Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only.

Janaway v Salford Health Authority

161 words (1 pages) Case Summary

16th Jul 2019 Case Summary Reference this In-house law team

Jurisdiction(s): UK Law

Janaway v Salford Health Authority (1989) AC 537

Conscientious Objection

Conscientious objection defence under Section 4 (1) of the Abortion Act 1967 applied only to persons who are actually involved in the abortion operation.

In this case, a secretary was requested to type a letter which referred a patient to a consultant in regards termination of the client’s pregnancy. She refused to carry out the doctor’s instruction claiming conscientious objection under section 4 (1) Abortion Act 1961. This section provided that ‘no person shall be under any duty, whether by contract or by any statutory or other legal requirement, to participate in any treatment authorised by this Act to which he has a conscientious objection.’

The court held that natural meaning of ‘participate in’ should be given to it. It means taking part in the treatment for the purpose of termination the abortion.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all