Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only.

R v Shayler

306 words (1 pages) Case Summary

27th Jun 2019 Case Summary Reference this In-house law team

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

R v Shayler [2001] 1 WLR 2206

Criminal law – Defence – Necessity


Shayler was a member of MI5. Before starting employment with the service, he signed a confidentiality declaration in accordance with the Official Secrets Act 1989 and was therefore under a contractual obligation not to disclose information that came into his possession by way of his employment. When he left the MI5, he signed a further declaration acknowledging its lasting effects. Around a year after signing the documentation, Shayler disclosed documents to a national newspaper relating to national security and shortly afterward left the country. Upon his return a couple of years later, he was charged with disclosing this information without permission under the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996, section 29.


The issue at hand was whether or not the defence of necessity was open to Shayler in the circumstances. Shayler argued that the defences were available to him on the basis of public interest, in order to avert damage to life and to expose serious illegality. Shayler also argued that he could rely on the right to freedom of expression under the European Convention on Human Rights 1950.


The appeal was dismissed. It was held that as Shayler was a former member of the security service, he could not rely on the defence of necessity or duress in relation to the Official Secrets Act 1989. Also, the court believed that Shayler was not in a position to identify any external threat to the general public. Further to this, the restriction on Shayler’s freedom of expression was justified in order to protect national security.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

Related Content

Jurisdictions / Tags

Content relating to: "UK Law"

UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Essays, case summaries, problem questions and dissertations here are relevant to law students from the United Kingdom and Great Britain, as well as students wishing to learn more about the UK legal system from overseas.

Related Articles