Legal Case Summaries
This selection of case summaries has been prepared by the legal professionals at LawTeacher.net. Select a case below to see a full summary or start typing a case name in the filter box below to find a particular case summary:
- 6 64 Flaminio Costa
- A A Juvenile v R
- A and Others v UK
- A G Ref No 1 1983
- A G v Whelan
- A GS Ref No3 Of 1994
- A v B
- A v UK
- Actus Reus Cases
- Adam Opel GMBH v Mitras Automotive
- Adams v Lindsell
- Adams v Rhymney
- Adoption Family Law
- AG For Northern Ireland v Gallagher
- AG v Jonathan Cape
- Agreement Cases
- Ahmad And Others v UK
- Ailsa Craig Fishing v Malvern Fishing
- Aircool Installations v British Telecommunications
- Airedale NHS Trust v Bland
- Alan v El Nasr
- Alaskan Trader No 2
- Albert v MIB
- Alcock v Chief Constable
- Alderslade v Hendon Laundry
- Alexander Barton v Armstrong
- Alexander v Home Office
- Alexander v North Eastern Railway
- Alexander v Rayson
- Alfred F Beckett Ltd v Lyons
- Alfred Mcalpine v Panatown
- Alfred Toepfer v ITEX
- Ali v Khan
- Allen v Flood
- Allied Maples Group v Simmons
- Amalgamated Investment v John Walker
- American Cyanamid v Ethicon
- Amsprop Trading Ltd v Harris
- Ancell v Mcdermott
- Anderson Ltd v Daniel
- Anderson v Secretary Of State
- Andrews Brothers v Singer
- Anns v Merton LBC
- Antonio v Antonio
- Appleton v Garrett
- Archbolds Freightage v Spanglett
- Archer v Williams
- Arcos v EA Ronaasen
- Armstrong v Sheppard
- Arthur JS Hall v Simons
- Ashbury Railway Carrage And Iron Co v Riche
- Ashe v National Westminster Bank
- Ashmore Benson Pease v AV Dawson
- Assault Cases
- Associated Japanese Bank v Credit Du Nord
- Atlas Express v Kafco
- Attia v British Gas
- Attorney General Of Belize v Belize Telecom
- Attorney General v Antrobus
- Attorney General v De Keyser Hotel
- Attorney General v Hartwell
- Attorney General v Jonathan Cape
- Attorney General v Pya Quarries
- Attorney Generals Reference No 1
- Attorney Generals Reference No 3
- Attorney Generals Reference No 6
- Attwood v Lamont
- Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Lenah
- Automatism Cases
- Avon Finance v Bridger
- Avon Insurance v Swire Fraser
- Avraamides v Colwill
- B And S v Leathley
- B S Contractors v Green
- B v C Surrogacy Adoption
- Bailey v Stephens
- Baker v Willoughby
- Banco Exterior Internacional v Mann
- Bank Of India v Sood
- Bank Of Ireland Home Mortgages v Bell
- Banks v Cox
- Banner Homes v Luff
- Bannerman v White
- Banque Keyser Ullmann v Skandia
- Barbudev v Eurocom
- Barclays Bank v Alcorn
- Barclays Bank v Bird
- Barclays Bank v O"brien
- Barclays v Fairclough
- Barker v Corus
- Barker v Saint Gobain Pipelines
- Barkway v South Wales
- Barrett v Halifax Building Society
- Barrett v Mod
- Barry v Davies
- Barton v County Natwest
- BBC v Johns
- Beard v London General Omnibus
- Beatty v Guggenheim Exploration
- Beckham v Mirror Group
- Bell v Lever Bros
- Bennett v Bennett
- Beresford v Royal Insurance
- Berkoff v Burchill
- Bernstein v Skyviews
- Beswick v Beswick
- Bettini v Gye
- Bhullar v Bhullar
- Bigg v Boyd Gibbins
- Biggs v Hoddinott
- Bigos v Boustead
- Biological GBH
- Bird v Jones
- Bisset v Wilkinson
- Blackburn v Attorney General
- Blackpool And Fylde Aero Club v Blackpool BC
- Blundell v St Andrews
- Bolam v Friern Hospital Management
- Bolitho v Hackney
- Bolton v Stone 1951
- Bonham v College Of Physicians
- Bonnington Castings v Wardlaw
- Botham v TSB
- Bourhill v Young
- Bowater v Rowley Regis
- Bowles v Bank Of England
- BP Exploration Co v Hunt
- Bradbury v Morgan
- Bradford v Robinson Rentals
- Brady v Brady
- Bratty v AG For Northern Ireland
- Brice v Brown
- Brimelow v Casson
- Brinkibon v Stahag Stahl
- British Coal Corporation v R
- British Crane v Ipswich Plant
- British Economic Lamp v Empire Mile
- British Railways v Pickin
- British Road Services v Arthur Crutchley
- British Westinghouse v Underground Railways
- Brittain v Garner
