Law Essays:Law Case File: Employment Law
Are you looking for employment law cases to assist you with writing law essays, law coursework and law dissertations?
Law Teacher hosts the UK's biggest case law database.
0-9 | a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | i | j | k | l | m | n | o | p | q | r | s | t | u | v | w | x | y | z
- Abler
v Sodexho MM Catering Betriebsgesellschaft mbH: C-340/01
- Acco
(UK) Ltd v Monge
- Ackinclose
v Gateshead Metropolitan Borough Council
- Adams
v British Airways plc
- Adams
v John Wright & Sons (Blackwall) Ltd
- Adamson
v B & L Cleaning Services Ltd
- Addison
v London Philharmonic Orchestra Ltd
- Adeneler
v Ellinikos Organismos Galaktos: C-212/04
- Adlam
v Salisbury and Wells Theological College
- A-G
for Guyana v Nobrega
- A-G
v Barker
- A-G
v Gilbert
- Age
Concern Scotland v Hines
- Agorastoudis
v Goodyear Hellas AVEE: Joined Cases C-187/05 - C-190/05
- Airlie
v Edinburgh District Council
- Albion
Automotive Ltd v Walker
- Albion
Automotive Ltd v Walker
- Alderson
v Maddison
- Alexander
v Standard Telephones and Cables Ltd (No 2); Wall v Standard
Telephones and Cables Ltd (No 2)
- Ali
v Christian Salvesen Food Services Ltd sub nom Salvesen
(Christian) Food Services Ltd v Ali
- Allan
v Stirling District Council sub nom Stirling District Council v
Allan
- Allen
& Son v Coventry
- Allen
(Jack) (Sales and Service) Ltd v Smith
- Allen
v National Australia Group Europe Ltd
- Alliance
Paper Group plc v Prestwich
- Alperton
Rubber Co v Manning
- Alphafield
Ltd v Barratt sub nom Apex Leisure Hire v Barratt
- Alsop
v Star Vehicle Contracts Ltd
- Amalgamated
Engineering Union v Minister of Pensions and National Insurance
- Amber
Size and Chemical Co Ltd v Menzel
- Amies
v Inner London Education Authority
- Angel
(Morris) & Son Ltd v Hollande
- Angel
(Morris) & Son Ltd v Hollande
- Annandale
Engineering v Samson
- Ansell
(Inspector of Taxes) v Brown
- Ansell
Rubber Co Pty Ltd v Allied Rubber Industries Pty Ltd
- Antal
International Ltd, Re
- Appleby
v Johnson sub nom Johnson v Appleby
- Arbuthnot
Pensions and Investments Ltd v Padden
- Archer
v James
- Argles
v Heaseman
- Armstrong
v South London Tramways Co Ltd
- Armstrong
Whitworth Rolls Ltd v Mustard
- Asamoah-Boakye
v Walter Rodney Housing Association Ltd
- Ashburton
(Lord) v Pape
- Asquith
v British Telecommunications plc
- Assi
v Dina Foods Ltd
- Associated
British Ports Ltd v Transport and General Workers Union
- Associated
British Ports v Transport and General Workers' Union
- Astbury
v Gist Ltd
- Athersmith
v Drury
- Avon
and Somerset Police Authority v Emery
- Aziz
v General Medical Council
- Bachnak
v Emerging Markets Partnership (Europe) Ltd
- Bagillo
Caterers Ltd v Karim
- Bailey
(N G) & Co Ltd v Preddy
- Bain
v Bowles
- Bain
v Central Vermont Rly Co
- Baker
v Cornwall County Council
- Baker
v Superite Tools Ltd
- Balfour
Beatty Rail Renewals Ltd v Brealey
- Bandey
v Penn
- Bank
of Credit and Commerce International SA (in liq) v Ali
- Bank
of Credit and Commerce International SA (in liq) v Ali
- Bank
of Montreal v Kuet Leong Ng
- Banking
Insurance and Finance Union v Barclays Bank plc
- Barber
v RJB Mining (UK) Ltd
- Barcock
v Brighton Corpn
- Barlow
v Whittle (t/a Micro Management)
- Barrett
v National Coal Board
