Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only.

R v SSHD ex p Fire Brigades Union 1995

319 words (1 pages) Case Summary

17th Jun 2019 Case Summary Reference this In-house law team

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Fire Brigades Union [1995] 2 AC 513

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – JUDICIAL REVIEW – PREROGATIVE POWERS – CRIMINAL INJURIES COMPENSATION

Facts

When the Secretary of State for the Home Department announced his intention not to bring into force ss.108-117 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 (CJA), which contained statutory provisions for a criminal injuries compensation scheme similar to the scheme which had been in force since 1964, and decided instead to introduce a new tariff scheme to replace the existing scheme, F and other bodies applied for judicial review of his decision.

Issues

Whether, in electing to introduce the non-statutory tariff scheme, the Secretary of State had acted unlawfully in breach of his duty under s.171(1) CJA to consider when to implement the relevant provisions of that Act, and in so doing had therefore abused his prerogative powers.

Decision/Outcome

The House of Lords, in dismissing both the Secretary of State for the Home Department’s appeal as well as F’s cross appeal under s.171(1), held that the Secretary of State for the Home Department had some discretion as to when to introduce the statutory scheme and was not under a legal duty to stipulate a commencement date but merely to keep the matter of the time of implementation under consideration. However, by announcing that the provisions in the Act would not now be implemented, the Secretary of State for the Home Department had acted unlawfully; the decision to introduce a new scheme, which was inconsistent with the statutory scheme, was an abuse of the prerogative power so long as the provisions of the Act remained unrepealed.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

Related Content

Jurisdictions / Tags

Content relating to: "UK Law"

UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Essays, case summaries, problem questions and dissertations here are relevant to law students from the United Kingdom and Great Britain, as well as students wishing to learn more about the UK legal system from overseas.

Related Articles