Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only.

Re K (deceased) [1985]

319 words (1 pages) Case Summary

15th Jun 2019 Case Summary Reference this In-house law team

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

Re K (deceased) [1985] Ch 85, ChD

Joint Tenancy – Severance – Manslaughter – Forfeiture


A husband and wife were in a marriage marred by domestic abuse.  The wife had suffered physical violence for a long period.  Upon being attacked by her husband she picked up a loaded shotgun and took off the safety catch intending to threaten him.  Unfortunately, she accidently shot and killed him.  She was tried for murder and being found guilty instead of manslaughter.  The husband had bequeathed her £1,000.  The husband’s estate wished to rely on the provisions of the Forfeiture Act 1982 to ensure that the joint tenancy was severed and the husband’s beneficial interest vest in his estate.


Whether the wife was prevented from benefitting from her husband’s will by the provisions of s2(2) Forfeiture Act 1982.  Whether forfeiture resulted in the automatic severing of their joint tenancy.


The court held that the wife could be relieved from the strict provisions of the Forfeiture Act 1982 and that the Court had discretion to order relief where necessary.  Whilst a threat of violence was sufficient for forfeiture to occur, taking into account the wife’s financial position and the extreme hardship this order would cause, and taking into account the conduct of the parties themselves, it was right for the court to exercise its discretion under s2(2) Forfeiture Act 1982 and so to order relief from this.  Severance of a joint tenancy would occur in the event of a beneficiary unlawfully killing another beneficiary as had happened in this case, but the Court felt it right to exercise its discretion to modify the effect of the rule and ensure that the joint tenancy remained un-severed in this case.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

Related Content

Jurisdictions / Tags

Content relating to: "UK Law"

UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Essays, case summaries, problem questions and dissertations here are relevant to law students from the United Kingdom and Great Britain, as well as students wishing to learn more about the UK legal system from overseas.

Related Articles