- Barretts
& Baird (Wholesale) Ltd v Institution of Professional Civil
Servants
- Barry
v Bateman Catering Ltd
- Barry
v Midland Bank plc
- Bartholomew
v London Borough of Hackney
- Bartsch
v St Helens and Knowsley Hospital NHS Trust
- Base
Metal Trading Ltd v Shamurin
- Base
Metal Trading Ltd v Shamurin
- Batham
v Torbay Corpn
- Batty
v BSB Holdings (Cudworth) Ltd
- Batty
v Melillo
- Batty
v Monks
- Bauman
v Hulton Press Ltd
- Baxter
v Burfield
- BBC
v Ioannou
- BBC
v Kelly-Phillips
- Beal
v Beecham Group Ltd
- Beecham
Group Ltd v Beal (No 2)
- Beetham
v Crewdson
- Bell
v Drummond
- Bell
v London General Transport Services Ltd
- Benjamin
v Interlacing Ribbon Ltd
- Bents
Brewery Co Ltd v Hogan
- Benveniste
v University of Southampton
- Berkeley
Administration Inc v McClelland
- Berry
Birch & Noble Financial Planning (Weston) Ltd v Berwick
- Berwick
Salmon Fisheries Co Ltd v Rutherford
- Bewley
v HM Prison Service
- Bickley
(J & S) Ltd v Washer
- Biddle
v Bond
- Bird
v British Celanese Ltd
- Bird
v M'Gahey
- Birmingham
Mosque Trust Ltd v Alavi
- Blackpole
Furniture Ltd v Sullivan
- Blair
v Lochaber District Council
- Bloomfield
v Springfield Hosiery Finishing Co Ltd
- Boal
Quay Wharfingers Ltd v King's Lynn Conservancy Board
- Boast
v Firth
- Bold
v Business Location Services Ltd
- Bone
v ICG (UK) Ltd (trading as Searle Manufacturing Co)
- Bontex
Knitting Works Ltd v St Johns Garage
- Booth
v United States of America
- Boston
Deep Sea Fishing and Ice Co v Ansell
- Bound
v Lawrence
- Bowen
v Hall
- Bower
v Hughes Hooker & Co
- Bowers
v Lovekin
- Bowes
& Partners v Press
- Boyd
Line Ltd v Pitts
- Boyle
(t/a Owen's Coaches of Sidcup) v Hedges
- Bradshaw
v Hayward
- Brady
v Giles
- Braithwaite
v South Durham Steel Co Ltd
- Brake
Brothers Ltd v Ungless
- Branch
v Ewington
- Brand
v Compro Computer Services Ltd
- Brand
v Compro Computer Services Ltd
- Brassington
v Cauldon Wholesale Ltd
- Brayshaw
v Lambeth Community of Refugees from Vietnam
- Breakspear
v Colonial Financial Services (UK) Ltd
- Briggs
v North Eastern Education and Library Board
- Briggs
v Oates
- Briscoe
v Lubrizol Ltd
- Bristow
v City Petroleum Ltd
- British
Airways Engine Overhaul Ltd v Francis
- British
Bakeries (Northern) Ltd v Adlington sub nom Adlington v British
Bakeries (Northern) Ltd
- British
Coal Corpn v Smith
- British
Leyland UK Ltd v Pay Board
- British
Syphon Co Ltd v Homewood
- British
Syphon Co Ltd v Homewood
- British
Telecommunications plc v Ticehurst sub nom Ticehurst and
Thompson v British Telecommunications plc
- British
Telecommunications plc v Ticehurst sub nom Ticehurst and
Thompson v British Telecommunications plc
- Bromley
v H & J Quick Ltd
- Bromley
v Smith
- Bromsgrove
Casting and Machining Ltd v Martin
- Bronester
Ltd v Priddle
- Brook
Lane Finance Co Ltd v Bradley
- Brook
v Dawson
- Brown
v BMI British Midland
- Brown
v Harper
- Brown
v JBD Engineering Ltd
- Brown
v JBD Engineering Ltd
- Brown
v Rentokil Ltd
- Brown
v Rentokil Ltd: C-394/96
- Browning
v Great Central Mining Co
- Bruce
v Anderson
- Bruce
v Wiggins Teape (Stationery) Ltd
- Brunnhofer
v Bank der �sterreichischen Postsparkasse AG: C-381/99
- Bryant
v Britannia Developments Ltd
- Bryant
v Flight
- BSM
(1257) Ltd v Secretary of State for Social Services
