Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only.

Hill v CA Parsons Ltd - 1972

297 words (1 pages) Case Summary

17th Jun 2019 Case Summary Reference this In-house law team

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

Hill v CA Parsons Ltd [1972] Ch. 305

Contract law – Breach of contract – Injunctions – Employment


The defendant, an engineering company, agreed with a trade union that after 12 months, their technical staff would become members of the trade union. The plaintiff was an employee, who had worked for the engineering company for over 30 years and had recently joined a professional engineer union. The defendants gave him one month’s notice to join their trade union, which he did not do. The plaintiff was 63 years of age. Shortly afterward, the company terminated the employment of the plaintiff and thirty-seven others, with one month’s notice. The plaintiff claimed for an injunction to prevent the defendants from terminating his employment. The trial judge held that he did not have the power to grant this to the plaintiff. The plaintiff subsequently appealed the decision.


The key issue for the court was to understand whether the plaintiff could impose an injunction upon the defendant’s termination of employment. This was an important decision for the court as if the plaintiff could not use this, it is likely that his employment would be terminated early and at 63 years of age, this might have given him difficulty. He would also only have damages available to him if this action failed.


The court allowed the plaintiff’s appeal. The plaintiff was owed at least six months’ notice with regards to the termination of his employment. Further to this, damages were not considered to be an adequate remedy and therefore the plaintiff was entitled to be able to rely on an injunction to prevent the defendant’s actions.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

Related Content

Jurisdictions / Tags

Content relating to: "UK Law"

UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Essays, case summaries, problem questions and dissertations here are relevant to law students from the United Kingdom and Great Britain, as well as students wishing to learn more about the UK legal system from overseas.

Related Articles