Law Essays:Law Case File: Criminal Law
Looking for criminal law cases? Law Teacher provides students like you with hundreds of cases to help you with your law essays!
Looking for more resources to help you with your law essays, law dissertations and law coursework?
More Criminal Law Resources:
Criminal Law Study Area | Criminal Law Essays | 2.2 Criminal Law Essay Sample
0-9 | a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | i | j | k | l | m | n | o | p | q | r | s | t | u | v | w | x | y |
- A (a child) v Ministry of Defence
- A (children) (conjoined twins: surgical separation), Re
- A v B
- A v Bottrill
- A v DPP
- A v Essex County Council
- A v X
- AB (care proceedings: disclosure of medical evidence to police), Re
- AB v South West Water Services Ltd
- Abbott v Bayley
- Abu v MGN Ltd
- Acrecrest Ltd v W S Hattrell & Partners
- Ad Valorem Factors Ltd v Ricketts sub nom Ricketts v Ad Valorem Factors Ltd
- Adam Phones Ltd v Goldschmidt
- Adams v Schering Chemicals Ltd
- Adams's Application for Judicial Review, Re
- Adlington v Comr of Police for the Metropolis
- Advocate (Lord) v Wemyss
- A-G for Tuvalu v Philatelic Distribution Corpn Ltd
- A-G of Gambia v N'Jie
- A-G v Associated Newspapers Group plc
- A-G v Birmingham Post and Mail Ltd
- A-G v British Broadcasting Corpn
- A-G v Carlton Bank
- A-G v English
- A-G v Guardian Newspapers Ltd
- A-G v Guardian Newspapers Ltd sub nom A-G v Guardian Newspapers Ltd (No 3)
- A-G v Independent Television News Ltd
- A-G v MGN Ltd
- A-G v News Group Newspapers Ltd
- A-G v Newspaper Publishing plc
- A-G v Newspaper Publishing plc
- A-G v Newspaper Publishing plc
- A-G v Observer Ltd, Re an application by Derbyshire County Council
- A-G v Punch Ltd
- A-G v Punch Ltd
- A-G v Times Newspapers Ltd
- Agnew v Jobson
- A-G's Reference (No 1 of 1975)
- A-G's Reference (No 1 of 1995)
- A-G's Reference (No 1 of 1997)
- A-G's Reference (No 1 of 2001)
- A-G's Reference (No 1 of 2002)
- A-G's Reference (No 2 of 1992)
- A-G's Reference (No 2 of 1999)
- A-G's Reference (No 2 of 1999)
- A-G's Reference (No 2 of 1999)
- A-G's Reference (No 2 of 2003)
- A-G's Reference (No 3 of 1975)
- A-G's Reference (No 3 of 1992)
- A-G's Reference (No 3 of 1994)
- A-G's Reference (No 3 of 1994)
- A-G's Reference (No 3 of 1998)
- A-G's Reference (No 3 of 1998)
- A-G's Reference (No 3 of 1999)
- A-G's Reference (No 3 of 2004)
- A-G's Reference (No 3 of 2004)
- A-G's Reference (No 4 of 1980)
- A-G's Reference (No 4 of 2000)
- A-G's Reference (No 6 of 1980)
- A-G's Reference (No 76 of 2004)
- A-G's Reference (No 79 of 2006); R v Whitta
- Ahsan v University Hospital Leicester NHS Trust
- Ailesbury (Marquis) and Iveagh (Lord), Re
- Airbus Industrie GIE v Patel
- Akenzua (administrators of the estate of Laws (decd)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Aldridge, Re, Aldridge v Aldridge
- Alexander Forbes Europe Ltd v SBJ Ltd
- Allen v The Oliver Group plc
- Allied Domecq Leisure Ltd v Cooper
- Allied Maples Group Ltd v Simmons & Simmons (a firm)
- AMF International Ltd v Magnet Bowling Ltd
- Anderson v Heatherwood and Wexham Park Hospitals NHS Trust
- Anderson v Milton Keynes General NHS Trust
- Andrews v Barnett Waddingham (a firm)
- Anns v Merton London Borough Council
- Anon
- Anon
- Anon
- Anson v Anson
- Arauco Co Ltd, Re
- Archibald Kinross v Sterling Precast Ltd