- Buchan
v Secretary of State for Employment
- Budd
v The Scotts Co (UK) Ltd
- Bull
(A H) & Co v West African Shipping Agency and Lighterage Co
- Bullock
v Merseyside County Council sub nom Merseyside County Council v
Bullock
- Bunce
v Postworth Ltd (trading as Skyblue)
- Burleigh
v Stibbs
- Burley
v Joseph W Burley & Partners Ltd
- Burrows
v Rhodes
- Business
Seating (Renovations) Ltd v Broad
- Button
v Thompson
- Bux
v Slough Metals Ltd
- Byrne
v Birmingham City District Council
- Cable
& Wireless plc v Muscat sub nom Muscat v Cable &
Wireless plc
- Cadman
v Health and Safety Executive
- Cadman
v Health and Safety Executive
- Cadman
v Health and Safety Executive
- Cadman
v Health and Safety Executive: C-17/05
- Calder
v James Finlay Corpn Ltd
- Camden
London BC v Coley
- Cameron
v Nystrom
- Cameron
v Royal London Ophthalmic Hospital
- Campbell
v Union Carbide Ltd
- Canadian
Aero Service v O'Malley
- Canadian
Worldwide Express Ltd v Smith
- Cantor
Fitzgerald (UK) Ltd v Wallace
- Cantor
Fitzgerald (UK) Ltd v Wallace
- Cantor
Fitzgerald International v Bird
- Cantor
Fitzgerald International v Callaghan
- Cape
Industrial Services v Ambler
- Capes
v Hutton
- Capital
Security Services Ltd v Baldwin
- Capper
Pass Ltd v Lawton
- Carmichael
v National Power plc
- Carmichael
v National Power plc
- Carter
v Hall
- Cartwright
v G Clancey Ltd
- Casson
Beckman & Partners (a firm) v Papi (carrying on business as
J W Papi & Co)
- Catamaran
Cruisers Ltd v Williams
- Catamaran
Cruisers Ltd v Williams
- Caulfield
v Marshalls Clay Products Ltd; Clarke v Frank Staddon Ltd
- Cavanagh
v Ulster Weaving Co Ltd
- Century
Insurance Co Ltd v Northern Ireland Road Tranport Board
- Challinor
v Taylor
- Charles
v Ellis & Ellis (t/a Property Services)
- Charlton
v Charlton Thermosystems (Romsey) Ltd
- Charnock
v Barrie Muirhead Ltd
- Chawner
v Cummings
- Cheng
Yuen v Royal Hong Kong Golf Club
- Chief
Constable of Kent County Constabulary v Baskerville
- Chiltern
House Ltd v Chambers
- Church
v Bakersfield Entertainment Ltd
- City
Alliance Ltd v Oxford Forecasting Services Ltd
- City
and Hackney Health Authority v National Union of Public
Employees
- Clamp
v Aerial Systems
- Clark
v BET plc
- Clark
v Nomura International plc
- Clark
v Oxfordshire Health Authority
- Clark
v Secretary of State for Employment
- Clarke
Chapman-John Thompson Ltd v Walters
- Clarke
v Frank Staddon Ltd; Caulfield v Marshalls Clay Products Ltd
- Clarke
v Frank Staddon Ltd; Caulfield v Marshalls Clay Products Ltd
- Clay
Cross (Quarry Services) Ltd v Fletcher sub nom Fletcher v Clay
Cross (Quarry Services) Ltd
- Clelland
v Edward Lloyd Ltd
- Clements
v London and North Western Rly Co
- Clifford
v Devon County Council
- Clifford
v Union of Democratic Mineworkers
- Clifton
Middle School Governing Body v Askew sub nom Askew v Governing
Body of Clifton Middle School
- Closson,
Re, ex p Harris
- Coales
v John Wood & Co
- Coase
v BBC
- Code
v Holmes
- Cofone
v Spaghetti House Ltd
- Coker
v Diocese of Southwark
- Coleman
Taymar Ltd v Oakes
- Colen
v Cebrian (UK) Ltd
- Colen
v Cebrian (UK) Ltd
- Colley
v Corkindale
- Collier
v Sunday Referee Publishing Co Ltd
- Collins
v Camden London Borough Council
- Collins
v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry
