Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only.

Dhanani v Crasnianski

308 words (1 pages) Case Summary

16th Jul 2019 Case Summary Reference this In-house law team

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK LawEU Law

Dhanani v Crasnianski [2011] EWHC 926

Contract Law – Intention to Create Legal Relations – Agreement to Agree


The defendant, Mr Crasnianski was a scientist and inventor. He met the claimant, Mr Dhanani by chance on the Eurostar whilst travelling from Paris to London. Mr Dhanani had worked as a vice president of DeutscheBank and was familiar with wealth management and private equity investment. After their conversation on the train, they met again and signed a term sheet setting out the goals of their partnership, and under which the defendant agreed to provide €50 million of his personal wealth to the claimant, which the claimant was then to invest in a newly created private equity fund which he managed. After falling out, the defendant no longer wished to invest the money. The claimant sued him for damages for £11.3 for breach of contract. The defendant denied this and counterclaimed for the sums already advanced.


Whether the signed ‘term sheet’ between the parties evidenced an intention to create legal relations or not. Whether or not there was an agreed contract, or only an agreement to create an agreement in the future.


There was no enforceable contract. The term sheet set out the parties’ intentions but it was not capable of being carried into effect without further agreement between the parties. It was therefore no more than an agreement to agree in the future the terms which were necessary to enable the agreement to be carried out. Whilst the parties may have subjectively considered themselves bound by the agreement, a court must look objectively at the whole course of the parties’ conduct, and an agreement is not binding simply because the parties consider it to be.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

Related Content

Jurisdictions / Tags

Content relating to: "EU Law"

EU law, or European Union law, is a system of law that is specific to the 28 members of the European Union. This system overrules the national law of each member country if there is a conflict between the national law and the EU law.

Related Articles