Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only.

R (on the application of Ricketts) v Basildon Magistrates’ Court

323 words (1 pages) Case Summary

27th Jun 2019 Case Summary Reference this In-house law team

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

R (on the application of Ricketts) v Basildon Magistrates’ Court

[2010] EWHC 2358; [2011] PTSR 180 

Property belonging to another under the Theft Act 1968.

Facts

The defendant, Ricketts, was arrested after taking bags from outside a charity shop and from the bins at the rear of the shop and putting them into his vehicle. On interview he admitted he was taking them to sell. He was charged with theft under the Theft Act 1968 and was committed by the magistrates to Crown Court. He sought judicial review of this decision in the High Court claiming there was insufficient evidence against him.

Issues

Whether abandoned property could belong to someone else under s.1(1) Theft Act 1968. To commit an offence of theft under s.1(1) and s.5(1) of the 1968 Act the defendant must appropriate property which ‘belonged to another’. The defendant contended that leaving property outside a shop and in bins at the rear of a shop raised an inference that the property had been abandoned and did not belong to another person.

Decision/Outcome

The magistrates had been right to commit the case. The charity shop did not own the property simply because it was left in close proximity to the shop. However, it could be inferred that the donors had left their property outside the shop intending to make a gift of it to the charity shop, and that these donors retained ownership until the gift was effected. Secondly, due to the close proximity of the bins to the shop it was inferred that the property in them was still under the charity’s control and, therefore, belonged to the charity. It was immaterial whether donors had placed the property in the bins or whether the charity had placed it there for disposal.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

Related Content

Jurisdictions / Tags

Content relating to: "UK Law"

UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Essays, case summaries, problem questions and dissertations here are relevant to law students from the United Kingdom and Great Britain, as well as students wishing to learn more about the UK legal system from overseas.

Related Articles