- Brogden v Metropolitan
- Brooks v Commissioner Of Police
- Broom v Morgan
- Broome v Perkins
- Brown v NCB
- BS N Ltd v Micado
- Buckland v Butterfield
- Bugdaycay v Home Secretary 1987
- Bulk Trading v Zenziper
- Bull v Bull
- Bunge Corporation v Tradax
- Burglary Cases
- Burma Oil Company v Lord Advocate
- Burmah Oil v Lord Advocate
- Burns v Burns
- Burton v Camden
- Burton v Islington
- Bushwall Properties v Vortex
- Butler Machine Tool v Ex Cell O
- Butterfield v Forrester
- Bux v Slough Metals
- Byrne And Co v Van Tienhoven
- Byrne v Deane
- C P Haulage v Middleton
- Cabinet Office Information Commissioner Dr Christopher Lamb
- Caldwell v Maguire
- Calverley v Green
- Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties
- Campbell v Mirror Group
- Canada Steamship Lines Ltd v The King
- Capacity Cases
- Caparo Industries v Dickman
- Capital And Counties v Hampshire CC
- Carillion Construction v Felix
- Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co
- Carmarthenshire CC v Lewis
- Carnegie v Waugh
- Carslogie Steamship v Norwegian Government
- Cassell v Riverside
- Cassidy v Daily Mirror
- Cassidy v MOH
- Castle v St Augustine Links
- Caswell v Powell
- Cattle v Stockton Waterworks
- Caunce v Caunce
- Cellulose Acetate v Widnes Foundry
- Century Insurance v NIRTB
- Chadwick v BRB
- Chahal v UK
- Chambers v DPP
- Chan Pui Chun v Leung Kam Ho
- Chapelton v Barry
- Chaplin v Hicks
- Chappell v Nestle
- Chaudhry v Prabhakar
- Cheltenham And Gloucester v Krausz
- Chen Home Department
- Cheney v Conn
- Chester v Afshar
- Chief Constable v Shimmen
- Children And Local Authorities
- Children And Their Welfare
- Chung Chi Cheung v R
- Chwee Kin Keong v Digilandmall
- CIBC Mortgages v Pitt
- City Of London Building Society v Flegg
- Clark Fixing Ltd v Dudley
- Clarke v Dickson
- Claughton v Charalambous
- Co-Operative Insurance v Argyll
- Cohen v Cohen
- Cole v Turner
- Collier v Collier
- Collins v Godefroy
- Collins v Wilcock
- Combe v Combe
- Compagnie Noga v Abacha
- Congreve v Home Office
- Consent Cases
- Consent Tabassum
- Consent Wilson
- Consideration Cases
- Conway v George Wimpey
- Cook v JL Kier
- Cook v Square
- Cooke v MGN
- Cooper v Phibbs
- Cork v Kirby
- Cornish v Midland Bank
- Corporation v Skibs A/S Avanti
- Corporate Officer House Commons v Information Commissioner
- Costello v Chief Constable Of Northumbria
- Coulthard v Neville Russell
- Council Of Civil Service Unions v Minister For The Civil Service
- Countess Of Dunmore v Alexander
- Courtney And Fairbairn Ltd V
- Coward v MIB
- Cowcher v Cowcher
- Credit Lyonnais Bank Nederland v Burch
- Criminallawcases
- Crofter Hand Woven Harris Tweed v Veitch
- Crossley v Rawlinson
- Crowhurst v Amersham Burial Board
- Crown River Cruises v Kimbolton Fireworks
- Crystal Palace v Dowie
- CTN Cash And Carry v Gallagher
- Cullinane v British Rema Manufacturing
- Cummings v Granger
- Cundy v Lindsay
- Currie v Misa
- Curtis v Chemical Cleaning And Dyeing
- Cutler v Wandsworth Stadium
- Cutter v Powell
- D C Builders v Rees
- Dahlia v Four Millbank
- Daiichi v Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty
- Dalrymple v Dalrymple
- Daly v General Steam
- Daniel v Drew
- Dann v Hamilton
- Darlington Futures v Delco
- Darlington v Wiltshier
- Das v Linden Mews
- Davidge v Bennett
- Day Morris Associates v Voyce
- Day v Savadge
- De Keysers Royal Hotel Case
- De Molestina v Ponton
- Deception Cases
- Dennant v Skinner And Collom
- Derry v Peek
- Dhanani v Crasnianski
- DHN v Tower Hamlets
- Dias
- Dick Bentley v Harold Smith
- Dickinson v Abel
- Dickinson v Dodds
- Dimskal Shipping v LTWF
- Director Of Public Prosecutions For NI
- Discharge Cases
- Divorce Family Law
- Dixon v Fisher
- Dodd Properties v Canterbury
- Dolphin Maritime v Sveriges
- Domestic Violence
- Donnelly v Joyce
- Donoghue v Stevenson
- Donohoe v Ingram
- Donovan v The Face
- Dooley v Cammell Laird
- Doughty v Turner Manufacturing
- Douglas v Hello
