Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only.

Crawley BC v Ure 1996

309 words (1 pages) Case Summary

17th Jun 2019 Case Summary Reference this In-house law team

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

Crawley BC v Ure [1996] 1 QB 13

Landlord and tenant; one joint tenant giving notice to quit without consulting the other


Mr and Mrs Ure were joint tenants of a council flat. Mrs Ure left and applied to the council for accommodation as a homeless person. They advised her to give notice to quit to terminate the tenancy. She did so without consulting Mr Ure. A possession order was served upon Mr Ure. Mr Ure appealed against the possession order.


Mr Ure argued that in failing to consult him, his wife had committed a breach of trust because a joint tenancy amounted to a trust for sale under s36 Law of Property Act 1925,with each tenant being both trustee and beneficiary. Under s26(3) Law of Property Act 1925 he claimed his wife was under a duty to consult him prior to giving notice. Further, he argued, the council had procured a breach of trust by advising Mrs Ure to give notice. The council argued a periodic tenancy is not a capital asset and cannot, therefore, be held on trust for sale. Even if it was a trust for sale, the trust only persists if both tenants wish it to continue. S26(3) only applies to positive acts, and the giving of notice to quit is not a positive act, but a proclamation that one tenant no longer wishes the tenancy to continue at the end of the term.


Notice to quit given by one joint tenant without the consent of the other was effective to terminate the tenancy. Although the tenancy did amount to a trust for sale, s26(3) did not apply to the giving of notice to quit because this was not, in substance, a positive act but merely an intimation that the tenant did not wish the tenancy to continue.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

Related Content

Jurisdictions / Tags

Content relating to: "UK Law"

UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Essays, case summaries, problem questions and dissertations here are relevant to law students from the United Kingdom and Great Britain, as well as students wishing to learn more about the UK legal system from overseas.

Related Articles