R v Sharp 1857 Dears & Bell 160
Wrongful entry to a burial ground and removal of remains from therein
The defendant was accused of breaking and entering a burial ground and removing the remains of his mother who was buried there. He did this under the pretext that he required that the grave be opened in order to assess whether the size of the grave would accommodate the coffin of his recently deceased father. He then took the remains of his mother to another churchyard where he intended to bury his father’s corpse with the remains of his mother. This was done without the knowledge or consent of the owners of the burial ground.
The jury was directed to convict at first instance. The defendant subsequently contended that the conviction was wrong. The Court was required to consider whether the defendant had acted wrongfully even where he had acted out of filial affection and religious duty.
The Court subsequently affirmed the conviction. The defendant had committed trespass and obtained a licence to enter the burial ground by misleading the person responsible for said burial ground. The removal of the corpse was not justified by the defendant’s “estimable motives.” The Court stated that the law recognises no property in a corpse and referred to the protection afforded to graves at common law which must be respected. Nevertheless, although the court stated that the conviction should stand, the Judge handed down a nominal fine of one shilling on account of respect for the motives of the defendant.
Cite This Work
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:
Related ServicesView all
Related ContentJurisdictions / Tags
Content relating to: "UK Law"
UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Essays, case summaries, problem questions and dissertations here are relevant to law students from the United Kingdom and Great Britain, as well as students wishing to learn more about the UK legal system from overseas.
Psychiatric Injury Claims in Tort Law
Psychiatric injury is a newly developed, incremental extension of the law and therefore has to be addressed separately....
Hong Kong Fir Shipping Ltd v Kisen Kaisha - 1962
Construction of contractual terms as ‘conditions’ and repudiatory breach of contract. Ship owners let the vessel, Hongkong fir, to charterers for a period of 24 months. Clause 1 of the contract obliged the owners to deliver a “seaworthy” vessel and Clause 3 further obliged them to maintain the vessel’s seaworthiness and good condition....
Smith v Superintendent of Woking Police
The defendant entered the grounds of a private enclosed garden at 11 pm. He stood and looked through the window of Miss M’s bedroom. Miss M saw the defendant staring at her through the window while she was in her night closes, causing her to jump and scream in fright....