- Home
- Order your essay!
- Price quote
- Guarantees
- Meet the team
- About our service
- About law teacher
- FAQs
- Scam warning
- Step by step
- Law journal
Law Case File: Employment Law
Welcome to our Employment Law Case Bank. We have provided these employment law cases to help you with your employment law essays and dissertations.
Employment law is rarely covered in any depth on the LL.B. Chances are, you’re studying for your LL.M, LPC or BVC. Or perhaps you’re taking the Open University Course W221: Employment Law and Practice. Maybe you’re struggling with an employment law essay or problem question – that’s why you’re here, right?
Employment law isn’t an easy subject, especially now we have the influence of european law to take into account. We must distinguish ‘employees’ from ‘workers’, understand the contract of employment and consequences of breach, be able to explain wrongful dismissal, unfair dismissal and statutory redundancy – these are all difficult and complex topics. In fact, wouldn’t it be great to have a practising Employment Law Solicitor at hand to advise you?
That’s exactly what we offer. If you’re struggling with an employment law essay or problem question, you’re not alone – but help is at hand. When you use our custom law essay service, we give you the exact answer to your Employment law essay or problem question, and we can help you in as little as 3 hours.
Send us your law essay or problem question and we’ll send you a fresh, original answer written by an expert employment law expert.
How good are your essays?
We guarantee the answer we provide will be 2.1 or 1st class standard (you choose) and written by a top employment law expert. Many of our writers have completed the LPC or BVC and currently work in private practice as employment law practitioners, advisors and consultants. Some regularly contribute to popular employment law digests.
These experts research and write about employment law on a daily basis. Now you can tap in to their knowledge.
Order a custom employment law essay and you’ll get:
- An exact, 100% original answer to your essay or problem question
- Written by a employment law expert
- Delivered confidentially to your email inbox
- In as little as 3 hours.
Click here to order now without obligation or call our friendly UK team
order,
and discuss your needs confidentially on 01623 499 057.
0-9 | a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | i | j | k | l | m | n | o | p | q | r | s | t | u | v | w | x | y | z
- Abler
v Sodexho MM Catering Betriebsgesellschaft mbH: C-340/01
- Acco
(UK) Ltd v Monge
- Ackinclose
v Gateshead Metropolitan Borough Council
- Adams
v British Airways plc
- Adams
v John Wright & Sons (Blackwall) Ltd
- Adamson
v B & L Cleaning Services Ltd
- Addison
v London Philharmonic Orchestra Ltd
- Adeneler
v Ellinikos Organismos Galaktos: C-212/04
- Adlam
v Salisbury and Wells Theological College
- A-G
for Guyana v Nobrega
- A-G
v Barker
- A-G
v Gilbert
- Age
Concern Scotland v Hines
- Agorastoudis
v Goodyear Hellas AVEE: Joined Cases C-187/05 - C-190/05
- Airlie
v Edinburgh District Council
- Albion
Automotive Ltd v Walker
- Albion
Automotive Ltd v Walker
- Alderson
v Maddison
- Alexander
v Standard Telephones and Cables Ltd (No 2); Wall v Standard
Telephones and Cables Ltd (No 2)
- Ali
v Christian Salvesen Food Services Ltd sub nom Salvesen
(Christian) Food Services Ltd v Ali
- Allan
v Stirling District Council sub nom Stirling District Council v
Allan
- Allen
& Son v Coventry
- Allen
(Jack) (Sales and Service) Ltd v Smith
- Allen
v National Australia Group Europe Ltd
- Alliance
Paper Group plc v Prestwich
- Alperton
Rubber Co v Manning
- Alphafield
Ltd v Barratt sub nom Apex Leisure Hire v Barratt
- Alsop
v Star Vehicle Contracts Ltd
- Amalgamated
Engineering Union v Minister of Pensions and National Insurance
- Amber
Size and Chemical Co Ltd v Menzel
- Amies
v Inner London Education Authority
- Angel
(Morris) & Son Ltd v Hollande
- Angel
(Morris) & Son Ltd v Hollande
- Annandale
Engineering v Samson
- Ansell
(Inspector of Taxes) v Brown
- Ansell
Rubber Co Pty Ltd v Allied Rubber Industries Pty Ltd
- Antal
International Ltd, Re
- Appleby
v Johnson sub nom Johnson v Appleby
- Arbuthnot
Pensions and Investments Ltd v Padden
- Archer
v James
- Argles
v Heaseman
- Armstrong
v South London Tramways Co Ltd
- Armstrong
Whitworth Rolls Ltd v Mustard
- Asamoah-Boakye
v Walter Rodney Housing Association Ltd
- Ashburton
(Lord) v Pape
- Asquith
v British Telecommunications plc
- Assi
v Dina Foods Ltd
- Associated
British Ports Ltd v Transport and General Workers Union
- Associated
British Ports v Transport and General Workers' Union
- Astbury
v Gist Ltd
- Athersmith
v Drury
- Avon
and Somerset Police Authority v Emery
- Aziz
v General Medical Council
STILL SEARCHING FOR THE RIGHT ANSWER? CLICK HERE TO ASK OUR LAW EXPERTS! - Bachnak
v Emerging Markets Partnership (Europe) Ltd
- Bagillo
Caterers Ltd v Karim
- Bailey
(N G) & Co Ltd v Preddy
- Bain
v Bowles
- Bain
v Central Vermont Rly Co
- Baker
v Cornwall County Council
- Baker
v Superite Tools Ltd
- Balfour
Beatty Rail Renewals Ltd v Brealey
- Bandey
v Penn
- Bank
of Credit and Commerce International SA (in liq) v Ali
- Bank
of Credit and Commerce International SA (in liq) v Ali
- Bank
of Montreal v Kuet Leong Ng
- Banking
Insurance and Finance Union v Barclays Bank plc
- Barber
v RJB Mining (UK) Ltd
- Barcock
v Brighton Corpn
- Barlow
v Whittle (t/a Micro Management)
- Barrett
v National Coal Board
- Barretts
& Baird (Wholesale) Ltd v Institution of Professional Civil
Servants
- Barry
v Bateman Catering Ltd
- Barry
v Midland Bank plc
- Bartholomew
v London Borough of Hackney
- Bartsch
v St Helens and Knowsley Hospital NHS Trust
- Base
Metal Trading Ltd v Shamurin
- Base
Metal Trading Ltd v Shamurin
- Batham
v Torbay Corpn
- Batty
v BSB Holdings (Cudworth) Ltd
- Batty
v Melillo
- Batty
v Monks
- Bauman
v Hulton Press Ltd
- Baxter
v Burfield
- BBC
v Ioannou
- BBC
v Kelly-Phillips
- Beal
v Beecham Group Ltd
- Beecham
Group Ltd v Beal (No 2)
- Beetham
v Crewdson
- Bell
v Drummond
- Bell
v London General Transport Services Ltd
- Benjamin
v Interlacing Ribbon Ltd
- Bents
Brewery Co Ltd v Hogan
- Benveniste
v University of Southampton
- Berkeley
Administration Inc v McClelland
- Berry
Birch & Noble Financial Planning (Weston) Ltd v Berwick
- Berwick
Salmon Fisheries Co Ltd v Rutherford
- Bewley
v HM Prison Service
- Bickley
(J & S) Ltd v Washer
- Biddle
v Bond
- Bird
v British Celanese Ltd
- Bird
v M'Gahey
- Birmingham
Mosque Trust Ltd v Alavi
- Blackpole
Furniture Ltd v Sullivan
