Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only.

Hartley v Mayoh

347 words (1 pages) Case Summary

16th Jul 2019 Case Summary Reference this In-house law team

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

Hartley v Mayoh & Co [1954] 1 QB 383

Breach of statutory duty under the Regulations for the Generation, Transformation, Distribution and the Use of Electrical Energy in Premises under the Factory and Workshop Acts 1901 and 1907; apportionment

Facts

A fire broke out at the factory of the first defendants and the fire brigade attended. The factory manager directed a fireman to the main switchboard to turn off the electrics. The officer switched off two master switches but failed to turn off two tumbler switches which were unconnected by any link-bar. A fireman was electrocuted to death as a result and his widow sued the factory and the electricity authority for negligence and breach of statutory duty. Both defendants were found liable and damages were apportioned between them. The first defendants appealed their apportionment.

Issues

The first defendants contended there was no cause of action under the Regulations because the purpose of the statutory provisionswas to protect factory workers in the course of their employment. They were not designed to protect fire officers and, therefore, he had no right of action even though he suffered loss by their contravention. The second defendants asserted that the fire officer was a person employed in the factory for the purposes of the Regulations because he was lawfully working on the premises and, therefore, the Regulations were intended to protect him and he had a right of action.

Decision/Outcome

The appeal was dismissed. The widow had no right of action for breach of statutory duty because Mr Hartley was not employed by the factory and was, therefore, not a person for whose benefit the Regulations were made. However, the factory manager was under a common law duty to know where the main electricity switch was and he was liable in negligence for his failure to correctly identify it.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

Related Content

Jurisdictions / Tags

Content relating to: "UK Law"

UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Essays, case summaries, problem questions and dissertations here are relevant to law students from the United Kingdom and Great Britain, as well as students wishing to learn more about the UK legal system from overseas.

Related Articles