burch Bros (Builders) Ltd
- R (minors) (abduction: consent), Re
- R (on the application of A) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- R (on the application of B) v Head Teacher of Alperton Community School
- R (on the application of Bempoa) v Southwark London Borough Council
- R (on the application of Caine) v Cavendish
- R (on the application of CD) v Criminal Injuries Compensation Appeal Panel; R (on the application of JM) v Criminal Injuries Compensation Appeal Panel
- R (on the application of E) v Criminal Injuries Compensation Appeals Panel
- R (on the application of E) v Criminal Injuries Compensation Appeal Panel
- R (on the application of Grundy & Co Excavations Ltd) v Halton Division Magistrates Court
- R (on the application of IFG Financial Services Ltd) v Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd
- R (on the application of Khan) v Her Majesty's Coroner for West Hertfordshire
- R (on the application of M) v Inner London Crown Court
- R (on the application of Mach) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- R (on the application of McCann) v Crown Court at Manchester; Clingham v Kensington and Chelsea Royal London Borough Council
- R (on the application of O'Reilly) v Blenheim Healthcare Ltd
- R (on the application of P) v Liverpool City Magistrates' Court
- R (on the application of R) v Durham Constabulary
- R (on the application of S) v Inner West London Coroner
- R (on the application of Selter Associates Ltd) v Leicestershire County Council
- R (on the application of Stunt) v Mallett
- R (on the application of Taylor) v Haydn-Smith
- R (on the application of the RSPCA) v Sittingbourne Magistrates
- R (on the application of U) v Metropolitan Police Comr; R (on the application of R) v Durham Constabulary
- R (on the application of Yildrim) v Immigration Appeal Tribunal
- R Cruickshank Ltd v Chief Constable of Kent County Constabulary
- R v A
- R v A
- R v Adaway
- R v Adomako
- R v Ainscough
- R v Anglian Water Services Ltd sub nom Hart v Anglian Water Services Ltd
- R v Antoine
- R v Antoine
- R v Antoine
- R v Antoine
- R v Archibald, A-G's Reference (No 69 of 2001)
- R v Associated Octel Co Ltd
- R v B
- R v B
- R v B
- R v B
- R v B
- R v Bahadoor
- R v Bailey
- R v Bailey
- R v Baldwin
- R v Banks
- R v Barlow
- R v Barnes
- R v Barney
- R v Barratt
- R v Bartley
- R v Bashir
- R v Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council, ex p Bassett
- R v Bates
- R v Beasley
- R v Begum (Husna)
- R v Begum (Husna)
- R v Belfon
- R v Bell
- R v Bennett
- R v Bennett
- R v Berry (No 3)
- R v Billinghurst
- R v Blake
- R v Blake
- R v Bland
- R v Blaue
- R v Blyth Valley Magistrates' Court, ex p Dobson
- R v Boguszewicz
- R v Bolduc and Bird
- R v Bolduc and Bird
- R v Boreman
- R v Boreman
- R v Bournewood Community and Mental Health NHS Trust, ex p L
- R v Boyton
- R v Bradish
- R v Brady
- R v Brady
- R v Breckenridge
- R v Briggs
- R v Brighton Borough Council, ex p Harvey
- R v Brockley
- R v Brown
- R v Brown
- R v Brown and other appeals
- R v Brown and other appeals
- R v Bruce
- R v Bryce
- R v Bryce
- R v Buckingham
- R v Burgess
- R v Burstow
- R v Burton
- R v Butler
- R v Byrne
- R v Byrne
- R v Byrne
- R v C
- R v C
- R v C
- R v Camden London Borough Council, ex p Aranda
- R v Camden London Borough Council, ex p Aranda
- R v Case
- R v Castle
- R v Cato
- R v Cerovic
- R v Choudhury, R v Uddin sub nom R v Choudhoury, R v Uddin
- R v Chute
- R v Clark
- R v Clark
- R v Clark