- Blair
v Lochaber District Council
- Bloomfield
v Springfield Hosiery Finishing Co Ltd
- Boal
Quay Wharfingers Ltd v King's Lynn Conservancy Board
- Boast
v Firth
- Bold
v Business Location Services Ltd
- Bone
v ICG (UK) Ltd (trading as Searle Manufacturing Co)
- Bontex
Knitting Works Ltd v St Johns Garage
- Booth
v United States of America
- Boston
Deep Sea Fishing and Ice Co v Ansell
- Bound
v Lawrence
- Bowen
v Hall
- Bower
v Hughes Hooker & Co
- Bowers
v Lovekin
- Bowes
& Partners v Press
- Boyd
Line Ltd v Pitts
- Boyle
(t/a Owen's Coaches of Sidcup) v Hedges
- Bradshaw
v Hayward
- Brady
v Giles
- Braithwaite
v South Durham Steel Co Ltd
- Brake
Brothers Ltd v Ungless
- Branch
v Ewington
- Brand
v Compro Computer Services Ltd
- Brand
v Compro Computer Services Ltd
- Brassington
v Cauldon Wholesale Ltd
- Brayshaw
v Lambeth Community of Refugees from Vietnam
- Breakspear
v Colonial Financial Services (UK) Ltd
- Briggs
v North Eastern Education and Library Board
- Briggs
v Oates
- Briscoe
v Lubrizol Ltd
- Bristow
v City Petroleum Ltd
- British
Airways Engine Overhaul Ltd v Francis
- British
Bakeries (Northern) Ltd v Adlington sub nom Adlington v British
Bakeries (Northern) Ltd
- British
Coal Corpn v Smith
- British
Leyland UK Ltd v Pay Board
- British
Syphon Co Ltd v Homewood
- British
Syphon Co Ltd v Homewood
- British
Telecommunications plc v Ticehurst sub nom Ticehurst and
Thompson v British Telecommunications plc
- British
Telecommunications plc v Ticehurst sub nom Ticehurst and
Thompson v British Telecommunications plc
- Bromley
v H & J Quick Ltd
- Bromley
v Smith
- Bromsgrove
Casting and Machining Ltd v Martin
- Bronester
Ltd v Priddle
- Brook
Lane Finance Co Ltd v Bradley
- Brook
v Dawson
- Brown
v BMI British Midland
- Brown
v Harper
- Brown
v JBD Engineering Ltd
- Brown
v JBD Engineering Ltd
- Brown
v Rentokil Ltd
- Brown
v Rentokil Ltd: C-394/96
- Browning
v Great Central Mining Co
- Bruce
v Anderson
- Bruce
v Wiggins Teape (Stationery) Ltd
- Brunnhofer
v Bank der sterreichischen Postsparkasse AG: C-381/99
- Bryant
v Britannia Developments Ltd
- Bryant
v Flight
- BSM
(1257) Ltd v Secretary of State for Social Services
- Buchan
v Secretary of State for Employment
- Budd
v The Scotts Co (UK) Ltd
- Bull
(A H) & Co v West African Shipping Agency and Lighterage Co
- Bullock
v Merseyside County Council sub nom Merseyside County Council v
Bullock
- Bunce
v Postworth Ltd (trading as Skyblue)
- Burleigh
v Stibbs
- Burley
v Joseph W Burley & Partners Ltd
- Burrows
v Rhodes
- Business
Seating (Renovations) Ltd v Broad
- Button
v Thompson
- Bux
v Slough Metals Ltd
- Byrne
v Birmingham City District Council
- Cable
& Wireless plc v Muscat sub nom Muscat v Cable &
Wireless plc
- Cadman
v Health and Safety Executive
- Cadman
v Health and Safety Executive
- Cadman
v Health and Safety Executive
- Cadman
v Health and Safety Executive: C-17/05
- Calder
v James Finlay Corpn Ltd
- Camden
London BC v Coley
- Cameron
v Nystrom
- Cameron
v Royal London Ophthalmic Hospital
- Campbell
v Union Carbide Ltd
- Canadian
Aero Service v O'Malley
- Canadian
Worldwide Express Ltd v Smith
- Cantor
Fitzgerald (UK) Ltd v Wallace
- Cantor
Fitzgerald (UK) Ltd v Wallace
- Cantor
Fitzgerald International v Bird
- Cantor
Fitzgerald International v Callaghan
- Cape
Industrial Services v Ambler
- Capes
v Hutton
- Capital
Security Services Ltd v Baldwin
- Capper
Pass Ltd v Lawton
- Carmichael
v National Power plc
- Carmichael
v National Power plc
- Carter
v Hall
- Cartwright
v G Clancey Ltd
- Casson
Beckman & Partners (a firm) v Papi (carrying on business as
J W Papi & Co)
- Catamaran
Cruisers Ltd v Williams
- Catamaran
Cruisers Ltd v Williams
- Caulfield
v Marshalls Clay Products Ltd; Clarke v Frank Staddon Ltd
- Cavanagh
v Ulster Weaving Co Ltd
- Century
Insurance Co Ltd v Northern Ireland Road Tranport Board
- Challinor
v Taylor
- Charles
v Ellis & Ellis (t/a Property Services)
- Charlton
v Charlton Thermosystems (Romsey) Ltd
- Charnock
v Barrie Muirhead Ltd
- Chawner
v Cummings
- Cheng
Yuen v Royal Hong Kong Golf Club
- Chief
Constable of Kent County Constabulary v Baskerville
- Chiltern
House Ltd v Chambers
- Church
v Bakersfield Entertainment Ltd
- City
Alliance Ltd v Oxford Forecasting Services Ltd
- City
and Hackney Health Authority v National Union of Public
Employees
- Clamp
v Aerial Systems
- Clark
v BET plc
- Clark
v Nomura International plc
- Clark
v Oxfordshire Health Authority
- Clark
v Secretary of State for Employment
- Clarke
Chapman-John Thompson Ltd v Walters
- Clarke
v Frank Staddon Ltd; Caulfield v Marshalls Clay Products Ltd
- Clarke
v Frank Staddon Ltd; Caulfield v Marshalls Clay Products Ltd
- Clay
Cross (Quarry Services) Ltd v Fletcher sub nom Fletcher v Clay
Cross (Quarry Services) Ltd
- Clelland
v Edward Lloyd Ltd
- Clements
v London and North Western Rly Co
- Clifford
v Devon County Council
- Clifford
v Union of Democratic Mineworkers
- Clifton
Middle School Governing Body v Askew sub nom Askew v Governing
Body of Clifton Middle School
- Closson,
Re, ex p Harris
- Coales
v John Wood & Co
- Coase
v BBC
- Code
v Holmes
- Cofone
v Spaghetti House Ltd
- Coker
v Diocese of Southwark
- Coleman
Taymar Ltd v Oakes
- Colen
v Cebrian (UK) Ltd
- Colen
v Cebrian (UK) Ltd
- Colley
v Corkindale
- Collier
v Sunday Referee Publishing Co Ltd
- Collins
v Camden London Borough Council
- Collins
v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry
- Comax
Secure Business Services v Wilson
- Community
Task Force v Rimmer
- Company's
Application, a, Re
- Conradi
Morrison & Co (a firm) v Sulh
- Construction
Industry Training Board v Labour Force Ltd
- Construction
Industry Training Board v Leighton sub nom Leighton v
Construction Industry Training Board
- Cook
v Diageo
- Cook
v North Metropolitan Tramways Co
- Cook
v Square D Ltd sub nom Square D Ltd v Cook
- Cook
v Square D Ltd sub nom Square D Ltd v Cook
- Cooke
v Siemens Communications Ltd
- Cooner
v P S Doal & Sons
- Co-op
Employers Association v Pay Board
- Cooper
v Kakad
- Cooper
v Simmons
- Co-operative
Insurance Society Ltd v Customs and Excise Comrs
- Cordero
Alonso v Fondo de Garantia Salarial (Fogasa): C-81/05
- Corn
v Matthews
- Corner
v Buckinghamshire County Council
- Cornwall
v Hawkins
- Corporate
Express Ltd v Day
- Corton
House Ltd v Skipper
- Cotes
v Sadler
- Couchman
v Sillar
- Courage
Take Home Trade Ltd v Keys
- Courtaulds
Northern Spinning Ltd v Moosa
- Coventry
v Woodhall
- Cow
v Surrey and Berkshire Newspapers Ltd
- Cox
v Mathews
- CPL
Distribution Ltd v Evans
- Cranleigh
Precision Engineering Ltd v Bryant
- Credit