- Downsview Nominees v First City
- Doyle v Olby
- DPP For NI v Lynch
- DPP v A
- DPP v Morgan
- DPP v Smith
- DSND Subsea v Petroleum
- Dubai Aluminium v Salaam
- Duffy v Lamb
- Dunlop v New Garage
- Dunlop v Selfridge
- Duress 1
- Duress Cases
- Durham Tees Valley Airport v Bmibaby
- Dutton v Poole
- E E Caledonia v Orbit Valve
- Easat Antennas Ltd v Racal Defence Electronics Ltd
- Easson v Lner Railway
- Eastham v Newcastle United Football Club
- Ecay v Godfrey
- Edgington v Fitzmaurice
- Edinburgh Dalkeith Railway Co v Wauchope
- Edwards v Skyways
- Edwin Hill v First National Finance
- EE v Kakar
- Elder v Paterson
- Elitestone v Morris
- Ellen Street Estates v Minister Of Health
- Ellis v Chief Adjudication Officer
- Eminence Property v Heaney
- Enfield Technical v Payne
- Entick v Carrington
- Entores v Miles
- ERJ Lovelock v Exportles
- ESSO Petroleum v Commissioners
- ESSO Petroleum v Harpers Garage
- ESSO Petroleum v Mardon
- Euro Brokers Holdings v Monecor
- Euro Diam Ltd v Bathurst
- Evans v Pontypridd
- Evenden v Guildford
- Everitt v Martin
- Eves v Eves
- Exchange Telegraph v Gregory
- Exclusion Clauses Cases
- F v West Berkshire
- Fagan v MPC
- Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services
- Fairclough v Swan Brewery
- Farley v Skinner
- Felthouse v Bindley
- Fercometal v Mediterranean
- Ferguson v Weaving
- Financial Matters During Marriage
- Financial Matters On Death
- Financial Matters On Divorce
- Financings Ltd v Stimson
- First National Bank v Syed
- Fisher v Bell
- Fisher v Bridges
- Flaminio Costa v ENEL
- Fletcher v Autocar And Transporters
- Foakes v Beer
- Foley v Classique Coaches
- Ford Motor Co v Amalgamated Union
- Foulger v Newcomb
- Francovich v Italy
- Froom v Butcher
- G Scammell Nephew Ltd v Ouston
- Gamerco SA v LCM
- Gammon v Attorney General
- Gandy v Gandy
- Garden Cottage Foods v MMB
- General Cleaning Contractors v Christmas
- George Mitchell v Finney Lock Seeds
- Getreide Import v Contimar
- Ghaidan v Godin Mendoza
- Gibson v Manchester City Council
- Gillatt v Sky
- Gillick v West Norfolk
- Glasbrook v Glamorgan
- Glasgow Corporation v Taylor
- Godden v Hales
- Goldsoll v Goldman
- Goodchild v Bradbury
- Gordon v Selico
- Gore v Van Der Lann
- Gorris v Scott
- Gough v Thorne
- Grainger And Son v Gough
- Grainger v Gough
- Granatino v Radmacher
- Grant v Edwards
- Gravy Solutions Ltd v Xyzmo Software
- Gray v Jones
- Gray v Thames Trains
- Great Eastern Shipping v Far East Chartering
- Great Lakes SS v Maple Leaf
- Great Peace Shipping v Tsavliris
- Greatorex v Greatorex
- Green v Green
- Green v Russell
- Gregg v Scott
- Gregory v Piper
- Greig v Insole
- Grogan v Robin Meredith Plant Hire
- Groves v Lord Wimbourne
- Grow With Us v Green Thumb
- Gulf Oil v Page
- Gunthing v Lynn
- H West Son v Shepherd
- Hadley v Baxendale
- Hadley v Kemp
- Haley v London Electricity Board
- Hall v Brooklands
- Hammersmith And Fulham LBC v Monk
- Hamp v Bygrave
- Hanina v Morland
- Hannaford v Selby
- Hannah Blumenthal
- Happy Day 2002 EWCA
- Hardman v Booth
- Hardman v CC Avon
- Hardwick Game Farm v Suffolk Agricultural
- Hardwick v Johnson
- Harris v Birkenhead Corp
- Harris v Evans
- Harris v Nickerson
- Hartley v Mayoh
- Hartley v Ponsonby
- Hartog v Colin Shields
- Harvela Investments v Royal
- Harvela v Royal Trust Of Canada
- Harvey v ADI Ltd
- Harvey v Pratt
- Haseldine v Daw
- Haynes v Harwood
- Haystead v DPP
- Hedley Byrne v Heller
- Heilbut Symons And Co v Buckleton
- Hellawell v Eastwood
- Henderson v Arthur
- Henry Williams v James Bayley
- Henthorn v Fraser
- Herd v Weardale Steel
- Heslop v Burns
- Hickman v Kent
- Hill v Baxter
- Hill v CA Parsons
- Hill v Chief Constable Of West Yorkshire
- Hill v Tupper
- Hillas And Co v Arcos
- Hills v News Group
- Hinds v The Queen
- Hinz v Berry
- Hochster v De La Tour
- Hodgson v Trapp
- Hoenig v Isaacs
- Holland v Hodgson
- Hollier v Rambler Motors
- Hollingworth v Southern Ferries
