Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only.

Allan v Liverpool Overseas

285 words (1 pages) Case Summary

21st Oct 2021 Case Summary Reference this In-house law team

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

Allan v Liverpool Overseas (1873-74) LR 9 QB 180

Exclusive possession is required to create a lease.


The joint appellants, Allan and Inman, owned steamship companies. They were given a licence to use part of a docks including some sheds and a coal depot. The Docks and Harbour Board who controlled the docks charged the appellants rent on these. The sheds were locked, with keys kept by both the company and the Board. However, the Board’s agents could enter the sheds and use them for other vessels whom they also charged a rent without the appellants’ consent. When the land came to be assessed for rates, the company owners appealed as to whether they or the Board should pay rates.


The issue was whether the appellants were classed as a lodger or a tenant. If they were tenants they would have to pay rates. If they were only lodger, only the Board was liable. The respondents argued that the appellants kept the keys during the night while the Board did not. They also suggested the coal depot was separate from the sheds.

Decision / Outcome

Tenants must have exclusive possession of the land. A person does not have exclusive possession if the landlord or his servants can enter at any time. Here, the Board had retained the ability to enter the premises at any time. It did not matter whether the premises consisted of sheds, quay space or a depot. Nor did it matter that the landlord only had keys during the day. Consequently, the appellants were only lodgers, not tenants, and the Board and not the appellants were liable to pay rates on the premises.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

Related Content

Jurisdictions / Tags

Content relating to: "UK Law"

UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Essays, case summaries, problem questions and dissertations here are relevant to law students from the United Kingdom and Great Britain, as well as students wishing to learn more about the UK legal system from overseas.

Related Articles