Evenden v Guildford City FC  QB 917
Employment law – Continuity of employment – Estoppel
Evenden was employed from 1955 to 1968 by the supporters club of Guildford City Football Club as a groundsman. The supporters club were a separate organisation to the football club. In November 1968, Evenden’s employment was transferred to the football club and he was given the same duties and all parties were under the impression that Evenden’s employment status would be continuous. In 1974, Evenden was made redundant by the football club. He then claimed for redundancy pay under the Redundancy Payments Act 1965 for his combined years of employment with the club, which he argued totalled 19 in all. The industrial tribunal only awarded him a sum based on six years of employment, since the transfer of employment. The industrial relations court dismissed his appeal. Evenden appealed again.
It was important for the court to consider the basis on which Evenden’s employment was transferred from the supporters club to the football club in 1968. Evenden looked to establish that there had been an agreement at that time that his employment was seen as continuous, which would have meant that he worked for the club for a total of nineteen years. The football club argued that Evenden, at that time, had begun working for a new employer and it was therefore not possible for Evenden to claim for the continuous employment.
Evenden’s appeal was allowed and the decision of the industrial relations court was reversed. The court found that the football club had agreed, when his employment was transferred, that Evenden’s employment was continuous and on this basis, he could claim for the full 19 years he believed he was owed.
Cite This Work
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:
Related ServicesView all
Related ContentJurisdictions / Tags
Content relating to: "UK Law"
UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Essays, case summaries, problem questions and dissertations here are relevant to law students from the United Kingdom and Great Britain, as well as students wishing to learn more about the UK legal system from overseas.
Bass Holdings Ltd v Morton Music Ltd
The plaintiffs granted the defendants a fifteen-year lease, with the option to extend the lease for a period...
Holwell Securities v Hughes
Holwell Securities claimed specific performance of the contract when Dr Hughes refused to complete the sale of his house. This claim was originally dismissed by the court. But, it was appealed. ...