- Armagas Ltd v Mundogas SA, The Ocean Frost
- Armstrong v Ministry of Defence
- Arndt v Smith
- Arnott v Sprake
- Arthur v HM Advocate
- Ashley v Chief Constable of Sussex Police
- Asiansky Television plc v Bayer Rosin (a firm)
- Asiansky Television plc v Bayer-Rosin
- Asiansky Television plc v Bayer-Rosin (a firm)
- Asiansky Television v Bayer Rosin (a firm)
- Askey v Wood
- Astbury v Astbury
- Atkins v DPP, Goodland v DPP
- Atkins v Dunn & Baker (firm)
- Atkinson v Warne
- Attorney-General v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd
- Auckland Unemployed Workers' Rights Centre Inc v A-G
- Australian Coastal Shipping Commission v Green
- Aylwen v Taylor Joynson Garrett (a firm)
- Azanian Peoples' Organisation (AZAPO) v President of the Republic of South Africa
- B & J (children) (care proceedings: responsibility for child's injury), Re
- B (a child) (care proceedings: additional expert evidence), Re
- B (a minor) v DPP
- B (a minor) v DPP
- B (a minor) v DPP
- B (a minor) v DPP
- B v United Kingdom (Application 9840/82)
- Baines v Tweddle
- Baker v Snell
- Bakhtiar v Keoshgerian
- Balfour Beatty Construction Ltd v Kelston Sparkes Contractors Ltd
- Balfron Trustees Ltd v Peterson
- Ball v Druces v Attlee (a firm)
- Ballard v Bond
- Bamford (Inspector of Taxes) v ATA Advertising Ltd
- Banditt v R
- Banditt v R
- Banks v Ablex Ltd
- Barber v DPP
- Barclays Bank plc v Kennedy
- Barings plc (in liq) v Coopers & Lybrand, Barings Futures (Singapore) Pte Lyd (in liq) v Mattar
- Barings plc, Re, Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Baker (No 5)
- Barker v Corus UK Ltd; Murray v British Shipbuilders (Hydrodynamics) Ltd; Patterson v Smiths Dock Ltd
- Barker v R
- Barker v R
- Barker v Saint Gobain Pipelines plc
- Barnfather v Islington Education Authority
- Barrett v Enfield London Borough Council
- Basma v Weekes sub nom Abdul Karim Basma v Weekes
- Bassie v Merseyside Fire and Civil Defence Authority
- Bate v Mishcon de Reya
- Bates' Patent, Re
- Batty v Danaher (practising as Jack Danaher & Co)
- Baxall Securities Ltd v Sheard Walshaw Partnership (a firm)
- Baxendale v Bennett
- Bayer AG v European Commission: T-41/96
- Beary v Pall Mall Investments (a firm)
- Beauchamp (Earl) v Winn
- Beckham v Drake
- Beckham v Drake
- Beckham v Drake
- Bedell v Russell
- Bedingfeld and Herring's Contract, Re sub nom Re Beddingfield, Norris and Herring's Contract and Vendor and Purchaser Act 1874
- Bell v Bell
- Bell v The Spirit Group Ltd
- Bella Casa Ltd v Vinestone Ltd
- Bellamy v Central Sheffield University NHS Trust
- Beoco Ltd v Alfa Laval Co Ltd
- Bernard v A-G of Jamaica
- Bews v Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust
- Bhoomidas v Port of Singapore Authority
- BHP Billiton Petroleum Ltd v Dalmine SpA
- BHP Billiton Petroleum Ltd v Dalmine SpA
- BICC Ltd v Cumbrian Industrials Ltd sub nom Parkman Consulting Engineers (an unlimited company) v Cumbrian Industrials Ltd
- Bilbie v Lumley
- Bingham v Dinardo Partnership
- Bird v Holbrook
- Bird v Holbrook
- Birkbeck Freehold Land Society, ex p
- Birmingham City Tramways Co Ltd v Law
- Birmingham City Tramways Co Ltd v Law
- Blackburn Rovers Football & Athletic Club v Avon Insurance plc
- Blackburn v Mackey
- Blackmore v Tidderley
- Blake v Barnard
- Blake v Galloway
- Bland v Morris
- Blayney v Knight
- Bloor v Liverpool Derricking and Carrying Co Ltd
