Warner Brothers Pictures Inc. v Nelson  1 KB 209
Contract law – Breach of contract – Damages
The defendant was a film artist, otherwise known as Bette Davis, who had entered into a contract with the plaintiffs, Warner Bros. Pictures, in the United States to provide her services exclusively to the company for the period of twelve months with a further twelve-month option. Under the contract, she could not, therefore, provide her services to another company, without the plaintiff’s express written consent. By her own admission, the defendant came to the United Kingdom to agree with a business to work to produce films for a third party and claimed that she was no longer bound by the original agreement with the defendants. The plaintiffs brought an action and claimed an injunction to restrain her actions.
The issue for the court was to understand and consider all of the options available with regards to remedying the breach of contract in this instance. Specific performance would be a strict requirement that would require Nelson to perform for the business, whereas damages would potentially be difficult to quantify in the circumstances. The court would also have to consider the length of time that such a restriction might run for.
The court found that the contract was not meant to force the defendant to specific performance but that an injunction would enforce the contract to perform and therefore specific performance was not an appropriate remedy. This was also the case for damages as they could not be appropriate quantified under the circumstances. On this basis, an injunction, with a time limit was applied to prevent Nelson from carrying out the other contract.
Cite This Work
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:
Related ServicesView all
Related ContentJurisdictions / Tags
Content relating to: "UK Law"
UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Essays, case summaries, problem questions and dissertations here are relevant to law students from the United Kingdom and Great Britain, as well as students wishing to learn more about the UK legal system from overseas.
Fraud Claim in Absence of Justifiable Reliance
Is the plaintiff’s fraud claim barred in Absence of Justifiable reliance? Is reliance element in fraud the same considering the principle ......
Midland Bank Trust Co Ltd v Green (No. 1)
For the consideration of £1, W granted G the option to buy a farm, title to which was unregistered. This was an estate contract and so a legal...
Common Law Reasoning and Institutions
This is the Court of Chancery… which gives to monied might the means abundantly of wearying out the right; which so exhausts finances, patience, courage, hope; so overthrows the brain and breaks the heart; that there is not an honorable man among its practitioners...