- Comax
Secure Business Services v Wilson
- Community
Task Force v Rimmer
- Company's
Application, a, Re
- Conradi
Morrison & Co (a firm) v Sulh
- Construction
Industry Training Board v Labour Force Ltd
- Construction
Industry Training Board v Leighton sub nom Leighton v
Construction Industry Training Board
- Cook
v Diageo
- Cook
v North Metropolitan Tramways Co
- Cook
v Square D Ltd sub nom Square D Ltd v Cook
- Cook
v Square D Ltd sub nom Square D Ltd v Cook
- Cooke
v Siemens Communications Ltd
- Cooner
v P S Doal & Sons
- Co-op
Employers Association v Pay Board
- Cooper
v Kakad
- Cooper
v Simmons
- Co-operative
Insurance Society Ltd v Customs and Excise Comrs
- Cordero
Alonso v Fondo de Garantia Salarial (Fogasa): C-81/05
- Corn
v Matthews
- Corner
v Buckinghamshire County Council
- Cornwall
v Hawkins
- Corporate
Express Ltd v Day
- Corton
House Ltd v Skipper
- Cotes
v Sadler
- Couchman
v Sillar
- Courage
Take Home Trade Ltd v Keys
- Courtaulds
Northern Spinning Ltd v Moosa
- Coventry
v Woodhall
- Cow
v Surrey and Berkshire Newspapers Ltd
- Cox
v Mathews
- CPL
Distribution Ltd v Evans
- Cranleigh
Precision Engineering Ltd v Bryant
- Credit
Suisse First Boston (Europe) Ltd v Padiachy, Winram and
Cracknell
- Cresswell
v Inland Revenue Board
- Crocker
v Molyneux
- Crompton
v Truly Fair (International) Ltd
- Crook
v Byrd
- Cross
v Redpath Dorman Long (Contracting) Ltd
- Crown
Dilmun v Sutton
- CRS
Computers Ltd v MacKenzie
- Cullen
v Creasey Hotels (Limbury) Ltd
- Cure
v Coutts & Co plc
- Cuthbertson
v Parsons
- Cutter
v Powell
- Cutts
v Ward
- D
v M
- Dabell
v Vale Industrial Services (Nottingham) Ltd
- Dacas
v Brook Street Bureau (UK) Ltd
- Dale
v CBS Online & Associates
- Daley
v Allied Suppliers Ltd
- Dalyell
v Tyrer
- Dance
v Dorothy Perkins Ltd sub nom Perkins (Dorothy) Ltd v Dance
- David
(Lawrence) Ltd v Ashton
- Davies
v Davies
- Davies
v Ebbw Vale UDC
- Davies
v Hotpoint Ltd
- Davies
v Hotpoint Ltd
- Davies
v Lord Berwick
- Davies
v Makuna
- Davies
v Presbyterian Church of Wales
- Davis
v New England College of Arundel
- Davis
v Starr
- Davis,
ex p
- de
Brito v Standard Chartered Bank Ltd
- De
Francesco v Barnum
- De
Francesco v Barnum sub nom Francesco v Barnum
- De
Silva v Advantage Building Systems
- Dean
v Branthwaite
- Dean
v Eastbourne Fishermen's and Boatmen's Protection Society and
Club Ltd
- Defrenne
v Sabena: 149/77
- Dekker
v Stichting Vormingscentrum voor Jong Volwassenen (VJV -
Centrum) Plus: C-177/88
- Dennison
v University College of St Mark and St John
- Department
of the Environment v Fox
- Depledge v Pye Telecommunications Ltd
- Descombes v Firthglow Ltd (trading as Protectacoat)
- Devonald v Rosser & Sons
- Dewar v Tasker & Sons Ltd
- Deyong v Shenburn
- Dhatt v McDonalds Hamburgers Ltd
- Diffang v Lewisham Hospital NHS Trust
- Dillingham v Harrison
- Dillon v Recruit Employment Services
- Discount Tobacco and Confectionery Ltd v Williamson
- Discount Tobacco and Confectionery Ltd v Williamson
- Dixon v Cementation Co Ltd
- Doggett v Waterloo Taxi-cab Co Ltd
- Donald v M & W Pearce Ltd
- Donnelly v Kelvin International Services
- Donovan v Laing, Wharton and Down Construction Syndicate
- Dowuona v John Lewis plc
- Doyle v White City Stadium Ltd
- Dugdale v Kraft Foods Ltd