Suisse First Boston (Europe) Ltd v Padiachy, Winram and
Cracknell
- Cresswell
v Inland Revenue Board
- Crocker
v Molyneux
- Crompton
v Truly Fair (International) Ltd
- Crook
v Byrd
- Cross
v Redpath Dorman Long (Contracting) Ltd
- Crown
Dilmun v Sutton
- CRS
Computers Ltd v MacKenzie
- Cullen
v Creasey Hotels (Limbury) Ltd
- Cure
v Coutts & Co plc
- Cuthbertson
v Parsons
- Cutter
v Powell
- Cutts
v Ward
- D
v M
- Dabell
v Vale Industrial Services (Nottingham) Ltd
- Dacas
v Brook Street Bureau (UK) Ltd
- Dale
v CBS Online & Associates
- Daley
v Allied Suppliers Ltd
- Dalyell
v Tyrer
- Dance
v Dorothy Perkins Ltd sub nom Perkins (Dorothy) Ltd v Dance
- David
(Lawrence) Ltd v Ashton
- Davies
v Davies
- Davies
v Ebbw Vale UDC
- Davies
v Hotpoint Ltd
- Davies
v Hotpoint Ltd
- Davies
v Lord Berwick
- Davies
v Makuna
- Davies
v Presbyterian Church of Wales
- Davis
v New England College of Arundel
- Davis
v Starr
- Davis,
ex p
- de
Brito v Standard Chartered Bank Ltd
- De
Francesco v Barnum
- De
Francesco v Barnum sub nom Francesco v Barnum
- De
Silva v Advantage Building Systems
- Dean
v Branthwaite
- Dean
v Eastbourne Fishermen's and Boatmen's Protection Society and
Club Ltd
- Defrenne
v Sabena: 149/77
- Dekker
v Stichting Vormingscentrum voor Jong Volwassenen (VJV -
Centrum) Plus: C-177/88
- Dennison
v University College of St Mark and St John
- Department
of the Environment v Fox
- Depledge v Pye Telecommunications Ltd
- Descombes v Firthglow Ltd (trading as Protectacoat)
- Devonald v Rosser & Sons
- Dewar v Tasker & Sons Ltd
- Deyong v Shenburn
- Dhatt v McDonalds Hamburgers Ltd
- Diffang v Lewisham Hospital NHS Trust
- Dillingham v Harrison
- Dillon v Recruit Employment Services
- Discount Tobacco and Confectionery Ltd v Williamson
- Discount Tobacco and Confectionery Ltd v Williamson
- Dixon v Cementation Co Ltd
- Doggett v Waterloo Taxi-cab Co Ltd
- Donald v M & W Pearce Ltd
- Donnelly v Kelvin International Services
- Donovan v Laing, Wharton and Down Construction Syndicate
- Dowuona v John Lewis plc
- Doyle v White City Stadium Ltd
- Dugdale v Kraft Foods Ltd
- Duke v GEC Reliance Ltd (formerly Reliance Systems Ltd)
- Dummett v American Express Services Europe Ltd
- Dunnachie v Kingston-Upon-Hull City Council
- Durrant v Financial Collection Agency Ltd
- Dutton v Hawker Siddeley Aviation Ltd
- Dyson Technology Ltd v Strutt
“THESE CASE NOTES ARE REALLY HELPFUL”.
AN EXACT ANSWER TO YOUR EMPLOYMENT LAW ESSAY QUESTION WILL HELP EVEN MORE!
ORDER ONE NOW!
- Eagland v British Telecommunications plc
- Eagland v British Telecommunications plc
- Easdown v Cobb
- Eastbourne BC v Foster
- Eastbourne Borough Council v Foster
- Eastbourne Borough Council v Foster
- Eastwood v Magnox Electric plc
- Eastwood v Magnox Electric plc; McCabe v Cornwall County Council
- Eaton Ltd v Nuttall
- Eaton v Robert Eaton Ltd
- Eaton v Western
- Ebbw Vale Steel, Iron & Coal Co v Tew
- Eccles & Co v Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co
- Edmonds v Lawson
- Edmondson v P J & D Stuart (trading as Stuart Plant Hire)
- Edwards v West Herts Group Hospital Management Committee
- Egginton v Reader
- Electrolux Ltd v Hudson
- Electrolux Ltd v Hutchinson
- Ellen v Topp
- Elsworth v Woolmore
- EMI Group Electronics Ltd v Coldicott (Inspector of Taxes)
- Enderby v Frenchay Health Authority: C-127/92
- Enderby v Frenchay Health Authority: C-127/92
- Enesco European Giftware Group Ltd v Birkett
- England v Bromley London Borough Council
- English v Gunter & Co Ltd
- Euro Brokers Ltd v Rabey
- European Commission v Luxembourg: C-445/03
- Europices SA (in liq) v Sanders: C-399/96
- Evans v Elemeta Holdings Ltd
- Evans v Liverpool Corpn
- Evans v Roe
- Evans v Ware
- Evening Standard Co Ltd v Henderson
- Everritt v Apex Masonry Contractors Ltd
- Express and Echo Publications Ltd v Tanton
- Express and Star Ltd v National Graphical Association
- Expro Services Ltd v Smith
- Faccenda Chicken Ltd v Fowler
- Fadipe v Reed Nursing Personnel
- Fairfield Ltd v Skinner
- Famatina Development Corpn Ltd, Re
- Farrant v Woodroffe School
- Farrell Matthews & Weir (a firm) v Hansen
- Fechter v Montgomery
- Fellows v Wood
- Fenton v Stablegold Ltd (t/a Chiswick Court Hotel)
- Fibrenetix Storage Ltd v Davis
- Fielding (Harold) Ltd v Mansi
- Finnegan v Clowney Youth Training Programme Ltd
- First Global Locums Ltd v Cosias
- Fisher v Oldham Corpn
- Fitzgerald v Hall, Russell & Co Ltd
- Fitzpatrick v Evans & Co
- Fitzwilliam Executive Search Ltd (t/a Fitzwilliam Technical Services) v Bestuur van het Landelijk Instituut Sociale Verzekeringen: C-202/97
- Fleming v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry
- Fletcher Aluminium Ltd v O'Sullivan
- Flett v Matheson
- Flett v Matheson
- Flower v London and North Western Rly Co
- Floyd v Weaver sub nom Weaver v Floyd
- Fontana (GB) Ltd v Fabio
- Ford v Warwickshire County Council
- Forshaw v Archcraft Ltd
- Fosca Services (UK) Ltd v Birkett
- Foster v South Glamorgan Health Authority
- Foster Wheeler (London) Ltd v Jackson
- Four Seasons Healthcare Ltd (formerly Cotswold Spa Retirement Hotels Ltd) v Maughan
- Fowler v Lock
- Fox v C Wright (Farmers) Ltd
- Foy v Brzezicki
- Framptons Ltd v Badger
- Franchi v Franchi
- Frankling v BPS Public Sector Ltd
- Franks v Reuters Ltd
- Franks v Reuters Ltd
- Fraser v Stolt Offshore Ltd
- French v Barclays Bank plc
- Friend v Civil Aviation Authority
- Friend v PMA Holdings Ltd
- FSS Travel and Leisure Systems Ltd v Johnson
- Future On-Line Ltd v Foulds (Inspector of Taxes) sub nom Future Online Ltd v Faulds (Inspector of Taxes)
- Gadd v Thompson
- Gallagher v Alpha Catering Services Ltd (t/a Alpha Flight Services)
- Gardiner v Motherwell Machinery and Scrap Co Ltd
- Gartside v Outram
- Gascol Conversions Ltd v Mercer
- Gates v R Bill & Son
- Gaumont-British Picture Corpn Ltd v Alexander
- General of the Salvation Army v Dewsbury
- George v Davies
- Gershman v Manitoba Vegetable Producers Marketing Board
- GFI Group Inc v Eaglestone
- Gibb v United Steel Companies Ltd
- Gibson v Motortune Ltd
- Gill v Varley
- Gillies v Richard Daniels & Co Ltd
- Giraud v Richmond sub nom Geraud v Richmond
- Glamorgan Coal Co Ltd v South Wales Miners' Federation
- Glendale Managed Services v Graham
- GMB v Man Truck & Bus UK Ltd
- GNT Holdings (UK) Ltd v Barter
- Goodeve v Gilsons
- Gould v Governors of Haileybury and Imperial Service College
- Gould v Haynes
- Governing Body of Addey and Stanhope School v Vakante
- Graham v South Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council
- Grant v Kent County Council
- Grant v Kent County Council
