• Home
• Order now
• Prices
• How we help
• Press
• Law marking
• Contact us
• Resources
• Log in

Law Case File: Other Law Cases

These are random law cases that would not fit in any other section of the site!

• WWF-World Wide Fund for Nature (formerly World Wildlife Fund) and another v World Wrestling Federation Entertainment Inc [2006] EWHC 184 (Ch), (Transcript)
• WWF-World Wide Fund for Nature (formerly World Wildlife Fund) and another v World Wrestling Federation Entertainment Inc [2006] EWHC 184 (Ch)
• Square Mile Partnership Ltd v Fitzmaurice McCall Ltd [2006] EWHC 22 (Ch), (Transcript)
• The Square Mile Partnership Ltd v Fitzmaurice McCall Ltd [2006] All ER (D) 72 (Jan)
• O Ltd v Z [2005] All ER (D) 387 (Apr)
• Schorsch Meier GmbH v Hennin [1975] 1 All ER 152
• Re Rolls-Royce Ltd [1974] 3 All ER 646
• Jackson v Horizon Holidays Ltd [1975] 3 All ER 92
• Fountain Forestry Ltd v Edwards and another [1974] 2 All ER 280
• Jugoslavenska Oceanska Plovidba v Castle Investment Co Inc [1973] 3 All ER 498
• Snelling v John G Snelling Ltd [1973] QB 87, [1972] 1 All ER 79, [1972] 2 WLR 588, 116 Sol Jo 217
• Dowty Boulton Paul Ltd v Wolverhampton Corporation (No 2) [1972] 2 All ER 1073
• The Conoco Britannia; J H Pigott & Son Ltd v Owners of the ships Conoco Britannia, Conoco Espana and Conoco Libya [1972] 2 All ER 238
• Binions and another v Evans [1972] 2 All ER 70
• Snelling v John G Snelling Ltd and others [1972] 1 All ER 79
• Rajkumar v First Federation Life Insurance Co Ltd (1970) 16 WIR 447
• Atkinson v United States Government and Others [1969] 3 All ER 1317
• Felton and Another v Callis [1968] 3 All ER 673
• Warner v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [1968] 2 All ER 356
• Beswick v Beswick [1968] AC 58, [1967] 2 All ER 1197, [1967] 3 WLR 932, 111 Sol Jo 540
• Hart v Hart (1881) 18 Ch D 670, 50 LJ Ch 697, 30 WR 8, 45 LT 13, [1881-5] All ER Rep Ext 1745
• Keenan v Handley (1864) 28 JP 660, 2 De GJ & Sm 283, 10 Jur NS 906, 12 WR 1021, 10 LT 800
• R v Thames Magistrates' Court, ex parte Horgan [1997] All ER (D) 89
• R v Thames Magistrates' Court, ex parte Horgan [1998] 2 BCLC 91
• R v Thames Magistrates' Court, ex parte Horgan [1998] 1 All ER 559
• Elias v Elias (No 1) (1997) 51 WIR 374
• Amsprop Trading Ltd v Harris Distribution Ltd [1997] 2 All ER 990, [1997] 1 WLR 1025, [1997] 47 EG 127
• Amsprop Trading Ltd v Harris Distribution Ltd and another [1997] 2 EGLR 78
• Amsprop Trading Ltd v Harris Distribution Ltd and Another (1996) Times, 13 November
• Amsprop Trading Ltd v Harris Distribution Ltd and another [1997] 2 All ER 990
• McCausland and another v Duncan Lawrie Ltd and another [1996] 4 All ER 995
