Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only.

R v H - 2005

358 words (1 pages) Case Summary

26th Oct 2021 Case Summary Reference this In-house law team

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

Legal Case Summary

R v H [2005] 1 WLR 2005

Definition of ‘sexual’/‘touching’ in ss.78-79 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003


The defendant propositioned the victim sexually and attempted to pull her towards him and place a hand over her mouth by grabbing at the pocket of her tracksuit. The defendant was convicted of sexual assault contrary to s.3 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003.


S.78 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 defines an act as sexual if a reasonable person would consider that either it is sexual by nature or ‘because of its nature it may be sexual and because of its circumstances or the purpose of any person in relation to it (or both) it is sexual’. S.79 defines ‘touching’ as including touching with a part of the body or anything else, ‘through anything’.

The defendant argued that touching a victim’s clothing did not count as touching the victim. He also argued that a reasonable person would consider the touching sexual.

Decision  /Outcome

The conviction was upheld. The Court of Appeal believed that Parliament did not intend to exclude touching a person’s clothing from the definition of sexual assault, given the broad definition in s.79.

The Court of Appeal defined the test for determining whether touching is ‘sexual’ in cases where the touching is not inherently sexual:

  1. Does the jury consider that the touching could be sexual?
  2. If so, in all the circumstances of the case, does the jury consider that the purpose of the touching was sexual?

If so, the touching is sexual within the meaning of the Act. While the judge’s directions in the present case had not been entirely adequate as he had not adopted this two-stage approach, the jury had been entitled to conclude that the touching was sexual. The convictions were therefore safe.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

Related Content

Jurisdictions / Tags

Content relating to: "UK Law"

UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Essays, case summaries, problem questions and dissertations here are relevant to law students from the United Kingdom and Great Britain, as well as students wishing to learn more about the UK legal system from overseas.

Related Articles