Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only.

Re Quaffers Ltd's Application (1988)

335 words (1 pages) Case Summary

17th Jun 2019 Case Summary Reference this In-house law team

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

Re Quaffers Ltd’s Application(1988) 56 P & CR 142, Lands Tr.



The claimant’s land was bound by two restrictive covenants prohibiting business use of the land and the sale of alcohol. The land in the locale had once been an open area, but since then had been closed off by a series of dual carriageways. One covenant had been granted prior to the motorway’s construction, while the other was granted at the same time.


S.84 of the Law of Property Act 1925 grants the Upper Tribunal (formerly the Lands Tribunal) the discretion to alter or completely discharge restrictive covenants in any of four circumstances: the restriction should be considered obsolete due to changes in the character of the locale or other relevant circumstances, its continued existence would impede some reasonable user, those with the benefit of the covenant agree to the discharge or alteration, or the proposed discharge or alteration will not injure the beneficiaries. The court has a discretion to also award compensation.

The issue in this case was whether the restrictive covenants should be discharged on the grounds that they were ‘obsolete’.


The Land Tribunal discharged the covenants absolutely, without compensation.

The Tribunal considered that due to the development of the motorway, the land retained by those with the benefit of the covenant could not longer benefit from the restriction. In the case of the later covenant, this made it obsolete as soon as it was granted: it did not matter that there had been no passage of time or change in the neighbourhood between its grant and the application to discharge it.

In addition, since the owners of the retained land could no longer benefit from the restriction, there was loss of amenity warranting compensation.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

Related Content

Jurisdictions / Tags

Content relating to: "UK Law"

UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Essays, case summaries, problem questions and dissertations here are relevant to law students from the United Kingdom and Great Britain, as well as students wishing to learn more about the UK legal system from overseas.

Related Articles