- Gray v Cookson
- Greater London Council v Farrar
- Green v Broxtowe District Council sub nom Greene v Broxtowe District Council
- Green v Governing Body of Victoria Road Primary School
- Green v Roberts
- Green v Wavertree Heating and Plumbing Co Ltd
- Greene v P J Carey (Contractors) Ltd
- Gregory-Stoke Parish v Pitmister
- Gregson v Watson
- Griffiths v Salisbury District Council
- Grimston v Cuningham
- Gryf-Lowczowski v Hinchingbrooke Healthcare NHS Trust
- Gunning v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd sub nom Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd v Gunning
- Gyaniao v Design Corner Ltd
- Gylbert v Fletcher
- Hadmor Productions Ltd v Hamilton
- Hagen v ICI Chemicals and Polymers Ltd
- Haigh v Department for Work and Pensions
- Haine v Rolls Royce plc
- Hair Colour Consultants Ltd v Mena
- Hairsine v Kingston upon Hull City Council
- Hale v Webb
- Halfpenny v IGE Medical Systems Ltd
- Hall v Lees
- Hall v Woolston Hall Leisure Ltd
- Halstead v Accountax Marketing Ltd
- Hancill v Marcon Engineering Ltd
- Hancock v BSA Tools Ltd
- Hanley v Pease & Partners Ltd
- Hanover Insurance Brokers Ltd v Schapiro
- Hanson v Fashion Industries (Hartlepool) Ltd
- Harber v North London Polytechnic
- Hardaker v Idle District Council
- Harrington Jones Architects Ltd v Harrington
- Harrison's Executor v Student Loans Co Ltd
- Hart v Riversdale Mill Co
- Hartley v Cummings
- Harvey v RG O'Dell Ltd
- Haughton v Olau Line (UK) Ltd
- Hayward v Cammell Laird Shipbuilders Ltd
- Healey v Bridgend County Council
- Hearst v Clark
- Helmore v Smith (No 2)
- Henry v London General Transport Services Ltd
- Henry v London General Transport Services Ltd
- Hepworth Heating Ltd v Akers
- Hewcastle Catering Ltd v Ahmed and Elkamah
- Hewcastle Catering Ltd v Ahmed and Elkamah
- Hewlett Packard Ltd v O'Murphy
- Hewlett v Allen
- Higgins v Hopkins
- Hill (William) Organisation Ltd v Tucker
- Hill v Allen
- Hill v Beckett
- Hill v General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corpn plc
- Hillingdon Area Health Authority v Kauders
- Hillyer v St Bartholomew's Hospital (Governors)
- Hilton International Hotels (UK) Ltd v Kaissi
- Hilton International Hotels (UK) Ltd v Kaissi
- Hilton v Shiner Ltd Builders Merchants
- Hinkley v Ashtons Manufacturing Ltd
- Hitchcock v Post Office
- Hivac Ltd v Park Royal Scientific Instruments Ltd
- Hobden v Almondsbury Care Ltd
- Hobson v GEC Telecommunications Ltd
- Hodges (Philip) & Co v Kell
- Hodges (Philip) & Co v Kell
- Hogan v Cambridgeshire County Council
- Hogg v Department for Education and Skills
- Holdcroft v South Derbyshire District Council
- Holder v Wong
- Holt v W H Rhodes & Son Ltd
- Home Office v Ayres
- Home Office v Holmes
- Hopkins v Norcros plc
- Horan v Hayhoe
- Horkulak v Cantor Fitzgerald International
- Horkulak v Cantor Fitzgerald International
- Horn v Chandler
- Howard v Wilson
- Howell v Consignia plc
- Howgate v Fane Acoustics Ltd
- Howman & Son v Blyth
- Huddersfield Fine Worsteds Ltd, Re; Krasner v McMath
- Hughes v Bonella
- Hughes v GMB Trade Union
- Hughes v Governing Body of Archers Court School
- Hughes v Humphreys
- Hugh-Jones v St John's College Cambridge
- Hulse v Hulse
- Humphrey v Gatwick Handling Ltd
- Humphreys v Board of Managers of St George's Church of England (Aided) Primary School
- Hunt v Great Northern Rly Co
- Hunt v Power Resources Ltd
- Hunter v Belcher
- Hunter v Smith's Dock Co Ltd
- Hurley v Mustoe
- Hussey v Pensey sub nom Hussy v Pacy sub nom Hussey v Pusy
- Hussman Manufacturing Ltd v Weir
- Hutchings v Coinseed Ltd
- Hutchinson v Westward Television Ltd
- Huttman v Boulnois
- Hutton v Thompson
- Hyland v J H Barker (North West) Ltd
- ILEA v Nash
- Ingram v Barnes
- Ingram v Foxon
- Initial Services Ltd v Putterill
- Innes v Equal Storm Ltd (t/a Merlin's Ark)
- Innovative Software Ltd v Howes
- Institution of Professional Civil Servants v Secretary of State for Defence
- Intelsec Systems Ltd v Grech-Cini
- Intercontinental Energy Ltd v Jowitt
- Internexus Group Ltd v Flood
- Inverclyde Council v Wilson
- IRC v Hambrook
- IRC v Lawrence
- Irish v Southwark Action for Voluntary Associations
- Ironmonger v Movefield Ltd (t/a Deering Appointments)
- Isaacs Partnership (a firm) v Umm Al-Jawaby Oil Service Co Ltd
- Isles of Scilly Council v Brintel Helicopters Ltd
- Item Software (UK) Ltd v Fassihi
- Jackson v Brown
- Jackson v Hill
- Jakeman v South West Thames Regional Health Authority and London Ambulance Service
- James v Krauth
- Janata Bank v Ahmed
- Janstorp International (UK) Ltd v Allen
- Jeetle v Elster
- Jenkins v Kingsgate (Clothing Production)
- Jennings v Salford Community Service Agency
- Jimnez Melgar v Ayuntamiento de Los Barrios: C-438/99
- John Dickie Homes Ltd v Jones
- Johnson & Bloy (Holdings) Ltd and Johnson & Bloy Ltd v Wolstenholme Rink plc and Fallon
- Johnson Underwood Ltd v Montgomery
- Johnson v Blenkensopp
- Johnson v Coventry Churchill International Ltd
- Johnson v Lindsay
- Johnson v Unisys Ltd
- Johnstone v Bloomsbury Health Authority
- Johnstone v Bloomsbury Health Authority
- Jones v Commerzbank AG
- Jones v Liberata Life Pensions Investments Ltd
- Jones v Liverpool Corpn
- Jones v Scullard
- Jones v Victoria Graving Dock Co
- Jones v Wasley
- Jowitt v Pioneer Technology (UK) Ltd
- Junior Carlton Club, Re
- Justfern Ltd v D'Ingerthorpe
- Kaid v Gruppo Ltd
- Kampelmann v Landschaftsverband Westfalen-Lippe: C-253/96 and C-258/96
- Kapadia v Stephen Fidler & Co
- Kaur v MG Rover Group Ltd
- Keane v Boycott
- Kear v Neural Technologies
- Kearney v Whitehaven Colliery Co
- Keeley v Fosroc International Ltd
- Keen v Commerzbank AG
- Keen v Henry
- Kelly v Liverpool Maritime Terminals Ltd
- Kelly v Mersey Docks and Harbour Co
- Kelman v Care Contract Services Ltd
- Kelsall v Lewisham Social Care and Health
- Kemp v Elisha
- Kemp v Lewis
- Kendal v Caley Fisheries Ltd
- Kenmir Ltd v Frizzell
- Kennedy v Dresdner Kleinwort Wassertein
- Kenny v South Manchester College
- Kenny v South Manchester College
- Kenny v Vauxhall Motors Ltd
- Kent Management Services Ltd v Butterfield
- Kenyon v Darwen Cotton Manufacturing Co Ltd
- Kerry Foods Ltd v Lynch
- Kershaw v Mirror Colour Print (Oldham) Ltd
- Kestongate Ltd v Miller
- Key Communications Ltd v Rose
- King v London Improved Cab Co
- King v Spurr
- King v University Court of the University of St Andrews
- King v West Yorkshire Fire and Civil Defence Authority
- Kirchner & Co v Gruban
- Kirkby v Taylor
- Knight v A-G
- Knight v Fox
- Knott v Rathbone Trading Ltd
- Kolatsis v Rockware Glass Ltd
