Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only.

Canadian Railway Co v The King

307 words (1 pages) Case Summary

17th Jun 2019 Case Summary Reference this In-house law team

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

Canadian Railway Co v The King [1931] UKPC 18

Circumstances where a licence will be implied and whether such a licence is revocable


The appellant had erected some five hundred miles of telegraph poles and wires along a roadway and along two branch lines, the land upon which they were erected being the property of the Crown. Some of the poles were erected between 1905 and 1910 and no express consent was given to their erection. Other poles were erected between 1893 and 1911 during the course of negotiations, although no agreement was ever reached. The Crown commenced proceedings alleging trespass and seeking damages or alternatively a declaration as to the appellant’s rights. The Supreme Court of Canada found in favour of the Crown and the appellant appealed to the Privy Council.


The primary issue in this context was whether any of the actions of the Crown suggested that the appellant’s poles were on the land under licence and, if so, whether the licence could be revoked.


It was held that on these facts the poles were on the land with the licence of the Crown. Although when first erecting the poles the appellant had been a trespasser, the length of acquiescence on the part of the Crown and an indication that rent had been paid meant that the Crown lost its right to assert that there was no licence. This licence was however revocable unless evidence could be produced to demonstrate that it was not. Given that there was no evidence of this type the Crown could revoke the licence but only by giving notice to the appellant and by specifying a future date for revocation which would be sufficient to allow the appellant to remove the poles and wires and erect them elsewhere.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

Related Content

Jurisdictions / Tags

Content relating to: "UK Law"

UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Essays, case summaries, problem questions and dissertations here are relevant to law students from the United Kingdom and Great Britain, as well as students wishing to learn more about the UK legal system from overseas.

Related Articles