- Hollywood Silver Fox Farm v Emmett
- Holman v Johnson
- Holwell Securities v Hughes
- Home And Overseas Ins v Mentor Ins
- Home Counties Dairies Ltd v Skilton
- R v SS Home Department Ex P Ejaz
- Home Office v Dorset Yacht
- Homicide Intro
- Hong Kong Fir Shipping Co v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha
- Horsfall v Thomas
- Hotson v East Berkshire AHA
- Houghton v Trafalgar Insurance
- Hounga v Allen And Another
- House of Commons v Information Commissioner
- Household Fire Insurance v Grant
- Howard Marine v Ogden
- Howard v Howard
- Howe v Motor Insurers Bureau
- HP Bulmer Ltd v J Bollinger SA
- Hudson v Ridge Manufacturing
- Hughes v Liverpool Victoria Friendly Society
- Hughes v Lord Advocate
- Hughes v Morris
- Hulme v Brigham
- Human Rights Lawcases
- Hummingbird Motors v Hobbs
- Hunter v British Coal
- Hunter v Canary Wharf
- Huth v Huth
- Hutton v Warren
- Huyton SA v Peter Cremer
- Hyam v DPP
- Hyde v Wrench
- Hyman v Hyman
- LBA v EMI
- Imperial Chemical Industries v Shatwell
- In The Matter Of K
- In The Matter Of LC
- Ingram v Little
- Inntrepreneur Pub v East Crown
- Inntrepreneur Pub v Sweeney
- Insanity Cases
- Intention Cases
- Interfoto Picture Library v Stiletto
- International Organisations Act
- International Transport Roth v Secretary Of State
- Intoxication Cases
- Introducing Family Law
- Invol Mans Cases
- Iqbal v London Transport Executive
- Ireland v UK
- Issa And Another v Hackney London
- J Evans And Son v Andrea
- J Murphy Sons v Johnston Precast
- Jackson v Attorney General
- Jackson v Horizon Holidays
- Jaggard v Dickinson
- Jaggard v Sawyer
- James v Thomas
- James v Woodall Duckham
- Janaway Salford Health
- Janvier v Sweeney
- JCC v Eisenhower
- Jeb Fasteners v Marks Bloom
- JH Milner v Percy Bilton
- Jobling v Associated Dairies
- Jobson v Johnson
- Joel v Morison
- John Summers Sons Ltd v Frost
- Johnson v Agnew
- Johnstone v Bloomsbury Health Authority
- Jolley v Sutton
- Jones v Boyce
- Jones v Challenger
- Jones v Jones
- Jones v Livox Quarries
- Jones v Manchester Corporation
- Jones v Padavatton
- Jones v Vernons Pools
- JT Stratford v Lindley
- Junior Books Ltd v Veitchi
- Kaitamaki v R
- Karsales v Wallis
- Kaur v MG Rover
- Kaya v Turkey
- KD v Chief Constable Of Hampshire
- Kearley v Thomson
- Keates v Cadogan
- Kennedy v The Charity Commission
- Kent v Griffiths
- Keown v Coventry Healthcare NHS
- Kepong Prospecting v Schmidt
- Khorasandjian v Bush
- Kings Motors Oxford Ltd v Lax
- Kings Norton Metal v Edridge
- Kingsnorth Finance v Tizard
- Kleinwort Benson v Malaysia Mining Corp
- Knapp v Railway Executive
- Knight v Knight
- Knightley v Johns
- Knightsbridge Estates v Byrne
- Knowles v Liverpool City Council
- Knuller v DPP
- Knuppfer v London Express
- Kokkinakis v Greece
- Kolmar Group AG v Traxpo Enterprises
- Korbetis v Transgrain
- Kralj v Mcgrath
- L Schuler v Wickman
- Laemthong International v Artis
- Lagden v O"Connor
- Lambert v Lewis
- Lampleigh v Braithwaite
- Latimer v AEC
- Lavarack v Woods
- Law Society v KPMG
- Le Fanu v Malcolmson
- Leach v Chief Constable Gloucestershire Constabulary
- Leaf v International Galleries
- Leeds Rugby v Harris
- Lefkowitz v Great Minneapolis Surplus
- Lefkowitz v Minneapolis
- Leigh v Dickeson
- Les Affreteurs v Leopold
- Lestrange v Graucob
- Letang v Cooper
- Lewis v Averay
- Liability For Fire Cases
- Lidar
- Liesbosch Dredger v SS Edison
- Lim Poh Choo v Camden And Islington
- Linden Gardens v Lenesta
- Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale
- Lister v Forth Dry Dock
- Lister v Hesley Hall Ltd
- Lister v Romford Ice
- Liverpool CC v Irwin
- Livingstone v Ministry Of Defence
- Lloyds Bank v Bundy
- Lloyds Bank v Rosset
- Lloyds v Harper
- Lms International v Styrene Packaging
- London And Blenheim Estates v Ladbroke
- London County Council v Cattermoles
- London Property Trust v High Trees
- Long v Lloyd
- Lonrho v Fayed
- Lonrho v Shell
