Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only.

Le Fanu v Malcolmson - 1848

326 words (1 pages) Case Summary

16th Jul 2019 Case Summary Reference this In-house law team

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): EU Law

Le Fanu v Malcolmson [1848] 1 HLC 637

Joint claim of libel by Irish factory proprietors against newspaper.


The Plaintiffs were the owners of various factories in Ireland. They raised an action of libel against newspaper publishers. The contentious publications concerned alleged ill-treatment of workers in the factories including excessive working hours and cruelty amounting to effective slavery.


At trial, the plaintiffs were awarded £500 in damages in relation to the claims. The case ultimately reached the House of Lords. The key issue in dispute concerned which factory owners had a valid claim of libel where the words complained of were directed against a class (i.e. all factory proprietors in Ireland). The plaintiffs argued that in action for libel by two or more joint plaintiffs it is necessary to show that the words complained of point to the plaintiffs, impute an offence and that it should appear manifestly to do them an injury by which they jointly suffer.


The House of Lords held that where the defamatory publication applies to a class of individuals yet descriptions in such a publication are capable of being, by implication, applied directly to an individual in that class, then an action may be maintained by such an individual in respect of the publication. Accordingly, each factory proprietor had a valid claim where the defendant newspaper made a publication referring to practices “in some of the Irish factories” and this could be imputed to mean the factory of an individual plaintiff. Lord Chancellor Cottenham noted that it was necessary for the protection of the law to extend to such circumstances where the libellous publication is framed in broad terms but where the writer of the libel clearly intended to mean specific individuals.

282 words

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

Related Content

Jurisdictions / Tags

Content relating to: "EU Law"

EU law, or European Union law, is a system of law that is specific to the 28 members of the European Union. This system overrules the national law of each member country if there is a conflict between the national law and the EU law.

Related Articles