- Bluett v Suffolk County Council
- Blunt v Beaumont
- Blyth v HM Advocate
- Blyth v HM Advocate
- Boateng v Hughmans (a firm)
- Bolton Pharmaceutical Co 100 Ltd v Swinghope Ltd
- Boodoosingh v Ramnarace
- Boome v Bromley R D C
- Boon v Eddison
- Booth v Crown Prosecution Service
- Booth v Hanley
- Booth v Smith
- Borwick v Urquhart (Procurator Fiscal, Kirkwall)
- Boughey v R
- Boulter v Clark
- Boulter v Clark
- Bovis Lend Lease Ltd v RD Fire Protection Ltd, Huthco Ltd v Bovis Lend Lease Ltd
- Bowden Wire Ltd's Trade Marks, Re, Bowden Wire Co Ltd v Bowden Brake Co Ltd
- Bowe v Townend
- Bowlt v Clark
- Bown v LAS Direct Ltd
- Boyce v Wyatt Engineering
- Bradford v Robinson Rentals Ltd
- Bradlaugh v Erskine
- Bradley v Wallaces Ltd
- Bravery v Bravery
- BRB (Residuary) Ltd v Cully
- Breeze v Ahmed
- Brew Bros Ltd v Snax (Ross) Ltd
- Brewer v Broadwood
- Bridgman v Skinner
- Briggs and Spicer, Re
- Brisbane v Dacres
- Bristol & West Building Society v Rollo Steven & Bond
- Bristol and West Building Society v May May & Merrimans (a firm)
- Brocks Mount Ltd v Beasant
- Brooke and Fremlin's Contract, Re
- Brooklyn House Ltd v Commission for Social Care Inspection
- Broom v Morgan
- Brown (Reference under para 6 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003), Re
- Brown v Bennett
- Brown v Corus (UK) Ltd
- Brown v KMR Services Ltd
- Brown v Lewisham and North Southwark Health Authority
- Brown v R
- Brown v Robinson
- Bunting Electric Manufacturing Co Ltd, Re; Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Golby
- Burns v Nowell
- Burton v Voelker
- Bush v Parker
- Butcher v Cornwall County Council
- Butler v Austen
- C v Cairns
- C v D
- C v Middlesbrough Council
- C v Middlesbrough Council
- Calden (Administrator of the Estate of Amanda Calden (decd)) v Dr Nunn and Partners
- Caltex Oil (Australia) Pty Ltd v Dredge Willemstad
- Cambridge Water Co Ltd v Eastern Counties Leather plc
- Cameron v Maguire (Procurator Fiscal, Oban)
- Cameron v Maguire (Procurator Fiscal, Oban)
- Campbell (application under para 3 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003), Re
- Canadian Pacific Rly Co v Kelvin Shipping Co Ltd, The Metagama
- Cardigan v Curzon-Howe
- Carford Catering Ltd v Fowler
- Carlisle and Cumberland Banking Co v Bragg
- Carter v McLaren
- Carty v Croydon London Borough Council
- Casey v Cartwright
- Casey v Morane Ltd
- Catherall v Michelin Tyres plc
- CB and JB (minors) (care proceedings: case conduct), Re
- Celanese International Corpn v BP Chemicals Ltd
- Central Asbestos Co Ltd v Dodd
- Centuryan Security Services v Kelly
- Cercato-Gouveia v Kyprianou
- CGB Publishing v Killey
- CGU International Insurance plc v Szabo
- Chambers v Miller
- Champion v Maughan
- Chantrey Vellacott (a firm) v Convergence Group plc
- Chappel v Hart
- Charles v State
- Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Ricketts
- Chester v Afshar
- Chester v Afshar
- Chief Constable of Avon and Somerset Constabulary v Shimmen
- Chief Constable of Bedfordshire Police v Liversidge
- Chief Constable of Cumbria v McGlennon
- Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police v Khan sub nom Khan v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police
- Chilvers v Rayner
- Chipchase v Chipchase (otherwise Leetch, otherwise Matthews)
- Christopherson v Bare