- R v Clarke
- R v Cole sub nom R v Cole, Lees and Birch
- R v Cole sub nom R v Cole, Lees and Birch
- R v Coleman
- R v Coles
- R v Coles
- R v Colle
- R v Colwill
- R v Cooper
- R v Coote
- R v Cope
- R v Corran
- R v Crabbe
- R v Cronshaw
- R v Croydon London Borough, ex p Easom
- R v Cuerrier
- R v Cunningham
- R v Cutts
- R v D
- R v D
- R v Dakou
- R v Dalby
- R v Davidson
- R v Davies
- R v Davies
- R v Day
- R v Dean
- R v Dear
- R v Densu
- R v Dhaliwal (appeal under s 58 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- R v Dias
- R v Dimsey; R v Allen
- R v Dimsey; R v Allen
- R v Docherty
- R v Dodman
- R v Doring
- R v Doring
- R v Downes
- R v DPP, ex p Cooke
- R v DPP, ex p Jones
- R v Drew
- R v Driscoll
- R v Dunne
- R v Easton
- R v Egan
- R v Elliott
- R v Elliott
- R v Ellis
- R v Ellis
- R v Elrington
- R v Erisman
- R v Evans
- R v Ewanchuk (A-G intervening)
- R v Ewanchuk (A-G intervening)
- R v Ewanchuk (A-G intervening)
- R v Fancy
- R v Fancy
- R v Finlay
- R v Finta
- R v Finta
- R v Fisher
- R v Fitzgerald
- R v Forest of Dean Justices, ex p Farley
- R v Forsyth
- R v Franklin
- R v French
- R v Futter
- R v FW Woolworth & Co
- R v G
- R v G
- R v G
- R v G
- R v G
- R v G
- R v G
- R v G
- R v G
- R v G
- R v Gabriel
- R v Gateway Foodmarkets Ltd
- R v Giannetto
- R v Gibson; R v Sylveire
- R v Gibson; R v Sylveire
- R v Gill
- R v Governor of Brockhill Prison, ex p Evans (No 2)
- R v Gowans; R v Hillman
- R v Graham
- R v Graham, R v Kansal, R v Ali, R v Marsh, R v Graham, R v Prince, R v Bramich
- R v Graham-Kerr
- R v Grant
- R v Gray and Evans
- R v Greatrex, R v Bates
- R v Green
- R v Greenstein, R v Green
- R v Groves
- R v Grunwald
- R v Guilfoyle
- R v Hagan
- R v Hall
- R v Hallett
- R v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council, ex p P
- R v Hancock; R v Warner; R v Michael
- R v Hardie
- R v Hardie
- R v Harding
- R v Harrison
- R v Harrison
- R v Harrow London Borough Council, ex p Coker
- R v Harrow London Borough Council, ex p Fahia
- R v Hart
- R v Haslam
- R v Havard
- R v Headley
- R v Hogan
- R v Horn
- R v Horseferry Road Magistrates' Court, ex p K
- R v Horseferry Road Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p Siadatan
- R v Howells
- R v Hussain
- R v Ike
- R v Inspector of Taxes, ex p Clarke sub nom R v Freshwell General Comrs for Income Tax, ex p Clarke
- R v Islam
- R v Izod
- R v Jackson
- R v Jackson
- R v Jackson
- R v Jackson
- R v Jakeman
- R v Janjua, R v Choudury
- R v Jefferson
- R v JF Alford Transport Ltd
- R v Jobidon
- R v Jones
- R v Jones
- R v Jones
- R v Jones
- R v Jurtyn
- R v K
- R v K
- R v K
- R v K
- R v K
- R v Kearns
- R v Kellam, ex p South Wales Police Authority
- R v Kennedy
- R v Khan
- R v Khan
- R v Kiddle
- R v Kimber
- R v King, R v Stockwell
- R v Kingham
- R v Kingston
- R v Kirkland
- R v Knight
- R v Kowalski
- R v Lalani
- R v Lamb
- R v Larter and Castleton
- R v Law Society, ex p Ingman Foods AB
- R v Lawrence
- R v Lawrence
- R v Lee
- R v Levine
- R v Lincolnshire (Kesteven) Justices, ex p O'Connor
- R v Linekar
- R v Linsberg and Leies
- R v Livesey
- R v Lock
- R v Loizou
- R v London Borough of Merton, ex p Ruffle
- R v Loukes
- R v Lynsey
- R v Lytton
- R v M
- R v M
- R v Macdougal
- R v Makoare
- R v Malpas
- R v Manning
- R v Marcus
- R v Mark
- R v Martin
- R v Martineau
- R v Mason
- R v Matudi
- R v Matudi
- R v May
- R v McCormack
- R v McCrudden
- R v Mellor
- R v Meredith
- R v Merrick
- R v Metcalfe
- R v Miah