• Re Sobam BV and another (both in receivership) [1996] 1 BCLC 446
• C (a minor) v Hackney London Borough Council [1996] 1 All ER 973
• Associated Newspapers Ltd v Wilson; Associated British Ports v Palmer and others [1995] 2 All ER 100
• Darlington Borough Council v Wiltshier Northern Ltd (Lowes and others, third parties) [1995] 3 All ER 895
• Re Leyland DAF Ltd [1994] 2 BCLC 106
• NAP Holdings UK Ltd v Whittles (Inspector of Taxes) [1993] STC 592
• Bibi Shamina and Another v Sampat Dyal and Others (1993) 50 WIR 239
• Sinclair v Lee and another [1994] 1 BCLC 286
• Re Lee (deceased); Sinclair v Lee and another [1993] 3 All ER 926
• White and another v Jones and others [1993] 3 All ER 481
• Re Dale (deceased); Proctor v Dale [1993] 4 All ER 129
• Conservative and Unionist Central Office v Burrell (Inspector of Taxes) [1980] 3 All ER 42
• Woodar Investment Development Ltd v Wimpey Construction UK Ltd [1980] 1 All ER 571
• Fothergill v Monarch Airlines Ltd [1979] 3 All ER 445
• Davis v Johnson [1979] AC 264, [1978] 1 All ER 1132, [1978] 2 WLR 553, 122 Sol Jo 178
• Dodwell & Co Ltd's Trust, Re, Baker v Timmins sub nom Re Dodwell & Co Ltd's Trust Deed [1979] Ch 301, [1978] 3 All ER 738, [1979] 2 WLR 169, 123 Sol Jo 98
• Science Research Council v Nasse; Leyland Cars v Vyas [1978] 3 All ER 1196
• Re Dodwell & Co Ltd's Trust Deed [1978] 3 All ER 738
• Davis v Johnson [1978] 1 All ER 1132
• Rowley, Holmes & Co v Barber [1977] 1 All ER 801, [1977] 1 WLR 371, [1977] ICR 387, 12 ITR 79, 120 Sol Jo 836
• Rowley Holmes & Co v Barber and another [1977] 1 All ER 801
• Ark Therapeutics plc v True North Capital Ltd [2006] 1 All ER (Comm) 138
• Re Tucker (a bankrupt) (No 2), ex parte the trustee v Langton Investment SA and another [1988] 2 All ER 339
• Re F H Lloyd Holdings plc [1985] BCLC 293
• Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Stahl und Stahlwarenhandel GmbH [1983] 2 AC 34, [1982] 1 All ER 293, [1982] 2 WLR 264, [1982] 1 Lloyd's Rep 217, [1982] Com LR 72, 126 Sol Jo 116
• AFOVOS SHIPPING CO. S.A. v ROMANO PAGNAN AND PIETRO PAGNAN (TRADING AS R. PAGNAN & F.lli) 10 LDAB 386
• Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Stahl und Stahlwarenhandelsgesellschaft mbH [1982] 1 All ER 293
• Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Stahl und Stahlwarenhandel GmbH [1980] 2 Lloyd's Rep 556
• Apple Corps Ltd v Apple Computer Inc [2004] All ER (D) 107 (Apr)
• JSC Zestafoni G Nikoladze Ferroalloy Plant v Ronly Holdings Ltd [2004] All ER (D) 258 (Feb)
• De La Chaumette v Bank of England (1829) 9 B & C 208, 7 LJOSKB 179, Dan & Ll 318
• EDMONDS (claimant) v. LAWSON QC and others (defendants) [2000] IRLR 18
• KUTTAPAN (appellant) v. LONDON BOROUGH OF CROYDON and others (respondents) [1999] IRLR 349
