Mogul Steamship Co Ltd v McGregor, Gow & Co  LR 23 QBD 598
Tort – Conspiracy to Injury – Damages
The plaintiffs were independent shipowners who sent their ships to the cargo port to obtain cargo. An association (the defendants), also in the business of owning cargo ships, sent more ships down to the port and reduced their freights so low that the plaintiffs were unable to make a profit. They further threatened to dismiss any agents who loaded the plaintiff’s ships. The plaintiff brought action alleging a conspiracy to injury and requested damages.
Whether the defendant’s actions were unlawful and deemed an indictable offence by way of a conspiracy.
The defendants had acted in an effort to protect their own profits and trade which was considered to be a lawful objective. No unlawful acts had taken place to warrant any wrongdoing, so therefore the plaintiffs had no cause of action. To prove that a conspiracy constituting an indictable offence occurred, a “matter contrary to law” would have to be shown to have occurred. Lord Halsbury found it impossible to suggest that there had been any malicious intention to injure rival traders, except in the sense that they intended their competitors to withdraw from trade. The defendant’s actions were therefore considered to be actions taken to support their own business interests. Further, unlawful acts would have to involve obstruction, violence, interference or molestation to meet the definition. None of those occurred. The appeal was upheld and no cause of action was available for the plaintiffs.
Cite This Work
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:
Related ServicesView all
Related ContentJurisdictions / Tags
Content relating to: "UK Law"
UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Essays, case summaries, problem questions and dissertations here are relevant to law students from the United Kingdom and Great Britain, as well as students wishing to learn more about the UK legal system from overseas.
The Rule of Law Explained
The rule of law does not have a fixed and precise definition, and its meaning can be different between nations, ......
Tuberville v Savage - 1669
Whether a threatening declaration of future harm constituted an unlawful assault.. A man placed his hand on his sword and told another, “If it were not assize-time, I would not take such language.” The justices of assize were in town....