- R v Milford Haven Port Authority
- R v Miller
- R v Miller
- R v Miller
- R v Minhas
- R v Mitchell
- R v Mohan
- R v Moloney
- R v Monk
- R v Montila sub nom R v M
- R v Morgans
- R v Morrison
- R v Muhamad
- R v Muhamad
- R v Munro
- R v Murphy
- R v Nathaniel
- R v Neale
- R v Neary
- R v Nichol
- R v Nicholas
- R v Nicholson
- R v Nicholson
- R v Noakes
- R v Nwinski
- R v Oakley
- R v Okolie
- R v Ondhia
- R v Orpin
- R v Orpin
- R v Osborne
- R v O'Shay
- R v Osolin (A-G of Canada intervening)
- R v P
- R v Paine
- R v Paine
- R v Paine
- R v Paraskeva
- R v Park
- R v Parker
- R v Parmenter
- R v Parmenter
- R v Pearce
- R v Peters
- R v Phekoo sub nom R v Pheekoo
- R v Pickford
- R v Pigg
- R v Pitman
- R v Pontes (A-G of Canada intervening)
- R v Poole
- R v Powell
- R v Powell and Daniels
- R v Powell and Daniels
- R v Powell, R v English
- R v R
- R v R
- R v Ramosa Ltd
- R v Ramzan; R v Israel; R v Vaikilipour
- R v Rashid
- R v Reid
- R v Reid
- R v Reid
- R v Renouf
- R v Richards
- R v Richards
- R v Richardson
- R v Richardson, R v Irwin
- R v Richardson, R v Irwin
- R v Riley
- R v Roberts
- R v Roberts, R v Taylor, R v Chapman, R v Daly
- R v Robertson
- R v Robinson
- R v Rogers
- R v Romeo
- R v Rook
- R v Rosinski
- R v Royle
- R v Russell
- R v Russell
- R v Ruzic (A-G for Ontario intervening)
- R v Ryland
- R v Saik
- R v Saik
- R v Sakavickas
- R v Salim (aka Herbinier)
- R v Sangha
- R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Gallagher
- R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Ghulam Fatima sub nom R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal, ex p Secretary of State for the Home Department
- R v Seymour
- R v Seymour
- R v Sharif
- R v Sheehan; R v Moore
- R v Sheppard
- R v Sheppard
- R v Sheppard
- R v Shillibier, Re HTV
- R v Shivpuri
- R v Shohid
- R v Short
- R v Shrewsbury and Atcham Borough Council, ex p Griffiths
- R v Slingsby
- R v Smith
- R v Smith
- R v Smith
- R v Smith
- R v Smith (Wallace Duncan)
- R v Smith (Wallace Duncan)
- R v Smith; R v Khela
- R v Sood
- R v Southwood
- R v Speechley
- R v Spratt
- R v Spratt
- R v St George
- R v St George
- R v Staines
- R v Steel
- R v Steer
- R v Stephens
- R v Stephenson
- R v Stone, R v Dobinson
- R v Suchedina
- R v Sultana
- R v Sutton
- R v Sutton Justices, ex p DPP
- R v Swarsbrick
- R v Symonds
- R v T
- R v T
- R v Taaffe
- R v Tabassum
- R v Tabassum
- R v Tatton
- R v Tewkesbury Corpn
- R v Thomson Holidays Ltd
- R v Timmins
- R v Tobierre
- R v Toews
- R v Toews
- R v Tombe
- R v Tutton
- R v Venna
- R v W
- R v W
- R v W
- R v Walker
- R v Walkington
- R v Warburton
- R v Warburton-Pitt
- R v Warden of the Fleet
- R v Warwick, R v Webster
- R v Welburn
- R v Welburn
- R v Wells Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p Westminster City Council
- R v Wells Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p Westminster City Council
- R v Wharton
- R v Wight
- R v Wight
- R v Williams
- R v Williams
- R v Wilson
- R v Winter
- R v Wollaston
- R v Wolverhampton Coroner, ex p McCurbin
- R v Wood
- R v Woodhurst
- R v Woodward
- R v Woollin
- R v Woollin
- R v Yaqoob
- R v Young
- R v Yuen Chong
- R v Zaman
- Racz v Home Office
- Racz v Home Office
- Rahman v Arearose Ltd
- Ranjan v Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police
- Rawlings v Rawlings
- Rawlings v Till sub nom Rawlins v Pitt
- Re W & P (a child: non-accidental injury)
- Read v Coker
- Read v J Lyons & Co Ltd
