Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only.

ERJ Lovelock v Exportles - 1968

302 words (1 pages) Case Summary

14th Jun 2019 Case Summary Reference this In-house law team

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

ERJ Lovelock v Exportles [1968] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 163

Contract – Vagueness – Uncertainty – Meaningless Phrases – Arbitration Clause


ERJ Lovelock Ltd, the buyers agreed to purchase a quantity of timber from the sellers, Exportles, who were a joint stock company dealing in lumber based in Moscow, Russia. The wood was to be bought and exported by Exportles, who were the sole exporter of timber out of Russia at this time. The agreement contained a dispute resolution clause which provided for ‘any dispute to be resolved by arbitration in London and for any other dispute to be resolved by arbitration in Moscow’.


Which, if any, of the apparently conflicting arbitration clauses were to be considered correct.  Whether or not the agreement was too vague or uncertain to be unenforceable or not.  Whether or not the court could simply disregard the ambiguous clause whilst preserving the rest of the agreement.


The agreement was not void for uncertainty.  The dispute resolution clause in of itself was so vague and ambiguous as to be capable of being considered deprived of meaning. Because it was a meaningless phrase, it would be disregarded by the court. There was therefore no effective arbitration clause at all. Instead the court would then determine the underlying dispute instead. This was possible because the central terms of the agreement themselves were still clear and determinable by the court. The dispute resolution clause was capable of being disregarded without destroying the central obligations of the parties.  As such, the court was capable of, and should ensure that the contract be given effect and upheld as far as possible.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

Related Content

Jurisdictions / Tags

Content relating to: "UK Law"

UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Essays, case summaries, problem questions and dissertations here are relevant to law students from the United Kingdom and Great Britain, as well as students wishing to learn more about the UK legal system from overseas.

Related Articles