Our offices are open as usual over the Easter break

Eastham v Newcastle United Football Club

304 words (1 pages) Case Summary in Cases

07/03/18 Cases Reference this

Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our professional writers as a learning aid to help you with your studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of UK Essays.

If you would like to view samples of the work produced by our academic writers please click here.

Eastham v Newcastle United Football Club Ltd [1964] Ch 413

Retention provisions in professional football contract acted in restraint of trade


The governing body of football in England (FA) provides that a player must register with the association of his club and while so registered can only play for that club. At the end of a season, players may be retained by a club. If retained, a player is banned from playing for any other club but is not employed by the club and no contract existed until he re-signed with it.


The plaintiff, a professional football player, was retained by the defendant club who refused to transfer him to another club. The plaintiff sought declaration that his agreement with the club and the rules of the FA relating to retention were not binding as being in unreasonable restraint of trade and/or ultra vires. After the writ was issued, the plaintiff agreed to his transfer and this was duly carried out.


The Court held that the retention provisions operated in restraint of trade. The retention provision were restrictions coming into operation after the employment was terminated and not as the exercise of an option causing the employment to continue. The retention notice does not have the effect of re-employing the player as he must re-sign a contract. Before re-signing, he can receive no wages.  The retention provisions, together with the transfer provisions, were more than what was reasonable for the defendants to protect their interests. Therefore, the retention provisions substantially interfered with the plaintiff’s right to seek employment and operated in unreasonable restraint of trade and were ultra vires.

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

DMCA / Removal Request

If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have the essay published on the UK Essays website then please.

Ready to get started?