- Kong v Commonwealth and British Services Ltd
- Kournavous v J R Masterton & Sons (Demolition) Ltd
- Lake v Essex County Council
- Lamb v Evans
- Lamb v Great Northern Rly Co
- Lambert v Great Eastern Rly Co
- Lamburn v Cruden
- Lane v Shire Roofing Co (Oxford) Ltd
- Lanksford v Business Post Ltd
- Lansing Linde Ltd v Kerr
- Lapthorne v Eurofi Ltd
- Larkin v Cambos Enterprises (Stretford) Ltd
- Latter v Braddell
- Laugher v Pointer
- Laughton and Hawley v Bapp Industrial Supplies Ltd
- Lavery v Plessey Telecommunications Ltd
- Lawson v Britfish Ltd
- Lawson, Re, Wardley v Bringloe
- LC Services Ltd v Brown
- Learoyd v Brook
- Lee Ting Sang v Chung Chi-Keung
- Lee v Barry High Ltd
- Lee v GEC Plessey Telecommunications
- Lee v GEC Plessey Telecommunications
- Lees v Whitcomb
- Leggott (G W) & Son v C H Normanton & Son sub nom Leggott (G W)
- Leng (Sir W C) & Co Ltd v Andrews
- Leslie v Fitzpatrick
- Leverton v Clwyd County Council
- Levez v TH Jennings (Harlow Pools) Ltd (No 2), Hicking v Basford Group Ltd
- Levinson v Pickfords Ltd
- Lewis v Governing Body of John Beddoes School
- Lewis v Peachey
- Lewson v Kirk sub nom Levison v Kirk
- Leyland Vehicles Ltd v Reston
- Liat (1974) Ltd v Greenidge
- Liat (1974) Ltd v Tomlinson
- Lightfoot v D & J Sporting Ltd
- Lilley v Elwin
- Limb & Co (Stevedores) (a firm) v British Transport Docks Board
- Limland v Stephens
- Lister v Romford Ice and Cold Storage Co Ltd
- Litster v Forth Dry Dock and Engineering Co Ltd
- Littlewoods Organisation Ltd v Harris
- Living Design (Home Improvements) Ltd v Davidson
- Living Design (Home Improvements) Ltd v Davidson
- Lloyd v Blackburn
- Lloyd v Brassey
- Lloyds Bank Ltd v Secretary of State for Employment
- Lloyds Bank plc v Fox
- LMC Drains Ltd v Waugh
- Loat v Andrews (or James)
- Lock International plc v Beswick
- London Ambulance Service v Charlton
- London Brick Co Ltd v Bishop
- London Tramways Co v Bailey
- Lotus Cars Ltd v Sutcliffe and Stratton
- Louis v Smellie
- Lowndes v Earl of Stamford and Warrington
- LTE Scientific Ltd v Thomas
- Lucas v Norton of London Ltd
- Luce v Bexley London Borough Council
- Lucey v E C Sames & Co Ltd
- Lumley v Gye
- Lunt v Merseyside Tec Ltd
- Lylly's Case
- Mace v R and H Green and Silley Weir Ltd
- Macer v Abafast Ltd
- MacFarlane v Bates Wells & Braithwaite (a firm)
- Mack v Allen
- MacPherson v London Borough of Lambeth
- Maddison v Alderson
- Maguire v BAE Systems (Defence Systems) Ltd
- Mahlburg v Land Mecklenburg-Vorpommern: C-207/98
- Mahmud v BCCI SA, Malik v BCCI SA (in liquidation)
- Mailway (Southern) Ltd v Willsher
- Mainstream Properties Ltd v Young
- Mallone v BPB Industries plc
- Maloney v St Helens Industrial Co-op Society Ltd
- Manchester City Council v Thurston
- Mandal v Rotherham Hospital NHS Trust
- Mangold v Helm: C-144/04
- Mann v Secretary of State for Employment
- Manor House Healthcare v Hays
- Mapleson v Sears
- Margerison v Bertwistle
- Market Investigations Ltd v Minister of Social Security
- Marley v Forward Trust Group Ltd
- Marney v Campbell Symonds & Co Ltd
- Marrison v Bell
- Marrousu v Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedale San Martino di Genova e Cliniche Universitarie Convenzionate: C-53/04
- Marrow v Flimby and Broughton Moor Coal and Fire Brick Co
- Marshall (Thomas) (Exports) Ltd v Guinle
- Marshall v Glanvill
- Marshalls Clay Products Ltd v Caulfield sub nom Caulfield v Marshalls Clay Products Ltd
- Martin v South Bank University: C-4/01
- Martin v Temperley
- Massey v Crown Life Insurance Co
- Master Ladies Tailors Organisation v Minister of Labour and National Service
- Maw v Jones
- May (Greg) (Carpet Fitters and Contractors) Ltd v Dring
- Mayer v British Broadcasting Corpn
- Maynard v Peter Robinson Ltd
- McAuley v Eastern Health and Social Services Board
- McCabe v Cornwall County Council
- McClaren v Home Office
- McClory v Post Office
- McClory v Post Office
- McConnell v Police Authority for Northern Ireland
- McCredie v Fife Council
- McCree v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council
- McDonald v Camden London Borough Council
- McDonald v John Twiname Ltd
- McDougall v Glasgow City Council
- McDougall v Glasgow City Council
- McEwing v Somoa Ltd
- McKay v Unwin Pyrotechnics Ltd
- McLeod (formerly Henry) v London General Transport Services Ltd
- McLoughlin v Gordons (Stockport) Ltd
- McLoughlin v Sutcliffe Catering (UK) Ltd
- McMeechan v Secretary of State for Employment
- Meade-Hill and National Union of Civil and Public Servants v British Council
- Meakin v Morris
- Mears v Safecar Security Ltd
- Medical Protection Society Ltd v Rees
- Mediguard Services Ltd v Thame
- Meek v Port of London Authority
- Melhuish v Redbridge Citizens Advice Bureau
- Merckx v Ford Motors Co Belgium SA: C-171/94 and C-172/94
- Merelie v Newcastle Primary Care Trust
- Meriton v Hornsby
- Merryweather v Moore
- Merton London Borough Council v Thomas
- Meteorological Office v James
- Methilhill Bowling Club v Hunter
- Methodist Conference (President) v Parfitt
- Methven v Cow Industrial Polymers Ltd
- Michael (John) Design plc v Cooke
- Middleton v Brown
- Mileham v St Marylebone Corpn and Latter
- Miles v Wakefield Metropolitan District Council
- Milestone School of English v Leakey
- Millard v Kelly
- Miller v Hamworthy Engineering Ltd
- Miller v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Milligan v Wedge
- Millwall Football Club and Athletic Co (1985) plc (in administration)
- Milne v Link Asset and Security Co Ltd
- Mingeley v Pennock & Ivory (t/a Amber Cars)
- Ministry of Defence v Farthing sub nom Farthing v Ministry of Defence
- Ministry of Defence v Jeremiah sub nom Jeremiah v Ministry of Defence
- Mitchell v Royal British Legion Club
- M'Laughlin v Pryor
- Mohammed v Camden London Borough Council
- Mole Mining Ltd v Jenkins
- Moore v Palmer
- Moore v Simoco Europe Ltd
- Moores v Bude Stratton Town Council
- Moorhouse v Lee
- Morgan v Brith Gof Cyf
- Morgan v London General Omnibus Co
- Morgan v West Glamorgan County Council
- Morley v Heritage plc
- Morley v Heritage plc
- Morren v Swinton and Pendlebury Borough Council
- Morris (Herbert) Ltd v Saxelby
- Morris v Secretary of State for Employment
- Morris, Re, ex p Cooper
- Morrison Fleet & Co Ltd v Fletcher (otherwise Futcher)
- Moult v Halliday
- Moxon v Ipsos-RSL Ltd
- MPB Structure Ltd v Munro
- Mulford v Manpower UK Ltd
- Mulox IBC Ltd v Geels: C-125/92
- Mulox IBC Ltd v Geels: C-125/92
- Mumford v Gething
- Munro v MPB Structures Ltd
- Murco Petroleum Ltd v Forge
- Murphy Telecommunications (Systems) Ltd v Henderson
