Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only.

Gough v Thorne - 1966

348 words (1 pages) Case Summary

14th Jun 2019 Case Summary Reference this In-house law team

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

Gough v Thorne

[1966] 1 WLR 1387; [1966] 3 All ER 398; (1966) 110 SJ 529

NEGLIGENCE, CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE, CHILDREN, ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENT, INJURY, CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE OF CHILD

Facts

The plaintiff was 13 and a half when she and her two brothers, aged 10 and 17, were standing on the pavement, waiting to cross a busy main road at a place which formed a junction with another road. A lorry, which had turned out of the other road, stopped at the main road, to allow the children to cross. Its front wheel was 5 feet from the bollard in the middle of the road. The lorry driver held out his right arm to warn the oncoming traffic of the children crossing and beckoned with his left arm to the plaintiff and her brothers. When they had just passed the front of the lorry, the defendant drove his car, using the gap between the lorry and the bollard and struck the girl. In the action for damages, the plaintiff alleged that the accident was due to the negligence of the defendant, who denied liability on grounds that it was caused by or contributed to by the plaintiff. The trial judge found that the defendant was guilty of negligence for his failure to observe the lorry driver’s signal and for driving with high speed, but the plaintiff was 1/3 liable as she advanced past the lorry without looking to her right. The plaintiff appealed to the Court of Appeal.

Issues

Could a child be guilty of contributory negligence?

Decision/Outcome

The appeal was allowed.

(1) Generally, a child cannot be guilty of contributory negligence.

(2) The only exception to this rule are older children where they could be expected to take precautions for their own safety and blame for the accident could be attached to them.

(3) Given that she was beckoned by the lorry driver, the child of 13 and a half cannot be expected to lean forward to check whether any traffic was approaching.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

Related Content

Jurisdictions / Tags

Content relating to: "UK Law"

UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Essays, case summaries, problem questions and dissertations here are relevant to law students from the United Kingdom and Great Britain, as well as students wishing to learn more about the UK legal system from overseas.

Related Articles