• Aerolift International Ltd v Mahoe Heli-Lift (SI) Ltd and Others [2002] 3 LRC 213
• Unilever (UK) Holdings Ltd. v. Smith (H.M. Inspector of Taxes) 76 TC 300
• Ball (H M Inspector of Taxes) v National & Grindlays Bank Ltd 47 TC 287
• Marcic v Thames Water Utilities Ltd [2001] 3 EGLR 111
• Brodie and Another v Singleton Shire Council ; Ghantous v Hawkesbury City Council [2001] 4 LRC 454
• GRAHAM GIBSON Pursuer and Appellant against MELANIE ROBB Defender and Respondent 2004 Scot (D) 37/4
• Smith v Mottley (1993) 48 WIR 20
• Collier v Hollinshead and another [1984] 2 EGLR 14
• Hardwick v Johnson and another [1978] 2 All ER 935
• In re GONIN, DECD. [1973 G. No.2379] [1973 G. No.2380] [1979] Ch. 16
• Re Gonin (deceased); Gonin v Garmeson and another [1977] 2 All ER 720
• Re Windle (a bankrupt), ex parte the trustee of the bankrupt v Windle and another [1975] 3 All ER 987
• NEW ZEALAND SHIPPING CO. LTD. APPELLANT AND A. M. SATTERTHWAITE & CO. LTD. RESPONDENT [ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND] [1975] A.C. 154
• MORGANS APPELLANT AND LAUNCHBURY AND OTHERS RESPONDENTS [On appeal from LAUNCHBURY v. MORGANS] [1973] A.C. 127
• Merritt v Merritt [1970] 2 All ER 760
• GOULD v. GOULD [Plaint No. Z. 5293A] [1970] 1 Q.B. 275
• GOULD v. GOULD [Plaint No. Z. 5293A] [1970] 1 Q.B. 275
• Gould v Gould [1969] 3 All ER 728
• Jones v Padavatton [1969] 2 All ER 616, [1969] 1 WLR 328, 112 Sol Jo 965
• Jones v Padavatton [1969] 2 All ER 616
• Balfour v Balfour [1919] 2 KB 571, 88 LJKB 1054, [1918-19] All ER Rep 860, 63 Sol Jo 661, 121 LT 346, 35 TLR 609
• Shadwell v Shadwell (1860) 9 CBNS 159, 30 LJCP 145, 7 Jur NS 311, 9 WR 163, 142 ER 62, 3 LT 628
• Merritt v Merritt [1970] 2 All ER 760
• GOULD v. GOULD [Plaint No. Z. 5293A] [1970] 1 Q.B. 275
• Sabena Technics SA v Singapore Airlines Ltd [2003] EWHC 1318 (Comm), [2003] All ER (D) 145 (Jun)
• Clark Goldring & Page Ltd v ANC Ltd (2001) Times, 27 March, [2001] All ER (D) 353 (Feb)
• Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Mardon [1976] QB 801, [1976] 2 All ER 5, [1976] 2 WLR 583, [1976] 2 Lloyd's Rep 305, 120 Sol Jo 131, 2 BLR 85
• Evans (J) & Son (Portsmouth) Ltd v Andrea Merzario Ltd [1976] 2 All ER 930, [1976] 1 WLR 1078, [1976] 2 Lloyd's Rep 165, 120 Sol Jo 734
• Wells (Merstham) Ltd v Buckland Sand and Silica Co Ltd [1965] 2 QB 170, [1964] 1 All ER 41, [1964] 2 WLR 453, 108 Sol Jo 177
• Chess (Oscar) Ltd v Williams [1957] 1 All ER 325, [1957] 1 WLR 370, 101 Sol Jo 186
• Strongman (1945) Ltd v Sincock [1955] 2 QB 525, [1955] 3 All ER 90, [1955] 3 WLR 360, 99 Sol Jo 540
• Routledge v McKay [1954] 1 All ER 855, [1954] 1 WLR 615, 47 R & IT 224, 98 Sol Jo 247
