Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only.

John Summers & Sons Ltd v Frost - 1955

298 words (1 pages) Case Summary

16th Jul 2019 Case Summary Reference this In-house law team

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

John Summers & Sons Ltd v Frost [1955] AC 740

Breach of statutory duty; fencing of dangerous machinery; contributory negligence


Mr Frost was an experienced maintenance fitter employed at the defendant factory. He was grinding a piece of metal on a grinding wheel which rotated 1450 times per minute. The upper part of the grinding wheel was covered by a safety hood but part of the rotating stone was unguarded. Mr Frost’s thumb came into contact with the exposed wheel and he sustained injury. He sought damages from his employer for breach of s14(1) Factories Act 1937.


S14(1) Factories Act 1937 places an employer under a duty to ensure that dangerous machinery is appropriately fenced off for their employee’s safety. The factory asserted that the requirement for fencing under the statute was only a duty to provide fencing so far as is possible to allow for its continued use. They also contended that the injury had been a result of Mr Frost’s own negligence. Mr Frost denied he had been contributorily negligent. He contended that s14 imposed an absolute duty on his employer to ensure dangerous machinery is fenced off where there is foreseeability of injury. The duty is absolute and unqualified.


Mr Frost was successful in his claim. There was a foreseeable risk of injury if the rotating stone was not appropriately fenced off. There was an absolute duty under s14(1) Factories Act 1937 to fence off dangerous machinery and the grinding stone was not fenced off. Mr Frost was not guilty of contributory negligence and the factory was liable for his injuries.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

Related Content

Jurisdictions / Tags

Content relating to: "UK Law"

UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Essays, case summaries, problem questions and dissertations here are relevant to law students from the United Kingdom and Great Britain, as well as students wishing to learn more about the UK legal system from overseas.

Related Articles