- Duke v GEC Reliance Ltd (formerly Reliance Systems Ltd)
- Dummett v American Express Services Europe Ltd
- Dunnachie v Kingston-Upon-Hull City Council
- Durrant v Financial Collection Agency Ltd
- Dutton v Hawker Siddeley Aviation Ltd
- Dyson Technology Ltd v Strutt
- Eagland v British Telecommunications plc
- Eagland v British Telecommunications plc
- Easdown v Cobb
- Eastbourne BC v Foster
- Eastbourne Borough Council v Foster
- Eastbourne Borough Council v Foster
- Eastwood v Magnox Electric plc
- Eastwood v Magnox Electric plc; McCabe v Cornwall County Council
- Eaton Ltd v Nuttall
- Eaton v Robert Eaton Ltd
- Eaton v Western
- Ebbw Vale Steel, Iron & Coal Co v Tew
- Eccles & Co v Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co
- Edmonds v Lawson
- Edmondson v P J & D Stuart (trading as Stuart Plant Hire)
- Edwards v West Herts Group Hospital Management Committee
- Egginton v Reader
- Electrolux Ltd v Hudson
- Electrolux Ltd v Hutchinson
- Ellen v Topp
- Elsworth v Woolmore
- EMI Group Electronics Ltd v Coldicott (Inspector of Taxes)
- Enderby v Frenchay Health Authority: C-127/92
- Enderby v Frenchay Health Authority: C-127/92
- Enesco European Giftware Group Ltd v Birkett
- England v Bromley London Borough Council
- English v Gunter & Co Ltd
- Euro Brokers Ltd v Rabey
- European Commission v Luxembourg: C-445/03
- Europi�ces SA (in liq) v Sanders: C-399/96
- Evans v Elemeta Holdings Ltd
- Evans v Liverpool Corpn
- Evans v Roe
- Evans v Ware
- Evening Standard Co Ltd v Henderson
- Everritt v Apex Masonry Contractors Ltd
- Express and Echo Publications Ltd v Tanton
- Express and Star Ltd v National Graphical Association
- Expro Services Ltd v Smith
- Faccenda Chicken Ltd v Fowler
- Fadipe v Reed Nursing Personnel
- Fairfield Ltd v Skinner
- Famatina Development Corpn Ltd, Re
- Farrant v Woodroffe School
- Farrell Matthews & Weir (a firm) v Hansen
- Fechter v Montgomery
- Fellows v Wood
- Fenton v Stablegold Ltd (t/a Chiswick Court Hotel)
- Fibrenetix Storage Ltd v Davis
- Fielding (Harold) Ltd v Mansi
- Finnegan v Clowney Youth Training Programme Ltd
- First Global Locums Ltd v Cosias
- Fisher v Oldham Corpn
- Fitzgerald v Hall, Russell & Co Ltd
- Fitzpatrick v Evans & Co
- Fitzwilliam Executive Search Ltd (t/a Fitzwilliam Technical Services) v Bestuur van het Landelijk Instituut Sociale Verzekeringen: C-202/97
- Fleming v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry
- Fletcher Aluminium Ltd v O'Sullivan
- Flett v Matheson
- Flett v Matheson
- Flower v London and North Western Rly Co
- Floyd v Weaver sub nom Weaver v Floyd
- Fontana (GB) Ltd v Fabio
- Ford v Warwickshire County Council
- Forshaw v Archcraft Ltd
- Fosca Services (UK) Ltd v Birkett
- Foster v South Glamorgan Health Authority
- Foster Wheeler (London) Ltd v Jackson
- Four Seasons Healthcare Ltd (formerly Cotswold Spa Retirement Hotels Ltd) v Maughan
- Fowler v Lock
- Fox v C Wright (Farmers) Ltd
- Foy v Brzezicki
- Framptons Ltd v Badger
- Franchi v Franchi
- Frankling v BPS Public Sector Ltd
- Franks v Reuters Ltd
- Franks v Reuters Ltd
- Fraser v Stolt Offshore Ltd
- French v Barclays Bank plc
- Friend v Civil Aviation Authority
- Friend v PMA Holdings Ltd
- FSS Travel and Leisure Systems Ltd v Johnson