• Gilchester Properties Ltd v Gomm [1948] 1 All ER 493, [1948] WN 71, 92 Sol Jo 220, 64 TLR 235
• Harrison (T & J) v Knowles and Foster [1918] 1 KB 608, 87 LJKB 680, 14 Asp MLC 249, 23 Com Cas 282, [1918-19] All ER Rep 306, 118 LT 566
• Sutro (L) & Co and Heilbut, Symons & Co, Re [1917] 2 KB 348, 86 LJKB 1226, 14 Asp MLC 34, 23 Com Cas 21, 116 LT 545, 33 TLR 359
• Heilbut, Symons & Co v Buckleton [1913] AC 30, 82 LJKB 245, 20 Mans 54, [1911-13] All ER Rep 83, 107 LT 769
• De Lassalle v Guildford [1901] 2 KB 215, 70 LJKB 533, 49 WR 467, [1900-3] All ER Rep 495, 84 LT 549, 17 TLR 384
• Peek v Derry (1887) 37 Ch D 541, 57 LJ Ch 347, 36 WR 899, 59 LT 78, 4 TLR 84
• Pasley v Freeman (1789) 3 Term Rep 51, 100 ER 450, [1775-1802] All ER Rep 31, 2 Smith LC 12th ed 71
• Chandelor v Lopus sub nom Lopus v Chandler (1603) Cro Jac 4, 1 Dyer 75n
• Elkington & Co Ltd v Amery [1936] 2 All ER 86, 80 Sol Jo 465
• Nash v Inman [1908] 2 KB 1, 77 LJKB 626, [1908-10] All ER Rep 317, 52 Sol Jo 335, 98 LT 658, 24 TLR 401
• Rhodes, Re, Rhodes v Rhodes (1890) 44 Ch D 94, 59 LJ Ch 298, 38 WR 385, [1886-90] All ER Rep 871, 62 LT 342
• Johnstone v Marks (1887) 19 QBD 509, 57 LJQB 6, 35 WR 806, 3 TLR 810
• Ryder v Wombwell (1868) LR 4 Exch 32, 38 LJ Ex 8, 17 WR 167, 19 LT 491
• Asda Stores Ltd v Malyn [2001] All ER (D) 419 (Mar)
• McCutcheon v David MacBrayne Ltd [1964] 1 All ER 430, [1964] 1 WLR 125, [1964] 1 Lloyd's Rep 16, 108 Sol Jo 93, 1964 SC (HL) 28
• L'Estrange v F Graucob Ltd [1934] 2 KB 394, 103 LJKB 730, [1934] All ER Rep 16, 152 LT 164
• Richardson, Spence & Co and Lord Gough Steamship Co v Rowntree [1894] AC 217, 58 JP 493, 63 LJQB 283, 7 Asp MLC 482, 6 R 95, [1891-4] All ER Rep 823, 70 LT 817, 10 TLR 335
• Attwood v Small (1838) 6 Cl & Fin 232, 2 Jur 226, 246, 7 ER 684, [1835-42] All ER Rep 258
• Dobell v Stevens (1825) 3 B & C 623, 3 LJOSKB 89, 5 Dow & Ry KB 490
• Noel v Lord Henley (1819) 7 Price 241
• Fibrosa Spolka Akcyjna v Fairbairn Lawson Combe Barbour Ltd [1943] AC 32, [1942] 2 All ER 122, 111 LJKB 433, 86 Sol Jo 232, 167 LT 101, 58 TLR 308
• Swift v Macbean [1942] 1 KB 375, [1942] 1 All ER 126, 111 LJKB 185, 166 LT 87, 58 TLR 110
• New System Private Telephones (London) Ltd v Hughes & Co [1939] 2 All ER 844, 83 Sol Jo 588, 161 LT 140, 55 TLR 917
• First Russian Insurance Co v London and Lancashire Insurance Co [1928] Ch 922, 97 LJ Ch 445, 140 LT 337, 44 TLR 583, 31 Ll L Rep 151
• The Penelope [1928] P 180, 97 LJP 127, 17 Asp MLC 486, 72 Sol Jo 557, 139 LT 355, 44 TLR 597
• Comptoir Commercial Anversois and Power Son & Co, Re [1920] 1 KB 868, 89 LJKB 849, [1918-19] All ER Rep 661, 122 LT 567, 36 TLR 101
• Metropolitan Water Board v Dick Kerr & Co [1917] 2 KB 1
