Legal Case Brief
Poussard v Spiers (1875) LR 1 QBD 410
Summary: Breach of condition of a contract
The Claimant (Poussard) was an opera singer. She was contracted by the defendant to perform in that capacity for a duration of three months. This was to subject to certain conditions, such as a salary of £11 per week, a start of “on or about” the 14th of November and an option to re-engage the Claimant’s services for another three months for a salary not exceeding 14 pounds per week. Instead of the 14th of November however, the launch performance was subsequently scheduled for the 28th of November, to which the Claimant gave no objection. However, she fell ill just before the start of the opera and could not sing for the first three days. The defendant hired another singer as potential cover and then actual cover when the claimant could not sing for the first three days of performances. Once the Claimant was well again, she wanted to take up her position in the performance but this was refused by the Defendant. An action for wrongful dismissal was then launched against the defendant. At trial, the jury found in favour of the defendant and awarded them the right to claim £83 from the Claimant, as it had been reasonable to hire her replacement. The Claimant appealed against this.
The issue in this case was whether failing to turn up to the first day of performance amounted to a breach of a condition of the contract.
It was held that failure to turn up did amount to a breach of a condition of the contract as this went to its very root and that Spiers were therefore free to rescind the contract.
Cite This Work
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:
Related ServicesView all
Related ContentJurisdictions / Tags
Content relating to: "UK Law"
UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Essays, case summaries, problem questions and dissertations here are relevant to law students from the United Kingdom and Great Britain, as well as students wishing to learn more about the UK legal system from overseas.
Criticisms of Shareholder and Stakeholder Debate
“...the company, as an artificial person, can have no interests separate from the interests of those who are associated with it, whether as shareholders, creditors, employers, suppliers, customers or in some other way. So, the crucial question is, when we refer to the company, to the interests of which of those sets of natural persons are we referring? Of course, one could take the view that the beauty of referring to the interests of the company, without any further specification of what is meant, is that the answer to my question is left wholly ambiguous and obscure ......
Effect of Brexit on Parliamentary Sovereignty
In this paper, I will discuss the continuous growth in the common law as well as the rise in powers of the judiciary in the United Kingdom....