- Future On-Line Ltd v Foulds (Inspector of Taxes) sub nom Future Online Ltd v Faulds (Inspector of Taxes)
- Gadd v Thompson
- Gallagher v Alpha Catering Services Ltd (t/a Alpha Flight Services)
- Gardiner v Motherwell Machinery and Scrap Co Ltd
- Gartside v Outram
- Gascol Conversions Ltd v Mercer
- Gates v R Bill & Son
- Gaumont-British Picture Corpn Ltd v Alexander
- General of the Salvation Army v Dewsbury
- George v Davies
- Gershman v Manitoba Vegetable Producers Marketing Board
- GFI Group Inc v Eaglestone
- Gibb v United Steel Companies Ltd
- Gibson v Motortune Ltd
- Gill v Varley
- Gillies v Richard Daniels & Co Ltd
- Giraud v Richmond sub nom Geraud v Richmond
- Glamorgan Coal Co Ltd v South Wales Miners' Federation
- Glendale Managed Services v Graham
- GMB v Man Truck & Bus UK Ltd
- GNT Holdings (UK) Ltd v Barter
- Goodeve v Gilsons
- Gould v Governors of Haileybury and Imperial Service College
- Gould v Haynes
- Governing Body of Addey and Stanhope School v Vakante
- Graham v South Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council
- Grant v Kent County Council
- Grant v Kent County Council
- Gray v Cookson
- Greater London Council v Farrar
- Green v Broxtowe District Council sub nom Greene v Broxtowe District Council
- Green v Governing Body of Victoria Road Primary School
- Green v Roberts
- Green v Wavertree Heating and Plumbing Co Ltd
- Greene v P J Carey (Contractors) Ltd
- Gregory-Stoke Parish v Pitmister
- Gregson v Watson
- Griffiths v Salisbury District Council
- Grimston v Cuningham
- Gryf-Lowczowski v Hinchingbrooke Healthcare NHS Trust
- Gunning v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd sub nom Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd v Gunning
- Gyaniao v Design Corner Ltd
- Gylbert v Fletcher
- Hadmor Productions Ltd v Hamilton
- Hagen v ICI Chemicals and Polymers Ltd
- Haigh v Department for Work and Pensions
- Haine v Rolls Royce plc
- Hair Colour Consultants Ltd v Mena
- Hairsine v Kingston upon Hull City Council
- Hale v Webb
- Halfpenny v IGE Medical Systems Ltd
- Hall v Lees
- Hall v Woolston Hall Leisure Ltd
- Halstead v Accountax Marketing Ltd
- Hancill v Marcon Engineering Ltd
- Hancock v BSA Tools Ltd
- Hanley v Pease & Partners Ltd
- Hanover Insurance Brokers Ltd v Schapiro
- Hanson v Fashion Industries (Hartlepool) Ltd
- Harber v North London Polytechnic
- Hardaker v Idle District Council
- Harrington Jones Architects Ltd v Harrington
- Harrison's Executor v Student Loans Co Ltd
- Hart v Riversdale Mill Co
- Hartley v Cummings
- Harvey v RG O'Dell Ltd
- Haughton v Olau Line (UK) Ltd
- Hayward v Cammell Laird Shipbuilders Ltd
- Healey v Bridgend County Council
- Hearst v Clark
- Helmore v Smith (No 2)
- Henry v London General Transport Services Ltd
- Henry v London General Transport Services Ltd
- Hepworth Heating Ltd v Akers
- Hewcastle Catering Ltd v Ahmed and Elkamah
- Hewcastle Catering Ltd v Ahmed and Elkamah
- Hewlett Packard Ltd v O'Murphy
- Hewlett v Allen
- Higgins v Hopkins
- Hill (William) Organisation Ltd v Tucker
- Hill v Allen
- Hill v Beckett
- Hill v General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corpn plc
- Hillingdon Area Health Authority v Kauders
- Hillyer v St Bartholomew's Hospital (Governors)
