Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only.

Jones (AE) v Jones (FW) [1977]

308 words (1 pages) Case Summary

17th Jun 2019 Case Summary Reference this In-house law team

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

Jones (AE) v Jones (FW) [1977] 1 WLR 438

Proprietary estoppel and tenants in common.


The defendant’s father bought a house. The defendant, Frederick Jones, supplied one quarter of the purchaser price on the mutual understanding that it would be his home for the rest of his life. He gave up his job and council house and moved into the property. When the father died, the house vested in the defendant’s stepmother, the plaintiff Alice Jones. She demanded rent from the defendant and, when he refused to pay, brought proceedings for possession. The trial judge refused to grant an order for sale but ordered the defendant to pay three quarters of a fair rent.


It was established that the assurances made by defendant’s father had induced the defendant to give up his job and council house. The defendant claimed that the plaintiff could not charge him rent on the basis of proprietary estoppel and counterclaimed that the plaintiff should transfer her interest in the house to him and that he should receive a life interest in the house. 


The Court of Appeal held that the plaintiff and the defendant were tenants in common having three quarters and one quarter shares respectively. Tenants in common cannot claim rent from each other even though the other occupies the whole property. Therefore, the plaintiff could not claim rent. Lord Denning MR said that the father’s conduct induced the defendant to rely on it to his detriment in giving up his house and job. Therefore, the plaintiff was estopped from turning him out. The court also refused to grant an order for sale as this would frustrate the purpose the house was bought for, namely to provide the defendant with a home.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

Related Content

Jurisdictions / Tags

Content relating to: "UK Law"

UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Essays, case summaries, problem questions and dissertations here are relevant to law students from the United Kingdom and Great Britain, as well as students wishing to learn more about the UK legal system from overseas.

Related Articles