- Lonsdale v Howard And Hallam Ltd
- Lord Advocate v Dumbarton DC
- Lowery v Walker
- Lowson v Coombes
- Lumley v Gye
- Luxmoore May v Messenger
- Luxor v Cooper
- Lynch v Knight
- M v Home Office
- Macarthys v Smith
- Macaura v Northern Assurance
- Maccormick v Lord Advocate
- Mackay v Dick
- Macklin v Dowsett
- Majrowski v Guys Hospital
- Makdessi v Cavendish Square Holdings
- Malcolm Charles Contracts v Crispin
- Malone v Laskey
- Malone v Metropolitan Police Commissioner
- Manchester Diocesan Council v Commercial
- Mansfield v Weetabix
- Manuel v Attorney General
- Marc Rich v Bishop Rock Marine
- Mariola v Lloyds
- Market Investigations v Minister Of Social Security
- Marriage And Nullity
- Mason v Provident Clothing
- Massey v Boulden
- Massey v Midland Bank
- Matthews v Ministry Of Defence
- Matthews v UK
- May And Butcher v The King
- Mbasogo v Logo Ltd
- Mccann And Others v UK
- Mccutcheon v David Macbrayne
- Mcfarlane v EE Caledonia Ltd
- Mcghee v National Coal Board
- Mcgowan v Radio Buxton
- Mcinerny v Lloyds Bank
- Mckew v Holland
- Mcloughlin v Obrian
- Mcrae v Commonwealth Disposals
- Mcwilliams v Arrol
- Meates v Westpac Corp
- Medforth v Blake
- Mehra v Shah
- Melluish v BMI
- Mendelssohn v Normand
- Mens Rea Cases 2
- Mens Rea Cases
- Mens Rea Intention Table
- Meretz Investments v ACP
- Merritt v Merritt
- Mersey Docks And Harbour Board v Cameron
- Metropolitan Police Commissioner v Charles
- Metropolitan Police v Caldwell
- Mileform v Interserve Security
- Miles v Forest Rock Granite
- Miller v Jackson
- Miller v Miller Mcfarlane v Mcfarlane
- Miller
- Ministry Of Sound v World Online
- Misrepresentation Cases
- Mistake Cases
- Moeliker v A Reyolle
- Mogul Steamship Co v Mcgregor
- Mohamud v WM Morrison Supermarkets
- Monarch Airlines v London Luton Airport
- Monarch Steamship v Karlshamns
- Moncrieff v Jamieson
- Monmouth BC v Marlog
- Monson v Tussauds
- Morales v Eccleston
- Morgan Crucible v Hill Samuel
- Morgan v Odhams Press
- Morris v Murray
- Morris v Saxelby
- Mortgage Corporation v Shaire
- Mri Trading v Erdenet
- Mulcahy v MOD
- Mullin v Richards 1998
- Murder Cases
- Murphy v Brentwood
- Murray v Ministry Of Defence
- Museprime Properties v Adhill Properties
- Musgrove v Pandelis
- National Coal Board v Gamble
- National Coal Board v Je Evans
- National Phonograph v Edison
- National Westminster Bank v Morgan
- National Westminster Bank v Skelton
- Necessity Cases
- Negligence Causation Cases
- Negligence Duty Cases
- Negligence Public Policy Cases
- Nettleship v Weston
- New Hampshire Insurance v Mgn
- New Zealand Shipping v Satterthwaite
- Newstead v London Express
- Nicholls v Lan
- Nicklinson v Ministry Of Justice v DPP
- Nicolene v Simmonds
- Nimmo v Alexander Cowan
- Nisshin Shipping v Cleaves Case Brief
- Nordenfelt v Maxim
- Norfolk Constabulary v Seekings
- North Ocean Shipping v Hyundai
- Northern Ireland v Lynch
- Notting Hill Housing Trust v Brackley
- Nottingham Patent Brick v Butler
- Nunn v Dalrymple
- Oakley v Walker
- Obg v Allan
- Obrien v Mgn
- Oconnell v Jackson
- Offer Hoar v Larkstore
- Offord v Davies
- Ogwo v Taylor
- Old Gate Estates v Toplis
- Olley v Marlborough Court Hotel
- ONC v Exnor Craggs Ltd
- Orchard v Lee 2009
- Oropesa
- Oscar Chess v Williams
- Osman v Ferguson
- Osman v UK
- Othman v UK
- Otuo v Morley
- Overseas Tankship v Miller Steamship
- Overseas Tankship v Morts Dock
- Overstone v Shipway
- Owens v Brimmell
- Oxford v Moss
- Oxley v Hiscock
- Page v Smith
- Pagnan Spa v Feed Products
- Palk v Mortgage Services
- Palsgraf v Long Island Railroad
- Pankhania v Hackney LBC
- Pao On v Lau Yiu Long
- Pape v Cumbria County Council
- Paragon Finance v Nash
- Parents And Children Cases
- Paris v Stepney Borough Council
- Parker v Clark
- Parker v South Eastern Railway
- Parkingeye v Somerfield
- Parkinson v College Of Ambulance
- Parmiter v Coupland
- Parsons Livestock v Uttley Ingham
- Participation Cases