- Ready Mixed Concrete (Supply of), Re sub nom Director General of Fair Trading v Smiths Concrete Ltd
- Ready Mixed Concrete (Supply of), Re sub nom Director General of Fair Trading v Smiths Concrete Ltd
- Redfern v Brownhart Ltd
- Reece v Taylor
- Rees v Dewhirst plc
- Reeves v Metropolitan Police Comr
- Rehman v University College London Hospitals NHS Trust
- Reilly v R
- Rennick v Rennick
- Republic v High Court, Accra, ex p Commission on Human Rights and Administrative Justice
- Rhodian River Shipping Co SA and Rhodian Sailor Shipping Co SA v Halla Maritime Corpn, The Rhodian River and Rhodian Sailor
- Rich (Marc) & Co Ltd v Societa Italiana Implanti PA
- Rich (Marc) & Co Ltd v Societa Italiana Implanti PA
- Richardson v Howie
- Richmond Ltd v DHL International (NZ) Ltd
- Richmond v Burch
- Rickards v Lothian
- Rimmer v Rimmer
- RJ (minors) (fostering: person disqualified), Re
- Roadrunner Properties Ltd v Dean
- Robbins v Whyte
- Roberton v Lewis (trading as Virginia Music)
- Roberts v Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust
- Robertson (Charles) (Developments) Ltd v White
- Robinson v Buss Murton LLP
- Robinson v Ealing London Borough Council
- Robinson v Post Office
- Rolls Royce plc v Heavylift-Volga DNEPR Ltd
- Romney Marsh (Lords Bailiff-Jurats) v Trinity House Corpn
- Ronson International Ltd v Patrick
- Rooney v Cardona
- Roquette Fr�res SA v Directeur G�n�ral de la Concurrence, de la Consommation et de la R�pression des Fraudes: C-94/00
- Rose v Kempthorne
- Rossiter v Conway
- Rossiter v Tilsley
- Roth, Re, Goldberger v Roth
- Roughton v Weston Area Health Authority
- Roughton v Weston Area Health Authority
- Rous v Mitchell
- Rouse v Squires
- Rowe v Lindsay
- Rowe v Tutte
- Royal Greek Government v Minister of Transport
- Royall v R
- Royall v R
- Royall v R
- Royscot Trust Ltd v Rogerson
- Rumbelow v Rumbelow and Hadder (or Hadden)
- Rumney and Smith, Re
- Ruoff v Long & Co
- Russell v Home Office
- Sabena Technics SA v Singapore Airlines Ltd
- Sabri-Tabrizi v Lothian Health Board
- Sadler v South Staffordshire and Birmingham District Steam Tramways Co
- Salcon Ltd v United Cement Pte Ltd
- Sales v Stromberg
- Sam v Atkins
- Sands v Thompson
- Savory v Holland Hannen and Cubitts (Southern) Ltd
- Sawyer v Sawyer
- Schulte (Bernhard) GmbH & Co KG v Nile Holdings Ltd sub nom Schulte (Bernhard) GmbH
- SCI (Sales Curve Interactive) Ltd v Titus SARL
- Scotney v Lomer
- Scott v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire
- Scott v Copenhagen Reinsurance Co (UK) Ltd
- Scott v Davis
- Scott v Shepherd
- Scottish & Newcastle plc v Raguz
- Seaboard Offshore Ltd v Secretary of State for Transport, The Safe Carrier
- Seaboard Offshore Ltd v Secretary of State for Transport, The Safe Carrier
- Seah Kok Meng v Public Prosecutor
- SEB Trygg Liv Holding AB v Manches sub nom AMB Generali Holding AG v SEB Trygg Liv Holding Aktiebolag
- Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v W
- Securicor Ltd v Smith
- Segara s/o Pillay v Public Prosecutor
- Selkirk v Romar Investments Ltd
- Seton v Lafone
- Settlement Corpn v Hochschild (No 2)
- Shah v Gale
- Shanghai Teraoka Electronic Co Ltd v European Council: T-35/01
- Shankie-Williams v Heavey
- Shapland v Palmer
- Sharma v Royal Mail Group plc
- Sharp v Highland and Islands Fire Board
- Sharp v Powell
- Shaw v Chairitie
- Shaw v Redbridge London Borough Council
- Sherman v Perkins
- Shoreditch Corpn v Bull
- Siddell v Smith Cooper & Partners (a firm)
- Siddiqui v James & Charles Dodd
