Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only.

WG Clark (Properties) Ltd v Dupre Properties Ltd

318 words (1 pages) Case Summary

15th Jun 2019 Case Summary Reference this In-house law team

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

WG Clark (Properties) Ltd v Dupre Properties Ltd [1992] Ch. 297

Property law – Landlord and tenant – Forfeiture


The basement flat of an apartment was leased to a tenant. A year later, the parties agreed that the tenant could extend the flat into an adjoining courtyard on the payment of £5,000. This required the re-granting of a new lease which included the courtyard and original flat but required the tenant to relinquish his original interest. The land registry declined the deed on the basis that the courtyard was already owned by a third-party. The tenant claimed damages against the landlord for false representation of the property. The landlord brought proceedings against the tenant on the basis that the statement of claim in the tenant’s action had denied his rights to the land, including both the flat and courtyard in question.


The court was required to understand the gravitas of the statement made by the tenant in relation to the landlord’s rights with regards to the property and the subsequent effect this had on the landlord’s right over the courtyard.


The tenant’s appeal was allowed and the defendant’s action was struck out. This was on the basis that the tenant’s statement, which positively represented the landlord’s interest in his property but did the same for a third-party in relation to the courtyard was a partial disclaimer, and would not affect the entitlement that the landlord has to possession of the property as a whole. Importantly, it was held per curiamthat if the tenant’s disclosure had rejected the landlord’s right to the land, it may be possible for the landlord to issue a notice under the Law of Property Act 1925, section 146 which required the tenant to forfeit the property.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

Related Content

Jurisdictions / Tags

Content relating to: "UK Law"

UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Essays, case summaries, problem questions and dissertations here are relevant to law students from the United Kingdom and Great Britain, as well as students wishing to learn more about the UK legal system from overseas.

Related Articles