• Horlock v Beal [1916] 1 AC 486, 85 LJKB 602, 13 Asp MLC 250, 21 Com Cas 201, [1916-17] All ER Rep 81, 60 Sol Jo 236, 114 LT 193, 32 TLR 251
• Leiston Gas Co v Leiston-cum-Sizewell UDC [1916] 2 KB 428, 14 LGR 922, 80 JP 385, 85 LJKB 1759, [1916-17] All ER Rep 329, 60 Sol Jo 554, 115 LT 172, 32 TLR 588
• Smith Coney and Barrett v Becker Gray & Co [1916] 2 Ch 86, 84 LJ Ch 865, [1914-15] All ER Rep 398, 112 LT 914, 31 TLR 151
• Newman (R S) Ltd, Re, Raphael's Claim [1916] 2 Ch 309, 85 LJ Ch 625, [1916] HBR 129, 60 Sol Jo 585, 115 LT 134
• Associated Portland Cement Manufacturers (1900) Ltd v William Cory & Son Ltd (1915) 31 TLR 442
• Chandler v Webster [1904] 1 KB 493, 73 LJKB 401, 52 WR 290, 48 Sol Jo 245, 90 LT 217, 20 TLR 222
• Krell v Henry [1903] 2 KB 740, 72 LJKB 794, 52 WR 246, [1900-3] All ER Rep 20, 89 LT 328, 19 TLR 711
• Civil Service Co-operative Society v General Steam Navigation Co [1903] 2 KB 756, 72 LJKB 933, 9 Asp MLC 477, 52 WR 181, 47 Sol Jo 877, 89 LT 429, 20 TLR 10
• Herne Bay Steam Boat Co v Hutton [1903] 2 KB 683, 72 LJKB 879, 9 Asp MLC 472, 52 WR 183, [1900-3] All ER Rep 627, 47 Sol Jo 768, 89 LT 422, 19 TLR 680
• Clark v Lindsay (1903) 47 Sol Jo 258, 88 LT 198, 19 TLR 202
• R v Beer [1903] 2 KB 693, 1 LGR 634, 67 JP 326, 72 LJKB 608, 10 Mans 263, 52 WR 221, 89 LT 412, 19 TLR 531
• Lumsden v Barton & Co (1902) 19 TLR 53
• Nickoll and Knight v Ashton Edridge & Co [1901] 2 KB 126, 70 LJKB 600, 9 Asp MLC 209, 6 Com Cas 150, 49 WR 513, [1900-3] All ER Rep 928, 84 LT 804, 17 TLR 467
• Blum v Ansley (1900) 64 JP 184, 16 TLR 249
• Turner v Goldsmith [1891] 1 QB 544, 60 LJQB 247, 39 WR 547, [1891-4] All ER Rep 384, 64 LT 301, 7 TLR 233
• Marshall v Schofield & Co (1882) 52 LJQB 58, 31 WR 134, 47 LT 406
• Arthur, Re, Arthur v Wynne (1880) 14 Ch D 603, 49 LJ Ch 556, 28 WR 972, 43 LT 46
• Howell v Coupland (1876) 1 QBD 258, 40 JP 276, 46 LJQB 147, 24 WR 470, [1874-80] All ER Rep 878, 33 LT 832
• Howell v Coupland (1874) LR 9 QB 462
• Robinson v Davison (1871) LR 6 Exch 269, 40 LJ Ex 172, 19 WR 1036, [1861-73] All ER Rep 699, 24 LT 755
• Boast v Firth (1868) LR 4 CP 1, 38 LJCP 1, 17 WR 29, 19 LT 264, [1861-73] All ER Rep Ext 1950
• Appleby v Myers (1867) LR 2 CP 651, 36 LJCP 331, [1861-73] All ER Rep 452, 16 LT 669
• Taylor v Caldwell (1863) 27 JP 710, 3 B & S 826, 32 LJQB 164, 2 New Rep 198, 11 WR 726, 122 ER 826, [1861-73] All ER Rep 24, 8 LT 356
• Rugg v Minett (1809) 11 East 210
• Williams v Lloyd (1628) Palm 548, W Jo 179

Copyright © Academic Answers Ltd. Academic Answers Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with Company Registration No: 4964706 VAT Registration No: 842417633 - Law Teacher - The law essay professionals