Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only.

Kinch v Bullard

337 words (1 pages) Case Summary

17th Jun 2019 Case Summary Reference this In-house law team

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

Kinch v Bullard [1998] 4 All ER 650

Joint Tenancy – Severance – Service of Notice of Intent to Sever


A married couple, Mr and Mrs Johnson were the beneficial joint tenants of their matrimonial home.  After suffering a breakdown in their personal relationship divorce proceedings were begun.  Mrs Johnson sent her husband a letter by first class post stating her intention to sever her interest and so sever the joint tenancy.  However, Mr Johnson was by this time terminally ill, and realising that she was likely to outlive her husband she then destroyed the letter.  Mr Johnson died a few weeks later, and Mrs Johnson then died a few months after that.  The executors required the court to rule on whether or not the notice had effectively severed their joint tenancy.


Had the joint tenancy been effectively severed by the delivery of a letter in which one of the joint tenants indicated a desire to sever their interest?  Whether or not this interest remained un-severed because the joint tenant later destroyed the letter before the other joint tenant read it, but after it had been delivered.


The tenancy had been effectively severed by the delivery of the letter and notice that the tenant intended to sever their interest as provided for by s36(2) Law of Property Act 1925.  Even though the wife at the time of delivery no longer wished to sever the joint tenancy, this could not prevent the notice from being effective.  Under s196 Law of Property Act 1925 a notice was properly served it is left at the last known place of abode or business in the United Kingdom of the person served.  Therefore, the notice of severance was effective from when the letter fell through the letterbox and it was irrelevant whether or not the wife destroyed the letter after it had been properly served.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

Related Content

Jurisdictions / Tags

Content relating to: "UK Law"

UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Essays, case summaries, problem questions and dissertations here are relevant to law students from the United Kingdom and Great Britain, as well as students wishing to learn more about the UK legal system from overseas.

Related Articles