- Sidhu v Aerospace Composite Technology Ltd
- Simmons v British Steel plc
- Simpson v A-G (Baigent's Case)
- Singleton Abbey (SS) (Owners) v SS Paludina (Owners), The Paludina
- Sivanandan v Hackney Action for Racial Equality
- Six Continents Retail Ltd v Carford Catering Equipment Ltd
- Skerman v H Bollman Manufacturers Ltd
- Skerries Salmon Ltd v Braer Corpn
- Skevill v Avery
- Slattery v Moore Stephens (a firm)
- Slipper v BBC
- Smart v HM Advocate
- Smillie v Lothian and Borders Police Board
- Smith (a child suing by his father and litigation friend) v Sheridan
- Smith (by her mother and next friend) v Secretary of State for Health
- Smith New Court Securities Ltd v Citibank NA sub nom Smith New Court Securities Ltd v Scrimgeour Vickers (Asset Management) Ltd
- Smith v Harris
- Smith v Ministry of Defence
- Smith v Newcastle & North Tyneside Health Authority
- Smith v West Yorkshire Health Authority (formerly Leeds Health Authority)
- Smith v Zeneca (Agrochemicals) Ltd
- Smithkline Beecham plc v Apotex Europe Ltd
- Smithwick v National Coal Board sub nom Smethwick v National Coal Board
- Sneddon v HM Advocate sub nom Sneddon v HM Advocate; P v HM Advocate
- Sneddon v HM Advocate sub nom Sneddon v HM Advocate; P v HM Advocate
- Sneddon v HM Advocate sub nom Sneddon v HM Advocate; P v HM Advocate
- Sneesby v Lancashire and Yorkshire Rly Co
- Sole v W J Hallt Ltd
- Somatra Ltd v Sinclair Roche & Temperley
- Somchai Liangsiriprasert v Government of the United States of America
- Somerset v Hart
- Somji v Cadbury Schweppes plc
- Sooklal v State
- Souchette Ltd v London County, Westminster and Parr's Bank Ltd
- Sousa v A & J Bull Ltd
- South Wales Police Authority v Morgan
- Southard v DPP
- Sparks v HSBC plc
- Spence v R
- Spencer v Boots The Chemist Ltd
- Spendiff v HM Advocate
- Stafford v State
- Stammers v Yearsley
- Standing v Bowring
- Stanley v Powell
- Stanley v Powell
- Stapley v Gypsum Mines Ltd
- Stark v Post Office
- State of New South Wales v Lepore and related appeals
- Stephens v Myers
- Steuerman v Dampcoursing Ltd
- Stevens v Lynch
- Stevens v R
- Stewart v Lambeth London Borough Council
- Stocken v Carter
- Stoneham's Settlement Trusts, Re, Popkiss v Stoneham
- Stotardt v South East London and Kent Bus Co Ltd
- Stovold v Barlows
- Stuttard (t/a De Wynns Coffee House) v Comrs of Customs and Excise
- Sully v Morewood
- Summers (by her litigation friend) v Stubbs
- Summers v Salford Corpn
- Sun Permanent Benefit Building Society v Western Suburban and Harrow Road Permanent Building Society
- Sunair Holidays Ltd v Dodd
- Sunport Shipping Ltd v Tryg-Baltica International (UK) Ltd
- Sutherland v Gustar (Inspector of Taxes)
- Sweetman v Nathan
- Syers v Chapman
- T (children: interim care order), Re
- Tame v New South Wales; Annetts v Australian Stations PTY Ltd
- Tanqueray-Willaume and Landau, Re
- Tant v HM Advocate
- Tappoo Holdings Ltd v Stuchbery
- Targett v Torfaen Borough Council
- Taylor Fashions Ltd v Liverpool Victoria Trustees Co Ltd, Old and Campbell Ltd v Liverpool Victoria Friendly Society
- Taylor v Mostyn
- Taylor v Neri
- Taylor v Poncia
- Taylor v Rover Co Ltd
- Taylor v Topping
- Telewest Ltd v Yorkshire Electricity Distribution plc
- Temple Bar (Owners) v Guildford (Owners), The Guildford sub nom The Guildford
- Temple v South Manchester Health Authority
- Tennant Radiant Heat Ltd v Warrington Development Corpn
- Thacker's Goods, Re
- Thames Cruises Ltd v George Wheeler Launches Ltd
- Thames Water Utilities Ltd v London Regional Transport