- Christopherson v Bare
- Chua Tian Bok v Public Prosecutor
- Cinci v HM Advocate
- City of Lincoln, The
- Clare v Buckle Mellows (a firm)
- Clark v Chief Constable of Essex Police
- Clarke, Re, ex p Debtor v S Aston & Son Ltd
- Clay v A J Crump & Sons Ltd
- Climpson v Coles
- Clinton Cards (Essex) Ltd v Royal and Sun Alliance Co Ltd
- Clough v First Choice Holidays and Flights Ltd
- CMC Group Plc v Zhang
- Cobb v Great Western Rly Co
- Cockcroft v Smith
- Codd v Cabe sub nom Cod v Cabe
- Coflexip SA v Stolt Offshore MS Ltd
- Cohen's Executors and LCC, Re
- Cole v Turner
- Collinge's Settled Estates, Re
- Collins Stewart Ltd v Financial Times Ltd
- Collins v Hertfordshire County Council
- Collins v Wilcock
- Compania Maritima San Basilio SA v Oceanus Mutual Underwriting Association (Bermuda) Ltd, The Eurysthenes
- Compania Naviera Maropan SA v Bowaters Lloyd Pulp and Paper Mills Ltd
- Concord International (Mauritius) Ltd v Concorde Tourist Guide Agency Ltd
- Connolly v Dale
- Conradi v Direction de la concurrence et des prix des Hauts-de-Seine and Minist�re public: 198/86
- Constable's Settled Estates, Re
- Conti v St Mary's Hospital NHS Trust
- Continental Oxygen Co, Re, Elias v Continental Oxygen Co
- Conway v Spencer
- Cook v Beal
- Cook v UK Insulation Ltd
- Cooper v Belsey
- Cooper v DPP
- Cooper v Phibbs
- Coppard v Customs and Excise Comrs
- Corporation of London v Eurostar (UK) Ltd
- Corporation of London v Eurostar (UK) Ltd
- Corr (administratrix of Corr deceased) v IBC Vehicles Ltd
- Cotterill v Starkey
- Cotton's Trustees and London School Board, Re
- Coulson v DPP
- County Ltd v Girozentrale Securities
- Coupe v Guyett
- Coward v Baddeley
- Cox v Sun Alliance Life Ltd
- Crapp v East Stonehouse Local Board
- Craven Settled Estates, Re
- Craven v Riches
- Credit Lyonnais Bank Nederland NV (now known as Generale Bank Nederland NV) v Export Credits Guarantee Department
- Credit Suisse (Monaco) SA v Attar
- Cross, Re, Harston v Tenison
- Crossley v Rawlinson
- Crown Dilmun v Sutton
- Cuckmere Brick Co Ltd v Mutual Finance Ltd
- Cummings v Granger
- Curtis v Betts
- Customs and Excise Comrs v Air Canada
- D & F Estates Ltd v Church Comrs for England
- D v DPP
- D v Irvine (Authority Reporter, Edinburgh)
- D v Irvine (Authority Reporter, Edinburgh)
- DA v North East London Strategic Health Authority
- Daglish v Ministry of Defence
- Dale v Wood
- Danby v Coutts & Co
- Daniel v Metropolitan Rly Co
- Daniels, Re
- Daniels, Re
- Danns v Department of Health
- Davey v Lee
- Davies and Kent's Contract, Re
- Davies v Eli Lilly & Co
- Davies v Swan Motor Co (Swansea) Ltd
- Davis v Schrogin
- Davis, ex p
- De La Bere v Pearson Ltd
- De Romana v Roberts
- Dean v Taylor
- Deane, Re, Bridger v Deane
- Debtor (No 1 of 1941), Re
- Debtor, a (No 7095/2001), Re
- Deep Vein Thrombosis and Air Travel Group Litigation, Re
- Deepak Fertilizers & Petrochemicals Corp Ltd v Davy McKee (UK) London Ltd
- Dempsey v HM Advocate
- Dench v Flynn & Partners
- Denham v Scott
- Denham v Scott
- Denny v Supplies and Transport Co Ltd
- Derby (Earl) and Fergusson's Contract, Re
- Deriche v Ealing Hospital NHS Trust
- Des Reaux and Setchfield's Contract, Re
- Desmond v Safeway Stores plc
- Deutsch v R
- Devon County Council v Clarke sub nom Clark v Devon County Council
- Dhedhi v United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust (formerly Pilgrim Health NHS Trust)