- Murray v Currie
- Murray v Philippine Airlines Inc
- Nadin (criminal proceedings concerning): C-151/04 and C-152/04
- Nakatani v International School of London
- National Coal Board v Ridgway sub nom Ridgway and Fairbrother v National Coal Board
- National Coal Board v Sherwin
- National Dock Labour Board v British Steel Corpn
- National Dock Labour Board v John Bland & Co Ltd
- National Vulcan Engineering Insurance Group Ltd v Wade
- Navy, Army and Air Force Institutes v Varley
- Neary v Dean of Westminster
- Nerva v RL & G Ltd
- Nethermere (St Neots) Ltd v Gardiner sub nom Nethermere (St Neots) Ltd v Taverna and Gardiner
- New Centurion Trust v Welch
- Newell v Gillingham Corpn
- Newham London Borough Council v Smith
- Newland v Simons and Willer (Hairdressers) Ltd
- Newlin Oil Co Ltd v Trafford
- Newns v British Airways plc
- Newns v British Airways plc
- Niblett v Midland Rly Co
- Nichol v Martyn
- Nicholson v Harrison
- Nicoll v Cutts
- Nicoll v Greaves
- Nikoloudi v Organismos Tilepikinonion Ellados AE: C-196/02
- Niven v Mitchell Drainage Services Ltd
- Nortel Networks (Cala) Inc v Dahan
- North East Coast Shiprepairers Ltd v Secretary of State for Employment
- Northern General Hospital NHS Trust v Gale
- Northern General Hospital NHS Trust v Gale
- Nottingham University v Fishel
- Nova Plastics Ltd v Froggatt
- Nowlan v Ablett
- Nunoo v Warp Technologies Holdings Inc
- Nu-Swift International Ltd v Mallinson
- O'Brien v Sim-Chem Ltd
- O'Brien v Transco plc (formerly BG plc)
- Ogden v Ardphalt Asphalt Ltd
- Ogle v Morgan
- O'Grady v M Saper Ltd
- O'Kelly v Trusthouse Forte plc
- Oliver v J P Malnick & Co
- Olsen v Corry and Gravesend Aviation Ltd
- O'Neill v Symm & Co Ltd
- Open University v Triesman
- Opie v John Gubbins (Insurance Brokers) Ltd
- O'Reilly v ICI Ltd
- Orman v Saville Sportswear Ltd
- O'Shea (CJ) Construction Ltd v Bassi
- Outlook Supplies Ltd v Parry
- Outram v Academy Plastics
- Overton v Freeman
- Owen v Bowen
- Owens v Multilux Ltd
- Owner v Hooper
- Oxford v Department of Health and Social Security
- Page v Freight Hire (Tank Haulage) Ltd
- Palmer v East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust
- Pambakian v Brentford Nylons Ltd
- Panayiotou v Sony Music Entertainment (UK) Ltd
- Parker v Ibbetson
- Parkes v Smethwick Corpn
- Parkes v Watts (t/a Ten Gables Nursing Home)
- Parkin v South Hetton Coal Co
- Parkins v Sodexho Ltd
- Parkinson v Plumpton
- Parry v Liverpool Malt Co
- Parsons v Albert J Parsons & Sons Ltd
- Partco Group Ltd v Wragg
- Patel v RCMS Ltd
- Pauley v Kenaldo Ltd
- Payne v Secretary of State for Employment
- Peake v Automotive Products Ltd sub nom Automotive Products Ltd v Peake
- Pearce v Lansdowne
- Pearson v Halesowen College
- Pearson v Kent County Council
- Pearson v William Jones Ltd
- Pendlebury v Christian Schools North West Ltd
- Peninsula Business Services Ltd v Sweeney
- Penman v Fife Coal Co Ltd
- People's Refreshment House Association Ltd v Jones
- Perrie v Mertrux Ltd
- Perry v Intec Colleges Ltd
- Perry v Intec Colleges Ltd
- Petrie v MacFisheries Ltd
- Pfeiffer v Deutsches Rotes Kreuz, Kreisverband Waldshut eV: C-397/01 to C-403/01
- Phillips v Clift
- Photostatic Copiers (Southern) Ltd v Okuda and Japan Office Equipment Ltd (in liquidation)
- Pickstone v Freemans plc
- Pilkington v Scott
- Pillar v Llynvi Coal and Iron Co Ltd
- Pinkney v Sandpiper Drilling Ltd
- Plews v Diagonal Computer Services Ltd
- Plumb v Birchanger Church of England Primary School
- Plymouth (Countess) v Throgmorton
- PMC Holdings Ltd v Smith
- Poland v John Parr & Sons
- Pone v Ordnance Survey
- Poparm Ltd v Weekes
- Poplett v Stockdale
- Porcelli v Strathclyde Regional Council sub nom Strathclyde Regional Council v Porcelli
- Port Talbot Engineering Co Ltd v Passmore and Evans
- Post Office v Howell
- Potter v Hunt Contracts Ltd
- Poulson v John Jarvis & Sons Ltd
- Powdrill v Watson
- Powles v Hider
- PR Consultants Scotland Ltd v Mann
- Prankerd, ex p sub nom ex p Fisher
- Prater v Cornwall County Council
- Pratt v Cook, Son & Co (St Paul's) Ltd
- Premier Motors (Medway) Ltd v Total Oil Great Britain Ltd
- Prescription Pricing Authority v Ferguson
- Prestcold Ltd v Irvine
- Preston Corpn v Biornstad, The Ratata
- Preston v Wolverhampton Healthcare NHS Trust and Secretary of State for Health, Fletcher v Midland Bank plc
- Price (WF) (Roofing) Ltd v Cox
- Price v Civil Service Commission
- Price v Mouat
- Pritchard v James Clay (Wellington) Ltd
- Propertycare Ltd v Gower
- Provident Financial Group plc v Hayward
- Qasim v Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust
- Qualcast (Wolverhampton) Ltd v Haynes
- Quarman v Burnett
- Quinn v Leathem
- Quinnen v Hovells
- R (on the application of Arthurworry) v Haringey London Borough Council
- R (on the application of Foster) v Eastbourne Borough Council
- R (on the application of Foster) v Eastbourne Borough Council
- R (on the application of O'Sullivan) v Secretary of State for Health
- R
v Arnesby Inhabitants
- R v Arnesby Inhabitants
- R v Arundel Inhabitants
- R v Billinghay Inhabitants
- R v Burbach Inhabitants
- R v Central Arbitration Committee, ex p Banking Insurance and Finance Union
- R v Chirk
- R v Coltishall Inhabitants
- R v Cromford Inhabitants
- R v Devonshire Justices
- R v Evered
- R v Fleet
- R v Gibbs
- R v Great Wigston, Leicester, Inhabitants
- R v Great Wishford Inhabitants
- R v Hales Inhabitants
- R v Hales-Owen Inhabitants
- R v Hoseason
- R v Kingsweare Inhabitants
- R v Laindon Inhabitants
- R v Little Bolton Inhabitants
- R v Longnor Inhabitants
- R v Lord
- R v Lord Chancellor's Department, ex p Nangle
- R v Lyth Inhabitants
- R v Margram Inhabitants
- R v Mountsorrel Inhabitants
- R v Northowram Inhabitants
- R v Notton Inhabitants
- R v Peck
- R v Powys County Council, ex p Smith
- R v Rainham Inhabitants
- R v Ripon Inhabitants
- R v Secretary of State for Employment, ex p Equal Opportunities Commission sub nom Equal Opportunities Commission v Secretary of State for Employment
- R v Shinfield Inhabitants
- R v Sow Inhabitants
- R v Spawnton Inhabitants
- R v St John Devizers Inhabitants
- R v St Margaret's, King's Lynn, Inhabitants
- R v St Martin's, Exeter, Inhabitants
- R v St Mary Kallendar, Winchester, Inhabitants
- R v St Mary, Guildford, Inhabitants
- R v St Peter's, Dorchester sub nom Trinity v St Peter's, Dorchester
- R v Stokesley Inhabitants
- R v Stuart sub nom R v Steward
- R v Titchfield Inhabitants
- R v Warden Inhabitants
- R v Weddington Inhabitants
- R v Welsh sub nom R v Welch
- R v Wen
- R v Weyhill, Hants, Inhabitants