- The Sivand
- Therm-A-Stor Ltd v Home Insulation Ltd
- Thomas v Kostanjevec
- Thomas, Re, Davies v Davies
- Thompson and Curzon, Re
- Thompson and Holt, Re
- Thompson v Bradford
- Thompson v Home Office
- Thompson v James
- Thompson v Schmidt
- Thompson's Settlement, Re, Thompson v Thompson
- Thomson Travel Ltd v Roberts
- Thomson, Re, Thomson v Thompson
- Thorn v City Rice Mills
- Three Rivers District Council v Bank of England
- Three Rivers District Council v Bank of England
- Three Rivers District Council v Bank of England
- Three Rivers District Council v Bank of England
- Three Rivers District Council v Bank of England
- Thurogood v Van Den Berghs and Jurgens Ltd sub nom Thorogood v Van Den Berghs and Jurgens Ltd
- Titley v Foxall
- Tobacco Trade Benevolent Association, Re, Baron Sinclair v Finlay & Co Ltd
- Tomlinson v Metropolitan Police Comr
- Topp v London Country Bus (South West) Ltd
- Toronto Rly Co v King
- Total Spares & Supplies Ltd v Antares SRL
- Toth v Jarman
- Tottage v Petty
- Townsend v Achilleas
- Trac Time Control Ltd v Moss Plastic Parts Ltd
- Transco plc v HM Advocate
- Transco plc v Stockport Metropolitan BC, Reddish Vale Golf Club v Stockport Metropolitan BC
- Tree v Bowkett
- Tremain v Pike
- Triodos Bank NV v Dobbs; Dobbs v Morrison
- Truscott v Carpenter and Man
- Turbervell v Savadge sub nom Tuberville v Savage
- Tweedie v Miles, Re
- Union Accident Insurance Co Ltd, Re
- Union Bank of Jamaica Ltd v Yap
- Union Bank of Manchester Ltd v Grundy
- Unipart Group Ltd v O2 (UK) Ltd
- Unipart Group Ltd v O2 (UK) Ltd
- United States of America v Dynar
- University of Keele v Price Waterhouse (a firm)
- Uttley v Uttley
- Uzor v Chinye
- Van Colle v Chief Constable of the Hertfordshire Police
- Vasey v Surrey Free Inns
- Vaughan v Halifax-Dartmouth Bridge Commission
- Vaughan v Hampson
- Vaughan v McKenzie
- Vehicle and Operator Services Agency v F & S Gibbs Transport Services Ltd
- Vehicle Inspectorate v Blakes Chilled Distribution Ltd
- Vehicle Inspectorate v Blakes Chilled Distribution Ltd
- Vehicle Inspectorate v Blakes Chilled Distribution Ltd
- Vehicle Inspectorate v Blakes Chilled Distribution Ltd
- Vehicle Inspectorate v Nuttall (t/a Redline Coaches)
- Vehicle Inspectorate v Nuttall (t/a Redline Coaches)
- Vehicle Inspectorate v Nuttall (t/a Redline Coaches)
- Verdon v Topham
- Verrell's Contract, Re
- Viasystems (Tyneside) Ltd v Thermal Transfer (Northern) Ltd
- Vincent and Tomlinson v Eyton
- Vinmar International Ltd v Theresa Navigation SA
- Vision Golf Ltd v 1 Loft House Hill Ltd
- Vision Golf Ltd v Weightmans (a firm)
- Volkswagen AG v European Commission: T-208/01
- Vowles v Evans
- Vrinera Marine Co Ltd v Eastern Rich Operations Inc, The Vakis T
- W (a child) (non-accidental injury: expert evidence), Re sub nom W v Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council
- W v Minister of Pensions
- Wagner v West Ham Corpn
- Walker v Mottram
- Walker v Murphy
- Walters v North Glamorgan NHS Trust
- Ward v Ward
- Wardlaw v Farrar
- Warner v Sampson
- Waters v Metropolitan Police Comr
- Waters v Metropolitan Police Comr
- Watson v British Boxing Board of Control Ltd
- Watson v British Boxing Board of Control Ltd
- Watson v Christie
- Watson v Hythe Borough Council
- Watson v Ian Snipe & Co (a firm)
- Weait v Jayanbee Joinery Ltd
- Weaver v Bush
- Webb v Barclays Bank plc
- Webster (Procurator Fiscal, Dunoon) v Dominick
- Webster v Watts
- Weir v Bettison (sued as Chief Constable of Merseyside Police)
