Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only.

Smith v Marrable (1843)

358 words (1 pages) Case Summary

17th Jun 2019 Case Summary Reference this In-house law team

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

Smith v Marrable (1843) 11 M & W 5

The lease of a furnished house includes an implied term that the house will be reasonably fit for habitation


The defendant, Sir Thomas Marrable, took a lease on a furnished house in Brighton for a term of five or six weeks from the claimant, John Smith, for a rent of eight guineas per week. The defendant and his family entered the house on 15th September and the day after, Lady Marrable complained to the claimant that the house was infested with bugs. The claimant then sent a person around to remove the infestation. When the attempt to remove the infestation failed, Lady Marrable wrote to Mrs Smith, informing her that her family would be leaving the house as soon as they were able to find suitable alternative accommodation and would pay one week’s rent when returning the keys. The keys were returned on 22nd September and the rent paid as stated. The claimant sued for the remainder of the rent. At the first trial the jury was directed that a lease contained an implied term that the property would be reasonably habitable and that the infestation may constitute a nuisance sufficient to raise a defence to the claim. The claimant sought a second trial on the basis that nuisance was not a defence to the action because it was only a cause of action and, even if it was a defence, it should have been specifically pleaded.


The issue in this circumstance was whether a there existed an implied term in a lease that a furnished property should be reasonably fit for habitation and if this term was breached, whether a tenant could summarily terminate the lease.


It was held that all leases of furnished properties contained an implied term that the property would be fit to be inhabited. Where a property was not fit to be inhabited, the tenant could terminate the lease without notice and the cause of the breach, which could be described as a nuisance, would give rise to a defence for a claim made by the landlord.  

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

Related Content

Jurisdictions / Tags

Content relating to: "UK Law"

UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Essays, case summaries, problem questions and dissertations here are relevant to law students from the United Kingdom and Great Britain, as well as students wishing to learn more about the UK legal system from overseas.

Related Articles