Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only.

Banner Homes Group Plc v Luff Development Ltd

313 words (1 pages) Case Summary

15th Jun 2019 Case Summary Reference this In-house law team

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

Banner Homes Group Plc v Luff Development Ltd [2000] Ch. 372

Constructive Trust – Oral Agreement – Joint Venture – Equity


The defendants, Luff Development Ltd, acquired a site that would be suitable for developing property on. Before this acquisition, the defendants made an agreement with the complainants, Banner Homes Group Plc, that they could develop this site as a joint venture. While there were many conversations and proposals between the companies, no written agreement was concluded. However, the defendants changed their mind about the agreement they had made with the complainants, but did not tell them in case they made a rival offer before they acquired the site.


The trial judge had dismissed the constructive trust claim based on the fact that there was no signed and written agreement between the parties. Banner Homes Group Plc appealed this decision and the issue in the case was whether this agreement amounted to a constructive trust.


The appeal was allowed and the constructive trust claim was successful. Under equity it would not be right for the defendants to be the sole beneficial owner for the joint venture. The fact that the Luff Development Ltd did not want to inform the complainants indicates a prior agreement. Lord Justice Chadwick affirmed Pallant v Morgan and explained the elements where equity would come into play; when there is a pre-acquisition agreement although not always contractually enforceable, the non-acquiring party has some interest in the property, the acquiring party has not informed the other beforehand or has not honoured the arrangement and that the prior understanding gave the acquiring party an advantage to the detriment of the other.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

Related Content

Jurisdictions / Tags

Content relating to: "UK Law"

UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Essays, case summaries, problem questions and dissertations here are relevant to law students from the United Kingdom and Great Britain, as well as students wishing to learn more about the UK legal system from overseas.

Related Articles