Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only.

R v G and F

334 words (1 pages) Case Summary

4th Jul 2019 Case Summary Reference this In-house law team

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

R v G and F [2013] Crim LR 678

Conspiracy – Rape – Conspiracy to Rape a Child – Sexual Offences – Judicial Direction – Appeal


After police searched one of the defendant’s (G) flat, they found indecent images of children on a laptop computer.   The police then searched his mobile phone and found a number of text messages exchanged between the two defendants.  These text messages detailed an explicit plan to rape a six year old boy.  One of G’s acquaintances had a child of the same age who matched the description of the boy discussed in the text messages.  The defendants were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit rape of a child under the age of 13 contrary to s5 Sexual Offences Act 2005.  The defendant’s pleaded not guilty, were convicted and now appealed on the grounds that there was no agreement or conspiracy to rape the child and so there was no case to answer.


Whether the text messages sent by G to F constituted an agreement to commit a criminal offence and so a conspiracy.  Whether it was required that the parties to the conspiracy intended to carry out their agreement or whether it was a fantasy.


The appeal was allowed.  No reasonable jury, properly directed could be sure on the evidence of the text messages alone that the defendants intended to carry out the agreement.  The Crown had not produced evidence to show that the defendants had met, were in close physical proximity and so had the opportunity to carry out their plan.  In cases like this where there was a discussed plan but it was not carried out a judge should give a direction to the jury on how to infer intent by summing up the sources of evidence that could be used by a jury to suggest that the defendants actually intended to carry out their plan rather than to simply fantasize about the agreement.  This was not done by the judge.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

Related Content

Jurisdictions / Tags

Content relating to: "UK Law"

UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Essays, case summaries, problem questions and dissertations here are relevant to law students from the United Kingdom and Great Britain, as well as students wishing to learn more about the UK legal system from overseas.

Related Articles