Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only.

Knapp v Railway Executive

304 words (1 pages) Case Summary

16th Jul 2019 Case Summary Reference this In-house law team

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

Knapp v Railway Executive [1949] 2 All ER 508

Breach of statutory duty; whether employee had right of action under s274 Brighton and Chichester Railway Act 1844

Facts

Mr Knapp was approaching a railway level crossing in his car where the barrier was down. He accidentally let his car run into the barrier which was not appropriately secured in breach of statutory duty under s274 Brighton and Chichester Railway Act 1844. The barrier swung open and hit an oncoming train injuring the train driver. The train driver successfully sued Mr Knapp in negligence and he sought indemnity from the Railway Executive for breach of statutory duty for failing to secure the barrier.

Issues

Mr Knapp contended the 1844 Act placed the Railway Executive under a duty to employ proper people to open and shut the gates and railway crossings, and the statute was designed to protect those using the highway and the railway. The barrier was not appropriately secured and this breach of duty caused injury to the train driver who should, therefore, recover damages from them as a person whom the statute was designed to protect. The Railway Executive contended that the 1844 Act was designed to protect persons using the turnpikes and highways, and therefore, no right of action stemmed from an injury to an employee of the Railway Executive.

Decision/Outcome

Mr Knapp was unsuccessful in his claim for indemnity. The 1844 Act was unequivocally designed to protect persons using the highway and the benefit of the protections of the statute could not be claimed by an employee of the Railway Executive. The train driver had no right of action.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

Related Content

Jurisdictions / Tags

Content relating to: "UK Law"

UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Essays, case summaries, problem questions and dissertations here are relevant to law students from the United Kingdom and Great Britain, as well as students wishing to learn more about the UK legal system from overseas.

Related Articles