Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only.

Knightley v Johns - 1982

297 words (1 pages) Case Summary

28th Oct 2021 Case Summary Reference this In-house law team

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

Legal Case Summary

Knightley v Johns and Others [1982] 1 WLR 349

Law of Tort – Novus Actus Interveniens – Damage – Remoteness of Damage – Causation


Mr Johns was driving negligently and this resulted in a crash where his car overturned near the exit of a tunnel. Due to the crash, two police officers attended the scene. One of the police officer forgot to safely seal off the tunnel to prevent traffic and in response, he ordered the other officer to ride his motorcycle down the one-way tunnel to do so. The officer was against the natural flow of traffic and subsequently; he was involved in a collision.


The case surrounded who was liable for the officer’s injury and whether the instruction of the police officer would be classed as a novus actus interveniens that broke the chain of causation.

Decision / Outcome

The court held that the defendant was negligent and his order was a novus actus interveniens that would negate the car driver’s liability for the police officer’s injuries. While it can be said that the police officers attending the tunnel for the crash was a foreseeable event, the negligent order to drive down a one-way tunnel into opposing traffic was not foreseeable. This third party order broke the chain of causation. This case states that the test for causation is whether the damage is reasonably foreseeable and a ‘natural and probable’ cause of the defendant’s action. In this scenario, the negligent order given by the other police officer could not be reasonably foreseen and therefore, it was a new intervening act that broke the chain of causation.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

Related Content

Jurisdictions / Tags

Content relating to: "UK Law"

UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Essays, case summaries, problem questions and dissertations here are relevant to law students from the United Kingdom and Great Britain, as well as students wishing to learn more about the UK legal system from overseas.

Related Articles