Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only.

Chaplin v Hicks - 1911

310 words (1 pages) Case Summary

14th Jun 2019 Case Summary Reference this In-house law team

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

Chaplin v Hicks [1911] 2 KB 786

Breach of contract; loss of a chance to win competition; measure of damages


Hicks was a famous actor and theatre manager. He invited women to enter a beauty contest by sending in photographs which would be placed in a newspaper. The readers of the newspaper would vote for their winner, who would be awarded a paid engagement as her prize. Chaplin entered the competition and came first in her group thereby affording her the opportunity to be considered as a finalist. The letter inviting her to attend the next stage of the contest arrived too late, and as a result she was denied the opportunity to be considered. She sought damages.


Chaplin contended that Hicks’ failure to take reasonable steps to bring the next stage to her attention amounted to a breach of contract. This breach, she argued, had resulted in a lost opportunity for her to attain lucrative engagements and she was, therefore, entitled to damages to compensate her for this loss. Hicks argued that even if there had been a breach of contract, any damages awarded should be nominal because any harm Chaplin had suffered would be too remote from the breach and incalculable. It would not be possible to assess the chances of Chaplin winning the competition and her losses, if any, were incapable of assessment.


Chaplin successfully recovered 100k in damages. Under the contract, she had the right to be considered within a limited class. Hicks’ breach of contract meant she could no longer be so considered. The loss of the chance of winning such a lucrative prize was a breach which afforded her the right to substantial, and not merely nominal damages. Such damages were not necessarily incapable of assessment.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

Related Content

Jurisdictions / Tags

Content relating to: "UK Law"

UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Essays, case summaries, problem questions and dissertations here are relevant to law students from the United Kingdom and Great Britain, as well as students wishing to learn more about the UK legal system from overseas.

Related Articles