Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only.

Smith v Brudenell-Bruce

353 words (1 pages) Case Summary

17th Jun 2019 Case Summary Reference this In-house law team

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

Smith v Brudenell-Bruce [2002] 2 P & CR 51; [2001] 28 EG 143 (CS)



The defendants were trustees of an estate, part of SavernakeForest, Wiltshire, comprised within a conveyance of 1951. Most of the forest was subject to a lease for 999 years, granted by the Forestry Commission in 1938. By conveyance of 1975, the trustees sold a cottage situated on their land to the plaintiff. The right of way from the cottage to the public highway over a track (eastern track) was expressly conferred by the conveyance. The track continued from the cottage to the boundary with the Forestry Commission land (western track). After the relationships between the plaintiff and the defendants deteriorated in 1998, the plaintiff was prohibited from using the western track. The plaintiff contended that he had continuously used the track by foot or by car and thus, he had a right of way over it either by prescription under s. 2 and 4 Prescription Act 1832 or by virtue of the doctrine of lost modern grant.


Did the plaintiff have a right of way over the western track by virtue of prescription or lost modern title?


The claim was allowed.

(1) Applying Dalton v Angus & Co (1881) 6 App Cas 740, the plaintiff had acquired the right of way by virtue of the doctrine of lost modern grant because his use of the western track was more intensive than that of the general public as he used it more often and used it for vehicular access as well as access on foot.

(2) Although the plaintiff had enjoyed the right of way for over 20 years as required by s. 2 Prescription Act 1832, there had been no use of the track ‘as of right’ in the year prior to the commencement of the instant proceedings as required by s. 4 Prescription Act 1832. Thus, the claim in prescription failed.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

Related Content

Jurisdictions / Tags

Content relating to: "UK Law"

UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Essays, case summaries, problem questions and dissertations here are relevant to law students from the United Kingdom and Great Britain, as well as students wishing to learn more about the UK legal system from overseas.

Related Articles