Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only.

Re Cordwell's Application [2008]

351 words (1 pages) Case Summary

15th Jun 2019 Case Summary Reference this In-house law team

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

Re Cordwell’s Application [2008] 2 P & CR 570



The claimant’s land was bound by a restrictive covenant restraining them from building more than one dwelling-house. The claimant wished to build a second bungalow, and acquired planning permission for this project. They then applied to discharge the restrictive covenant.


S.84 of the Law of Property Act 1925 grants the Upper Tribunal discretion to alter or completely discharge restrictive covenants in any of four circumstances. One such circumstance is where the continued existence of the covenant would impede some reasonable user and either is contrary to the public interest or does not secure to persons entitled to the benefit of it any practical benefits of substantial value or advantage to them.

The issue in this case was whether impeding the construction secured the beneficiaries of the covenant practical benefits of substantial value or advantage, and the relevance of planning permission to this. The objectors argued that the use would impact the amenity of their properties and alter the character of the estate, while the claimant argued that it is down to the local planning authority to protect the amenity and character of the community via planning policy.


The Tribunal declined to discharge or alter the covenant.

The Tribunal emphasised that the planning permission and restrictive covenant regimes are two separate systems of planning control which might be relevant to each other, but not necessarily. At most, the grant of planning permission is relevant when determining whether the covenant grants practical benefits of value or advantage, but it was far from decisive of the issue.

The Tribunal concluded that preventing the loss of amenity to the objectors’ property was sufficient practical advantage to exclude the court’s discretion to discharge the covenant.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

Related Content

Jurisdictions / Tags

Content relating to: "UK Law"

UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Essays, case summaries, problem questions and dissertations here are relevant to law students from the United Kingdom and Great Britain, as well as students wishing to learn more about the UK legal system from overseas.

Related Articles