Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only.

Thompson v Metropolitan Police Commissioner

304 words (1 pages) Case Summary

21st Jun 2019 Case Summary Reference this In-house law team

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

Thompson v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [1998] QB 498



The case concerned two conjoined actions by claimants who had been manhandled, assaulted, and abused by police officers employed by the defendant. Both brought claims for a combination of assault, personal injury, malicious persecution, and wrongful imprisonment. At first instance, both were awarded aggravated damages. The defendant appealed against the award of aggravated damages in each case, arguing that the judge had improperly directed the jury on the issue of aggravated damages and that the awards were excessive.


The issue concerned the appropriate directions which should be given to the jury in a claim for compensatory and aggravated damages.


The court emphasised the need to give the jury stronger guidance in determining the quantum of damages in claims for false imprisonment or malicious persecution, on account of the need for consistency. In this regard, a separate award should be made for each category of damages in order to ensure transparency.

With respect of compensatory damages, the judge should indicate to the jury appropriate upper and lower limits. Where an award of exemplary damages was appropriate, the judge should direct that this should not be punitive although it may contain a penal element. He should propose a starting figure and direct that the award should generally be less than twice the basic award.

In this case, the lack of such direction had led the jury to award excessive damages. The court therefore substituted the awards for lower sums.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

Related Content

Jurisdictions / Tags

Content relating to: "UK Law"

UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Essays, case summaries, problem questions and dissertations here are relevant to law students from the United Kingdom and Great Britain, as well as students wishing to learn more about the UK legal system from overseas.

Related Articles