Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only.

Pape v Cumbria County Council

312 words (1 pages) Case Summary

16th Jul 2019 Case Summary Reference this In-house law team

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

Pape v Cumbria County Council [1992] 2 All ER 211

Employer’s liability; safe system of working; duty to warn of risks of dermatitis.

Facts

Ms Pape was employed as a part-time cleaner by the defendant council. The council had provided their employees with rubber gloves, but the employees were neither encouraged to wear them, and nor were they warned of the risks of failing to wear gloves when handling various detergents, and chemical cleaning products. Ms Pape developed extensive dermatitis and sought damages in negligence from the defendant council.

Issues

The defendant council owed their employees a non-delegable duty of care to provide a safe and proper system of working per Wilsons & Clyde Coal Co Ltd v English [1938] AC 57. Ms Pape contended that although gloves had been provided by her employer, the council had failed to instruct or actively encourage her to use them, and she had not been warned of the risks of developing a serious skin condition from coming into frequent contact with chemical cleaning agents. The defendant council submitted that the provision of rubber gloves to their employees discharged their duty of care to provide a safe system of work, and the responsibility for wearing the gloves provided fell to the individual employee.

Decision/Outcome

Ms Pape’s claim was allowed and she was awarded damages. To discharge their duty of care to provide a safe system of work, it was insufficient to simply supply the rubber gloves. The duty extended to taking reasonable care to ensure the safety equipment was appropriately understood, and the risks of handling strong chemical cleaning products with unprotected hands should have been brought to the employee’s attention.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

Related Content

Jurisdictions / Tags

Content relating to: "UK Law"

UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Essays, case summaries, problem questions and dissertations here are relevant to law students from the United Kingdom and Great Britain, as well as students wishing to learn more about the UK legal system from overseas.

Related Articles