- Dibagula v Republic
- Dickenson v Watson
- Dickin and Kelsall's Contract, Re
- Dilke, Re, Re Dilke's Settlement Trusts, Verey v Dilke
- Dillon v Dillon
- Director General of Fair Trading v Buckland
- Director General of Fair Trading v Buckland
- Director General of Fair Trading v Pioneer Concrete (UK) Ltd sub nom Supply of Ready Mixed Concrete (No 2), Re, Director General of Fair Trading v Pioneer Concrete (UK) Ltd
- Dixon v Clement Jones Solicitors (a firm)
- DN v Greenwich London Borough Council
- DN v Greenwich London Borough Council
- DN v Greenwich London Borough Council
- Docwra, Re, Docwra v Faith
- Doe (a pseudonym) v Bennett
- Dominion Natural Gas Co Ltd v Collins and Perkins
- Donachie v The Chief Constable of the Greater Manchester Police
- Donachie v The Chief Constable of the Greater Manchester Police
- Donaldson v Williams
- Dornan v JW Ellis & Co Ltd
- Doughty v Turner Manufacturing Co Ltd
- Downs v Chappell
- Doyle (John) Construction Ltd v Laing Management (Scotland) Ltd
- Doyle (John) Construction Ltd v Laing Management (Scotland) Ltd
- DPP v Ara
- DPP v Everest
- DPP v Glendinning
- DPP v K & B
- DPP v K & B
- DPP v K (a minor)
- DPP v Merriman
- DPP v Morgan
- DPP v Newbury; DPP v Jones
- DPP v Ping Lin
- DPP v Santra-Bermudez
- DPP v Santra-Bermudez
- DPP v Santra-Bermudez
- DPP v Smith (Michael Ross)
- DPP v W
- DPP v W
- Drake v Beckham
- Drake v Beckham
- Dudarec v Andrews
- Duke v Robson
- Duncombe v Wingfield
- Dunnachie v Kingston-Upon-Hull City Council
- Dunnachie v Kingston-upon-Hull City Council and other appeals
- Dziennik v CTO Gesellschaft Fur Containertransport MBH
- E v S Garages Ltd
- Eames v Hacon
- East Anglian Rlys Co v Eastern Counties Rly Co
- East India Co v Tritton
- East Yorkshire Gravel Co Ltd's Application, Re
- EB v Order of the Oblates of Mary Immaculate in the Province of British Columbia (A-G of Canada intervening)
- Ebbs v James Whitson & Co Ltd
- Eckersley v Binnie
- Edgcombe v Rodd
- Edinburgh United Breweries Ltd v Molleson
- Edwards and Rudkin to Green, Re
- Edwards v Governors of Hanson School
- Effort Shipping Co Ltd v Linden Management SA, The Giannis NK
- Eggarevba v State
- Eiles v Southwark London Borough Council
- El Awadi v Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA Ltd
- Elcom, Re, Layborn v Grover Wright
- Eleady-Cole v The Brothers of Charity Services Merseyside
- Electronic Data Systems Ltd v National Air Traffic Services Ltd
- Elliott v C (a minor)
- Elworthy v Bird
- Ely Brewery Co v Pontypridd U D C
- Emeh v Kensington and Chelsea and Westminster Area Health Authority
- Enertrag (UK) Ltd v Sea and Land Power and Energy Ltd
- Engelhart v Farrant & Co
- Ernst & Young (a firm) v Butte Mining plc
- Essa v Laing Ltd
- Essendon Engineering Co Ltd v Maile
- Essendon Engineering Co Ltd v Maile
- Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Hall Russell & Co Ltd and Shetland Islands Council, The Esso Bernicia
- Etherington and Lancashire and Yorkshire Accident Insurance Co, Re
- European Commission v Volkswagen AG: C-74/04
- Evans v Benyon
- Evans v Clifton Inns Ltd
- Evans v Volex Group plc
- Everard (F T) and Sons Ltd v BP Marine Ltd
- Express Ltd (t/a Express Dairies Distribution) v Environment Agency
- Eyre v Norsworthy
- Fagan v Metropolitan Police Comr
- Fagan v Metropolitan Police Comr
