Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only.

Lumley v Gye - 1853

322 words (1 pages) Case Summary

21st Oct 2021 Case Summary Reference this In-house law team

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

Legal Case Summary

Lumley v Gye [1853] 2 E & B 216

Tort – Wrongdoing – cause of action against third party


Miss Wagner was an opera singer at Lumley’s theatre on a three month contract. Gye and Wagner made an agreement that Wagner would break her contract and refuse to sing at Lumley’s theatre. Wagner agreed to sing at Gye’s theatre only.


Whether Lumley had a cause of action against a third party for wrongdoing and whether he was entitled to claim damages.

Decision / Outcome

Wagner and Gye were joint wrongdoers as they conspired together, causing loss. Where a third party interferes, either intentionally and or maliciously with the performance of the contract, they are liable for any loss (in the form of damages) that arises from the interference, either individually or jointly. Any persuasion used to influence a contracting party to breach their contractual obligations could go towards proving the third party demonstrated an intention to interfere and cause loss. The court held, there were two propositions that determined whether a third party could be liable for an actionable tort. Either, the person whose persuasions to break the contract was liable, or that the action of seducing a person from a contract, or persuading a person who has contracted for service was found liable for damages for their interference. Thus, it was deemed that the application was wide enough to encompass the current case where it would apply to an opera singer. In the event that a contract is broken and does result in a loss of sorts, if there was no knowledge of the breach by a third party and or no intention to cause loss, they will not be liable to pay damages. Lumley did have a cause of action and Gye (the third party) was required to pay damages.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

Related Content

Jurisdictions / Tags

Content relating to: "UK Law"

UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Essays, case summaries, problem questions and dissertations here are relevant to law students from the United Kingdom and Great Britain, as well as students wishing to learn more about the UK legal system from overseas.

Related Articles