Our offices are open as usual over the Easter break

Arcos v EA Ronaasen & Son – 1933

324 words (1 pages) Case Summary in Cases

07/03/18 Cases Reference this

Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our professional writers as a learning aid to help you with your studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of UK Essays.

If you would like to view samples of the work produced by our academic writers please click here.

Arcos v EA Ronaasen & Son [1933] AC 470

The right to reject goods under a contract of sale.

Facts

English purchasers concluded a contract for the sale of staves of timber wood from the English agents of a Russian company for the purposes of making cement barrels, specifying staves of Russian redwood and whitewood to be of half-an-inch in thickness. A large proportion of the staves delivered were over half-an-inch and the buyer rejected them on the grounds that they did not conform to the contract’s requirement. An arbitration found that the staves were still commercially within and merchantable under the contract as they remained fit for the purposes of making cement barrels, thus the buyer could not reject them.

Issue

The question arose as to whether the buyer had the right to reject goods that do not conform to specifications within the contract for sale, yet are commercially within and merchantable under the contract’s description.

Held

The Court held that a buyer in a contract for sale has the right to demand goods of certain specifications and is not, accordingly, bound to accept goods that do not conform to contractual specifications merely due to them being merchantable or commercially equivalent to that specification. Rather, the goods must conform to the specifications to which the parties have agreed and the contract cannot be constructed as to add a qualification of commercial equivalence that is not otherwise stipulated. On the facts, the contract for timber wood provided no elasticity in its terms and expressly specified the thickness of the wood. As the staves of wood did not conform to the contractual requirements, despite the possibility of their commercial equivalence and merchantability under the contract, the buyer had the right to reject the goods.

Word Count: 284

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

DMCA / Removal Request

If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have the essay published on the UK Essays website then please.

Ready to get started?