Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only.

Dolphin Maritime v Sveriges - Summary

326 words (1 pages) Case Summary

17th Jun 2019 Case Summary Reference this In-house law team

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

Dolphin Maritime & Aviation Services Ltd v Sveriges Angfartygs Assurans Forening (The Swedish Club) [2009] EWHC 716 (Comm)

Contract – Jurisdiction – Inducing breach of contract – Rights of third parties – Damages


The Claimant was a cargo recovery agent and the Defendant was a Swedish P&I Club. The Claimant was engaged by an insurer to recover cargo. The Defendant engaged a ship that collided with an insured vessel. The vessel was wrecked. The insurer paid out the cargo vessel and gained its rights through subrogation. The insurer then engaged the Claimant to recover on its behalf. The Claimant issued a letter of undertaking (LOU) to the Defendant to recover loss on behalf of the insurer. The insurer then settled directly with the Defendant which meant the Claimant did not receive a commission on recovery. The insurer refused to pay the commission so the Claimant brought action against the Defendant for a failure to comply with the LOU.


Whether there was a procurement of contract by the Defendant and whether the Claimant had a claim under article 5(3), s 1 of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999.


The appeal by the Defendant was allowed. The LOU specified that the payment should be made to the Claimant first or the insurer’s solicitors in order for the Defendant’s duty to be discharged. However, there was no inference that the Claimant would benefit from recovering the payment by these means and did not purport to confer a benefit to the Claimant within the meaning of section 1(1)(b) of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999. Further, on the proper construction of contract, it did not appear that there was an intention for the term to be enforceable by the Claimant.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

Related Content

Jurisdictions / Tags

Content relating to: "UK Law"

UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Essays, case summaries, problem questions and dissertations here are relevant to law students from the United Kingdom and Great Britain, as well as students wishing to learn more about the UK legal system from overseas.

Related Articles