- Partridge v Crittenden
- Patel v Ali
- Pawlett v Attorney General
- Pay v Probation Service
- Pearce v Brooks
- Peck v UK
- Peckham v Ellison
- Peekay Intermark v Australia
- Penfold v Westcote
- Pennyfeathers Ltd v Pennyfeathers Property
- Performance Cars v Abraham
- Perrett v Collins
- Perry v Suffields
- Pettitt v Pettitt
- Pharmaceutical Society v Boots
- Phillips v Brooks
- Phipps v Pears
- Phipps v Rochester Corporation
- Photo Production v Securicor
- Pickstone v Freemans
- Pigott v Thompson
- Pinnels Case
- Pioneer Container Case
- Pitts v Hunt
- Platform Funding v Bank Of Scotland
- Poland v Parr Sons
- Popiw v Popiw
- Port Jackson v Salmond
- Potton Developments v Thompson
- Poussard v Spiers
- Prelim Crimes Cases
- Prest v Petrodel Resources
- Price v Easton
- Pritchard v Briggs
- Pritchard v Cook And Red Ltd
- Proactive Sports Management v Rooney
- Progress Bulk Carriers v Tube City
- Promissory Estoppel Cases
- PSGB v Boots 1953
- Pullman v Hill
- Pursell v Horn
- Purton v Kilker Projects
- Pym v Campbell
- Pyrene Co v Scindia Navigation
- Quinn v Leathem
- R Abbasi v Foreign Secretary
- R B Customs Brokers v UDT
- R G v Immigration Appeal Tribunal
- R Gentle v Foreign Secretary
- R v A
- R v ABCD
- R v Abdul Hussain
- R v Adaye
- R v Adomako
- R v Ahluwalia
- R v Allen
- R v B 2007
- R v Bailey
- R v Bainbridge
- R v Barnes
- R v Bateman
- R v Blaue
- R v Bollom
- R v Bounekhla
- R v Bourne
- R v Bowen
- R v Braham
- R v Bree
- R v Brind 1991
- R v Brooks
- R v Brown 1985
- R v Brown And Stratton
- R v Brown
- R v Bunch
- R v Burgess
- R v C 2004
- R v Caldwell
- R v Calhaem
- R v Campbell
- R v Cato
- R v Chan Fook
- R v Chan Wing Siu
- R v Cheshire
- R v Church
- R v Ciccarelli
- R v Clarence
- R v Clarke 2009
- R v Clarke
- R v Clarkson 1971
- R v Clinton
- R v Clouden
- R v Coates
- R v Codere
- R v Cole
- R v Collins
- R v Constanza
- R v Conway
- R v Cooper
- R v Craig And Bentley
- R v Crutchley
- R v Cunningham
- R v Dalloway
- R v Dawson And James
- R v Dawson
- R v Devonald
- R v Dica
- R v Director Of Serious Fraud Office
- R v Donovan
- R v Dowds
- R v Dudley And Stephens
- R v Elbekkay
- R v Evans
- R v Fiak
- R v Flatt
- R v Flattery
- R v Foreign Secretary Abassi
- R v Foreign Secretary Gentle
- R v Franklin
- R v G 2004
- R v G And F
- R v G Recklessness
- R v Galliano
- R v Geddes
- R v George
- R v Ghosh
- R v Gnango
- R v Golds
- R v Gomez
- R v Gotts
- R v Graham
- R v Grewal
- R v Griffiths
- R v Gurpinar
- R v H 2005
- R v Hale
- R v Hall 1985
- R v Hall 1973
- R v Hampden
- R v Hardie
- R v Hasan
- R v Hayward
- R v Heard
- R v Hennessy
- R v Hennigan
- R v Hinks
- R v HM Attorney General
- R v Home Secretary Ex P Northumbria
- R v Horncastle And Others
- R v Howard
- R v Howe
- R v Hudson And Taylor
- R v Hysa
- R v Inglis
- R v Instan
- R v Ireland And Burstow
- R v Ireland
- R v Jackson
- R v JF Alford Transport
- R v Jheeta
- R v Jogee
- R v Johnson
- R v Jones And Smith
- R v Jones
- R v Jordan
- R v Kelly And Lindsay
- R v Kemp
- R v Kennedy
- R v Khan 1990
- R v Kimsey
- R v King
- R v Kingston
- R v Kirk
- R v Konzani
- R v Lamb
- R v Latimer
- R v Lewis
- R v Lipman
- R v Lockley
- R v Lord Rees Mogg
- R v Lowe
- R v Lowrie
- R v M J And Another
- R v M Naghten
- R v Majewski
- R v Malcherek And Steel
- R v Marangwanda
- R v Martin 1881
- R v Martin
- R v Miller 1954
- R v Miller
- R v Millward
- R v Misra Srivastava
- R v Moloney
- R v Morris
- R v Mowatt
- R v Moys
- R v Mullen
- R v Nedrick
- R v Notman
- R v Olugboja
- R v Ong
- R v Page
- R v Pagett
- R v Parker
- R v Parmenter
- R v Pembliton
- R v Pittwood
- R v Poulton
- R v Powell And English
- R v Prince 1875
- R v Quayle 2005
- R v Quick
- R v R 1992
- R v Rai
- R v Richardson
- R v Rimmington And R v Goldstein
- R v Rimmington
- R v Roberts
- R v Robinson
- R v Rostron
- R v Ruffel
- R v Ryan 1996
- R v Saik
- R v Sangha
- R v Savage
- R v Saw