- Hilton International Hotels (UK) Ltd v Kaissi
- Hilton International Hotels (UK) Ltd v Kaissi
- Hilton v Shiner Ltd Builders Merchants
- Hinkley v Ashtons Manufacturing Ltd
- Hitchcock v Post Office
- Hivac Ltd v Park Royal Scientific Instruments Ltd
- Hobden v Almondsbury Care Ltd
- Hobson v GEC Telecommunications Ltd
- Hodges (Philip) & Co v Kell
- Hodges (Philip) & Co v Kell
- Hogan v Cambridgeshire County Council
- Hogg v Department for Education and Skills
- Holdcroft v South Derbyshire District Council
- Holder v Wong
- Holt v W H Rhodes & Son Ltd
- Home Office v Ayres
- Home Office v Holmes
- Hopkins v Norcros plc
- Horan v Hayhoe
- Horkulak v Cantor Fitzgerald International
- Horkulak v Cantor Fitzgerald International
- Horn v Chandler
- Howard v Wilson
- Howell v Consignia plc
- Howgate v Fane Acoustics Ltd
- Howman & Son v Blyth
- Huddersfield Fine Worsteds Ltd, Re; Krasner v McMath
- Hughes v Bonella
- Hughes v GMB Trade Union
- Hughes v Governing Body of Archers Court School
- Hughes v Humphreys
- Hugh-Jones v St John's College Cambridge
- Hulse v Hulse
- Humphrey v Gatwick Handling Ltd
- Humphreys v Board of Managers of St George's Church of England (Aided) Primary School
- Hunt v Great Northern Rly Co
- Hunt v Power Resources Ltd
- Hunter v Belcher
- Hunter v Smith's Dock Co Ltd
- Hurley v Mustoe
- Hussey v Pensey sub nom Hussy v Pacy sub nom Hussey v Pusy
- Hussman Manufacturing Ltd v Weir
- Hutchings v Coinseed Ltd
- Hutchinson v Westward Television Ltd
- Huttman v Boulnois
- Hutton v Thompson
- Hyland v J H Barker (North West) Ltd
- ILEA v Nash
- Ingram v Barnes
- Ingram v Foxon
- Initial Services Ltd v Putterill
- Innes v Equal Storm Ltd (t/a Merlin's Ark)
- Innovative Software Ltd v Howes
- Institution of Professional Civil Servants v Secretary of State for Defence
- Intelsec Systems Ltd v Grech-Cini
- Intercontinental Energy Ltd v Jowitt
- Internexus Group Ltd v Flood
- Inverclyde Council v Wilson
- IRC v Hambrook
- IRC v Lawrence
- Irish v Southwark Action for Voluntary Associations
- Ironmonger v Movefield Ltd (t/a Deering Appointments)
- Isaacs Partnership (a firm) v Umm Al-Jawaby Oil Service Co Ltd
- Isles of Scilly Council v Brintel Helicopters Ltd
- Item Software (UK) Ltd v Fassihi
- Jackson v Brown
- Jackson v Hill
- Jakeman v South West Thames Regional Health Authority and London Ambulance Service
- James v Krauth
- Janata Bank v Ahmed
- Janstorp International (UK) Ltd v Allen
- Jeetle v Elster
- Jenkins v Kingsgate (Clothing Production)
- Jennings v Salford Community Service Agency
- Jim�nez Melgar v Ayuntamiento de Los Barrios: C-438/99
- John Dickie Homes Ltd v Jones
- Johnson & Bloy (Holdings) Ltd and Johnson & Bloy Ltd v Wolstenholme Rink plc and Fallon
- Johnson Underwood Ltd v Montgomery
- Johnson v Blenkensopp
- Johnson v Coventry Churchill International Ltd
- Johnson v Lindsay
- Johnson v Unisys Ltd
- Johnstone v Bloomsbury Health Authority
- Johnstone v Bloomsbury Health Authority
- Jones v Commerzbank AG
- Jones v Liberata Life Pensions Investments Ltd
- Jones v Liverpool Corpn
- Jones v Scullard
- Jones v Victoria Graving Dock Co
- Jones v Wasley
- Jowitt v Pioneer Technology (UK) Ltd
- Junior Carlton Club, Re
- Justfern Ltd v D'Ingerthorpe
- Kaid v Gruppo Ltd