- R v White
- R v Wortley
- Racal Communications Ltd v Pay Board
- Rainey v Greater Glasgow Health Board
- Randleson v Murray
- Rapson v Cubitt
- Rashid v ILEA
- Ratata, The
- Ratcliffe v North Yorkshire County Council sub nom North Yorkshire County Council v Ratcliffe
- Raymond v Minton
- Read v Motivation Business Ltd
- Reading v A-G
- Ready Mixed Concrete (South East) Ltd v Minister of Pensions and National Insurance
- Ready Mixed Concrete (Supply of), Re
- Real Time Civil Engineering Ltd v Callaghan
- Redgrave v Kelly
- Redpath Dorman Long (Contracting) Ltd v Sutton
- Rees v Cambrian Wagon Works Ltd
- Reeve v Reeve
- Reid v Camphill Engravers
- Reid v North West Ceilings Ltd (t/a Shopspec)
- Reid v Rush & Tompkins Group plc
- Reiss Engineering Co Ltd v Harris
- Rencoule (H A) (Joiners and Shopfitters) Ltd v Hunt
- Renshaw v Queen Anne Residential Mansions Co Ltd
- Rice v Fon-a-Car
- Richardson v Pitt-Stanley
- Richardson v Stephenson Clarke Ltd
- Richmond Medical Agency Ltd v Bassom
- Rickard v PB Glass Supplies Ltd
- Rigby v Ferodo Ltd
- Riley v Warden
- Riley-Williams v Argos Ltd
- Riniker v Waymark Holidays Ltd
- Riversdale Mill Co v Hart
- Roach v CSB (Moulds) Ltd
- Robb v Green
- Robb v Leon Motor Services Ltd
- Roberts v Smith
- Robertson v British Gas Corpn
- Robertson v Rockware Glass Ltd
- Robertson v Stolt Offshore Ltd
- Rogers v Markel Corpn
- Rowley v Cerberus Software Ltd
- Rowley, Holmes & Co v Barber
- Roworth v Welbeck Steel Service Centres Ltd
- Royce v Charlton
- Royle v Manchester City Football Club plc
- Royle v Trafford Borough Council
- Rudder v International Aeradio (Caribbean) Ltd
- Rushbrook v Grimsby Palace Theatre and Buffet Ltd
- Russell v Shinn
- Rutten v Cross Medical Ltd: C-383/95
- Ryan v Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council
- S and U Stores Ltd v Lee
- S and U Stores Ltd v Wilkes
- Sadler v Henlock
- Sagar v H Ridehalgh & Son Ltd
- Samuels v Townsend
- Sandby, ex p
- Sanders v Parry
- Sanderson v Bell sub nom Saunderson v Bell
- Sarker v South Tees Acute Hospitals NHS Trust
- Saunders v Richmond-upon-Thames London Borough Council
- Saunders v Whittle
- Savage v Walthew
- Savoy Hotel Co v LCC
- Scally v Southern Health and Social Services Board
- Scally v Southern Health and Social Services Board
- Schmidt v Austicks Bookshops Ltd
- Scott (Thomas) & Sons (Bakers) Ltd v Allen
- Scott v Philips Components Ltd
- Sealand Petroleum Co Ltd v Barratt
- Searle (G D) & Co Ltd v Celltech Ltd
- Searle v Ridley
- Secretary of State for Education and Employment v Bearman
- Secretary of State for Employment v A Ford & Son (Sacks) Ltd
- Secretary of State for Employment v Anchor Hotel (Kippford) Ltd
- Secretary of State for Employment v Chapman
- Secretary of State for Employment v Cohen
- Secretary of State for Employment v Cooper
- Secretary of State for Employment v Cox
- Secretary of State for Employment v Deary
- Secretary of State for Employment v Doulton Sanitaryware Ltd
- Secretary of State for Employment v Haynes
- Secretary of State for Employment v Spence
- Secretary of State for Employment v Stewart
- Secretary of State for Employment v Stone
- Secretary of State for Employment v Stone
- Secretary of State for Scotland v Taylor
- Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Bottrill
- Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Bottrill
- Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions v Snowdon
- Seligman (Robert) Corpn v Baker
- Semtex Ltd v Gladstone
- Shabinsky v Horwitz
- Shaikh v Independent Tribunal Service
- Sharman v Sanders
- Sharman v Union Iron Works Co
- Sharp (G F) & Co Ltd v McMillan
- Sheehan v DMQA Technical Services (UK) Ltd
- Shelton v Full House Restaurants Ltd
- Shepherd v Neve
- Shields v E Coomes (Holdings) Ltd
- SI (Systems and Instrumentation) Ltd v Grist
- Sidey v Phillips (Inspector of Taxes)
- Sillars v Charringtons Fuels Ltd
- Silverwood v Willow Oak Developments Ltd (t/a Windsor Recruitment)
- Silverwood v Willow Oak Developments Ltd (t/a Windsor Recruitment)
- Silvey v Pendragon plc
- Sime v Imperial College London
- Simmons v Heath Laundry Co
- Simms v Sainsbury Supermarkets Ltd
- Singh v Guru Nanak Gurdwara
- Sita (GB) Ltd v Burton
- Skyrail Oceanic Ltd v Coleman sub nom Coleman v Skyrail Oceanic Ltd (t/a Goodmos Tours)
- Slade v Metrodent Ltd
- Sleeman v Barrett, etc (Exors of Bennett)
- SMC Electronics Ltd v Akhter Computers Ltd
- Smedley v Gooden
- Smith v A J Morrisroes & Sons Ltd
- Smith v American Life Insurance Co
- Smith v Associated Omnibus Co
- Smith v Gardner Merchant Ltd
- Smith v General Motor Cab Co Ltd
- Smith v Martin and Kingston upon Hull Corpn
- Smith v Roberts sub nom Smith v Lawrence
- Smith v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry
- Smith v Walton
- Soares v Beazer Investments Ltd
- Societe Maritime Francaise v Shanghai Dock and Engineering Co Ltd
- Sorbie v Trust Houses Forte Hotels Ltd
- SOS Kinderdorf International v Bittaye
- Soteriou v Ultrachem Ltd
- Sougrin v Haringey Health Authority
- Sougrin v Haringey Health Authority
- South Wales Miners' Federation v Glamorgan Coal Co Ltd
- Southern Electricity Board v Collins
- Southwark Diocese v Coker
- Southwood Hostel Management Committee v Taylor
- Spanlite Structures Ltd v Jarrett
- Speed v Thomas Swift & Co Ltd
- Squire v Bayer & Co
- Squire v Midland Lace Co
- Staffordshire County Council v Black
- Staffordshire Sentinel Newspapers Ltd v Potter
- Stanbury v Exeter Corpn
- Stanton's Case
- Starcomm Ltd v Knapman
- Stark v DCM Optical Clinic plc
- Steel v Union of Post Office Workers
- Steen v Ikon Office Solutions plc
- Stein v Van Laurun Ltd
- Stephenson v Johnson
- Stevedoring and Haulage Services Ltd v Fuller
- Stewart (Rex) Jeffries Parker Ginsberg Ltd v Parker
- Stewart v Thomson Racal Ltd
- Stilgoe v UK Coal Mining Ltd
- Stoddart v Cawder Golf Club
- Stransky v Bristol Rugby Ltd
- Strathclyde Regional Council v Wallace sub nom West Dunbartonshire Council v Wallace
- Strudwick v Iszatt Bros Ltd (or IBL)
- Stuncroft Ltd v Havelock
- Suffolk County Council v Secretary of State for the Environment
- Summerfield v London Co-op Society Ltd
- Sunderland Polytechnic v Evans
- Sunderland Polytechnic v Evans
- Sunley Turriff Holdings Ltd v Thomson
- Sunley Turriff Holdings Ltd v Thomson
- Sutherland v Network Appliance Ltd
- Swain v West (Butchers) Ltd
- Swanney v Penn Hill Pharmacy Ltd
- Swithenbank Foods Ltd v Bowers
- Sybron Corpn v Rochem Ltd
- Sykes v Dixon
- Szumczyk v Associated Tunnelling Co Ltd
STRUGGLING TO FIND TIME TO COMPLETE YOUR EMPLOYMENT LAW ESSAY?
