Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only.

Greenfield v Greenfield

316 words (1 pages) Case Summary

21st Oct 2021 Case Summary Reference this In-house law team

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

Greenfield v Greenfield (1979) 39 P & CR 570, ChD

Joint Tenants – Severance of Joint Tenancy – Mutual Agreement – Course of Conduct


Two brothers purchased a house together, and made an express statement that they would be holding the land as joint tenants.  Both got married and moved their wives into the house shared between them.  For convenience and privacy, the brothers physically divided the house between them building a wall and each occupied one part of the house.  When one of the brothers died, the surviving brother evicted his brother’s widow.  The widow claimed that the brothers’ joint tenancy had been severed by the partitioning of the house and that this amounted to a course of conduct showing an intention to sever the joint tenancy.


Was the partitioning of the house sufficient to amount to a course of conduct indicating that the joint tenants had intended to sever their joint tenancy and become tenants in common instead?

Decision / Outcome

The joint tenancy had not been severed.  The surviving brother retained his right to survivorship and was entitled to evict his brother’s widow.  Whilst the brothers had indeed separated the property physically, this was insufficient to amount to a course of conduct that amounted to a clear suggestion that the brothers had intended to sever their joint tenancy.  The physical separation of the property had been done for the sake of convenience, and was not in itself enough to overcome the clear express statement that the brothers had made in providing that they were joint tenants.  The parties were aware of the doctrine of survivorship, and mere physical separation did not imply an intention that this was to be disregarded and the rights of a joint tenant surrendered.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

Related Content

Jurisdictions / Tags

Content relating to: "UK Law"

UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Essays, case summaries, problem questions and dissertations here are relevant to law students from the United Kingdom and Great Britain, as well as students wishing to learn more about the UK legal system from overseas.

Related Articles