- Kampelmann v Landschaftsverband Westfalen-Lippe: C-253/96 and C-258/96
- Kapadia v Stephen Fidler & Co
- Kaur v MG Rover Group Ltd
- Keane v Boycott
- Kear v Neural Technologies
- Kearney v Whitehaven Colliery Co
- Keeley v Fosroc International Ltd
- Keen v Commerzbank AG
- Keen v Henry
- Kelly v Liverpool Maritime Terminals Ltd
- Kelly v Mersey Docks and Harbour Co
- Kelman v Care Contract Services Ltd
- Kelsall v Lewisham Social Care and Health
- Kemp v Elisha
- Kemp v Lewis
- Kendal v Caley Fisheries Ltd
- Kenmir Ltd v Frizzell
- Kennedy v Dresdner Kleinwort Wassertein
- Kenny v South Manchester College
- Kenny v South Manchester College
- Kenny v Vauxhall Motors Ltd
- Kent Management Services Ltd v Butterfield
- Kenyon v Darwen Cotton Manufacturing Co Ltd
- Kerry Foods Ltd v Lynch
- Kershaw v Mirror Colour Print (Oldham) Ltd
- Kestongate Ltd v Miller
- Key Communications Ltd v Rose
- King v London Improved Cab Co
- King v Spurr
- King v University Court of the University of St Andrews
- King v West Yorkshire Fire and Civil Defence Authority
- Kirchner & Co v Gruban
- Kirkby v Taylor
- Knight v A-G
- Knight v Fox
- Knott v Rathbone Trading Ltd
- Kolatsis v Rockware Glass Ltd
- Kong v Commonwealth and British Services Ltd
- Kournavous v J R Masterton & Sons (Demolition) Ltd
- Lake v Essex County Council
- Lamb v Evans
- Lamb v Great Northern Rly Co
- Lambert v Great Eastern Rly Co
- Lamburn v Cruden
- Lane v Shire Roofing Co (Oxford) Ltd
- Lanksford v Business Post Ltd
- Lansing Linde Ltd v Kerr
- Lapthorne v Eurofi Ltd
- Larkin v Cambos Enterprises (Stretford) Ltd
- Latter v Braddell
- Laugher v Pointer
- Laughton and Hawley v Bapp Industrial Supplies Ltd
- Lavery v Plessey Telecommunications Ltd
- Lawson v Britfish Ltd
- Lawson, Re, Wardley v Bringloe
- LC Services Ltd v Brown
- Learoyd v Brook
- Lee Ting Sang v Chung Chi-Keung
- Lee v Barry High Ltd
- Lee v GEC Plessey Telecommunications
- Lee v GEC Plessey Telecommunications
- Lees v Whitcomb
- Leggott (G W) & Son v C H Normanton & Son sub nom Leggott (G W)
- Leng (Sir W C) & Co Ltd v Andrews
- Leslie v Fitzpatrick
- Leverton v Clwyd County Council
- Levez v TH Jennings (Harlow Pools) Ltd (No 2), Hicking v Basford Group Ltd
- Levinson v Pickfords Ltd
- Lewis v Governing Body of John Beddoes School
- Lewis v Peachey
- Lewson v Kirk sub nom Levison v Kirk
- Leyland Vehicles Ltd v Reston
- Liat (1974) Ltd v Greenidge
- Liat (1974) Ltd v Tomlinson
- Lightfoot v D & J Sporting Ltd
- Lilley v Elwin
- Limb & Co (Stevedores) (a firm) v British Transport Docks Board
- Limland v Stephens
- Lister v Romford Ice and Cold Storage Co Ltd
- Litster v Forth Dry Dock and Engineering Co Ltd
- Littlewoods Organisation Ltd v Harris
- Living Design (Home Improvements) Ltd v Davidson
- Living Design (Home Improvements) Ltd v Davidson
- Lloyd v Blackburn
- Lloyd v Brassey
- Lloyds Bank Ltd v Secretary of State for Employment
- Lloyds Bank plc v Fox
- LMC Drains Ltd v Waugh
- Loat v Andrews (or James)
- Lock International plc v Beswick
- London Ambulance Service v Charlton
- London Brick Co Ltd v Bishop
- London Tramways Co v Bailey
- Lotus Cars Ltd v Sutcliffe and Stratton
- Louis v Smellie
- Lowndes v Earl of Stamford and Warrington
- LTE Scientific Ltd v Thomas
- Lucas v Norton of London Ltd