- West Bromwich Building Society v Mander Hadley
- West London Commercial Bank v Reliance Permanent Building Society
- West Pennard Churchyard, Re
- Western Trust & Savings Ltd v Travers & Co (a firm)
- Western Trust and Savings Ltd v Strutt and Parker
- Westminster City Council v Blenheim Leisure (Restaurants) Ltd and Langer and Cura
- Westminster City Council v Blenheim Leisure (Restaurants) Ltd and Langer and Cura
- Westminster City Council v Croyalgrange Ltd
- Westminster Corpn and United Travellers Club Co Ltd v Chapman
- Weston v Gribben
- Wheeler v Morris
- Whistler, Re
- White Rose Cottage, Re
- White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police sub nom Frost v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police
- Whitham, Re, Whitham v Davies
- Whitting v Whitting
- Whittle v Bennet
- Whittle v Bennett
- Wigman v R
- Wildtree Hotels Ltd v Harrow London BC
- Willett and Argenti, Re
- Williams Bros Direct Supply Stores Ltd v Cloote
- Williams v Home Office
- Williams v Jones
- Williams v Linnitt
- Willie v Companies House
- Willis v Redbridge Health Authority
- Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority
- Wilson (trading as Wilson's Greengrocers) v Knight
- Wilson v Pringle
- Wilson v South Kesteven District Council
- Wilson, Re, Wilson v Holloway
- Wimpey (George) & Co Ltd v BOAC
- Wings Ltd v Ellis
- Wings Ltd v Ellis
- Winterburn v Brooks
- Wisdom v Hodson
- Witter (Thomas) Ltd v TBP Industries Ltd
- Wong v Parkside Health NHS Trust
- Wong v Parkside Health NHS Trust
- Woolworths plc v Henry Boot Management Ltd
- Wootton v Dawkins sub nom Wootton v Dorking
- Wright v HM Advocate
- Wright v McLean
- Wright v McLean
- Wright v Olswang
- Wright v Robotham
- Wrothwell (FJH) Ltd v Yorkshire Water Authority
- Yates (Peter) & Co v Bullock
- Yates, Re, Bostock v D'Eyncourt
- Yip v R
- Young v Ministry of Defence
- Young v Pridd
- Younger v Saner
- Younger v Saner
- Youssif v Jordan
- Z Ltd v A-Z and AA-LL
- Zakaria v Dickson
- Zimbabwe United Freight Co Ltd v State
Secure your law degree, order your criminal law essay right now!
Other criminal law free cases
- Caldwell
- Insanity Cases
- Actus Reus Cases
- Adomako
- Assault Cases
- Automatism Cases
- Biological Gbh
- Burglary Cases
- Consent Tabassum
- Consent Wilson
- Consent Cases
- Criminal Law Case Titles
- Criminallawcases
- Deception Cases
- Dias
- Duress 1
- Homicide Intro
- Insanity Cases
- Intoxication Cases
- Invol Mans Cases
- Lidar
- Mens Rea Cases 2
- Mens Rea Cases
- Mens Rea Intention Table
- Miller
- Mistake
- Murder
- Necessity
- Participation Cases
- Prelim Crimes Cases
- Robbery
- Self Defence
- Strict Liability Cases
- Theft Cases
- Theft Of Property And Fraud By Misrepresentation
- Voluntary Manslaughter
Secure your law degree, order your custom law essay right now!
Other criminal law free cases
- Caldwell
- Insanity Cases
- Actus Reus Cases
- Adomako
- Assault Cases
- Automatism Cases
- Biological Gbh
- Burglary Cases
- Consent Tabassum
- Consent Wilson
- Consent Cases
- Criminal Law Case Titles
- Criminallawcases
- Deception Cases
- Dias
- Duress 1
- Homicide Intro
- Insanity Cases
- Intoxication Cases
- Invol Mans Cases
- Lidar
- Mens Rea Cases 2
- Mens Rea Cases
- Mens Rea Intention Table
- Miller
- Mistake
- Murder
- Necessity
- Participation Cases
- Prelim Crimes Cases
- Robbery
- Self Defence
- Strict Liability Cases
- Theft Cases
- Theft Of Property And Fraud By Misrepresentation
- Voluntary Manslaughter