- R (Al Rawi and others) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs
- R v Secretary of State for Transport, Ex P Factortame
- R v Secretary Of State For Wales, Ex P Kennedy
- R v Sharp 1857
- R v Sharp David Bruce
- R v Shayler
- R v Shepherd 1862
- R v Shepherd
- R v Shillam
- R v Shivpuri
- R v Slingsby
- R v Smith 1974
- R v Smith 2011
- R v Smith
- R v SSHD Ex Parte Fire Brigades Union
- R v St George
- R v Steer
- R v Stephenson
- R v Stewart
- R v Stone And Dobinson
- R v Stones
- R v Sullivan
- R v T 1990
- R v Taaffe
- R v Tabassum
- Fitzroy George v SSHD
- R v Thomas
- R v Turner No 2
- R v Valderrama Vega
- R v Walkington
- R v Warburton
- R v Watson 2015
- R v Watson
- R v Wenton
- R v White
- R v Williams And Davies
- R v Williams
- R v Wilson 1984
- R v Wilson
- R v Windle
- R v Wood
- R v Woollin
- Raffles v Wichelhaus
- Rahman v Arearose
- Raja v Austin Gray
- Raja v Lloyds TSB Bank Plc
- Ramsgate Hotel v Montefiore
- RBS v Etridge No
- Re A Conjoined Twins
- Re Bond Worth Ltd
- Re Buchanan Wollaston
- Re Caseys Patents
- Re Ellenborough Park
- Re F Mental Patient Sterilisation
- Re Farnol Eades Irvine And Co
- Re Hackney Pavilion
- Re Mahmoud v Ispahani
- Re Mcardle
- Re Polemis And Furness Withy
- Re Ransomes Plc
- Re Schebsman
- Re Selectmove
- Re Sharpe 1980
- Ready Mixed Concrete v Minister Of Pensions
- Redgrave v Hurd
- Redland Bricks v Morris
- Reeves v Commissioner Of Police
- Reffel v Surrey County Council
- Reilly v Booth
- Remedies Cases 1
- Remedies Cases 2
- Revill v Newbery
- Reynolds v Times Newspapers
- Rialas v Mitchell
- Rice v Great Yarmouth Borough Council
- Richmond College v Mcdougall
- Rickards v Lothian
- Ricketts v Basildon Magistrates
- Robbery Cases
- Robert Addie v Dumbreck
- Robertson v Wait
- Robinson v Balmain New Ferry
- Robinson v Harman
- Robinson v Kilvert
- Robshaw v United
- Rodway v Landy
- Roe v Kingerlee
- Rookes v Barnard
- Ropaigealach v Barclays Bank
- Roper v Knott
- Rose And Frank v Crompton
- Rothwell v Chemical
- Routledge v Grant
- Rts Flexible Systems v Molkerei
- Rudge v Richens
- Ruxley v Forsyth
- Ryan v Mutual Tontine
- Rylands v Fletcher
- S Pearson v Dublin Corp
- Saadi v Italy And Chahal v UK
- Sabic UK Petrochemicals v Punj Lloyd
- Sadler v Imperial Life Assurance Of Canada
- Salmon v Seafarer Restaurants
- Salomon v Salomon
- Samarenko v Dawn Hill House
- Sandiford v The Secretary Of State For Foreign Affairs
- SAS v France
- Saunders v Anglia Building Society
- Savage And Parmenter
- Sayers v Harlow Urban
- Schawel v Reade
- Schuler AG v Wickman Machine
- Scott v Avery
- Scott v London St Katherine
- Scott v Pauly
- Scott v Shepherd
- Scout Association v Barnes
- Scriven Bros v Hindley
- Scruttons Ltd v Midland Silicones
- Secretary Of State For Home Department v Rehman
- Secretary Of State For The Home Department v MN And KY
- Self Defence
- Selmouni v France
- Shadwell v Shadwell
- Shanklin Pier v Detel Products
- Shanshal v Al Kishtaini
- Sharneyford Supplies v Edge
- Sharp v Harrison
- Shaw v Director Of Public Prosecutions
- Shaw v DPP
- Shell UK v Lostock Garage
- Shirlaw v Southern Foundries
- Shogun Finance v Hudson
- Silven v RBS
- Sim v Stretch
- Simpkins v Pays
- Sirros v Moore
- Sky Petroleum v VIP Petroleum
- Smith And Snipes v River Douglas
- Smith v Austin Lifts
- Smith v Baker
- Smith v Chadwick
- Smith v Eric Bush
- Smith v Hughes
- Smith v Land And House Corp
- Smith v Leech Brain
- Smith v Littlewoods
- Smith v Mawhood
- Smith v Stone
- Smith v Superintendent Of Woking
- Snelling v John G Snelling
- Soering v United Kingdom
- South Wales Miners Federation v Glamorgan Coal
- Southern Water Authority v Pegrum
- Southwark London BC v Williams
- Spartan Steel v Martin
- Speed v Thomas Swift
- Speight v Gosnay
- Spicer v Smee
- Spring v Guardian Assurance
- Spurling v Bradshaw
- St Albans DC v ICL Ltd
- St Helens Melting v Tipping
- St John Shipping v Joseph Rank
- St Martins Property v Sir Robert Mcalpine