- Fagan v Metropolitan Police Comr
- Fairbrother v Gabb & Co
- Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd (t/a GH Dovener & Son)
- Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd and other appeals
- Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd; Fox v Spousal (Midlands) Ltd; Matthews v Associated Portland Cement Manufacturers (1978) Ltd
- FAL Oil Co Ltd v Petronas Trading Corpn SDN BHD sub nom FAL Oil Co Ltd v Petronas Trading Corpn, The Devon
- Farah v Metropolitan Police Comr
- Farah v Metropolitan Police Comr
- Farquhar v Newbury RDC
- Farrell v Merton Sutton & Wandsworth Health Authority
- Farrell v Secretary of State for Defence
- Farrer v Lacy, Hartland & Co
- Farrier-Waimak Ltd v Bank of New Zealand sub nom Bank of New Zealand v Farrier-Waimak Ltd
- Farrukh v Irwin Mitchell (a firm)
- Faulkner v Talbot
- Feakins v Burstow
- Featherstone v Staples
- Federal Commerce and Navigation Ltd v Suisse-Atlantique Soci�t� D'Armement SA, The Cruzeiro do Sul
- Federazione Nazionale del Commercio Oleano (Federolio) v EC Commission: T-122/96
- Fennelly v Connex South Eastern Ltd
- Ferguson-Davie v Ferguson-Davie
- Fernback v Clarke
- Ferrer v Beale sub nom Fetter v Beale sub nom Fitter v Veal
- Finecard International Ltd (t/a The Ninja Corpn) v Urquhart Dyke & Lord (a firm)
- Flack v Hudson
- Flannagan v Shaw
- Fleming v Securities Commission
- Fletcher v Brent London Borough Council
- Fletcher v Collis
- Flintshire County Council v Reynolds
- Floyd v John Fairhurst & Co
- Forde v Skinner
- Formula One Autocentres Ltd v Birmingham City Council
- Forticrete Ltd v Lafarge Roofing Ltd
- Foster v Biosil
- Foster v Biosil
- Foster v Prince
- Fotedar v St George's Healthcare NHS Trust (No 2)
- Fountain Forestry Ltd v Edwards
- Fowler v Lanning
- Frances v Ley sub nom Day v Beddingfield
- Francisco v Diedrick
- Fraser v Berkeley
- French v Chief Constable of Sussex Police
- French v Thames Valley Strategic Health Authority
- Frewen v Hays
- Frewin v Consignia plc
- Furbert v R
- G (DM) (an infant), Re,
- Gammon (Hong Kong) Ltd v A-G of Hong Kong
- Gammon (Hong Kong) Ltd v A-G of Hong Kong
- Garcia v East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust
- Garcia v St Mary's National Health Service Trust
- Gardner v RP Winder (Wholesale Meats) Ltd
- Garnett, Re, Gandy v Macaulay
- Garrett v Halton Borough Council; Myatt v National Coal Board
- Garth v Earnshaw
- Gavalas v Police
- Gavalas v Police
- Gavalas v Police
- Gaylard v Morris
- Geffroy (criminal proceedings against): C-366/98
- General Engineering Services Ltd v Kingston and St Andrew Corpn
- Gertor, The
- Gibbon v Christchurch, High Harrogate (All of), Sheepshanks Intervening
- Gibbons v Pepper sub nom Gibbon v Pepper
- Gibbons v Pepper sub nom Gibbon v Pepper
- Giblett v P & NE Murray Ltd
- Gilhespie v Burdis
- Giorgianni v R
- Girbash v Main Line Auto Engineering Ltd
- Glamorganshire Iron and Coal Co v Irvine
- Glanville v Glanville
- Glencore Grain Ltd v Goldbeam Shipping Inc; Goldbeam Shipping Inc v Navios International Inc; The Mass Glory
- Glentree Estates Ltd v Gee
- Glicksman v Redbridge Healthcare NHS Trust
- Glover v London and South Western Rly Co
- Godden v Kent and Medway Strategic Health Authority
- Golden Strait Corpn v Nippon Yusen Kubishika Kaisha, The Golden Victory
- Goldman v Thai Airways International Ltd