CLICK HERE, AND ORDER NOW.
- Tarmac Roadstone Holdings Ltd v Peacock
- Taylor v Brewer
- Taylor v Carr and Porter
- Taylor v Laird
- Taylor v Motability Finance Ltd
- Taylor v Serviceteam Ltd and Waltham Forest Borough Council
- Tees and Hartlepool Port Authorities Ltd v Freer
- Teesside Times Ltd v Drury
- Tele Danmark A/S v Handels- og Kontorfunktionrernes Forbund i Danmark (HK): C-109/00
- Temco Service Industries SA v Imzilyen: C-51/00
- Tensator Group Ltd v Falzon
- Tetley GB Ltd v Ghatahorde
- TFS Derivatives Ltd v Morgan
- Thalassa Industries Ltd v Keenan
- Thanet District Council v Websper
- Thatcher v Middlesex University
- Therman v Abell
- Thomas v Vivian
- Thomas v Williams
- Thompson v British Berna Motor Lorries Ltd
- Tillery Valley Foods v Channel Four Television
- Titmus and Titmus v Rose and Watts
- Todd v Adam
- Todd v Kerrich
- Tolson v Governing Body of Mixenden Community School
- Tomlinson v Dick Evans U Drive Ltd
- Toms v Hammond
- Tottenham Green Under Fives' Centre v Marshall
- TSC Europe (UK) Ltd v Massey
- Tulett v B&Q plc
- Turley v Allders Department Stores Ltd
- Turnbull v Wieland
- Turner v Grovit
- Turner v Grovit
- Turner v Grovit
- Turner v Haberdasher's Monmouth School for Girls
- United Indigo Chemical Co Ltd v Robinson
- United Sterling Corpn Ltd v Felton and Mannion
- Universal Thermosensors Ltd v Hibben
- University of Aston in Birmingham v Malik
- University of Oxford (Chancellor, Master and Scholars) v Humphreys
- Unwin v Barclays Bank plc
- Vassallo v Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedale San Martino di Genova e Cliniche Universitarie Convenzionate: C-180/04
- Vaughan v Booth
- Vaught v Tell Sell UK Ltd
- Venables v Smith
- Vine v National Dock Labour Board
- Viscido v Ente Poste Italiane: C-52/97, C-53/97 and C-54/97
- Waddington v Leicester Council for Voluntary Services
- Walden Engineering Co Ltd v Warrener
- Walden Engineering Co Ltd v Warrener
- Waldock v Winfield
- Walker v Co-operative Insurance Society
- Wallace v C A Roofing Services Ltd
- Walls v Scott
- Walsh v Walley sub nom Walley v Walsh
- Walter v Everard
- Walton v Everington
- Warburton v Heyworth
- Ward Evans Financial Services Ltd v Fox
- Ward v Haines Watts
- Warner Holidays Ltd v Secretary of State for Social Services
- Warren v Whittingham
- Warren v Wylie
- Warren v Wylie
- Waterman v Fryer
- Way v Latilla
- Webb v EMO Air Cargo (UK) Ltd
- Webb v EMO Air Cargo (UK) Ltd
- Webb v EMO Air Cargo (UK) Ltd (No 2)
- Webb v England
- Weber v Universal Ogden Services Ltd: C-37/00
- Webley v Department for Work and Pensions
- Wecomm Ltd v Rosenhoiz
- Weir v Consult Marine Ltd
- Wells v North East Lincolnshire Council
- Welsh v British Nuclear Fuels Ltd
- Wessex Dairies Ltd v Smith
- Wessex National Ltd v Long
- West Midlands Residuary Body v Deebank
- Westall Richardson Ltd v Roulson
- Westwick v Theodor
- Wheeler v Quality Deep Ltd (t/a Thai Royale Restaurant)
- Wheeler v Qualitydeep Ltd (trading as Thai Royale Restaurant)
- Whincup v Hughes
- Whitely v Marton Electrical Ltd
- Whitmore v HM Prison Service
- Whitmore v IRC
- Whittaker v Minister of Pensions and National Insurance
- Whittle v Frankland
- Wickens v Champion Employment
- Wickham v Harding
- Wignall v British Gas Corpn
- Wilkinson v Lugg
- Willard v Whiteley Ltd
- Willett v Boote
- Williams v Butlers Ltd
- Williams v Dreamings Ltd (in liquidation)
- Williams v Moss' Empires Ltd
- Williams v North's Navigation Collieries (1889) Ltd
- Williams v Watsons Luxury Coaches Ltd
- Willis v Thorp
- Wilmerson v Lynn and Hamburg SS Co Ltd
- Wilson (Inspector of Taxes) v Clayton
- Wilson v Circular Distributors Ltd
- Wiltshire County Council v National Association of Teachers in Further and Higher Education
- Wiluszynski v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council
- Winstone v Linn
- Winter v Cardiff RDC
- Wise Group v Mitchell
- Wise v Wilson
- Wishart v National Association of Citizens Advice Bureaux Ltd
- Wishart v National Coal Board
- Wood v Cunard Line Ltd
- Wood v Fenwick
- Wood v Need (t/a A1 Investigations Bureau)
- Woodcock v Committee for the Time Being of the Friends School, Wigton & Genwise Ltd
- Woodhouse v Peter Brotherhood Ltd
- Woodroffe v Farnham
- Woods v Durable Suites Ltd
- Woodward v Abbey National plc
- WPP Holdings Italy SRL v Benatti
- Wray v West
- Wren v Eastbourne Borough Council sub nom Wren v Eastbourne Borough Council and UK Waste Control Ltd
- Wren v Eastbourne Borough Council sub nom Wren v Eastbourne Borough Council and UK Waste Control Ltd
- Wright v Canterbury Christ Church University College
- Wright v Gihon
- Wright v Wallcott (trading as Ellerslie House Outreach Project)
- Wrottesley v Regent Street Florida Restaurant
- Yemm v British Steel plc
- Yemm v British Steel plc
- Yewens v Noakes
- York City and District Travel Ltd v Smith
- Young & Woods Ltd v West
- Young v Hoffman Manufacturing Co Ltd
- Younis v Trans Global Projects Ltd
- Yuan v Birkbeck College
DON'T WASTE TIME AND MARKS ‘GUESSING' AT THE RIGHT SOLUTION.
CLICK HERE FOR AN ANSWER IN AS LITTLE AS 3 HOURS.