Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Any information contained in this act summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only.

The European Union Act 2011

764 words (4 pages) Act

12 Oct 2018 Act Reference this LawTeacher

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): EU Law

Why was it introduced (political and sociological context)?

The European Union Act 2011 introduced restrictions on the ratification of treaties amending or replacing the European Union’s founding treaties and on UK approval of certain decisions under those treaties. Following the signing of the Treaty of Lisbon in 2007, Parliament passed the European Union (Amendment) Act 2008, which provided for the Treaty to take effect in UK law. A proposal for a UK-wide referendum on the Treaty was defeated in the House of Commons by 311 votes to 248. The 2011 Act emerged against this political backdrop and responded to calls for greater parliamentary and public control of future transfers of power to the EU.

Law Teacher writing support

Writing a law essay?

We choose a writer who is an expert in your area of law and qualified to at least the academic level you select. Most of our writers hold a master’s degree or PhD, have teaching experience, or both.

Send us your question and, if you wish, any marking criteria. We’ll write an essay to your instructions.

The aim of the Act was primarily to strengthen UK procedures and safeguards for agreeing to EU treaty changes and certain decisions. It also affirmed that directly applicable and directly effective EU law was recognised in the UK by virtue of domestic legislation.

What main changes did it make to the law?

The primary change introduced by the Act was the requirement for a referendum before the UK could ratify certain treaties or approve certain decisions transferring power or competence to the EU. This became known as the referendum lock. The Act did not require a referendum for every treaty amendment. Other decisions required approval by an Act or by motions in both Houses, depending on the provision that applied.

The 2011 Act replaced most of the earlier approval requirements in sections 5 and 6 of the European Union (Amendment) Act 2008. Section 18 was declaratory. Directly applicable and directly effective EU law continued to be recognised through the European Communities Act 1972 or another Act requiring its recognition. Section 18 did not require a new Act of Parliament for each directly applicable or directly effective EU measure or alter the priority that EU law had under the 1972 Act. The Supreme Court explained this effect in R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5 at [60]–[67].

Key Sections

Section 2 required a statement to be laid before Parliament under section 5, approval by an Act of Parliament and satisfaction of the referendum condition or the exemption condition before a treaty amending or replacing the Treaty on European Union (TEU) or the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) could be ratified. The referendum condition required a referendum throughout the UK, or the UK and Gibraltar, and a majority in favour. The exemption applied where the approving Act stated that the treaty did not fall within section 4. Section 3 imposed similar requirements on decisions under the simplified revision procedure in Article 48(6) TEU and provided a limited additional exception for certain changes which the approving Act stated were not significant in relation to the UK.

Section 4 set out the types of change that could trigger a referendum. Accession of a new member state, codification of an existing practice or provision applying only to other member states did not by itself trigger one. Section 5 required a ministerial statement, including an opinion on whether section 4 applied. Sections 6 to 10 provided for approval of other decisions under the treaties. Sections 11 to 13 dealt with the referendum franchise and related matters, including the Electoral Commission’s role. Part 2 approved a protocol enabling the UK to take up an additional European Parliament seat. Section 15 approved the protocol, and section 16 and Schedule 2 dealt with filling the seat.

2026 update

The European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018, Schedule 9, repealed the European Union Act 2011 in stages. Sections 1 to 13, 14(1) and 15(1), and Schedule 1, were repealed on 4 July 2018. The remaining provisions, including section 18, were repealed at the end of the transition period on 31 December 2020. The 2018 commencement regulations preserved the validity of acts and omissions in relation to matters previously approved or exempted under the 2011 Act.

The referendum on EU membership on 23 June 2016 was held under the separate European Union Referendum Act 2015. The United Kingdom left the EU on 31 January 2020. The European Communities Act 1972 was repealed on exit day, subject to savings for the transition period.

After the transition period, the 2018 Act preserved EU-derived domestic legislation and incorporated specified direct EU legislation. The Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023 revoked specified legislation and removed the general domestic rule of EU law supremacy for this body of law, subject to statutory exceptions. The retained law that survived became known as assimilated law from 1 January 2024.

Separate provision is made for the domestic effect of the Withdrawal Agreement under section 7A of the 2018 Act. This includes citizens’ rights and applicable EU law under the Windsor Framework for Northern Ireland. Those arrangements operate under the Withdrawal Agreement and the 2018 Act.

Last updated: 12 November 2026

LawTeacher

LawTeacher

LawTeacher.net is the UK’s leading provider of academic legal support, offering both writing services and an extensive collection of law study resources for students in the UK and overseas.

Founded in 2003 by Grey’s Inn graduate Barclay Littlewood, the Company was built on a commitment to excellence, with unique guarantees and a high standard of service from day one.

The team includes over 500 UK legally qualified writing experts, with many practising solicitors and barristers, and several former lecturers.

Areas of Legal Expertise

Contract Law Criminal Law Constitutional and Administrative Law EU Law Tort Law Property Law Equity and Trusts Jurisprudence Company Law Commercial Law Family Law Human Rights Law Employment Law Evidence Public International Law Legal Research and Methods Dispute Resolution Business Law and Practice Civil Litigation Criminal Litigation Professional Conduct Taxation Wills and Administration of Estates Solicitors’ Accounts

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

Related Content

Jurisdictions / Tags

Content relating to: “EU Law”

EU law, or European Union law, is a system of law that is specific to the 27 members of the European Union. Under the principle of primacy, EU law takes precedence over conflicting national law within its scope.

Related Articles

Prices from

£ 99

Estimated costs for: Undergraduate 2:2 • 1000 words • 7 day delivery

Place an order

Delivered on-time or your money back

Give yourself the academic edge today

Each order includes

  • On-time delivery or your money back
  • A fully qualified writer in your subject
  • In-depth proofreading by our Quality Control Team
  • 100% confidentiality, the work is never re-sold or published
  • Standard 7-day amendment period
  • A paper written to the standard ordered
  • A detailed plagiarism report
  • A comprehensive quality report