- Gordon v HM Advocate
- Gordon v Selico Co Ltd
- Gorham v British Telecommunications plc
- Gorrie v The Marist Brothers
- Gowans (reference under para 6 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003), Re
- Grainger v HM Advocate
- Grand Trunk Rly Co v McAlpine
- Grand Trunk Rly Co v McAlpine
- Gray v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board
- Gray v Southampton and South West Hampshire Health Authority
- Gray v Southampton and South West Hampshire Health Authority
- Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Executive v Sands
- Green v Bannister
- Green v Chief Constable of Lothian and Borders Police (Green, third party)
- Green v Hills
- Green v Vickers Defence Systems Ltd
- Green v Yorkshire Traction Co Ltd
- Greenwich London Borough Council v Browne
- Gregg v Scott
- Gregg v Scott
- Greis Case
- Grell-Taurel Ltd v The Caribbean Home Insurance Co Ltd
- Grey v Grant
- Greymalkin Ltd v Copleys (a firm)
- Griffith-Boscawen v Scott
- Griffiths v Dunnett
- Griggs v Transco plc
- Groom v Selby
- Groupama Insurance Co Ltd v Channel Islands Securities Ltd
- Grove, Re, Public Trustee v Dixon
- Guest v Warren
- Gurney, Re, Mason v Mercer
- Gusty, The and The Daniel M
- Guy v Livesey
- Haggard v Mason
- Halbot v Lens
- Hale v Jennings Bros
- Halkett v Earl of Dudley
- Hall Dare's Contract, Re
- Hall v Fearnley
- Hallam, petitioner
- Halsted v Clark
- Hamer v London, City and Midland Bank Ltd
- Hamilton v Papakura District Council
- Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council v Monk
- Hancock v Somes
- Harding v Scott-Moncrieff
- Harding v The Pub Estate Co Ltd
- Hardman v Child
- Harkness and Allsopp's Contract, Re
- Harley Street Capital Ltd v Tchigirinsky
- Harracksingh v A-G of Trinidad and Tobago
- Harris v Mobbs
- Harris v Perry & Co
- Harrison v Hodgson
- Harrison v Michelin Tyre Co Ltd
- Harrison v West of Scotland Kart Club
- Harrow London Borough Council v Shah
- Harrow London Borough Council v Shah
- Hatton v Treeby
- Hawker's Settled Estates, Re
- Hawkins v R
- Hawley v Luminar Leisure Ltd
- Hawley v Luminar Leisure plc
- Haystead v Chief Constable of Derbyshire
- Haystead v Chief Constable of Derbyshire
- He Kaw Teh v R
- He Kaw Teh v R
- Head's Trustees and Macdonald, Re
- Heasmans v Clarity Cleaning Co Ltd
- Hedley v Barlow
- Hemmings v Stoke Poges Golf Club
- Hendry v Turner
- Hereford and Worcester County Council v Clayton
- Hevican v Ruane
- Hewitt v DPP
- Heyward v Plymouth Hospital NHS Trust
- Hibbert v R
- Hibbert v R
- HIH Casualty and General Insurance Ltd v Chase Manhattan Bank
- Hillman (reference under para 6 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003), Re
- Hills v Potter
- Hills v Potter
- Hillsdown Holdings plc v Pensions Ombudsman
- Hinckley and Country Building Society v Henny
- Hipwood v Gloucester Health Authority
- HM Advocate v Caledonian Newspapers Ltd
- HM Advocate v Shearer
- HM Prison Service v Beart
- Hobin v Douglas
- Hobson v Bartram & Sons Ltd
- Hollis v Vabu Pty Ltd (trading as Crisis Couriers)
- Holmes (W & R) and Cosmopolitan Press Ltd's Contract, Re
- Holmes v Mather
- Holsgrove v South West London Strategic Health Authority
- Holt v Holroyd Meek Ltd
- Holtby v Brigham & Cowan (Hull) Ltd
- Holy v Law Society
- Holyday v Oxenbridge
- Hone v Going Places Leisure Travel Ltd
- Hook v Hook