- Stabilad Ltd v Stephens Carter Ltd
- Standard Chartered v Walker
- Stansbie v Troman
- Staples v West Dorset
- Statutory Duties Cases
- Sterling Hydraulics v Dichtomatik
- Stevenson Jacques v Mclean
- Stevenson Jordan v Harrison
- Stewart Gill v Horatio Myer
- Stilk v Myrick
- Stockdale v Hansard
- Storer v MCC 1974
- Storey v Ashton
- Stovin v Wise
- Strickland v Turner
- Strict Liability Cases
- Sturges v Bridgman
- Sudbrook Trading Estate Ltd v Eggleton
- Summit Investment v BSC
- Sumpter v Hedges
- Sutton v Mishcon De Reya
- Swedish Central Railway v Thompson
- Sweet v Parsley 1970
- Tabcorp v Bowen
- Tanner v Tanner
- Target Home Loans v Clothier
- Tarleton v Mcgawley
- Taylor v Bowers
- Taylor v Caldwell
- Taylor v Hamer
- Taylor v Laird
- Template
- Tenax Steamship Co v Owners of the Motor Vessel Brimnes
- Terms Cases
- The Calgarth
- The Case Of Proclamations
- The Hansa Nord
- The Mahkutai
- The Moorcock
- The Post Chaser
- The Six Carpenters Case
- Theaker v Richardson
- Theft Cases
- Theft Of Property And Fraud By Misrepresentation
- Thoburn v Sunderland City Council
- Thomas v National Union Of Mineworkers
- Thomas v Thomas
- Thomas Witter Ltd v TBP Industries
- Thompson v Bridges
- Thompson v Foy
- Thompson v Lohan
- Thompson v London Midland And Scottish Railway
- Thompson v Metropolitan Police
- Thornton v Shoe Lane
- Tinn v Hoffman
- Titchener v British Railways Board
- Tito v Waddell
- Tolley v Fry
- Tomlin v Standard Telephones
- Tomlinson v Congleton Borough Council
- Toomes v Conset
- Torquay Hotel v Cousins
- Torreggiani And Others v Italy
- Transco v Stockport
- Transco v United Utilities
- Tremain v Pike
- Trendtex Trading Corporation v Credit Suisse
- Trendtex Trading v Bank Of Nigeria
- Trespass To Person Cases
- Tribe v Tribe
- Trident Insurance v Mcniece
- Troughton v MPC
- Trustees Of Ampleforth Abbey v Turner
- TSB Bank v Camfield
- Tuberville v Savage
- Tulk v Moxhay
- Turkey v Awadh
- Tweddle v Atkinson
- Ultramares Corporation v Touche
- Undue Influence Cases
- Vacwell v BDH
- Van Gend En Loos v Nederlandse Administratie
- Varga And Others v Hungary
- Vaughan v Vaughan
- Vellino v Chief Constable of Manchester
- Venables And Thompson v News Group
- Vernon v Bosley No 1
- Vicarious Liability Cases
- Victoria Laundry v Newman Industries
- Voluntary Manslaughter
- Wainwright v Home Office
- Wakefield v Duckworth
- Walker v Northumberland County Council
- Wall v Collins
- Waller v Waller
- Walters v North Glamorgan
- Ward v London Council
- Ward v Tesco
- Warner Bros v Nelson
- Watford Electronics v Sanderson
- Watt v HCC
- Watts v Morrow
- Weeks v Tybald
- Welton v North Cornwall District Council
- Wenkheim v Arndt
- Wheat v E Lacon
- Wheeler v Copas
- Wheeler v JJ Saunders
- Wheeler v New Merton Board Mills
- Wheeler v Prime Minister
- Whiston v Secretary Of State For Justice
- White And Bluett
- White And Carter v Mcgregor
- White And Others v Chief Constable
- White v Blackmore
- White v Bluett
- White v Jones
- Wilkinson v Downton
- Williams JW v Williams MA
- Williams v Morgan
- Williams v Roffey
- Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority
- Wilson Smithett v Bangladesh Sugar
- Wilson v Lombank
- Wilson v Tyneside Window Cleaning
- Wilsons And Clyde Coal v English
- Winterbottom v Wright
- With v O"flanagan
- Withers v Perry Chain
- WJ Alan v El Nasr
- Wong v Parkside Health NHS Trust
- Wood v Odessa Waterworks
- Woodar v Wimpey
- Woodrup v Nicol
- Woods v Durable Suites
- Woodward v Mayor Of Hastings
- Wooldridge v Sumner
- Woollerton And Wilson v Richard
- Wright v Gibbons
- Wright v Lodge
- Wyatt v Kreglinger
- X City Council v MB
- X Minors v Bedfordshire CC
- Yewen v Noakes
- Yianni v Evans
- Yip Chiu Cheung v R
- YL v Birmingham City Council
- Young v Dalgety
- Young v Kent County Council
- Young
- Yuanda UK v WW Gear Construction
- Z v UK
- Zanzibar v British Aerospace
Cite This Essay
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.